Donald Trump pledged to lift a cap on the state and local tax deduction valuable to many New York homeowners that he imposed as president.
“I will cut taxes for families, small businesses and workers, including restoring the SALT deduction, saving thousands of dollars for residents of New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and other high cost states,” Trump said, referring to the acronym for the state and local tax write-off, at a rally Wednesday.
Trump made the pitch in an unorthodox campaign spot — New York’s Long Island. SALT is particularly salient in New York’s suburbs, where high tax rates and high property values mean that residents are more likely to have hefty state and local tax bills.
Donald Trump during a campaign rally in Uniondale, New York
Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, Trump’s signature tax law, capped the value of the SALT deduction at $10,000, regardless of marital status. Limiting the deduction has a disproportionate effect on communities with higher taxes and property values — areas which tend to be dominated by Democrats, including New York and New Jersey.
Wednesday’s rally took the former president — with under 50 days until Election Day — outside of the swing states likely to determine November’s election outcome. While New York is Trump’s home state — and he has said he thinks he can carry the state — no Republican presidential candidate has won the state since 1984 and polls show his opponent Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris with a double-digit lead.
The New York City suburbs are also home to several swing congressional districts where the outcome could determine whether Republicans are able to hold onto their narrow majority in the House.
The setting — in Uniondale, New York — also highlights how Trump and Harris are both seeking to court suburban women and independent voters, looking to expand their electoral coalitions beyond their already fervent bases, and draw from a shrinking pool of undecideds.
Central to that pitch is the economy and addressing the concerns among those voters and Americans at large over high prices and costs, including for housing, as well as anxiety over jobs and wages — with the two candidates competing with a slew of promises to offer tax benefits or cuts to ease the financial burdens on U.S. households.
Trump has flirted with reviving the SALT deduction before, but Democrats scoffed at the timing of the former president’s latest comments.
“Trump was the one who took away SALT. It hurt many New Yorkers, including lots on Long Island,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said Tuesday. “Now that he’s going back to Long Island for the first time he changes his mind? Give me a break.”
New York House Republicans are exerting pressure on Trump to address SALT, which is an important electoral issue in their districts. Several members, including Representative Mike Lawler, face close reelection races in the areas surrounding New York City.
“I previously raised it with him in August,” Lawler said Tuesday, referring to a conversation he had with Trump about SALT. “I know others have raised it with him as well. It’s an issue that matters, and I think he recognizes that.”
Trump also made another pledge to appeal to households burdened by consumer debt: a temporary 10% cap on credit card interest. The average interest rate was 21.51% commercial bank credit cards in May 2024, according to Federal Reserve data.
Trump did not provide any details about how he plans to lower credit card rates, which are set by banks and vary based on the Fed’s interest rate and the borrower’s risk profile. The central bank’s announcement to lower interest rates by a half of a percentage point will likely only slightly lower credit card borrowing costs.
Trump also promised to designate the Sept. 11, 2001, Ground Zero site at the World Trade Center a national monument, which would put it under the protection of the National Park Service. Trump called the space “hallowed ground” and said it was important to remember those who perished by preserving it “for all time.”
Tax-centric campaign
Repealing the SALT cap is the latest in a series of tax breaks Trump has proposed in an effort to sway voters, following pledges to end taxes on overtime, tipped wages and Social Security benefits. And he’s called for renewing tax cuts from his signature 2017 law that are slated to expire next year and for reducing the corporate tax rate even further to 15% from 21%.
Harris also supports eliminating taxes on tips, and has vowed to end subminimum wages for tipped workers. She’s proposed several measures to help lower costs for households and small businesses. She’s also pitched a 28% capital gains tax rate on people earning $1 million or more and raising the corporate tax rate to 28%.
Those competing plans would all come with big price tags and spark a fierce battle over tax policy in the next Congress. Repealing the SALT cap alone would add more than $1 trillion to the cost of the tax law extension over the next 10 years, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.
Trump and Harris both have competing plans to make housing more accessible. Harris has promised $25,000 down-payment assistance for first-time home buyers, while Trump pledged to reduce regulatory obstacles to building new homes and opening portions of federal land for housing construction.
New York state at large is dealing with a lack of affordable places to live after years of adding more jobs than homes. Housing production in New York City’s suburbs is far behind other major urban centers.
As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.
Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.
The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.
WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.
The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.
Untested Legal Mechanism
To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.
White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.
Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.
“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.
USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs
Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).
However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:
Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
Potash and critical minerals
Fish and seafood
Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)
Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.
Canadian Response and Market Reaction
Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.
With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.
The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.
The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.
Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.