Connect with us

Personal Finance

401(k) auto-enrollment less effective than expected, study says

Published

on

Images By Tang Ming Tung | Digitalvision | Getty Images

Employers are increasingly putting workers’ 401(k) plan savings on autopilot.

But the positive impact of automated retirement savings is more muted than initially thought, new research finds.

Previously “underexamined” factors — like workers cashing out 401(k) balances when they leave a job — “meaningfully reduce” the long-term impact of policies like automatic enrollment and automatic escalation, according to a new paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research.

Importantly, some of the paper’s co-authors — James Choi of Yale University, and David Laibson and John Beshears of Harvard University — are behavioral economists who pioneered early research into the positive effects of automatic enrollment.

“They are like the OGs [originals],” said David Blanchett, head of retirement research at PGIM, an investment manager. “These are the people who’ve been doing research on this topic now for decades.”

‘Not as positive as we had previously thought’

Automated savings has been a cornerstone of 401(k) policy since Congress passed the Pension Protection Act of 2006.

Policies like auto-enrollment and auto-escalation aim to boost the size of employees’ nest eggs, by automatically enrolling workers in their company 401(k) and then raising (or “escalating”) their savings rate over time.

In this way, people’s tendency towards inertia works in their favor.

401(k) doesn't seem to have the same fanbase that social security has, says Allison Schrager

About two-thirds of 401(k) plans were using auto-enrollment as of 2022, according to survey data from the Plan Sponsor Council of America, a trade group. Of them, 78% used auto-escalation.

Overall, their effect on savings is positive, “just not as positive as we had previously thought based on the research we had done before,” Choi said in an interview.

The group’s initial research didn’t track results for workers who left jobs where they’d been automatically enrolled.

This research update sought to do a broader analysis, incorporating factors like job turnover, Choi said.

More from Personal Finance:
You may be paying fees for cash back at retailers
Why some young adults are disconnected from the job market
The benefits of giving to a 529 college savings plan

Overall, Choi and his co-authors recently found that auto-enrollment raised average 401(k) contribution rates by 0.6 percentage points of income over workers’ careers.

That’s a 72% decrease in effectiveness from the 2.2-percentage-point boost that was extrapolated by the “results of early pioneering papers,” the paper said.

“You’re talking 1.6% of income less saved per year,” Choi said. “If you were to just add that up over a 40-year career, you’re talking more than a half year of income saved.”

When also accounting for compounding interest on those savings, it can amount to a “quite substantial” financial difference, he added.

The impact of 401(k) leakage

The disparity is largely a function of so-called “leakage” from 401(k) plans. meaning the early withdrawal of funds before retirement.

About 40% of workers who leave a job cash out their 401(k) plans each year, according to the Employee Benefit Research Institute. Such leakage amounted to $92.4 billion in 2015, according to EBRI’s most recent data.

Workers may withdraw 401(k) plan funds before their employer match is fully vested, meaning they’d forgo that free money.

Additionally, just 43% of workers defaulted into auto-escalation of their savings rates ultimately accepted a higher contribution rate after one year, the National Bureau of Economic Research paper found.

By comparison, early research conducted by behavioral economists like Richard Thaler and Shlomo Benartzi estimated that share around 85%.

Job turnover also complicates auto-escalation in addition to auto-enrollment, PGIM’s Blanchett said.

For example, a worker’s escalated contribution rate may reset at a lower savings rate if they were to join a new employer’s 401(k) plan.

While auto-escalation isn’t necessarily a reliable way to get people to save more money, auto-enrollment has proven “very successful,” Blanchett said.

Maximizing your Social Security benefits

He believes the effectiveness of auto-enrollment shouldn’t be judged based on 401(k) leakage, which is a separate policy issue, he said.

“I think auto-enrollment does a spectacular job at getting individuals in the plan,” Blanchett said. “But we still have this massive leakage issue. It still exists whether you have auto-enrollment or you don’t.”

That said, there’s room for improvement with automated savings.

“I’d like us to get to a point where 7% or 8% is the median default savings rate,” Blanchett said.

When coupled with an employer match, the typical worker would be saving 10% or more of their salaries, a bar workers should generally strive for, he said.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

As college costs soar, Ivy Leagues boost financial aid packages

Published

on

Fstop123 | E+ | Getty Images

While most people agree that a college education is worthwhile, fewer say it’s worth the high cost.

However, as college costs continue to rise, many top schools are responding by offering more generous financial aid packages to ensure affordability for qualified students, with some even covering the entire cost for low-income families. 

College tuition has surged by 5.6% a year, on average, since 1983, significantly outpacing other household expenses, a recent study by J.P. Morgan Asset Management found.

For the 2024-25 school year, tuition and fees plus room and board for a four-year private college averaged $58,600, up from $56,390 a year earlier. At four-year, in-state public colleges, it was $24,920, up from $24,080, according to the College Board.

Despite the rising costs, financial aid has not kept pace: Families now shoulder 48% of college expenses with their income and investments, up from 38% a decade ago, J.P. Morgan Asset Management also found.

The new, simplified Free Application for Federal Student Aid form, which first launched in 2023, was meant to improve access by expanding Pell Grant eligibility to provide more financial support to low- and middle-income families.

But even Pell Grants have not kept up with the rising cost of a four-year degree. Currently, the maximum Pell Grant award is $7,395, after notching a $500 increase in the 2023-34 academic year.

“Aid continues to not be enough and that’s the reality,” said Tricia Scarlata, head of education savings at J.P. Morgan Asset Management.

Taking on too much debt was also the No. 1 worry among college-bound students, according to a recent survey by The Princeton Review.

More from Personal Finance:
How to maximize your college financial aid offer
College hopefuls have a new ultimate dream school
$2.7 billion Pell Grant shortfall poses a threat for college aid

Top colleges expand financial aid awards

This also comes amid President Donald Trump’s plans to dismantle the U.S. Department of Education and transfer the country’s $1.6 trillion student loan portfolio to the Small Business Administration.

“While the federal student loan program is in a state of flux, a lot of students are getting money directly from colleges,” said Eric Greenberg, president of Greenberg Educational Group, a New York-based consulting firm.

Education as a state responsibility: Breaking down President Trump's executive order

To bridge the affordability gap, some of the nation’s top institutions are boosting their financial aid awards to attract top students wary of sky-high college tab.

“There’s a trend of colleges with money using it as opposed to sitting on it,” Greenberg said.

Harvard University was the latest school to announce that it will be tuition free for undergraduates with family incomes of up to $200,000 beginning in the 2025-26 academic year. 

Nearly two dozen more schools have also introduced “no-loan” policies, which means student loans are eliminated altogether from their financial aid packages.

Acceptance rates hit all-time lows

Schools with the financial wherewithal to expand their no-loan aid programs are giving students a tremendous benefit, Scarlata said. “I think it’s wonderful — you still have to get into Harvard though.”

Coming out of the pandemic, highly selective colleges and universities experienced a record-breaking increase in applications, according to a report by the Common Application.

Now the acceptance rates at Ivy League schools are near rock bottom. Harvard’s acceptance rate is just under 4%, down from more than 10% two decades ago; at Princeton and Yale, it’s about 5%, down from 12% and 10%, respectively.

“The arms race for financial aid is setting up an extreme crescendo for college admissions,” said Jamie Beaton, co-founder and CEO of Crimson Education, a college consulting firm. 

More generous aid packages and tuition-free policies remove the most significant financial barrier to higher education and attract even more applicants, he said — at schools that were already among the most difficult to get into.

“There’s a massive incentive to try to gain admission to top schools,” Beaton said. “The acceptance rate has halved. And it likely will again.”

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Your last chance to claim an IRS stimulus check is approaching

Published

on

Douglas Sacha | Moment | Getty Images

If you still haven’t filed your 2021 tax return and never received a pandemic-era IRS stimulus check, the deadline is April 15 because there’s a three-year window to claim refunds, according to the agency.

Filers who never got the 2021 stimulus payment of up to $1,400 could claim the recovery rebate credit on that year’s return.  

“If you didn’t get the stimulus, you’re running out of time,” said Syracuse University law professor Robert Nassau, director of the school’s low-income tax clinic. 

More from Personal Finance:
How to file for a free tax extension in minutes before the deadline
Amid tariff turmoil, ‘timing the market doesn’t work, expert says
You can still lower your 2024 tax bill or boost your refund

The IRS in December announced plans to automatically send “special payments” of up to $1,400 to 1 million taxpayers who didn’t claim the 2021 recovery rebate credit on tax returns for that year.  

The agency said most payments were expected to arrive via direct deposit or paper check by late January 2025, based on the taxpayer’s 2023 tax return information.

In order to see if the IRS issued a stimulus payment, you can create an online account and view “tax records” under the “records and status” toolbar. 

“That’s the best place to look,” said Tommy Lucas, a certified financial planner and enrolled agent at Moisand Fitzgerald Tamayo in Orlando, Florida.

Your IRS online account also shows if you filed a 2021 return, Lucas said. 

If you don’t submit your 2021 filing by April 15, you could also miss other tax breaks, such as the earned income tax credit, which can trigger a refund even without taxes owed, according to the IRS.  

Currently, there are more than $1 billion in unclaimed refunds for tax year 2021, the IRS estimated in early March. That represents more than 1.1 million taxpayers and a median unpaid refund of $781. These figures don’t include applicable credits, including the recovery rebate credit.

Tax season is a prime time for scams: Here’s how to protect yourself

You need ‘proof’ of filing by the deadline

While there are several free options for tax returns this season, some may not offer electronic filing for 2021 returns, Nassau warned. 

If you’re forced to mail your 2021 return, you should send the filing via certified mail for “proof” you sent it by the April 15 deadline, he said. 

“I’ve had situations where the IRS gets something after the filing [due] date, and they just reflexively say it’s too late,” Nassau said. “Spend the $5 and send it certified.”

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Disability advocates sue Social Security and DOGE to stop service cuts

Published

on

A Social Security Administration (SSA) office in Washington, DC, March 26, 2025. 

Saul Loeb | Afp | Getty Images

A group of disability advocates filed a federal lawsuit against the Social Security Administration and the so-called Department of Government Efficiency on Wednesday aimed at stopping cuts to the agency’s services.

Recent changes at the Social Security Administration under DOGE — including staff reductions, the elimination of certain offices and new requirements to seek in-person services — have made it more difficult for individuals with disabilities and older adults to access benefits, the lawsuit argues.

The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

The plaintiffs include the National Federation of the Blind, the American Association of People with Disabilities, Deaf Equality, the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, the Massachusetts Senior Action Council and individual beneficiaries.

“The defendants’ actions are an unprecedented and unconstitutional assault on Social Security benefits, concealed beneath the hollow pretense of bureaucratic ‘reform,'” the complaint states.

In nine weeks, the new administration has “upended” the agency with “sweeping and destabilizing policy changes,” the plaintiffs claim, that have shifted agency functions to local offices while slashing telephone services.

More from Personal Finance:
Trump administration loses appeal of DOGE Social Security restraining order
Social Security changes may impact service, benefit payments
Trump pick to lead Social Security faces questions on DOGE

“The result is a systematic dismantling of SSA’s core functions, leaving millions of beneficiaries without the essential benefits they are legally entitled to,” the lawsuit complaint states.

The “mass restructuring” of the agency is unlawful and violates the Rehabilitation Act and the Administrative Procedure Act, the lawsuit argues. The changes also violate multiple constitutional provisions, including the First Amendment right to petition the government for redress of grievances, according to the plaintiffs.

With 1.1 million disability claims pending, the recent actions could also be life threatening to individuals who are dying or going bankrupt while waiting for decisions, they allege.

The Social Security Administration did not respond to CNBC’s request for comment.

“President Trump has made it clear he is committed to making the federal government more efficient,” White House spokesperson Liz Huston said in an email statement. “He has the authority to manage agency restructuring and workforce reductions, and the administration’s actions are fully compliant with the law.”

Lawsuit alleges reform is ‘administrative vandalism’

People hold signs during a protest against cuts made by U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration to the Social Security Administration, in White Plains, New York, U.S., March 22, 2025. 

Nathan Layne | Reuters

The Social Security Administration sends monthly checks to around 73 million Social Security and Supplemental Security Income beneficiaries.

DOGE, which is not an official government entity, has been tasked with cutting “waste, fraud and abuse” within the federal government. President Donald Trump issued an executive order creating DOGE on Jan. 20, the same day he was inaugurated.

Since then, the Social Security Administration has cut 7,000 employee positions and closed the Office of Civil Rights and Equal Opportunity and the Office of Transformation. The Office of Civil Rights and Equal Opportunity handled the agency’s equal employment opportunity and civil rights programs. The Office of Transformation was responsible for coordinating customer service-related initiatives like adding the ability to use digital signatures and electronic documents.

The Social Security Administration has also changed its identity proofing policies for claiming benefits and changing direct deposit information that is expected to require more individuals to visit the agency’s offices in person.

The agency has updated its policy, allowing individuals applying for Social Security Disability Insurance, Medicare, or Supplemental Security Income who cannot use a personal my Social Security account to complete their claim entirely over the telephone, starting April 14. 

The reforms amount to the dismantling of “core functions of SSA, abandoning millions of Americans to poverty and indignity,” according to the plaintiffs’ complaint.

“What the defendants frame as ‘reform’ is, in truth, administrative vandalism,” the lawsuit states.

Beneficiaries face long waits, overpayment issues

The plaintiffs include seven individuals whose experiences, including long customer service waits and, in some cases, demands to repay large sums to the Social Security Administration, are detailed in the complaint.

One plaintiff, Treva Olivero, who has been legally blind since birth, was informed in March 2024 that she had been overpaid Social Security disability insurance benefits for five or six years, prompting the agency to demand she repay more than $100,000, according to the complaint.

Olivero’s Medicaid coverage was also terminated soon after, which left her without income and health coverage. She has since been in an “ongoing struggle” to have her disability benefits reinstated, while also facing almost $80,000 in medical debt, according to the complaint.

Fiserv CEO on the nomination to Social Security Commisioner role

Another plaintiff, Merry Schoch, who received Social Security disability insurance for many years, returned to work to help pay for large medical bills after she was hit by a waste management truck in 2022. She reported her income to the Social Security Administration, and the agency made no changes to her benefit payments, according to the complaint.

Two years later, Schoch stopped working and reported her unemployment to the Social Security Administration. In August 2024, the agency then terminated her benefits and informed Schoch that she owed $30,000 for the disability benefit payments she received while working full time, according to the complaint.

Last September, Schoch was informed she could reapply for benefits. However, she has since struggled to get in touch with the agency over the phone, online and in person. 

Both Olivero and Schoch are members of the National Federation of the Blind, which is also a plaintiff.

The plaintiffs want the court to reverse the Social Security Administration’s recent reforms, including staff reductions, closures of certain offices and policies requiring in-person appointments.

Continue Reading

Trending