Connect with us

Accounting

9 out 10 made at least one ransomware payment last year

Published

on

Ransomware attacks have risen dramatically in just over a year, which has led to the vast majority of IT decision-makers reporting they’ve made at least one payment in the same timeframe.

These were among the findings of cybersecurity solutions company ExtraHop, which found that 95% of people who provide input into their company’s IT decisions reported experiencing at least one ransomware incident last year. The average number of incidents, which include both successful and non-successful ransomware attempts, was eight. The data indicates that organizations are increasingly losing ground against ransomware; while 9% said they experienced no incidents in 2022, last year that proportion shrank to 5%. ExtraHop said that, in the most recent survey, 58% of organizations experienced six or more incidents in 2023, up 32% year over year.

Further, people are actually paying these ransoms more often. ExtraHop said 91% of organizations paid at least one ransom last year, and 75% of respondents said they paid more than half the time. The number of organizations never having paid a ransom has significantly decreased — in the 2022 survey results, 28% of respondents never paid the ransom, compared to 17% in 2023 and 9% in 2024.

ransomware-five.jpg

“We suspect more organizations are paying ransoms because they can’t afford not to pay. This could be due to a variety of factors. For one, they may lack the business and operational resilience to weather a ransomware attack. So they pay the ransom out of desperation or necessity, believing that paying the ransom provides them with the quickest path back to restored business operations. And when people’s health or lives are at stake, some organizations have no choice but to pay,” said the report, though it noted that paying the ransom doesn’t guarantee an organization will get its data back, and that other research shows that organizations that have fallen victim to a ransomware attack are six times more likely to be targeted again over the next three months.

The most common payment amount, taking up 41.6% of ransoms, was somewhere between $500,000 and $1 million.

This is part of the overall trend of growing cybercrime costs. A February study from Statista said that in 2024 alone the global cost of cybercrime is expected to be $9.22 trillion — an eye-watering sum that is roughly equal to the GDP of Japan and Germany combined. By 2028, costs are estimated to rise even further to $13.82 trillion, just four trillion short of China’s entire GDP. This cost included stolen money, damage and destruction of data, lost productivity, theft of intellectual property, theft of personal or financial data, post-attack disruption to the ordinary course of business, restoration and deletion of hacked data and systems, and reputational harm.

Putting things in private sector terms, the estimate cybercrime toll in 2024 is about as big as the total market caps of Microsoft, Apple, Google and NVIDIA combined — or about 19 times the total value of Walmart.

Costs like this include ransomware, yes, but other kinds of cybercrime as well, like identity theft, which tends to be driven by data breaches. These, too, are on the rise according to cybersecurity solutions provider Surfshark, with data breaches having grown by 434.9% from just Q3 to Q4 of 2023. In the third quarter of 2023, 627 accounts were being breached every minute. In the fourth quarter, however, 3,353 accounts were leaked every 60 seconds. The U.S. experienced about 90 million breaches, more than any other country; China was a distant second, at about 70 million. However, when looking at things in terms of growth, the data shows that the central Asian nation of Kyrgyzstan seems to be under some sort of cyber crime wave, as breaches have increased 19,240% over the course of a year.

Regardless, numbers like these indicate that cybercrime is, unfortunately, a booming business.

“Some still believe a typical hacker is just a guy wearing a hoodie in a dark room. But that isn’t true anymore. Cybercrime has evolved into a professionalized global enterprise with skilled hackers, nation-state backed groups, and organized cybercrime rings working in tandem,” said Carlos Salas, a cybersecurity expert at virtual private network provider NordLayer.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending