Connect with us

Accounting

Treasury, IRS propose rules on excluding Tribal general welfare Benefits from income

Published

on

The Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Friday to implement Section 139E of the Tax Code, created by the Tribal General Welfare Exclusion Act of 2014, excluding from gross income the value of any Tribal general welfare benefit.

The 2014 law allows Tribal governments to provide nontaxable assistance and benefits to tribal members that are excludable from their gross income for federal income tax purposes. The proposed rules would provide that gross income does not include the value of any Indian general welfare benefit paid to or on behalf of a Tribal citizen of a Tribal Nation. They were the result of a historic level of three pre-regulation consultations with Tribal Nations and multi-year consultation with the Treasury Tribal Advisory Committee in partnership with Treasury’s Office of Tribal and Native Affairs, Office of Tax Policy, and the Internal Revenue Service. 

A decade ago, Congress passed the Tribal General Welfare Exclusion Act of 2014 to provide an expanded general welfare exclusion specifically for Tribal programs that improved upon the historical administrative general welfare exclusion. The law also created the Treasury Tribal Advisory Committee (TTAC) to advise the Treasury Secretary on Tribal tax matters, and provided for audit suspensions on the Act’s enforcement until IRS field agents and Tribal Financial officers were trained on regulations.

treasury-seal-hq.jpg
The U.S. Treasury building in Washington, D.C.

Samuel Corum/Bloomberg

Reflecting input from the TTAC and Tribal Leaders, the proposed regulations affirm the views of the Treasury and the IRS that the Indian Tribal governments themselves are in the best position to determine support for their Tribal citizens. Under the proposed regulations, Indian Tribal governments have flexibility to design general welfare programs that consider the Tribe’s unique cultural practices, history and traditions. In addition, the proposed regulations provide deference to Tribal governments on certain issues, including whether benefits are for the promotion of general welfare and whether benefits are provided in exchange for participation in cultural or ceremonial activities.

The proposed regs also address the statutory prohibition of “lavish or extravagant” Tribal general welfare benefits. The Treasury and the IRS agree with the TTAC and Tribal Leaders that whether a benefit is lavish or extravagant should be based on the facts and circumstances at the time the benefit is provided, including the Tribe’s culture, cultural practices, history, geographic area, traditions, resources and economic conditions or factors. The proposed regulations therefore provide that a benefit will be presumed to not be lavish or extravagant if it is described in, and provided in accordance with, written specified guidelines that Indian Tribal governments establish for their programs.

Section 3(b)(2) of the 2014 law requires consultation with the TTAC in establishing the required education and training of IRS employees and the provision of training and technical assistance to Tribal financial officers. Section 4 of the Act includes a temporary suspension of certain IRS enforcement actions.

Consistent with the TTAC and Tribal Leader comments, the proposed regulations provide that the temporary suspension of audits and examinations described in section 4 of the Act will not be lifted until the education and training prescribed by Section 3(b)(2) of the Act is completed.

The Treasury is starting a Tribal consultation on the proposed regulations and is seeking Tribal feedback. For more about this rule, see Treasury’s Tribal Consultation Notice, the Dear Tribal Leader Letter, Tribal Consultation and Federal Feedback Summary and Tribal Fact Sheet

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending