Enjoy complimentary access to top ideas and insights — selected by our editors.
Layoffs and other executive moves at the Internal Revenue Service are the latest in a series of ripples the Trump administration has made in the tax arena, from proposed tariffs to extending the landmark Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.
Accountants and tax pros are left asking how new reporting standards, congressional budget efforts and a thinned-out IRS will impact the ongoing tax season.
Thousands of employees across the IRS’s divisions responsible for small business and self-employed filers, enforcement and collection duties and handling processing responsibilities were laid off on Feb. 20, further complicating the IRS’s struggles with retaining talent. Most of them were hired by the agency on a probationary basis with funding from the Inflation Reduction Act.
These firings have former IRS commissioners concerned that the agency’s progress towards improving filing turnarounds will now be upended, leaving senior staffers to pick up the slack.
“A lot of these people have been there a year to two years, and are revenue agents and revenue officers, but also customer service,” John Koskinen, who was IRS commissioner from 2013-2017, told Accounting Today. “They can do more standard work, so the more senior people can handle a more complicated issue. … So when you wipe them out, the more senior people then have to fill the gaps to the extent they can.”
Bipartisan legislators have been working to advance proposals that, if passed, would improve the digital filing process for taxpayers and provide more flexibility in the IRS’s “math error” calculations. The House Ways and Means Committee passed both bills in February.
Mark Giallonardo, tax partner-in-charge for Top 25 Firm Cherry Bekaert’s south Florida region, said that for now, accountants need to first manage filing expectations to help clients weather these delays, while prioritizing electronic filings and payments to minimize the slowdown in processing and problem resolution.
Fraud has also become a growing concern among accountants, as the IRS’s diminished enforcement capabilities fuel concerns of bad actors falling through the cracks.
Data released by the agency’s Criminal Investigations unit showed that for the 2024 fiscal year, IRS-CI was successful in identifying over $9.1 billion in total fraud, obtaining court orders totaling $1.7 billion in restitution to the IRS and seizing approximately $1.2 billion in criminal assets.
Noteworthy cases from the IRS-CI include one of the agency’s first indictments and guilty pleas of a U.S. taxpayer solely for not paying taxes on gains from cryptocurrency sales, as well as the $4 billion Binance settlement over violations of the Bank Secrecy Act.
All of that could change in the wake of widespread staff cuts, however.
Kevin Knull, chief executive of the Frisco, Texas-based tax record fintech TaxStatus, said that delays are only the tip of the iceberg.
“In the aftermath of massive data breaches in 2024, criminals are already using stolen taxpayer identification numbers to file fake and fraudulent returns, trying to claim the refunds before the legitimate taxpayer files or is aware of the issue,” Knull said. “When these fraudulent claims are uncovered, the legitimate taxpayer is forced to deal with the consequences, including working with the IRS to recover their rightful benefits or refunds.”
Under the proposed arrangement, a joint task force of DOGE representatives and IRS software engineers would oversee debugging, software testing, programming and implementing safeguards to prevent fraud, according to the memo obtained by Bloomberg Tax. At the time of reporting, the memo did not limit what kinds of taxpayer information DOGE officials could access.
Legal experts with The W Tax Group, a tax defense company located in Southfield, Michigan, explained how DOGE’s involvement weighs the importance of protecting personal privacy against the significance of improving how the IRS operates.
“The reality is that the IRS already shares sensitive taxpayer information with contractors, congressional committees and Treasury personnel, [therefore] proper restrictions on DOGE, with limited and monitored access, will help root out mismanaged money and fraud without putting taxpayer privacy in danger,” Stephen Weisberg, principal attorney and founder, said. “If the process is handled appropriately, the risks are not as extreme as some suggest.”
Once a new IRS acting commissioner is confirmed, the agency’s path forward will start to come into focus and provide accountants with more clarity on what to expect from the service moving forward.
Former IRS heads predict delays ahead for agency
Following numerous layoffs at the IRS, former agency leaders say processing delays are on the horizon.
More than 7,000 IRS staffers, most of whom were probationary employees, were dismissed last month as part of government-wide cuts. With the enforcement and collection areas sustaining the largest downsizes, past IRS commissioners said the decisions seemingly go against the mission to increase cost savings.
“The irony is this is an administration that claims to be worried about the deficit and claims to be looking for $2 trillion in savings. … And it seems to be nonsensical to think that one good way to do that is to hamstring your revenue arm, your accounts receivable division,” John Koskinen, who was IRS commissioner from 2013-2017, told Accounting Today.
“Indiscriminate firings of IRS employees around the country are a recipe for economic disaster,” Doreen Greenwald, National Treasury Employees Union national president, said in a statement. “In the middle of a tax filing season, when taxpayers expect prompt customer service and smooth processing of their tax returns, the administration has chosen to decimate the whole operation by sending dedicated civil servants to the unemployment lines.”
The Trump Administration is turning the tax world on its head
Death and taxes, as the old adage goes, are the only two things certain in life. But while taxes aren’t going away, the same can’t be said for the underlying regulations.
Starting with President Trump’s Jan. 20 executive order enacting a lengthy hiring freeze at the IRS and continuing with the administration’s efforts to renew the expiring provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, there are numerous proposals in play that promise to bring widespread change.
In speaking with AT’s Michael Cohn, Mark Everson, a former IRS commissioner and current vice chairman of the Washington D.C.-based consulting firm Alliant, said the anti-DEI campaign from the Trump administration will be reflected in the IRS’s future.
“Consistent with the move against DEI, my guess would be a return to enforcement without scrutiny of results by racial grouping,” Everson said.
Bipartisan bills seek to modernize tax filing and admin at IRS
The Electronic Filing and Payment Fairness Act and IRS Math and Taxpayer Help Act are moving on with bipartisan support, both aiming to introduce more transparency and ease of access to taxpayers’ lives.
The first would introduce changes into the filing procedures by allowing electronically submitted documents to be afforded the same timeliness standards as paper counterparts, known as the “mailbox rule.” The second would mandate that the IRS provide taxpayers with justifications behind “math error” calculations and a 60-day comment period to refute the findings.
“The AICPA is pleased that these bills have been included in the markup and is encouraged by the momentum generated by these provisions moving forward in a bipartisan way,” Melanie Lauridsen, vice president of tax policy and advocacy for the AICPA, said in a statement.
IRS hiring freeze, pulled job offers is cold start for 2025 tax season
It’s a cold start of tax season for the IRS, as a lengthy hiring freeze casts a great shadow over the agency.
President Trump’s executive order, simply named “Hiring Freeze,” established an indefinite hold on recruiting at the agency “until the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget and the Administrator of the United States DOGE Service, determines that it is in the national interest to lift the freeze,” according to the order.
In speaking with AT’s Michael Cohn, Bill Smith, managing director of CBIZ Advisors’ National Tax Office, said curtailing hiring efforts in an industry already starved for talent will prove troublesome for the IRS.
“A third of the workforce is eligible for retirement, and if you hire new people, they don’t come in as senior auditors, they come in out of college or relatively inexperienced for the most part,” Smith said. “It takes two years to train them and get them marginally effective. … If you kill all that, there will be a tremendous amount of natural attrition at the service, and the attrition is going to be at the most experienced level, which will have a huge impact.”
In a decisive move toward standardized environmental financial reporting, accounting standards boards issued updated implementation guidance during the week ending July 25, 2026, regarding the formal recognition and valuation of corporate carbon offsets and environmental credits. The revised frameworks establish precise rules for how enterprises must measure, record, and disclose carbon credits on balance sheets, eliminating years of inconsistent reporting practices across public capital markets.
Under the finalized accounting standard, purchased carbon offsets can no longer be categorized under vague administrative expenses or unstandardized intangible asset accounts. Instead, organizations must classify environmental credits based on underlying operational intent—distinguishing between credits held for immediate compliance compliance obligations, long-term offset obligations, or active market trading. Furthermore, companies are required to evaluate carbon holdings for fair value impairment at the end of each reporting period, ensuring that depreciated or low-quality environmental credits do not distort corporate asset values.
The standardized rules carry significant implications for corporate audit committees and chief accounting officers. External audit firms are implementing rigorous verification protocols to validate the physical legitimacy, legal ownership, and scientific permanence of carbon credits claimed on balance sheets. Inaccurate or overstated carbon accounting claims now carry substantial financial litigation risk, alongside potential regulatory enforcement for misleading ESG disclosures.
To remain fully compliant, corporate accounting departments must establish centralized carbon tracking systems integrated into primary standard ERP ledgers. Accounting teams that proactively adopt standardized environmental reporting protocols will build investor credibility, streamline annual audit processes, and insulate their organizations against evolving regulatory scrutiny.
Corporate tax departments reached a critical juncture in automated operational management. With nations worldwide rapidly enacting digital service taxes, localized value-added tax (VAT) mandates, and real-time electronic invoicing requirements, manual tax calculations have become obsolete. Modern corporate tax divisions are aggressively deploying AI-driven tax engine software to automate complex cross-border indirect tax calculations in real time.
The imperative for automated tax compliance stems from the sheer complexity of current trade policies and multi-jurisdictional commerce. E-commerce platforms, software vendors, and global manufacturers face constantly changing regional tax rates, statutory exemption rules, and cross-border tariff structures. Automated tax engines embed directly into enterprise enterprise resource planning (ERP) architectures, automatically applying correct tax codes at the point of sale, calculating real-time withholding amounts, and generating compliant e-invoices.
Automated audit trail generation represents another key advantage of modern tax tech integration. Advanced compliance platforms log every transactional tax determination on immutable digital ledgers, providing tax authorities with transparent, self-verifying audit trails. This capability drastically reduces the operational duration and administrative cost of corporate tax audits, protecting enterprises against severe penalties resulting from calculation errors or missed reporting deadlines.
For chief financial officers and tax directors, investing in automated tax compliance is a vital operational risk mitigation strategy. Automating routine tax calculations frees high-level accounting professionals to focus on strategic tax planning, transfer pricing optimization, and risk management in an increasingly complex global economic environment.
As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.
Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.
The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.