Connect with us

Accounting

Video game developers leverage R&D tax credits

Published

on

Video game developers are benefiting from research and development tax credits and recent changes in the rules for deducting R&D expenses, with tax professionals helping claim valuable tax breaks for gaming companies.

“For video game developers, improved cash flow can really translate into additional resources for hiring talent, developing their next product, their next title, accelerating timelines, expanding distribution, whatever the case is,” said Josh Harbin, a senior manager at Top 10 firm Baker Tilly in Sacramento.  “Ultimately the R&D tax credit is not only rewarding the innovation work that’s being done, it’s also fueling and continuing to grow the industry.”

The tax credit provides particular advantages for game developers. “When you look at what qualified research is under this tax definition, the video game industry is uniquely situated at the intersection of both entertainment and technology,” said Harbin. “When you’re developing a new title, a new game, there’s coordination between that artistic, creative aspect as well as the technical, engineering aspect. You have this dual nature, and it’s critical to distinguish the difference between that creative, artistic element, the narrative, visual design, storytelling aspect, from the underlying technical development, the game engine, the algorithms, rendering systems, etc. That’s why from my point of view, this is a unique area for the R&D credit.”

In every game there are new advancements that leverage R&D. “That same kind of mentality is going to come into play for video game developers on whatever title and whatever game they’re creating next,” said Harbin. “They want to create the most immersive experience for their players, and they’re going to continue to innovate on things like ensuring a smooth process, improving frame rates, reducing latency. Are we rendering things the proper way? Those types of activities are continuously being done on everyday development.”

Besides the federal tax credit, many companies can also claim state tax credits for research. “About 40 states have an underlying state credit following the federal definition, so you get a state benefit as well as a federal benefit, and it’s based on whether activities meet a statutory test,” said Todd Sutherland, partner and director of research and development tax credits at Top 50 firm UHY in Houston. “Gamers in today’s world would be largely doing software development through apps or other functionality. Those activities generally are treated as R&D activities, if they’re writing code, algorithms, things like that, if they have software engineers, analysts, the typical agile, waterfall, scrum, sprint type development philosophies. Those types of trades or businesses can also be eligible to earn credits based on those development activities.”

Artificial intelligence

R&D activities can involve various aspects of development in the video game industry. “You could be looking at game engine innovation, proprietary engines, new algorithms, simulators, embedding AI, creating rendering pipelines, etc.,” said Harbin. “You could be looking at ways to make sure your game is approachable on different platforms. Whether you’re looking at consoles or PCs or mobile devices, how the game transitions between different platforms. Something that’s always evergreen within the R&D space for video games is things like performance improvements, rendering latency, improving frame rates, all of that type of activity.”

The development of games for each new gaming platform or console also involves some amount of research. “There’s definitely nuances to each platform that they’re distributing on,” Harbin noted.

Artificial intelligence is increasingly being used in games, including helping to write some of the code and influence how the game is played. 

“AI is obviously a hot topic across every industry at this point,” said Harbin. “Within the video game aspects, embedding it within the game itself is something that can be experimented with, how the game can dynamically shift for a given player using these types of technologies. I would say, generally, we’re probably in the early stages of how AI is going to influence the video game industry, and most industries for that matter.”

Documenting the R&D credit

The IRS has been toughening the rules around documenting R&D activities on Form 6765 to ensure companies are submitting legitimate claims for the tax credits.

“The IRS is heavily focused on documentation right now,” said Harbin. “Anytime you claim an R&D credit annually, it’s on Form 6765 or whatever applicable state form. There’s generally three main areas that you’d be looking at for an R&D credit. You’d be looking at what that qualified research activity is, understanding the costs associated with those activities and then computing the credit. The key at each one of these steps is documentation, for example, clearly illustrating how a particular project is considered qualified research under this tax definition, and providing that contemporaneous documentation to support it. And this is what we’re seeing heavily scrutinized on IRS exams and in recent case law as well, the biggest issue being the lack of that substantiation.”

He advises companies to be careful about documenting the R&D they do. “The biggest advice I could give would be around documentation, understanding what needs to be documented and how best it can be documented, really illustrating that the work you’re doing meets the IRS definition of qualified research and providing that,” said Harbin. “A lot of times, companies are creating documentation during their general product development lifecycles. Making sure they retain those documents for this purpose, and documenting even more is always helpful, really illustrating the point that what we’re doing is innovative activity. It’s going to go a long way.” 

While he hasn’t seen instances where the IRS challenged the R&D tax credits claimed by video game developers, it can be a problem in other types of companies. “In general, that is a big sticking point for the IRS currently across the industries, not just in video game development, but documentation is definitely something that the IRS is focused on, something that they are pointing to when they deny credits,” said Harbin.

Even with the staffing cuts at the IRS this year, especially on the enforcement side, companies and their tax professionals still need to be careful that the claims are correctly documented. “The staffing changes, aside from just R&D credits, have been impactful for different IRS exams,” said Harbin. “Some cases have been closed sooner than we thought they might have been, but we do still see audits for R&D tax credits popping up, and that’s why it’s still important to have this documentation in place for taking advantage of these credits.”

R&E expensing changes

Besides claiming the R&D tax credit, many companies are expected to take advantage of a provision in the recently passed One Big Beautiful Bill Act restoring the ability to deduct research and experimentation expenses in the first year under Section 174 of the Tax Code rather than amortizing them over five years under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

“There’s two different tax concepts when we talk about R&D,” said Harbin. “One is the R&D credit under Section 41 of the Code. The other is the research and experimentation expenditure deduction, basically Section 174 of the Code. What’s making news recently is Section 174 and that’s because from 2022 to 2024 there’s a significant shift in policy in how these costs were being treated for tax purposes. Your domestic R&E or 174 costs were required to be capitalized and amortized over a five-year period, rather than the previous policy, which was being able to fully deduct those costs in a given tax year. For foreign costs, it was a 15-year amortization period. Now, with the new bill, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, starting in the 2025 tax year, companies once again have the option to fully deduct their domestic 174 R&E costs. Foreign costs would still have to be capitalized over that 15-year period. And further — which can come into play for video game developers — certain small businesses do have an opportunity to retroactively apply these rules to the 2022 to 2024 timeframe through various elections and method changes.”

He pointed out that there are different ways to do a retroactive application. “It could be something you’re doing on your 2024 tax return right now, but it could be something that you address in the near term before July 6, 2026, but yes you do have opportunities on the tax returns that are likely in process right now,” said Harbin.

Industry investment

Other industries besides the gaming industry will be benefiting from claiming R&D credits and faster expensing of costs. The Trump administration especially wants to incentivize companies to do business in the U.S.

“The government doesn’t release data on taxpayers that are recognizing 174 costs,” said Sutherland. “They do, however, release very old data on sectors that are claiming the credit. The two sectors that claim most of the credits are the manufacturing sector and professional, scientific and technical services sector. The manufacturing sector takes 40% of all R&D credit claims. The good news at the end of this, outside of the accounting challenges, is companies can have confidence in investing in domestic R&D again. They can get credits, generally speaking. On top of it, these credits are intended to be job creators and encouraged to reinvest the cash from the credits back into the industry. And frankly, it’s trying to encourage more onshore R&D.”

He noted that the OBBBA did not change the amortization requirements for foreign companies. 

“Foreign R&D expenses were not altered,” said Sutherland. “You still have to amortize foreign R&D costs over 15 years. For gamers, a lot of software development is offshore, and that’s been a real challenge for companies to recognize that they’ve got to amortize those costs for 15 years, and they don’t get credit on them. This administration and Congress always wants to create a strong R&D incentive.” 

However, he believes it will help make the U.S. more competitive compared to other countries that are members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development in terms of the strength of its R&D incentives. 

Harbin sees benefits for game developers from use of the tax incentives. “The R&D credit can significantly improve cash flow for game development studios who really need cash to hire talent to create the games,” he said. “It’s a unique blend of artistic creativity, as well as technological advancement. Recognizing this mix is important when it comes to R&D tax credits, and really documenting the difference between the two and making sure that the computations are done appropriately. That’s one of the reasons I’m passionate about working with different studios to navigate this process and helping them along the way so that they continue to create innovative games.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

SEC’s Semiannual Reporting Proposal Faces Investor Pushback: What CFOs Need to Know

Published

on

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

A proposal from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to potentially shift some public companies away from quarterly financial reporting toward a semiannual model is drawing significant pushback from investors, even as it continues moving through the regulatory process. The debate has direct implications for corporate finance teams, auditors, and the broader transparency of U.S. capital markets.

What the SEC Proposed

According to a summary published by accounting advisory firm Cohen & Co., the SEC issued a proposed rule on May 19, 2026, aimed at simplifying financial reporting requirements for many U.S. public companies. The proposal would potentially reduce the frequency of certain mandatory disclosures from quarterly to semiannual, a structural change that has not been made to core U.S. reporting requirements in decades.

The proposal follows an extended debate within U.S. policy circles, with proponents arguing that reduced reporting frequency could lower compliance costs and free up management time for longer-term strategic planning rather than quarter-to-quarter results management.

Why Investors Are Pushing Back

Comment letters submitted in response to the proposal have been extensive, and according to Cohen & Co.’s review of the public record, investors “appear to be largely opposed” to the shift, viewing frequent interim reporting as a core benefit of U.S. capital markets relative to other jurisdictions.

Accounting and law firms have taken a more measured position, generally urging any changes to remain aligned with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), whose existing disclosure requirements and guidance are built around a quarterly reporting cadence. A shift to semiannual reporting without corresponding changes to FASB guidance could create friction between SEC filing requirements and GAAP-based disclosure expectations.

Lessons From the U.K. Experience

The debate is not without precedent. The United Kingdom moved away from mandatory quarterly reporting for listed companies in 2014, returning to a semiannual disclosure requirement. According to Cohen & Co.’s analysis, that experience offers a cautionary data point: there was no measurable increase in capital expenditure or R&D investment following the change, while analyst coverage of affected companies declined as reliable interim information became less available — a particular risk for smaller and newly public companies that rely on analyst coverage to maintain investor visibility.

Practical Implications for Finance Teams

Beyond the debate over disclosure philosophy, the proposal carries practical complications. Many companies have debt covenants and credit agreements structured around quarterly financial delivery; a shift to semiannual reporting could require renegotiating those terms. Reduced reporting frequency would also extend the “window of market silence” between disclosures, a factor that governance and investor-relations teams would need to manage carefully to avoid information asymmetry.

Separately, and unrelated to the reporting-frequency debate, the SEC and FASB have continued finalizing more routine updates this year. New Accounting Standards Updates are taking effect for December 31, 2026, fiscal year-ends covering income tax disclosures, credit loss measurement, induced debt conversions, and stock compensation, according to Eide Bailly’s review of 2026 ASU activity. Additional guidance on paid-in-kind dividends and environmental credits is also on the near-term horizon.

What to Watch Next

The semiannual reporting proposal remains in the comment and review phase, and no final rule has been adopted as of this writing. Finance leaders should monitor the SEC’s regulatory agenda for further movement, while treating the current quarterly reporting requirement as the operative standard until any final rule is issued and an effective date is set.

Given the extent of investor opposition documented in the comment file, a full shift to mandatory semiannual reporting appears more likely to result in either a scaled-back compromise or continued study rather than swift adoption — though the SEC’s ultimate direction remains uncertain.

 

Continue Reading

Accounting

AI-Driven Automation and Continuous Accounting Frameworks

Published

on

The accounting profession is undergoing a fundamental structural transition as enterprise finance departments shift from periodic month-end closes toward automated continuous accounting models. By integrating specialized machine learning algorithms directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms, chief accounting officers are transforming financial reporting from a retrospective exercise into a real-time operational asset.

The Shift from Periodic Close to Continuous Financial Reporting
Traditional accounting workflows heavily relied on manual data reconciliation, spreadsheet calculations, and multi-week closing cycles at the end of each fiscal period. In contrast, continuous accounting frameworks utilize automated software agents to process, validate, and post transactional data in real time as business activities occur.

Automated bank reconciliation tools cross-reference incoming bank feeds, invoice records, and purchase orders automatically. By resolving transactional variances instantly throughout the month, corporate accounting teams eliminate the traditional workload spikes associated with quarterly and annual closes.

Machine Learning in Audit Trails and Anomaly Detection
Advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning tools are redefining internal audit and financial control environments. Automated systems analyze 100% of general ledger entries, identifying anomalous transactions, duplicate payments, and unauthorized journal entries in real time.

Rather than relying on random statistical sampling, corporate internal auditors can focus their attention on high-risk flags automatically surfaced by algorithmic monitoring platforms. This continuous risk assessment strengthens internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) and significantly reduces fraud risk.

Evolving Roles for Accounting Professionals
As routine data entry and manual reconciliation tasks become fully automated, the skill set required for accounting professionals is shifting toward data analysis, system design, and strategic business advisory.
– Systems Governance: Accountants are increasingly responsible for monitoring algorithmic accuracy and managing data integration pipelines.
– Business Partnership: Finance professionals leverage real-time financial dashboards to advise operational leaders on margin management and working capital allocation.
– Regulatory Compliance Management: Accounting teams utilize automated platforms to ensure compliance with dynamic tax codes and international accounting standards.

Core Implementation Recommendations
1. Deploy Automated Reconciliation Tools: Integrate continuous transaction processing modules into existing enterprise ERP architectures.
2. Establish Algorithmic Governance Controls: Implement strict internal testing protocols to ensure automated accounting rules comply with GAAP/IFRS standards.
3. Reskill Accounting Teams: Invest in training finance staff on data analytics, workflow automation, and predictive financial modeling.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Trending