Connect with us

Accounting

Trump says July 4 tax-cut bill deadline isn’t the ‘end all’ date

Published

on

President Donald Trump said that his self-imposed July 4 goal to pass his tax bill isn’t an absolute deadline, remarks that give Republican negotiators additional breathing room as lawmakers remain at loggerheads over several issues in the massive economic package.

“It’s important, it’s not the end-all,” Trump told reporters on Friday about the Independence Day deadline. “It can go longer, but we’d like to get it done by that time if possible.”

House Speaker Mike Johnson suggested earlier Friday that the July 4 date may slip, even as he and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said they believed they could soon unlock a compromise over one of the key sticking points in the bill: the state and local tax deduction.

Trump is planning to stay in Washington over the weekend to exert pressure on lawmakers to reach a deal on the bill, according to a White House official. Republicans remain divided over several thorny issues holding up the bill, including size of the SALT deduction, cuts to Medicaid health benefits and the price-tag of the legislation.

Bessent said that he met with a group of what he called the “SALT Republicans” at the Treasury Department Thursday, where he said they made progress even as New York Republican Nick LaLota proclaimed he’s a “hard no” on a proposal being floated to raise the cap for only five years. 

“My sense is we’re very close to a deal. It’s going to help the voters in their district, but it is going to be fair for the overall American people,” Bessent told Fox Business on Friday. “It’s time for everyone to put away individual interests.”

Those so-called SALT Republicans are pushing to preserve a deal included in the House bill that increased the deduction cap to $40,000, up from the $10,000 in current law. The Senate draft keeps the write-off at $10,000.

Some House lawmakers from New York, New Jersey and California have threatened to block the bill without an adequate SALT compromise.

Talks between Bessent, House members and Senate leaders in recent days have coalesced around including a $40,000 cap in the legislation, but senators have pushed to water down other elements included in the House SALT plan, including a lower income limit to claim the credit and a slower annual increases to the write-off.not supported.

The talks have been fraught, with LaLota calling an offer Bessent presented before the Treasury meeting on Thursday as “insulting” and “disgusting.” LaLota said then he would not go to the Treasury meeting but others attended.

On Friday, LaLota said he’d heard talk of a proposal that would set the SALT cap at $40,000 for five years and then revert to $10,000 after that. 

“I can’t be a yes on that. That just affirms the very thing I’ve been against for so long,” he said.

New York divisions

Fellow New York Republican Mike Lawler, however, called the ongoing talks “productive” but declined to disclose details. When asked if SALT Republicans are splintering, Lawler said, “I’ll let others speak for themselves.”

Johnson told reporters Friday that he believes the long-running negotiations over the SALT deduction will be “resolved in a manner that everybody can live with.”

“No one will be delighted about it, but that’s kind of the way this works around here,” Johnson said, projecting that he believes other sticking points on the bill can be resolved Friday.

Senator Markwayne Mullin, a key negotiator, added that they have spent hours negotiating alongside the White House on SALT, reiterating that neither side will feel “great” about it, but that he hopes there will be more reasons to vote for it than against it.

“The fact is: we need the SALT guys,” Mullin said on Fox News. “It’s expensive, though. It’s a really, really expensive price tag.”

Ongoing talks

House Budget Committee Chairman Jodey Arrington told Fox Business SALT is just one of several issues — including resolving differences over cuts to Medicaid and nutrition benefits — that still has to be addressed. He said that a key issue for many House members is the overall price tag of the bill, which may prove to be a challenge if the Senate produces a more costly version than the House proposal.

Dozens of House conservatives in coordination with four Senate conservatives are raising objections to the cost of the House bill. They want to see deeper cuts to the safety net and are angered that some cuts have been tossed out of the bill by the Senate parliamentarian.

“The Senate has to work through some issues. I’m not as concerned about SALT and about the healthcare and welfare reforms,” Arrington said. “I’m mostly concerned about the cost.”

Trump has said he wants Congress to send him the final bill to sign by July 4, a deadline that is looking increasingly elusive as lawmakers grind through the talks. The Senate is planning to stay in Washington through the weekend and could begin the voting process in the coming days.

— With assistance from Jamie Tarabay, Akayla Gardner and Stephanie Lai

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending