Connect with us

Accounting

U.S. investigating SAP, Carahsoft for possible price-fixing

Published

on

German software developer SAP SE, product reseller Carahsoft Technology Corp. and other companies are being probed by U.S. officials for potentially conspiring to overcharge government agencies over the course of a decade. 

Since at least 2022, Justice Department lawyers have been looking at whether SAP — which makes accounting, human resources, supply chain and other business software used across the globe — illegally conspired with Carahsoft to fix prices on sales to the U.S. military and other parts of the government, according to federal court records filed in Baltimore.

The civil investigation, which hasn’t previously been reported, poses a legal risk to a top technology vendor to the U.S. government and to Germany’s most valuable company as its shares are soaring.

The review also shines an even greater light on Carahsoft, a large software vendor whose offices in Virginia were raided on Tuesday by FBI agents and military investigators. 

Carahsoft spokesperson Mary Lange described the search as “an investigation into a company with which Carahsoft has done business in the past.” It’s not clear if the search is related to the investigation of SAP. Lange and other Carahsoft representatives declined to answer detailed questions. 

SAP's corporate campus in Walldorf, Germany
A logo on an office at the SAP SE campus in Walldorf, Germany.

Alex Kraus/Bloomberg

SAP has been cooperating with the DOJ’s civil investigation “since the beginning,” spokesman Daniel Reinhardt said in an emailed statement. The German company is not involved in any criminal investigation related to Carahsoft and has no information about “the latest events” concerning its vendor, he said.

SAP shares dropped 2.4% to close at €201.80 in Frankfurt on Wednesday. The shares have risen about 44% this year. 

News of the probe also had knock-on effects for shares of ServiceNow Inc. and Okta Inc., which both “saw over 40% of disclosed federal contract dollars come through Carahsoft,” according to a note from Piper Sandler. Shares of ServiceNow fell as much as 4% on Wednesday. Okta shares declined as much as 1.7%.

Civil probe

The long-running civil probe is focused on the companies possibly rigging the market for the more than $2 billion worth of SAP technology that the U.S. government has purchased since 2014, according to the court records. They show prosecutors are also examining the role of other software resellers and a unit of Accenture, a giant management and technology consulting firm.

Many investigations end without any formal accusations of wrongdoing. 

Accenture spokesperson Peter Soh said the subsidiary, Accenture Federal Services LLC, “is responding to an administrative subpoena and is cooperating with the DOJ.” The Justice Department didn’t respond to requests for comment. 

The Justice Department classifies bid rigging as a form of fraud that involves an agreement among competitors as to who will be the winning bidder.

The investigation came to public light in an ongoing court fight between the prosecutors and Carahsoft over the closely held firm’s handling of a legal demand for documents. While many records in that separate proceeding are sealed or heavily redacted, unredacted versions of documents describing the underlying investigation were also publicly available.

False Claims Act

It’s unclear exactly when prosecutors began examining the relationship between SAP, which has its headquarters in Walldorf, Germany, and Carahsoft, based in Reston, Virginia. But by June 2022 prosecutors had sent Carahsoft a demand to turn over documents and provide information related to potential violations of the False Claims Act.

The civil investigative demand — which was among the unredacted documents obtained by Bloomberg News — states that prosecutors are examining whether SAP, Carahsoft and other firms made false statements to the Department of Defense by coordinating bids and prices for “SAP software, cloud storage, and related hardware and services.” The document directs Carahsoft to produce a wide array of emails, text messages, contracts, staff lists and other information related to its sale of SAP software. 

More than a year later, federal prosecutors sued Carahsoft, seeking to have a federal judge in Baltimore enforce the demand and alleging that the company has “obstinately refused to provide this basic information.” Back-and-forth litigation in the case — much of it sealed from public view — continued up to last Friday, when it was assigned to a new magistrate judge for pretrial fact-finding known as discovery. 

One of Carahsoft’s lawyers, Richard Conway, declined to answer questions about the case, the civil investigation or the FBI search of his client’s office.

“I don’t discuss such matters in the press,” he said when reached by phone Tuesday. 

In response to questions about the FBI search, Lange said Carahsoft is “fully cooperating on this matter” and “operating business as usual.”

Carahsoft dominant

Since its founding in 2004, Carahsoft has grown into a dominant player in the government technology procurement market. Last year, it ranked 45th on Forbes’ list of the largest private companies in the U.S., with $11 billion in estimated revenue and more than 2,400 employees.

Among all federal vendors of IT products, Carahsoft holds the second-highest value of contracts directly with the government, totaling $3.5 billion since the beginning of fiscal 2020, according to Bloomberg Government data. Only Dell Technologies Inc. has more revenue.

SAP technology is a big chunk of this business. Carahsoft received more than 600 federal contracts for SAP tech worth more than $990 million and “facilitated” as much as $1 billion more in additional sales, prosecutors said in court filings. 

It’s unclear what portion of these sales prosecutors believe might have been shaped by bid rigging. The False Claims Act allows the government to recover up to three times its damages plus a penalty. 

Both SAP and Carahsoft have had other run-ins with the Justice Department.

In 2015, Carahsoft and VMware LLC agreed to pay $75.5 million to resolve allegations in a False Claims Act lawsuit accusing them of overcharging the government for VMware’s software and services from 2007 to 2013, according to a statement from the department.

Deferred prosecution

In January, SAP agreed to pay more than $220 million to resolve a foreign bribery investigation by U.S. authorities. The company entered into a three-year, deferred-prosecution agreement with the Justice Department after it was charged in a pair of schemes to bribe government officials in South Africa and Indonesia.

Earlier this month, German prosecutors opened a criminal probe into the company’s chief technology officer, who is stepping down due to “inappropriate” behavior. 

The new investigation comes to light as SAP’s share price has been hitting record highs amid a corporate restructuring. This year, chief executive officer Christian Klein has cut jobs and spending at the company, even as other executives have left or announced their departures in recent months. 

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending