Donald Trump vowed to boost the U.S. auto industry by making interest on car loans fully tax-deductible and renegotiating a trade deal with Mexico and Canada as he sought to court business leaders and workers in swing-state Michigan.
“Your car industry is going out of business,” Trump said in an address at the Economic Club in Detroit on Thursday, touting his agenda as one that would revitalize an industry with deep roots in that city. “My goal is to see U.S. auto manufacturing even greater than it was in its prime, and for Detroit and Michigan to be at the center of the action.”
The Republican presidential nominee vowed to invoke the six-year renegotiation provision of the USMCA — a trade deal among North American partners that replaced NAFTA under his first administration — to prevent cars being made by China across the border in Mexico from being sold in the United States.
Trump vowed to impose “whatever tariffs are required” to do so — floating rates as high as even 1000%.
He also pledged to stop Chinese-made autonomous vehicles from operating on American roads — a policy poised to benefit billionaire backer Elon Musk, the head of Tesla Inc., who is competing with the same technology.
Former President Donald Trump
Sarah Rice/Bloomberg
“I will stop Chinese and other countries-produced automobile and autonomous vehicles,” Trump said. “The autonomous vehicles I will stop from operating on American roads. I will close the loopholes under Biden and Harris that are beginning to allow Chinese vehicles to creep onto American streets.”
The administration of President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, Trump’s general election rival, has proposed a ban on Chinese-made hardware and software for connected vehicles, citing national security concerns around automobile machinery.
Key battleground
Trump’s address in Michigan, one of the seven battleground states likely to determine the outcome of November’s election against Harris, is the latest in a pitched fight between the candidates to court both business leaders as well as blue-collar workers worried about jobs and prices in an election in which the economy is a defining issue.
Both candidates have offered a slew of competing tax breaks and benefits both to spur job creation and help consumers buffeted by high prices.
Trump said his plan to make car-loan interest deductible would “stimulate massive domestic auto production, and make car ownership dramatically more affordable for millions and millions of working American families.”
The former president also touted a proposal to help small businesses afford work vehicles by doubling the amount of equipment investment they can deduct to $1 million from $500,000, and a proposal to write off automakers’ costs for heavy machinery and other equipment.
“This will be great for small businesses and great for Ford and General Motors,” Trump said of his proposals. “We’ll sell cars and trucks and work vans like never before.”
Detroit, where Trump spoke, is known as the Motor City with auto manufacturing heavy in the region and the industry’s workers pivotal to carrying the state. While the powerful United Auto Workers has endorsed Harris, Trump has made inroads among organized labor’s rank-and-file fueled in part by worries about Biden’s push to transition the US to electric vehicles and the impact it will have on jobs and wages.
Democrats seized on one of Trump’s remarks at the event, disparaging the battleground state’s largest city.
“Our whole country will end up being like Detroit if she’s your president,” Trump said.
Polls show a tight contest in Michigan, with a Bloomberg News/Morning Consult survey in September finding Harris up by 3 percentage points, 50% to 47% over Trump among likely voters in the state. Swing-state voters across the seven battlegrounds say they trust Trump more than Harris on handling the economy but the vice president has managed to chip away at his edge on the issue since replacing Biden atop the Democratic ticket.
Trump also touted his vow to lower the corporate tax rate to 15%, but only for companies that manufacture domestically. That move marks a substantial reduction from the current 21% rate. Harris has called for raising the corporate tax rate to 28%.
High inflation
Trump also hit Harris over high prices, a major political liability for his opponent, seeking to capitalize on voter frustration with the administration’s handling of the economy. Bureau of Labor Statistics figures released earlier Thursday showed underlying U.S. inflation rose more than forecast in September.
The Republican presidential nominee also repeated his criticisms of the Federal Reserve, saying the central bank acted “a little too quickly” in their half-point reduction in interest rates last month, and calling it a “political maneuver” to help Harris ahead of the election.
Trump’s comments are the latest in a long-running tussle with the central bank, centered on his charges that the Fed has worked against him and suggesting that presidents should have more sway, despite traditional efforts to insulate the bank’s decisions from political considerations.
The hotter-than-expected inflation in the Thursday report fueled a debate over whether the Fed will opt for a smaller rate cut next month or a pause and saw stocks fall.
Monthly jobs figures released last week showed employment growth topped estimates in September, wage growth accelerated and unemployment declined — offering the vice president a slight boost in her argument that the economy is on an upswing.
A Bloomberg analysis found the jobless rate in six of the seven crucial battleground states has fallen below where it was when Trump was president.
As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.
Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.
The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.
WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.
The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.
Untested Legal Mechanism
To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.
White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.
Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.
“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.
USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs
Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).
However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:
Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
Potash and critical minerals
Fish and seafood
Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)
Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.
Canadian Response and Market Reaction
Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.
With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.
The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.
The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.
Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.