Connect with us

Accounting

Washington State tax hikes target tech giants

Published

on

New taxes passed in the final days of Washington’s legislative session seek to bridge a record budget deficit by shifting more of the tax burden to technology companies like Amazon.com and Microsoft Corp. 

The bills, currently awaiting Democratic Governor Bob Ferguson’s signature, will have a much broader impact, shifting business calculations across nearly every industry, including banks, grocery stores and hospitals. 

The new levies — passed less than two weeks after they were introduced — inject additional uncertainty into an economy still recovering from the pandemic and bracing for supply chains disruptions from President Donald Trump’s tariffs. A pending Republican economic package also aims to pair federal tax cuts that could add trillions to the national debt with healthcare and other spending reductions.

Without a state income tax — on individuals or corporations — Washington legislators turned the dials up on several existing taxes. They expanded the kinds of services subject to sales tax, increased rates for the state’s nearly 100-year-old levy on gross receipts and added a new top tier for capital gains to be taxed at 10%.

“This budget forced us to make choices that no one would like to make,” said Senator June Robinson, who led the budget process for state Democrats. She said she’d been flooded with messages warning of “dire circumstances” for both spending cuts and tax increases. State law requires a balanced budget, unlike at the federal level where the government can run large deficits.

Big tech companies that fueled so much of the region’s growth — and inequality — over the past two decades were the primary target of the new tax hikes. The final package would raise more than $9 billion in additional revenue over the next four years.

The existing tax on corporate gross receipts, known as the Business and Occupation tax, was designed to have a low rate that is broadly applied. Now “advanced computing” companies would see that rate more than triple, including a 7.5% surcharge for companies earning more than $25 billion in the previous year. That tax obligation would be capped at $75 million.

The sales tax bill would repeal the exemption for digital automated services, including advertising. 

That’s easier for Microsoft and Amazon, the world’s second- and fourth-largest companies, to absorb, but it’s harder for the rest of the local tech ecosystem that has grown out of the talent pool seeded by those behemoths. 

These cumulative tax changes would add extra costs for a Seattle startup competing with a company in Austin, Texas, according to Kelly Fukai, head of the Washington Technology Industry Association, who said the tech industry accounts for 22% of Washington’s economy and pays $4.3 billion in taxes. 

“While we’re trying to make it be more progressive, we’re just not getting there,” Fukai said of the tax package. “In fact, we’re probably hurting some of the people that we want to hurt the least.”

Even changes to the capital gains tax, aimed at wealthy investors, would also impact founders trying to sell their startups. A bill increases the top rate on long-term investments to 10% from 7% for sales of more than $1 million.

There’s still uncertainty over what Ferguson, who took office earlier this year, will do next. He has less than three weeks to decide if he’ll veto anything, and he could still call lawmakers back to Olympia for a special session. In a statement Sunday night, he said he intends to “carefully review all revenue increases.”

Ferguson dashed earlier Democratic proposals to raise even more taxes, including a first-in-the-nation wealth tax. The Senate on Sunday went ahead with a symbolic vote on that measure, which would tax certain financial assets over $50 million, even though the House didn’t take it up. Democratic leaders said they were committed to revisiting a wealth tax in future sessions. 

Democrats said they consistently heard from constituents advocating for a “balanced approach” that didn’t rely just on cuts. Republicans argued that there was still more room to whittle down a nearly $78 billion biennial budget that spends 8% more than the last one, but Democrats said they cut as much as they could without gutting core services. 

Business impact

Lawmakers on Sunday bemoaned the tough choices forced by a record budget deficit. Almost everyone who spoke in Olympia, Washington shortly before legislative business concluded for the year said it was the hardest session they’d ever seen.

Drastic cuts from the federal government are poised to further dent state finances and institutions. Emotions were heightened by the unexpected death of one senator and the wife of another just in the past week. More than one member cried. 

In the case of hospitals, higher taxes mean cuts to services, according to Chelene Whiteaker, head of government affairs for the Washington State Hospital Association. She estimates that health care finances will face a $260 million hole by the time this year’s legislation is fully implemented in 2027. 

“There are sometimes unintended consequences,” Whiteaker said. “Hospitals are seen as quote ‘the big guys.’ Yes, we employ a lot of people, but we’re operating at no-margin or low-margin.”

Tammie Hetrick, head of the Washington Food Industry Association, which represents independent supermarkets, convenience stores and their suppliers, warned that increasing the business and occupation tax on producers and wholesalers creates a pyramiding effect of higher costs at every step from farmer to shopper. 

“We are looking at a significant amount of tax increases that will disproportionately impact independent grocers,” Hetrick said. She said she’s urging Ferguson to use his veto power “to protect the cost of food for consumers.”

The legislature passed other taxes as well, including higher rates on property and fuel. Lawmakers even passed a levy that appears to be designed to target Elon Musk’s Tesla, taxing the sale of credits under the state’s zero-emission program. 

Fukai said businesses will look at the entirety of these new taxes, and even if they don’t pick up and leave, they’re likely to plan their growth for elsewhere.

“People love Washington, right? We all are here for a reason. We all love our communities,” Fukai said. “However, when we start adding these costs on like this, and especially of this magnitude, I think that’s where we’re hitting this sort of tipping point.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending