Connect with us

Personal Finance

What Harris’ plan to tax unrealized gains means for the wealthy

Published

on

Democratic presidential candidate US Vice President Kamala Harris speaks at a campaign rally at Enmarket Arena during a two-day campaign bus tour in Savannah, Georgia, on August 29, 2024.

Saul Loeb | AFP | Getty Images

As Vice President Kamala Harris outlines her economic agenda, the Democratic presidential nominee has called for higher taxes on wealthy Americans and corporations — although experts say her plan is unlikely to gain traction. 

Harris in August endorsed the tax increases proposed by President Joe Biden in his fiscal year 2025 budget, including a 25% minimum tax on total income, including so-called “unrealized gains,” or asset growth, exceeding $100 million. This is known as the billionaire minimum tax.

As of June 2023, there were 10,660 centi-millionaires, or people with at least $100 million in assets, living in the U.S., according to a report from Henley & Partners, a wealth and migration advisory firm. The report used data from New World Wealth.

“It’s just not right that those who can most afford it are often paying a lower tax rate than our teachers and our nurses and our firefighters,” Harris said at a campaign event on Wednesday in New Hampshire. “That’s why I support a billionaire minimum tax and corporations paying their fair share.”  

More from Personal Finance:
44% of workers are ‘cautiously optimistic’ about retirement goals
Relocating retirees want lower costs. Moving abroad may be the answer
40% of workers are behind on retirement. Not saving earlier was a mistake

If enacted, taxpayers with wealth above the $100 million threshold would have to report unrealized gains for each asset class annually, including the basis, or original purchase price, and market value as of Dec. 31, according to the U.S. Department of the Treasury. They would also report total liabilities.

Currently, investors incur capital gains taxes of 0%, 15% or 20% after selling a profitable asset owned for more than one year. Plus, there’s an extra 3.8% net investment income tax for higher earners.

Biden has called for a billionaire minimum tax in his 2025, 2024 and 2023 fiscal year budgets and Senate Democrats pushed for a similar levy in October 2021. But the proposals have failed to gain traction.

“There’s very little political support for this,” said Steve Rosenthal, senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center.

The Harris campaign did not provide a comment to CNBC.

There’s also been pushback from the business community. Billionaire entrepreneur Mark Cuban on Thursday told CNBC’s “Squawk Box” that he doesn’t think Harris would tax unrealized gains.

“Every conversation I’ve had is that it’s not going to happen,” he said.

“If you tax unrealized gains, you’re going to kill the stock market,” he added.

Billionaire minimum tax is an ‘unworkable proposal’

While many Americans favor higher taxes on the wealthy, policy experts have criticized components of Biden’s proposed billionaire minimum tax.

“It moves in the opposite direction of sound tax policy,” said Erica York, senior economist and research manager with the Tax Foundation’s Center for Federal Tax Policy.

The policy “poses significant administrative and compliance challenges,” including liquidity concerns, possible gaming and IRS disputes, she said. “I still think it ends up being an unworkable proposal.”

Mark Cuban on the Harris tax plan: She is pro-business, going center 100%

Rosenthal offered a similar critique of the proposal, including possible legal challenges, particularly after a June Supreme Court ruling.

Although the justices didn’t comment directly on wealth taxes, the ruling left questions about whether a future wealth tax could pass constitutional muster.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Maximizing Returns in High Rate Climate and market uncertainty

Published

on

Maximizing Returns in High-Rate Climate

In the macroeconomic environment of late July 2026, personal cash management requires an active, structured approach to wealth preservation. With central bank benchmark rates remaining elevated to ensure long-term disinflation, conservative yield-bearing vehicles—such as short-term U.S. Treasury bills, money market funds, and high-yield savings accounts (HYSAs)—continue to offer reliable nominal returns between 4% and 5%. For individual investors, maximizing net returns requires moving beyond passive checking accounts and executing a disciplined cash laddering strategy.

Leaving substantial liquid capital in traditional bank deposits creates an invisible drag on personal net worth due to ongoing inflation. By implementing a tiered liquidity framework, individuals can split emergency cash reserves and short-term capital allocations across rolling maturities. Allocating cash into 4-week, 8-week, and 13-week Treasury bills creates a continuous cycle of maturing liquidity, allowing investors to continuously reinvest capital at prevailing market yields while maintaining immediate access to emergency funds.

Tax efficiency represents a critical dimension of high-yield cash optimization. For high-earning individuals residing in states with substantial local income taxes, direct holdings in short-term U.S. Treasury instruments often deliver superior net post-tax yields compared to standard commercial bank HYSAs. Because interest earned on federal Treasury bills is strictly exempt from state and local taxation, investors can retain a larger portion of their compounding interest gains without taking on additional credit or market risk.

Ultimately, personal wealth accumulation in mid-2026 relies on intentional capital deployment. Cash should be managed as a productive asset class that generates consistent, risk-free returns. Regularly auditing account yield terms, automating recurring transfers, and leveraging tax-advantaged fixed-income instruments ensures that personal liquidity remains fully optimized against macroeconomic fluctuations.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Algorithmic Wealth Management: Balancing Automated Financial Planning with Human Oversight

Published

on

Balancing Automated Financial Planning with Human Oversight

The personal finance industry in July 2026 is experiencing a technological evolution, driven by the wide deployment of next-generation algorithmic wealth management tools. Modern digital financial platforms have expanded far beyond basic automated index investing; today’s robo-advisors utilize real-time tax-loss harvesting, dynamic portfolio rebalancing, and hyper-personalized spending analysis to optimize retail investor outcomes. However, as these digital solutions become ubiquitous, investors face the crucial challenge of balancing automated execution with human strategic judgment.

The core advantage of automated financial planning platforms lies in their ability to remove emotional bias from investment execution. During periods of market volatility or localized sector realignments, automated algorithms systematically rebalance portfolios back to target asset allocations without falling victim to panic selling or speculative enthusiasm. Furthermore, integrated cash-flow monitoring algorithms analyze individual spending patterns in real time, automatically sweeping surplus income into designated retirement or debt-liquidation accounts to accelerate net worth accumulation.

Despite these operational advantages, algorithmic tools have inherent structural limitations when addressing complex, highly personalized financial life events. Decisions involving multi-generational estate planning, highly complex tax strategies, small business exits, or nuanced real estate transactions require contextual human judgment that software models cannot replicate. Relying solely on automated models without periodic human professional review can result in misaligned risk profiles or overlooked tax liabilities during major life transitions.

The optimal approach for personal financial planning in late 2026 is a hybrid advisory model. Individuals should utilize automated platforms for routine asset allocation, continuous tax optimization, and low-cost passive index tracking, while engaging qualified human financial advisors for periodic strategic planning, estate structuring, and qualitative risk evaluations. This dual approach ensures maximum cost efficiency and disciplined execution while retaining essential strategic guidance.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

High-Yield Optimization: Structuring Personal Cash Reserves in a Sustained Rate Environment

Published

on

Structuring Personal Cash Reserves in a Sustained Rate Environment

In the financial environment of mid-2026, personal cash management has re-emerged as a vital component of holistic wealth building. With central bank policy rates holding firm to maintain long-term price stability, yield-bearing instruments such as money market funds, high-yield savings accounts (HYSAs), and short-term Treasury bills continue to offer compounding returns around 4% to 5%. For individual investors, effectively structuring cash reserves requires shifting away from passive bank deposits toward active yield optimization.

A frequent pitfall in personal asset management is leaving substantial liquid capital in traditional checking or low-yield savings accounts, where real returns are continuously eroded by baseline inflation. By implementing a disciplined ‘cash ladder’ strategy—allocating liquid funds across tiered maturities using ultra-short Treasury instruments and FDIC-insured high-yield accounts—individuals can secure maximal yields while retaining immediate liquidity for emergency expenses or tactical investment opportunities.

Simultaneously, investors must evaluate the tax efficiency of their cash holdings based on their tax bracket and geographic location. For high earners situated in states with high local income taxes, direct holdings in short-term U.S. Treasury bills often yield a higher net post-tax return than standard high-yield savings accounts, as Treasury interest is strictly exempt from state and local taxation. Understanding these nuanced tax distinctions allows individuals to capture significant incremental gains without taking on additional market risk.

Ultimately, personal financial health in late 2026 hinges on intentional liquidity management. Cash reserves should not be viewed merely as static emergency funds, but as a dynamic asset class that contributes positively to net worth growth. Regularly auditing yield terms, automating cash transfers, and optimizing for post-tax efficiency ensures that personal capital remains fully productive across all economic conditions.

Continue Reading

Trending