Connect with us

Accounting

Trump, Republicans rush to overcome internal clashes on tax bill

Published

on

Republican Party leaders are rushing to overcome lingering internal fights over President Donald Trump’s massive tax and spending package as Democrats launch attacks to exploit the divisions.

Senate Republicans were still at odds Monday over how much to cut Medicaid and other social safety-net programs and how rapidly to end Biden-era clean energy tax breaks as Democrats gained the chance to force votes on amendments to the package.

Democrats, locked out of power in Washington, are planning to offer amendments during a marathon voting session to exploit the infighting and make the GOP goal of getting holdouts to back the bill as soon as Monday night more difficult. 

“I’m confident that the bill is going to progress as-is over the next few hours, and it will be on the president’s desk to sign on July 4,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Bloomberg Television on Monday morning.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune was less assured. Asked if he was confident he had enough support to pass the legislation, Thune replied, “Never until we vote.”

Trump remained in contact with lawmakers Monday, as he was over the weekend, according to an administration official who said the White House remains optimistic that the president would get the legislation to sign by Friday.

U.S. Treasuries edged higher on Monday but the prospect of larger budget gaps, which would require an increase in bond issuance, is expected to weigh on the bonds, particularly those with the longest maturities. A Bloomberg index of that debt has underperformed the rest of the market this year index and the yield on 30-year Treasuries in May briefly rose above 5% for the first time this year, though it has come down since. 

Investors have grown wary of lending to the U.S. government for such extended periods, demanding higher yields as a result and increasing a cushion known as the term premium.

Political problems

The minority party believes the $3.3 trillion package, which cuts social safety net programs to partly pay for tax cuts that skew toward the wealthy, will provoke a political backlash against Republicans in the 2026 midterm elections. They will use the amendment votes to highlight the legislation’s most politically problematic provisions and put Republican senators on the record through their votes.

Under Senate rules, Democrats can offer unlimited amendments that can pass with just 51 votes. They say they will aim to strip out Republican cuts to Medicaid health insurance for the poor and disabled, food stamps and college student loans. 

Some Republicans are also planning to offer amendments in long-shot bids to bake some of their priorities into the bill.

Susan Collins of Maine is planning to offer an amendment that would double the rural hospital fund to $50 billion, in exchange for a tax increase on some of the highest-earning Americans. Many rural lawmakers are concerned Medicaid cuts in the legislation would force hospitals in sparsely populated areas to close even with the new dedicated aid fund.

Her amendment would increase the top tax rate on individuals earning $25 million to 39.6%. The amendment could factor into last-minute negotiations if Collins still hasn’t been persuaded to support the legislation.

Offensive posture

The Democrats are trying to either put swing-state moderates on record supporting cuts to social-safety net programs or persuade them to take them out — something that would rile the Republican fiscal conservatives. An amendment to stop cuts to rural hospitals, a particularly sensitive topic to some GOP members, is high on their list. 

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer on Sunday was already relishing the retirement announcement of North Carolina Senator Thom Tillis, a casualty of the GOP infighting over the bill’s Medicaid cuts.

“It just shows you that the Republican majority is at risk because their Big Ugly Bill is so unpopular,” he told reporters.

Tillis warned Republicans were at risk of a backlash by failing to keep Trump’s health care promises. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that 11.8 million people could lose health coverage over the next decade as a result of the bill.

“What do I tell 663,000 people in two years or three years when President Trump breaks his promise by pushing them off of Medicaid because the funding’s not there anymore?” Tillis said on the Senate floor, referring to Medicaid recipients in his state of North Carolina who could lose coverage.

Tillis on Sunday announced he wouldn’t be running for reelection, a decision that gives him more latitude to break with Trump, who had threatened to back a primary challenge to Tillis. The 64-year-old senator has said that he’ll oppose the bill and railed on it in a floor speech for Medicaid cuts. 

Vote counting

Thune needs to win over at least five of a group of eight major GOP holdouts on the bill. The amendment votes could make the job harder by fanning the flames of division. 

The Republican leader can afford to lose only three of his 53 members in the chamber, with Vice President JD Vance breaking the tie.

Kentucky’s Rand Paul has said he is going to vote “no” on the legislation based on the price tag and the inclusion of a $5 trillion debt ceiling increase. If both Tillis and Paul remain in opposition, Thune can only lose one more.

That means Thune has to satisfy most of a group of conservatives including Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming, Rick Scott of Florida and Mike Lee of Utah. Thune told reporters he would back an amendment they support to roll back the expansion of Medicaid under President Barack Obama’s Affordable Care Act but he said he couldn’t guarantee that the amendment will pass. If it fails, it remains unclear how this block of conservatives will vote on final passage. Scott declined to say when asked Monday.

Thune is also trying to convince the more moderate Collins and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska to swallow their qualms over cuts to social safety net programs and clean energy tax credits and vote for the bill.  

— With assistance from Steven T. Dennis, Cam Kettles, Catherine Lucey, Sonali Basak, Carter Johnson and Michael Mackenzie

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending