Connect with us

Accounting

Trump sparks lasting panic with funding ban that ended in two days

Published

2 years ago

on

The memo dropped late on Monday evening after a weeklong flurry of executive orders from President Donald Trump, and was rescinded less than 48 hours later. But the mandate to pause all federal loans and grants has reverberated across the country, from tiny nonprofits to sprawling health agencies. 

Providers of community services struggled to access government funds and now question what they can rely on going forward. Medical researchers are unclear how grants will be affected. States are grappling with how to plan their budgets.

The directive from the Office of Management and Budget, calling for a freeze on all federal grants, was temporarily blocked by a federal judge and raised questions about the limits of the president’s power. Yet the chaos it unleashed previews the types of fights to come in an administration that has made clear that it plans to reshape the U.S. government and eliminate what it considers to be wasteful spending and policies at odds with its conservative agenda.

“It’s hard for people to plan for the future and maintain current program services if they don’t think there’s going to be funding for those services going forward,” said Susanne Byrne, executive director of the York Street Project in Jersey City, New Jersey. 

Her organization, which offers rental assistance and operates a homeless shelter and a childhood development center, was set to make rent payments coming due on apartments for 45 different families using federal funds from the Department of Housing and Urban Development on Tuesday. The staff found themselves locked out of HUD’s payment portal.

Byrne spent Tuesday on numerous calls with other housing groups and with local representatives of HUD. Not only were the families she works with at risk of eviction if landlords didn’t receive payments by early February, but she worried how her own staffers might fare if the organization had to pare back its activity or lay off workers. 

“If people lose their jobs, how do they support their families themselves? They’re going to end up being people who need the services they used to provide to others,” she said. The group eventually regained access to the portal.

The White House abruptly rescinded the funding freeze memo on Wednesday, a move Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt immediately muddied with a social media post that said the rescission of the memo doesn’t end the pause on government money flows. Judges overseeing two pending legal challenges could rule in the coming days providing more clarity on what — if any — funds could continue to be held up. 

The confusion added to turmoil among federal workers who were already grappling with an executive order last week that banned diversity, equity and inclusion policies from the federal government. The order said the administration would cut off funding for programs that support those efforts, though the exact impact is still unclear.

The Department of Government Efficiency, led by Elon Musk, is trying to find ways to slash more expenses. Trump is offering buyouts to federal employees who were warned that he’s seeking a “more streamlined and flexible workforce.”

Agency anxiety

Already, the planned cutbacks to DEI have raised concerns about funding for medical research programs. The Trump administration sent a memo this week to organizations that have received funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and ordered them to end “all programs, personnel, activities, or contracts promoting” DEI, according to the document seen by Bloomberg News. 

Georges Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Association, said multiple health departments received the memo, and it wasn’t immediately clear how far-reaching the impact could be. He said it could affect the future of a wide range of public health projects, including research into the racial disparities of heart disease and cancer or programs for the disabled or elderly.

“The challenge is we’re allowing people to redefine DEI as not being merit-based when that’s not what it’s about,” Benjamin said. “It targets services to people who are more in need than others.”

The prospect of cuts has led to confusion and anxiety at the National Institute of Health, which invests most of its nearly $48 billion budget in medical research. Almost 83% of that goes toward grants awarded to outside scientists, institutions and medical schools across the US, according to the agency.

Employees have been advised to refrain from promoting certain funding opportunities related to disadvantaged populations so as not to draw attention to them, according to a person familiar with the matter, who asked not to be named speaking about internal discussions. NIH staffers have been warned against making social media posts that could put a target on their offices, the person said.

The NIH said in a statement that the Health and Human Services Department has issued a pause on mass communications and public appearances that aren’t related to emergencies to allow the new team “to set up a process for review and prioritization.” Clinical trials are continuing, though no new studies are being launched.

Within the Commerce Department, officials in charge of a $700 million effort to remake economically depleted cities into hubs of technological innovation scrambled in the wake of this week’s funding freeze announcement. The so-called Tech Hubs project was on a spreadsheet circulated by OMB that listed grants under scrutiny, instigating confusion among recipients of the grant funding, as well as former and current officials who helped to put the plan together.

The Tech Hubs initiative, funded by the Chips Act and a subsequent defense spending bill, poured hundreds of millions of dollars into technological projects in more than a dozen states, including red states like Indiana, Montana, South Carolina, Georgia and Ohio. Many of the projects focus on industries that the Trump administration has identified as key national security priorities, such as semiconductor manufacturing, quantum computing and critical mineral processing. 

But some of the hubs have programs aimed at including more women and minorities in the workforce, while others include “equity” or “climate resilience” in their missions.

So far, the tech hubs haven’t received any guidance from the Commerce Department, said spokespeople for six of the hubs. People within the hubs are setting up meetings with their lawmakers and trading texts with staffers on Capitol Hill, seeking a full-throated commitment that they won’t lose funding. The Commerce Department didn’t immediately return a request for comment.

‘Unnecessary disruption’

At the local government level, the questions over federal aid introduce new uncertainty at a time many states are preparing their budgets for fiscal 2026, said Lucy Dadayan, principal research associate with the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center at the Urban Institute.

This has “caused unnecessary disruption and confusion, as well as considerable anxiety regarding the amount of federal funds that will be allocated to the states,” she said.

Local organizations are preparing for more shocks. The childcare industry, for one, is bracing for potential changes that could upend businesses already on the brink of collapse. Federal dollars are states’ main funding source for subsidies that help low-income families afford child care. Some 1.8 million children receive them each year, according to the U.S. Government Accountability Office.

Easterseals, a 106-year-old nonprofit that provides services to people with disabilities, senior citizens, veterans and their families, was concerned about funding troubles when its payment system portal shut off hours before the OMB memo was released, said Kendra Davenport, CEO of its national office. The group’s affiliates use this portal to access federal grants to cover operational costs and payroll. 

“It really was foreboding not knowing how quickly we were going to have to shut down programs that are 100% funded with federal funds and how quickly we would have to determine how many people we were going to lay off,” Davenport said.

After hearing about the freeze, Easterseals assessed whether it could maintain programs without federal funding but knew that most nonprofits, including its own, operate on tight margins. Most affiliates are so focused on programmatic work that they don’t have time to raise private funding that would fill gaps, Davenport said.

As the national office looks at future revenue, staff are scrutinizing nonessential expenses that can be taken out of the budget and put into reserves. 

“We now know we are operating in a very different federal funding climate,” Davenport said. “So we have been very careful.”

Related Topics:
Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

5 days ago

on

August 9, 2026

By

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

1 week ago

on

August 5, 2026

By

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

1 week ago

on

August 5, 2026

By

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending