Connect with us

Accounting

What CPAs should know about the return of 100% bonus depreciation in 2025

Published

on

A client calls with a question: “I just bought a warehouse and spent $250,000 improving it. Can I deduct all of that this year?”

If the improvements were placed in service after Jan. 19, 2025 — and if the binding acquisition contract was signed after that same date — the answer might be yes, thanks to the permanent reinstatement of 100% bonus depreciation under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

This article breaks down what changed and how CPAs can help clients take full advantage. Whether your clients are investing in commercial buildings, launching new ventures or improving existing properties, this update creates fresh opportunities for accelerated deductions.

New rules to understand

Before OBBBA, bonus depreciation was set to phase down:

  • 60% in 2024
  • 40% in 2025
  • 20% in 2026
  • 0% in 2027

OBBBA scrapped that phase-down and permanently restored 100% bonus depreciation for qualified property placed in service after Jan. 19, 2025, so long as the binding contract to acquire the property was signed on or after that same date.

That timing distinction is essential. The tax treatment for otherwise identical properties could vary dramatically based on both the placed-in-service date and the date the acquisition contract was executed.

How placement and contract dates affect eligibility

Let’s take an example: Your client buys a $2 million warehouse and spends $250,000 on lighting, electrical and flooring upgrades.

  • If placed in service on Jan. 15, 2025 (with a contract signed before Jan 19), they only qualify for 40% bonus depreciation.
  • If placed in service on Jan. 22, 2025 (with a contract signed after Jan 19), they qualify for 100% bonus.

That shift could mean the difference between writing off $100,000 or the full $250,000 in year one.

Bonus depreciation applies to five-, seven- and 15-year assets — components typically identified in a cost segregation study. For clients making major capital investments, clarifying these dates early is critical.

Assets that qualify

100% bonus depreciation remains available for property with a MACRS recovery period of 20 years or less, including:

  • Furniture, fixtures, and equipment;
  • Interior finishes and flooring;
  • Qualified Improvement Property;
  • Exterior improvements like landscaping, paving or site lighting.

Used property still counts, as long as the taxpayer didn’t previously use it themselves.
For new acquisitions or improvement projects, proactively identifying these assets allows for smoother coordination with your tax and engineering teams.

Key opportunities for CPAs

If you work with real estate investors, professional service firms or business owners, here’s how this new framework affects your advisory role:

  • Model depreciation scenarios to inform estimated payments and cash flow.
  • Evaluate placed-in-service dates alongside contract signing dates.
  • Coordinate any needed Form 3115 filings for method changes if prior assets were misclassified.
  • Engage cost segregation experts early to have studies ready before filing deadlines.

Because 100% bonus depreciation is now a permanent feature of the Tax Code under OBBBA, the urgency to beat a phase-out is gone, but strategic timing still matters, especially around contract dates and placed-in-service triggers.

Bringing it all together for your clients

100% bonus depreciation is now permanently restored. This changes how clients should plan for 2025 and beyond.

It’s not about chasing deductions just for the sake of it, it’s about applying the Tax Code strategically so your clients capture these benefits compliantly and thoughtfully.

Whether you’re advising a real estate syndicator, a growing professional services firm or a business owner expanding operations, now is the time to review placed-in-service rules, contract timelines, asset classifications and overall depreciation strategy.

To run quick estimates on potential savings, you can use a Cost Seg Calculator. It’s a simple way to model whether bonus depreciation makes a material difference in your client’s numbers.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending