Connect with us

Accounting

PCAOB sanctions Raines & Fischer for deceiving inspection staff

Published

on

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board today announced settled disciplinary orders sanctioning Raines & Fischer and three of its partners — William Fischer, Brian Uhlman and Steven Sarrel — for attempting to deceive PCAOB inspection staff and other violations.

Firm personnel improperly created and modified workpapers after document completion dates and in anticipation of PCAOB inspections in 2020 and 2022, violating PCAOB Rule 4006, Duty to Cooperate with Inspectors, and AS 1215, Audit Documentation. The personnel concealed the altered workpapers before they were provided to inspectors, taking steps such as changing computer clocks and printing documents to PDF. 

“Attempting to deceive the PCAOB’s inspection staff undermines investor protection,” PCAOB Chair Erica Williams said in a statement. “To protect investors and safeguard the integrity of the inspection process, the PCAOB will continue to pursue disciplinary action against firms and individuals that fail to cooperate with inspections.”

PCAOB logo - office - NEW 2022

Sarrel and Uhlman also violated Rule 4006. Sarrel was responsible for the alteration of workpapers prior to the 2020 inspection of a broker-dealer engagement for which he was engagement partner. Uhlman was responsible for the alteration of workpapers prior to the 2022 inspection of two broker-dealer engagements for which he was engagement partner. Neither partners informed the inspectors of the alterations, despite participating in meetings with PCAOB staff during the inspections.

Fischer was the firm’s managing partner and in charge of its audit department and quality control during this period. He took no action, despite being aware in both instances of the alterations, and failed to prevent the altered workpapers from being provided to PCAOB staff.

The PCAOB found that Raines & Fischer’s quality control system was deficient. The firm also violated documentation standards by failing to assemble for retention complete and final sets of workpapers for four broker-dealer engagements in addition to the three subject to inspection. The firm also repeatedly violated PCAOB Rule 2201 by falling to timely file its Form 2 for four consecutive years.

Uhlman additionally failed to comply with audit and attestation standards related to the audit and examination of carrying a broker-dealer. During that engagement, he failed to test key internal controls over compliance and supplemental information included in the schedules supporting the broker-dealer’s financial statements.

Fischer also violated AS 1220, Engagement Quality Review, by falling to perform adequate engagement quality reviews for seven broker-dealer engagements. He also violated PCAOB Rule 3502, Responsibility Not to Knowingly or Recklessly Contribute to Violations, by contributing to the firm’s noncooperation for both inspections and its violations of rules and standards.

“These respondents were responsible for a host of audit and attestation deficiencies and compounded those violations with their attempts to conceal the shortcomings in their work from the PCAOB’s inspectors. That misconduct warrants the strong sanctions imposed in the orders issued by the Board today,” Robert Rice, director of the PCAOB’s Division of Enforcement and Investigations, said in a statement.

The sanction is the latest in a long line of increased enforcement efforts by the PCAOB, most recently including revoking a firm’s registration and barring its sole partner for audit quality and control failures on Tuesday. In November, it sanctioned five firms for reporting violations. In September, it settled sanctions against four firms for failing to make required communications with audit committees, as well as one firm for violating reporting requirements. The board previously sanctioned Baker Tilly, Grant Thornton Bharat, Mazars and SW Audit in February, as well as three firms in November 2023 and five firms in July 2023.

Without admitting or denying the findings, all four respondents consented to their respective orders:

  • Censure each respondent;
  • Permanently revoke the Firm’s registration;
  • Bar Uhlman from associating with a PCAOB-registered firm with a right to petition the Board to terminate the bar after five years (and requiring additional CPE requirements prior to petitioning);
  • Bar Fischer and Sarrel from associating with a registered firm with the right to petition to terminate the bars after three years; and,
  • Impose civil money penalties of $200,000 on the Firm, $125,000 on Uhlman, $75,000 on Fischer, and $65,000 on Sarrel.

Continue Reading

Accounting

The AICPA’s Mark Koziel: More upside than downside for accountants

Published

on

Mark Koziel speaking at 2025 Engage

Even as accountants worry about a host of pressing issues, there are strong reasons to be optimistic about the future of the profession, according to Mark Koziel the president and CEO of the American Institute of CPAs.

“We’ve had issues coming at us for decades, and in each and every instance we’ve tended to thrive,” he added.

As an example, he cited the long list of technological developments that were all supposed to take accountants’ jobs, from the desktop calculator and the personal computer, to Excel and blockchain — all of which ended up only helping to make accountants more productive.

“Every time, there’s a new development in technology, they want to put us out of business,” he joked.

And even in times of economic uncertainty, accountants have an edge: “Typically, we are the last to fall into a recession, and the first to come out of them, because as companies come out of a recession, they turn first to their CGMAs and their CPAs for help.”

With all that in mind, he noted that he wanted to change the title of his keynote from “Professional Issues Update” to “Professional Opportunities Update,” before diving into a wide-ranging discussion of the most important major trends and developments affecting accountants.

Among the areas he discussed were:

1. Changes at the IRS. The tax agency was able to make it through the spring filing season with service levels that were relatively consistent with previous years — but that may not be true in the fall, Koziel warned, as retirements and layoffs that were delayed to help the service make it through April 15 have gone into effect.

“In the heat of busy season this spring, there were all kinds of rumors and hearsay about what was happening at the agency, and we put out a press release just to members to say, ‘Please, stop reading the headlines. We talk to the IRS regularly, and as far as we can tell, service levels will be consistent with the past few years,’ and we were right. Members coming out of busy season said the same thing,” Koziel explained. “I don’t know that we can say that going into the fall busy season — the IRS has even fewer people than they had before.”

2. The fate of the PCAOB. As passed by the House of Representatives, the Trump administration’s “Big Beautiful Bill” includes a provision that would scrap the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and roll up its functions into the Securities and Exchange Commission.

“We are having a lot of discussion about what the SEC/PCAOB thing will look like,” Koziel said. “It is still being discussed as the bill goes into the Senate side. I’d say it’s pretty likely. I don’t care if the PCAOB stays or if what it does rolls up into the SEC — but what an incredible opportunity for us to have a say in how inspections are done, and so on. The SEC, too, would like to look at things differently.”

“The inspection rules were written 20 years ago, and when we talk about audit transformation, we need to make sure those inspections match up with what we’re doing,” he added. “This is an incredible opportunity to do that.”

3, Private equity. While many are concerned about how the influx of PE money into the profession will reshape accounting — and Koziel was adamant about making sure that it doesn’t compromise quality, particularly in audit — he said firms need to be able to find the model that works for them, and that PE can teach some valuable lessons.

“What can we learn from private equity?” he asked. “Partner accountability. As much as we’ve talked about it, our governance never really allowed for partner accountability to occur in firms. It’s very true in PE that there’s partner accountability.”

4, Tariffs: Almost all business leaders (90% in the second quarter of 2025, according to a recent AICPA survey) believe that tariffs are creating business plan uncertainty — which creates an opportunity for accountants to offer meaningful guidance to clients, as they have in many previous eras of uncertainty.

“This is like the Paycheck Protection Program at the beginning of COVID — we take complex things and make them simple,” Koziel said. “Let’s stay on top of this and communicate with our clients on a regular basis.”

5. Staffing: AICPA chair Lexy Kessler, who joined Koziel in his keynote, reported that undergraduate enrollments in accounting are up for the third quarter in a row, a welcome development after years of serious concern about the profession’s pipeline shortage.

“We’re seeing results, but we’re not done yet,” she warned. “We need to keep our foot on the gas.”

Increased compensation for younger accountants and an uncertain economic environment have helped with the boost, but that isn’t all, Kessler said: “There’s some shifting in the marketplace — accounting has job stability, pay is looking better, students are seeing people from the profession out in classrooms, and they’re saying, ‘I had no ideas that’s what accountants do.'”

“I encourage everyone to change the story they’re telling,” she told the audience. Talk about the impact you have, not all the work it takes to make that impact.”

Koziel added some valuable advice for firm leaders from his time working at a Buffalo-based CPA firm in the 1990s: “When I was in charge of recruiting, I’d ask our partners, ‘Is this firm the right place for your kids?’ And if it’s not, fix it.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Instead adds AI-driven tax reports

Published

on

Tax management platform Instead launched artificial intelligence-driven tax reports, harnessing AI to analyze full tax returns to glean tax strategies and missed opportunities.

The San Francisco-based company’s reports, which are designed for clarity and compliance, include:

  • Tax Return Analysis Report, which reveals tax-saving opportunities in tax returns for individuals (1040) and businesses (Schedule C, E, F, 1120, 1120S, 1065).
  • Tax Plan Report, which provides a real-time summary and action list of all tax strategies across all entities in a tax year and includes potential and actual savings, summaries for each tax strategy, and IRS and court case references.
  • Tax Strategy Reports for every tax strategy, with detailed calculations of deductions and credits, supporting documentation, and an actionable plan.

Instead users can collaborate with their tax professionals on the platform or search the Instead directory of firms that support the platform and offer tax planning and advisory services. 

Andrew Argue

Andrew Argue

“We are excited to bring our users the future of smart, effective decisions when it comes to filing taxes,” said Andrew Argue, co-founder of Instead, in a statement. “With Instead, users can easily uncover and implement tax strategies and opportunities that will save them money and have the transparent calculations to support a tax return. And this is just the beginning…we have some exciting things on our roadmap and look forward to sharing them very soon!”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Half of accountants expect firms to shrink headcount by 20%

Published

on

Fifty-two percent of accountants expect their firms to shrink in headcount by 20% in the next five years, according to a new report.

The Indiana CPA Society, in collaboration with CPA Crossings, released today a 2025 Workforce Transformation report. Paradoxically, while it found that most respondents anticipate their firms to reduce headcount, 75% said that their firms will need the same amount or more staff to meet future client demand. 

Sixty percent of respondents said that entry-level professionals are the role they anticipate needing fewer employees in the future due to automation. Nearly half as many responded saying experienced professionals (approximately 33%) and manager-level roles (approximately 25%). 

The report highlights the weaknesses of the pyramid-shaped practice structure that is the basis for most firm’s current talent management and workforce development systems. One challenge is the pyramid’s low retention design. 

“The pyramid practice structure was not designed to retain staff. It actually does the opposite. Upward mobility is statistically difficult to attain,” the report reads. “Firms have a lot of requirements for entry-level staff, but there is a lot less need for experienced staff. Firms eventually have a lot of entry-level professionals qualified to become experienced staff but only a few openings. It only gets more difficult as staff try to move from experienced staff to managers. For those who want to move from managers to owners, the wait could be 15 years or more — or maybe never.”

The report discussed the dwindling pipeline of incoming talent, saying, “Currently, there are not enough qualified staff to maintain a bottom layer that is wide enough,” and generational preferences, saying, “Gen Zers are looking for meaning and emotional connection. If they cannot find these connections in their work, it won’t take much for them to decide to move on.”

The final weakness of the pyramid model the report highlighted was advances in technology, particularly automation and artificial intelligence. 

“Advances in technology, especially with automation and artificial intelligence, could obliterate the work being done by the bottom of the pyramid,” the report reads. “This impact is beginning to be seen in accounting firms across the country as manual and time-consuming data entry and reconciliation tasks, once assigned to entry-level staff, are being automated. Firms are already seeing great benefits from this transfer, such as faster and more accurate data processing.”

The report suggests that firms take on a new practice structure that focuses on precision hiring, proactive retention, practical technology implementation, pricing expertise, practice area expansion or focus, and people acceleration. 

Continue Reading

Trending