Connect with us

Accounting

Why growth is so hard for firms and how to fix it

Published

on

Growth, on the surface, is what every firm leader wants. More revenue, more profits, more employees. That’s the dream, right?

Here’s the thing, though: not everyone’s dream looks the same. Growth, it turns out, is not a one-size-fits-all approach. Not only does the definition differ from business to business, but so do the strategies for reaching that goal. Growth is also complicated, particularly for small accounting firms.

A leader looking to level up from a small staff of less than 10, for instance, may find the systems and leadership approaches that worked before have suddenly stopped working. And that’s when growth stalls out.

This period between 8 and 20 employees is often a firm’s first scaling plateau. It’s the point at which the organization has maximized its potential within its current operational structure, team design, market focus, or leadership skills capabilities. It is a critical period of growth that can make or break any accounting firm. The key to breaking through is to:

  • Understand that this plateau exists.
  • Determine what you as a leader truly want from your firm.
  • Map out the organizational design of your future firm.
  • Build the necessary scaffolding to support that design as the firm moves through its growth phases.

Here’s how to anticipate and overcome the challenges of this frustrating first scaling plateau and to achieve the kind of growth that makes sense for you and your firm.

Hitting the wall: why it’s hard to scale beyond eight employees

I’ve worked with and studied a lot of small firms over the years. And despite all of the little differences among them — location, specializations, etc. — they all had one thing in common. Regardless of past success, when they went to scale up from about eight employees to double digits, things changed. And usually not for the better.

Key metrics like revenue per employee, productivity and profitability all seemed to drop as staff size grew. Sometimes this would cause them to put a hold on growth and shrink back down, and suddenly those metrics would pick up again. But they were always hitting a wall as they looked to move through that magic zone between 8 and 20 employees.

What was happening? The dynamics of the team were changing. Most firms with eight or fewer employees run as a very flat organizational structure. But as they move above that number, they probably need to bring in someone to help manage the staff, resulting in a kind of hybrid structure in the 8 – 12 employee range.

Get a little bigger than that and the new management layer can get more complicated. Maybe some of the new people aren’t as adept at leading, for example. Now a lot of time and energy is spent on managing the team and trying to find the right manager-to-staff ratio instead of focusing solely on business growth like in the old days.

Beyond 20 employees, an organization begins to look more naturally hierarchical. Responsibilities become clarified. Strong leaders emerge. Individual departments can function efficiently and productively both within themselves and as part of the larger whole. The firm no longer looks the way it used to, but the new way makes sense.

It’s in that 8 – 20 range where things get muddled. This is the scaling plateau that most growing firms tend to hit. It’s a time to really evaluate organizational strategy and design to find a purposeful and sustainable path forward. Unfortunately, many firms try to stick with what they’ve always done and plow through these challenges.

And that’s when they hit the wall and their growth trajectory gets derailed.    

Recognizing the signs: lower productivity, less visibility, falling profit margins

I’ve talked to plenty of firm leaders who have seen these things happen, and they all tend to express variations on the same general sentiment:

“The business I started doesn’t feel like the business I’m running today.”
“I used to have my hands across everything, and now I’m not sure where things are anymore.”
“The people on my team used to be a lot more productive than they are now.”

Undergirding these kinds of statements are a number of common questions they’re running into, such as:

  • Why are client issues happening and why am I not aware of them sooner?
  • Why is the profit margin dropping when it has been steadily increasing over the past few years?
  • Why does it seem like our team is getting lazier and less productive?
  • Why don’t I have enough time to work directly with clients?
  • Why do I feel like my staff is unhappy and looking to leave?
  • I’ve never experienced these problems before, so why is all of this happening now?

It becomes a point of disconnection that threatens the confidence of many firm leaders. The organization isn’t operating the way they expect it to and they don’t know what to do about it.

Righting the ship: defining growth, understanding how to get there, and pursuing it deliberately

The problem is twofold. On one side, most leaders never take the time to really examine what’s going on in their firms. They know something’s not working, but they just forge ahead and hope the issues will work themselves out. Those leaders who do opt for some reflection, on the other hand, often don’t have these types of epiphanies until their firm has already hit the wall.

So the first step to righting the ship is simply taking the time to acknowledge the problems and understand what your firm is up against. From there, you can start to course correct by doing three things:

  1. Define what you want from your firm. How big do you want to be? What kind of culture are you trying to have? Is the sweet spot a lean-and-mean organization that sits comfortably between about 12 and 16 employees? Or are you looking to build a bigger firm with more people and more moving parts?
  2. Understand what’s needed for growth. If you’re really looking to grow, is your firm structured to support that goal? Do your resources and capacity match your forecasted revenue? Keep in mind that it’s not just about bringing in a bunch of new people; it’s about making sure the people you do bring in are filling the critical needs your growth is going to demand. 
  3. Be deliberate about operational management. A growing firm has a lot more bodies that need to start rowing the boat collectively. That means you need to be more thoughtful about things like the kind of work those people are trying to do, the processes they need to support that work, and the training they need to be successful.

Bridge the gap between goals and growth

Is bigger always better?

When it comes to facing the 8 – 20 employee wall, that’s the overriding question that firm leaders need to ask themselves. As an entrepreneur, you want to maximize your firm’s profitability. But are you viewing that goal through the proper lens? 

One of the things I’ve learned in talking with hundreds of leaders over the years is that growth and success look very different from firm to firm. For one owner, building a big team to handle more clients and offer more services might be the goal. For another, promoting a healthy work-life balance might be more important than adding more people.

In the end, the objective should be to build the right company based on your own parameters. That’s a unique thing for every business. And that’s what you need to figure out as a firm leader in order to determine where your ultimate happiness lies.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending