Connect with us

Accounting

Trump’s corporate tax break worth $67B hits a snag

Published

on

One of the most lucrative tax breaks corporate America won in Donald Trump’s signature economic legislation — worth an estimated $67 billion this year — is hitting a roadblock in a minimum tax Congress set three years ago under Democratic President Joe Biden.

Trump’s recently enacted tax law sweetened a break for corporate research and development investments, a provision especially valuable to technology, pharmaceutical and manufacturing businesses. But some businesses won’t be able to take full advantage of the break, thanks to the Biden-era provision that lobbyists argue threatens to curtail the economic boost in Republicans’ tax law. 

Some of Washington’s most powerful interest groups and GOP lawmakers are now pressing for a workaround, either through new legislation or a reinterpretation of existing law by Trump’s Treasury Department.

Companies can now deduct the full cost of domestic R&D in one year, rather than spreading out the deduction over five years. Even better for businesses, they can also fully deduct delayed breaks for R&D investments going back to 2022, a boon estimated to be worth $67 billion in upfront tax savings, according to Congress’s Joint Committee on Taxation.

But companies crunching the numbers are finding the glut of previously delayed R&D deductions is so big that claiming them all at once this year would trigger the corporate alternative minimum tax passed under Biden or separate international tax provisions enacted during Trump’s first term that are aimed at preventing firms from moving profits offshore.

It isn’t clear how many companies will hit the 15% minimum tax limit this year as a result, but Salesforce Inc. has already warned investors it expects to do so. Rohit Kumar, leader of the PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP tax policy services group, said the issue has been bubbling up with dozens of clients across sectors.

Business interest groups argue the limitation weakens one of the law’s most pro-growth tax provisions by undermining incentives to invest in research inside the U.S.

“Companies in general invest less in R&D when they can’t expense their R&D costs,” said Charles Crain, managing vice president of policy for the National Association of Manufacturers. 

The “stack-up” of R&D deductions from the previous three years is causing the issue, Crain said. 

Without a change, companies may be stuck continuing to spread out deductions for their 2022 through 2024 research and development costs over five years. While companies would still get the same tax savings, it would take longer.

Crain said deductions for annual research and development spending aren’t expected to trigger the minimum tax after this year.

Not everyone agrees that companies are missing out on a benefit Congress intended for them. Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren, who sits on the tax-writing Finance Committee, said the minimum tax is working as designed to prevent corporations from shirking taxes.

“They make so much money and pay so little in taxes that with these huge additional tax giveaways that the Republicans have given them, they might actually have to pay an alternative minimum tax,” the Massachusetts Democrat said. “Yeah, that was exactly how it was supposed to work.” 

Impact

Salesforce said in a quarterly security filing that the company anticipates being hit by the corporate alternative minimum tax because of the tax breaks included in the new law. Other companies, including Broadcom Inc., Airbnb Inc. and Applied Materials Inc., said in filings the new tax breaks could prevent them from claiming hundreds of millions of dollars in tax credits related to past payment of the corporate alternative minimum tax. 

None of the four companies responded to requests for comment on how the tax snag would impact their research and development spending plans.

The manufacturers’ association pressed Republicans to address the issue as the legislation was making its way through Congress but was unsuccessful, Crain said.

Along with the National Association of Manufacturers, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, another heavy-hitting Washington business lobby, is pushing for a way around the limitation, said Watson McLeish, the chamber’s senior vice president of tax policy.

“It will ultimately end up diluting the potential impact,” McLeish said. “It’s counterintuitive and counterproductive.”

Next steps

Congressional Republicans and business lobbyists are turning first to the Trump administration to use regulatory authority as a way of bypassing the limits. 

Representative Nicole Malliotakis, a New York Republican on the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee, said GOP lawmakers are “working with Treasury to get some clarity.” The department didn’t respond to requests for comment.

Malliotakis said if Congress considers another tax package soon, she also would try to add a provision to bypass the limitation.

Experts differed on whether the Treasury Department has the authority to give companies what they want through regulatory changes. 

PwC’s Kumar said the department likely does at least as it applies to the corporate alternative minimum tax. Removing limits imposed by international tax provisions may be more difficult because Congress granted Treasury less leeway in that statute, Kumar said.

Democrats left Treasury “wide discretion” to flesh out the details when Congress established the corporate alternative minimum tax in their party-line 2022 climate and tax law. That would give Treasury the wiggle room to avoid limiting deductions for prior-year research and development costs, Kumar said.

Timothy Powell, a national tax partner at Ernst & Young LLP, wasn’t so sure. Congress left the department an unusual amount of leeway on implementing the 15% minimum tax. But Congress also specifically directed Treasury to prevent “duplications and omissions,” Powell said.

If companies used research and development investments to lower their tax exposure in prior years, excluding it from the corporate minimum tax calculation now could be considered a duplication, he said.

“That’s the challenge. I don’t want to say they can’t, I think it’s just a little bit of a hurdle they have to think through,” Powell said.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending