Connect with us

Accounting

What not-for-profits and their accountants need to know about the OBBBA

Published

on

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed into law on July 4, contains several provisions that could affect the future of not-for-profit organizations. 

One provision creates a permanent cash contribution deduction for non-itemizers. This deduction is limited to $1,000 for single filers ($2,000 for those married filing jointly) and notably, this deduction does not apply to contributions made to supporting organizations under Section 509(a)(3) of the Tax Code and to donor-advised funds. 

Additionally, a limitation on charitable contributions for taxpayers who itemize deductions was created by imposing a floor equal to 0.5% of the taxpayer’s contribution base for that taxable year. 

These provisions will likely increase contributions from individuals who do not itemize, as non-itemizers are not subject to the 0.5% limitation on their contributions.

Taxpayers who itemize deductions will feel the impact of this provision the most. For example, a married couple with an adjusted gross income of $500,000 will have their charitable contributions reduced by $2,500 because of it. The remaining amount of charitable contributions may not provide a tax benefit to the couple if they need to use a portion of the remaining charitable contributions to exceed the standard deduction limit for married filing jointly taxpayers. Effectively, those contributions have no tax benefit to the MFJ couple. This can further restrict an individual’s tax benefit of charitable contributions. 

Not-for-profit organizations need to be aware of this impact on their individual contribution base. In this situation, taxpayers who want to maximize the tax benefit of their charitable contributions may want to set up a donor-advised fund to “stack contributions.” The taxpayer could fund the DAF in one year with contributions they would have made over several years and then make distributions from the DAF on an annual basis. By doing this, the contributions would only be subject to the 0.5% limitation once, providing more overall tax benefit for the same charitable contributions. Not-for-profit organizations should ask contributors if they have a DAF or be ready to refer them to an organization that can assist them in establishing one.

Excise tax modification

Under previous law, certain private colleges and universities had to pay a 1.4% excise tax on their net investment income if they had at least 500 tuition-paying students and a student-adjusted endowment of $500,000 or more. The OBBBA enacted two major changes effective for tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2025. The student threshold increased from 500 to 3,000 tuition-paying students, likely resulting in fewer institutions subject to the excise tax. Additionally, a tiered tax system will replace the flat 1.4% with different rates based on the institution’s student adjusted endowment as follows:

Student adjusted endowment Excise tax rate
$500,000–$749,999 1.4%
$750,000–$1,999,999 4%
$2,000,000+ 8%

This tiered excise tax model intentionally targets private colleges and universities with large endowments. This provision was originally enacted to encourage private colleges and universities with larger endowments to use the funds to reduce the cost of education or provide more scholarships to students. It demonstrates that Congress continues to examine the amounts held by not-for-profit organizations in their endowment funds and has identified it as a potential revenue raiser for future legislation. Not-for-profit organizations should continue to work with peer advocacy groups to coordinate responses to any future expansion of this excise tax.

Tax credit for individual scholarship contributions

Effective for tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2026, a new tax credit of up to $1,700 has been created specifically for individuals who make charitable contributions to public charities that provide scholarships to qualifying elementary and secondary school students. To qualify for the scholarships, students must come from homes with incomes below 300% of the area’s median gross income and be eligible to enroll in a public elementary or secondary school. 

The credit provides more benefit than a charitable contribution deduction as it is a direct offset to the individual’s tax liability and is also not subject to the deduction limitations on either itemizers or non-itemizers. Individuals who are looking to maximize the tax benefit of their charitable contributions and existing qualifying organizations will benefit the most from this change.

1% floor on corporate charitable contribution deductions

This provision establishes a floor equal to 1% of taxable income for the deductibility of corporate charitable contributions. Exceeding 1% is deductible up to 10% and if a corporation’s contributions exceed the 10% limit, the provision allows taxpayers to add the amount disallowed under the 1% floor to the amount carried over to the following year.

While this change is unlikely to significantly impact charitable giving by large corporations, it may cause small or midsized corporations to consider reducing contributions to charities and instead look to sponsoring community events. These business expenses would not be subject to the 1% floor and still enable the corporations to support their local community. 

Nonprofit organizations that rely heavily on direct charitable contributions from corporate donors should anticipate a change in how small and midsized companies approach charitable support. The not-for-profit’s fundraising development team should continue to focus on the social impact of the contribution when addressing corporate donors and look for ways to increase direct sponsorship of community activities to help corporate donors maximize the after-tax benefit of the contribution.

No tax on overtime

The OBBBA introduced a maximum deduction for qualified overtime income of $12,500 for single filers ($25,000 for joint returns). Not-for-profit organizations are now required to separately state the amount of qualified overtime on their employees’ Form W-2. 

This additional filing requirement may cause increased administrative time or changes to the payroll reporting process. On the other hand, we may see employees express increased interest in working overtime hours.

Excess compensation

Before the OBBBA, only the top five highest-paid employees at a tax-exempt organization were subject to the excise tax on compensation in excess of $1 million. With the new provision, this rule has expanded to include any employee or former employee that has earned over $1 million during any tax year after Dec. 31, 2016. This results in more highly paid employees being subject to the excise tax.

This change is likely to impact many large not-for-profit organizations that have more than five employees with excess compensation. These organizations should further refine their internal processes to ensure they identify individuals meeting this requirement, especially those individuals compensated by related parties.

It is important to note that the exception to this rule for remuneration for medical services remains in effect.

What now?

These OBBBA provisions will require some learning and flexibility from not-for-profit organizations. While there are challenges that come with these changes, there are also new opportunities and incentives for those looking to make charitable contributions.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending