Connect with us

Accounting

Trump tax law is surprise boon for affordable housing creation

Published

on

A set of provisions tucked into President Donald Trump’s new tax-and-spending law has real estate developers and affordable housing proponents cheering — though some view it as a bittersweet victory.

The law makes significant changes to the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit, the New Markets Tax Credit and Opportunity Zones, three tax-based community development programs that housing groups and private sector investors broadly favor. The revamp is expected to spur construction of new apartment buildings and renovation of older ones, with housing analysts saying they could create as many as 1.2 million more affordable units over the next ten years than they would have if the programs had remained the same. 

“We think of it as the single largest increase in affordable rental housing resources in at least 25 years,” said Peter Lawrence, the chief public policy officer at Novogradac, a consulting firm with a focus on real estate. 

The new law increases some tax benefits investors can get for putting capital into affordable housing projects through the Low-Income Housing program. It also makes permanent other credits through the New Markets program, adding clarity for investors and developers seeking to make long-term plans. And it sets stricter standards for Opportunity Zones, in a move to prevent misuse and ensure that private investment dollars reach the low-income communities for which they were intended.

Together, those measures are poised to incentivize more construction of affordable units in targeted neighborhoods and, in turn, ease some of the housing price pressure that has burdened an increasingly broad swathe of Americans.

That makes the provisions something of an anomaly in a law that has become known for cuts to programs for the poor paired with giveaways to the wealthiest Americans. An analysis by economists at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School says the law will leave households in low-income and some middle-income categories “worse off” overall. 

“It’s the gives and the takes,” said Jeff Monge, managing partner of Monge Capital, a real estate investment advisory firm specializing in public-private partnerships. “The gives are these tax credit opportunities for investors to divert or make their investments that will eventually create prosperity for the communities that they invest in. But then you’ve got to pay for it. How are you paying for it? It ends up being a rollback on the very same communities that you’re trying to help on the other side.”

Affordability crisis

The changes come during a housing affordability crisis that experts say is the worst in recent memory. A June report by Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing Studies found a record high number of renters — almost 23 million — are considered “cost-burdened,” meaning more than 30% of their incomes go to paying for housing and utilities. The crisis is being driven in large part by a lack of housing supply. The National Low Income Housing Coalition estimates a shortage of roughly 7 million affordable housing units across the US. 

While affordable housing measures are often thought of as a priority of the Democratic Party, these measures were palatable to Republicans in part due to how they were structured: They are tax breaks rather than funding allocations, and they lay responsibility for maintaining the quality of affordable housing units on the private sector. 

Under the law, investors cannot get their full tax credits or can have their value clawed back if the units they invested in fall into disrepair or are converted to market-rate units over a 15-year period. The law requires the units to remain affordable for another 15 years after that period ends, but that latter period is harder for the government to enforce.

The provision to make the New Markets credits permanent was added in the Senate, where Republicans on the Finance Committee, including Idaho Senator Mike Crapo and Montana Senator Steve Daines, shepherded them through. 

“This program has been supported by both parties for a long time,” said Bob Rapoza, spokesman for the New Markets Tax Credit Coalition, a trade group representing community development funds that use the tax credit. 

Together, the changes to the programs mirror legislation that housing advocates have been trying to get Congress to pass for a decade.

The new law increases the size of tax credits awarded under the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit and decreases the requirements for public funding by states and municipalities as a proportion of the overall funding package for an affordable housing development. This makes it easier for states, cities and other government entities to fund a greater number of development projects simultaneously while developers use more private financing sources, which are often cheaper than relying on the municipal bond issues. 

Meanwhile, an expanded pool of investors will be able to use the now-permanent New Markets Tax Credit. Community development organizations can tap into tax credits in the program to fund loans not only for housing development but also for new businesses, manufacturing facilities and cultural spaces. 

Rapoza’s group estimates that over 10 years the New Markets program alone could fund around 4,000 projects, add around 17,000 affordable housing units and create as many as 435,000 new jobs. Novogradac’s Lawrence said these projections sounded reasonable. 

Opportunity Zones

The tax law also made permanent Opportunity Zones, a program that gives investors tax breaks for putting money into projects in low-income areas that was created in 2017 as part of Trump’s first tax-cut package. Opportunity Zones have drawn some criticism for failing to get private capital to the places where it is most needed and accelerating gentrification forces that push poorer people from their neighborhoods. That’s because the program originally let governors designate areas that were near low-income census tracts, but not inside of them, as qualifying for the tax breaks. And it did not require any tracking or reporting on the program’s impact. 

Novogradac’s Lawrence said that the tweaks to the standards for Opportunity Zones could help make the program’s investments more meaningful and also provide evidence of its worth, helping attract additional investors. A similar dynamic could occur in the New Markets program, according to Monge.

Still, the experts noted potential roadblocks for the programs to generate the most possible benefit. Developers using the Low-Income Housing credit often rely in part on other public funding sources, including Community Development Block Grants from the Department of Housing and Urban Development. The Trump administration has sought to end that grant program. 

It has also proposed cutting nearly all of the budget for a Treasury Department office, the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund, that oversees the administration of the New Markets credit. 

Monge said he applauded the changes, but hoped they did not leave investors too much room to misbehave. 

“We don’t have a history of investors looking at doing good and well. There’s a history of doing well,” he said.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending