Connect with us

Accounting

What accounting firms can learn about talent management from tech vendors

Published

on

In a previous article, I discussed ways that accounting firms can learn from the technology vendors that serve them. Here, we continue exploring lessons that accountants can learn from vendors, with a focus on one of the most pressing challenges in our profession: talent management. With a massive capacity issue at hand, anything firms can do to better engage, retain and attract talent will help immeasurably.

1. Embrace a meritocracy

A lesson that accounting firms can take from tech vendors is the value of a meritocratic culture, where top talent is promoted and given opportunities to excel based on performance, not tenure or seniority. This is a core value at successful technology companies: rewarding talent based on impact.

During my time working in Google’s finance team, I had the privilege of working with leaders like Sheryl Sandberg, the former COO of Facebook, and Sukhinder Singh Cassidy, the current CEO of Xero. One thing that stood out was their ability to make objective, impact-driven decisions when it came to promotions and talent management. They prioritized the greatest contributors and those who demonstrated the highest potential for the business, regardless of how long they had been at the company.

Historically, CPA practices have been seniority-driven, which worked well when there was a steady pipeline of accountants and workplace stability. But today’s reality is different. The number of new accountants entering the profession is dwindling, and those that do have a wide range of career options that go far beyond the traditional accounting partnership model. This was abundantly clear from a panel at Botkeeper’s conference AI Unchained, where we discussed alternative structures including accounting platforms, franchises and ESOPs.

As firm leaders, you might be concerned that this approach could cause friction among long-standing team members. After all, promoting a newer team member over someone who has been around longer can ruffle feathers. However, the alternative is riskier: If your top performers aren’t recognized or given opportunities to shine, they will leave. A-players attract A-players. Creating a culture where top performers are disengaged or overlooked can lead to talent loss, which is far more damaging in the long run. By embracing a meritocratic approach, you ensure that your firm’s future is powered by those who thrive in this current reality.

2. Make cross-training a foundation of your practice

In the tech world, wearing multiple hats is the norm. When I worked at Siri (yes, the iPhone assistant, which was eventually acquired by Apple), individuals with cross-functional skills were the norm, not the exception.

Engineers didn’t just code; they also created product designs. Product managers didn’t just product manage; they also handled parts of marketing. This kind of cross-training at tech vendors didn’t just build versatility in an era where agility is needed, it also fostered collaboration and innovation.

In accounting, cross-training can be just as impactful. For example, at the Botkeeper conference panel titled “Walking a Tightrope Between Evolving Technologies and Traditional Accounting” with Angie Grissom (Rainmaker), Geni Whitehouse (ITA) and Mike Maksymiw (Aprio Alliance), the group lamented how the accounting curriculum still doesn’t teach future CPAs data literacy or interpretation skills.

Imagine an accounting firm where every accountant is cross-trained in data analytics. Not only would this prepare them for the future, but it would also allow them to deliver higher-value services to clients. Instead of being confined to compliance work, these cross-trained accountants could provide strategic insights that help clients grow their businesses. 

Cross-training doesn’t just benefit the firm’s services offerings — it engages and motivates employees. When team members are given the opportunity to develop new skills and wear different hats, they feel more valued and challenged. This sense of empowerment drives higher performance and fosters loyalty. Employees who feel like they are growing and expanding their skill set are far more likely to stay with a firm long-term. Cross-training offers them a sense of progress and personal investment in their career growth, which in turn increases their commitment to the firm.

3. Use both quantitative and qualitative feedback to manage talent

Tech vendors have long been applying business performance management principles to talent management. At my company Aiwyn, we regularly conduct pulse employee engagement surveys where team members rate their satisfaction across different vectors. We gather both qualitative and quantitative feedback, ensuring that we have a clear understanding of how employees feel, where they see room for improvement, and where they feel supported.

Accounting firms can adopt a similar approach. You wouldn’t run your business without tracking financial metrics, so why run your talent management program without tracking employee satisfaction? Regular pulse surveys, engagement metrics and feedback loops give you a real-time understanding of your team’s morale. This allows you to address issues before they become problems and ensure that your employees feel valued, heard and engaged.

Implementing KPIs for talent management helps you identify trends over time. Are certain teams consistently reporting low engagement scores? Is there a department where turnover is unusually high? By analyzing the data, you can take proactive steps to improve your workplace culture and retain top talent.

In conclusion, the traditional methods of managing talent for an accounting practice no longer align with the realities of today’s workplace. By taking lessons from tech vendors, firms can adopt a more meritocratic approach, make cross-training a core part of their culture, and use data-driven insights to improve employee engagement and retention.

Do you want to build a workplace that attracts top talent and helps your team thrive in an era of rapid technological change? By embracing these modern talent management strategies, you’ll position your firm to thrive in a rapidly changing world.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending