Connect with us

Accounting

Trump pick for SEC chair faces conflict-of-interest scrutiny

Published

on

Paul Atkins, President Donald Trump’s pick to lead the Securities and Exchange Commission, faced an early political test over his strong ties to Wall Street and digital-asset firms.

At his nomination hearing Thursday, the former Republican SEC commissioner and founder of consulting firm Patomak Global Partners met with stiff opposition from Democratic lawmakers over his potential conflicts of interest and support of deregulation.

Senator Elizabeth Warren, speaking just before his Banking Committee hearing, said she’s concerned that Atkins is “thinking about his past and future clients” rather than American families. That criticism is unlikely to get in the way of his approval by the GOP-controlled Senate. 

Supporters of Atkins see him as an ideal choice to roll back Biden-era policies, bolster capital formation and provide clarity to the crypto industry.

In a letter sent Thursday to Warren, Atkins said he had “met or exceeded” the same ethics standard applied to prior SEC nominees, and was divesting from more than 150 financial holdings.

Priorities reset

Atkins told lawmakers he plans to work on “clear rules of the road” for Wall Street and digital-asset firms. 

“Unclear, overly politicized, complicated and burdensome regulations are stifling capital formation, while American investors are flooded with disclosures that do the opposite of helping them understand the true risks of an investment,” Atkins said. “It is time to reset priorities and return common sense to the SEC.”

Atkins, 66, would be the wealthiest SEC chair in recent decades. He and his wife, Sarah, an heir to a roofing-products firm, have a net worth of at least $327 million, according to Office of Government Ethics filings.

His stake in Patomak is worth at least $25 million, based on  documents made public on Tuesday. Atkins said he will resign as chief executive and divest from the firm and other holdings within 90 days of confirmation.

Client list

The firm’s long list of clients has raised questions about Atkins’s ability to navigate any conflicts of interest. His filings show compensation from Bank of America Corp., Barclays Plc, Exxon Mobil Corp., global investment firm Temasek Holdings Pte. and trading firm Virtu Financial Inc., among others. 

Warren, the top Democrat on the Banking Committee, has pressed him for details on who will purchase his stake in his firm. Divestitures aren’t enough “unless he agrees to disclose to Congress who the buyer will be and whether they are paying for access to the SEC chair,” Warren said in an emailed statement before the hearing.

Warren also has accused Atkins, an SEC commissioner from 2002 to 2008, of downplaying risks in the market before the financial crisis. Atkins responded by saying the crisis was multifaceted but rooted in subprime mortgage loans made by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac under government pressure.

Scaling back

Atkins is expected to scale back regulation and enforcement, a path the SEC is already taking under the Trump administration. 

Last month, the SEC asked a federal court to delay arguments in its legal defense of climate disclosure rules. And on Monday, the agency’s acting enforcement director said penalties will generally be lower.

Atkins is listed as a contributor to the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, which calls for a rollback of SEC regulations and eliminating the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the audit regulator established after the Enron accounting scandal. Atkins deflected questions on whether the board should be scrapped, saying it was up to Congress. 

Senator Angela Alsobrooks, a Maryland Democrat, pushed Atkins to pledge that he won’t allow politics to interfere with the SEC’s work. She referenced reports about SEC Commissioner Mark Uyeda, who is now acting head of the agency, asking enforcement attorneys to declare that a case they wanted to bring against billionaire and Trump adviser Elon Musk wasn’t politically motivated. Bloomberg reported the unusual request in February. 

Atkins told the panel he didn’t anticipate there would be any attempts to politically influence the agency while he is chairman.  

Crypto prospects

For the crypto community, Atkins’s nomination is viewed as critical for the development of a light-touch framework that sharply contrasts with former SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s aggressive approach. Gensler pursued firms for failure to register as exchanges and disclose information about their tokens.

Wall Street firms often criticized Gensler’s fast-paced rulemaking agenda and tight timelines — sometimes as few as 30 days — to respond to agency proposals. They also complained about the time and money spent complying with regulations, including new disclosures in their corporate financial statements.

“It’ll be more of an emphasis on capital formation and investment choice as opposed to more of an emphasis on investor prohibition or greater regulatory obligations,” said Nick Morgan, president of the Investors Choice Advocates Network and former SEC attorney. “That’s a very good thing.”

Luke Pettit, the Trump pick to serve as assistant secretary of the Treasury, as well as Jonathan Gould, the nominee to lead the Treasury’s Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, also testified before the panel. 

Continue Reading

Accounting

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

Published

on

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

In a decisive move toward standardized environmental financial reporting, accounting standards boards issued updated implementation guidance during the week ending July 25, 2026, regarding the formal recognition and valuation of corporate carbon offsets and environmental credits. The revised frameworks establish precise rules for how enterprises must measure, record, and disclose carbon credits on balance sheets, eliminating years of inconsistent reporting practices across public capital markets.

Under the finalized accounting standard, purchased carbon offsets can no longer be categorized under vague administrative expenses or unstandardized intangible asset accounts. Instead, organizations must classify environmental credits based on underlying operational intent—distinguishing between credits held for immediate compliance compliance obligations, long-term offset obligations, or active market trading. Furthermore, companies are required to evaluate carbon holdings for fair value impairment at the end of each reporting period, ensuring that depreciated or low-quality environmental credits do not distort corporate asset values.

The standardized rules carry significant implications for corporate audit committees and chief accounting officers. External audit firms are implementing rigorous verification protocols to validate the physical legitimacy, legal ownership, and scientific permanence of carbon credits claimed on balance sheets. Inaccurate or overstated carbon accounting claims now carry substantial financial litigation risk, alongside potential regulatory enforcement for misleading ESG disclosures.

To remain fully compliant, corporate accounting departments must establish centralized carbon tracking systems integrated into primary standard ERP ledgers. Accounting teams that proactively adopt standardized environmental reporting protocols will build investor credibility, streamline annual audit processes, and insulate their organizations against evolving regulatory scrutiny.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Published

on

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Corporate tax departments reached a critical juncture in automated operational management. With nations worldwide rapidly enacting digital service taxes, localized value-added tax (VAT) mandates, and real-time electronic invoicing requirements, manual tax calculations have become obsolete. Modern corporate tax divisions are aggressively deploying AI-driven tax engine software to automate complex cross-border indirect tax calculations in real time.

The imperative for automated tax compliance stems from the sheer complexity of current trade policies and multi-jurisdictional commerce. E-commerce platforms, software vendors, and global manufacturers face constantly changing regional tax rates, statutory exemption rules, and cross-border tariff structures. Automated tax engines embed directly into enterprise enterprise resource planning (ERP) architectures, automatically applying correct tax codes at the point of sale, calculating real-time withholding amounts, and generating compliant e-invoices.

Automated audit trail generation represents another key advantage of modern tax tech integration. Advanced compliance platforms log every transactional tax determination on immutable digital ledgers, providing tax authorities with transparent, self-verifying audit trails. This capability drastically reduces the operational duration and administrative cost of corporate tax audits, protecting enterprises against severe penalties resulting from calculation errors or missed reporting deadlines.

For chief financial officers and tax directors, investing in automated tax compliance is a vital operational risk mitigation strategy. Automating routine tax calculations frees high-level accounting professionals to focus on strategic tax planning, transfer pricing optimization, and risk management in an increasingly complex global economic environment.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Trending