Connect with us

Accounting

Big changes expected at SEC under new chair Paul Atkins

Published

on

The nominee for the next chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission, Paul Atkins, is likely to pursue a more deregulatory approach than the current SEC chair, Gary Gensler, according to SEC commissioner Mark Uyeda.

Speaking Monday at the AICPA & CIMA Conference on Current SEC and PCAOB Developments, Uyeda discussed Atkins after President-elect Trump announced his intention last week to nominate Atkins. As one of the Republican members of the Commission, he is favorably disposed to Atkins and worked for him at one time.

“This will be my fourth transition that we’ve had in administrations,” Uyeda said. “I was really excited about the President’s announcement last week of his intent to nominate Paul Atkins as our next chairman of the commission. I’m fortunate to have known Paul going back to when I was a state securities regulator out in California and he was SEC commissioner. Out of that one meeting, it was enough for where Paul was kind enough to offer me a job, and that’s what brought me from Sacramento to Washington in 2006, where I joined his staff.”

uyeda-mark-sec.png

SEC commissioner Mark Uyeda, speaking at the AICPA & CIMA Conference on Current SEC and PCAOB Developments

Gensler has announced he will be stepping down on January 20, the day of Trump’s inauguration. Uyeda expects there to be an acting commissioner for a period of time before Atkins is conformed as chair. He would like to see Atkins to put less reliance on staff guidance like Staff Accounting Bulletin 121, which expresses the views of the SEC staff regarding the accounting for obligations to safeguard crypto-assets an entity holds for platform users. Uyeda would like to see SAB 121 repealed by Atkins or the acting commissioner.

“We’ve had a lot of activity in the last several years now not only at the SEC but at the PCAOB,” said Uyeda. “Some of it has been staff driven. Some of it has been by the commission. Take SAB 121, which has gotten a huge amount of criticism. My biggest concern about when you do things through a Staff Accounting Bulletin is there’s no notice and comment process. It just gets issued. There is no Commission vote on it either. It is a statement of the staff. I think one of the things that needs to occur is, given the huge impact that SAB 121 has had is that needs to be withdrawn and then replaced instead with a more thoughtful process. Perhaps it goes over to FASB to do what they do so well, which is to have the consultation and say, ‘Look, are we thinking through this, right? What is our basis for this? What are the trade-offs? Let’s collect more data and evidence as to how investors would view these disclosures.'”

Uyeda also objected to the the 1% materiality threshold under the SEC’s proposed climate-related disclosure rule, which is currently on hold.

He was asked by Dennis McGowan, vice president of professional practice at the Center for Audit Quality, about his expectations for the Commission under Atkins’ leadership.

“First is a return to capital formation,” said Uyeda. “That is one of the core pillars of our mission, how we facilitate capital formation, and we have made it much more burdensome to be a public company with very little scaling between the large cap issuers and the smaller reporting companies. We want an environment where going public is a viable option, because if you don’t have the opportunity to go public, well, why would someone want to invest in the first place? And even with some of the IPOs today, I get more concerned that it’s not viewed as a true capital-raising opportunity, but rather more of a liquidity event for the early stage venture capital and insiders.”

He also hopes to see a more friendly stance toward cryptocurrency. “We have been essentially sending crypto policy through enforcement the last four years,” said Uyeda. “There are a number of things that we can be doing in this area, not only on the accounting side, but with the disclosures that are required, how you think about this in the context of custody, with respect to auditing crypto reserves. There is so much we can be doing in these areas which I would expect the SEC to try to put renewed focus on.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

IRS updates procedures list for accounting method changes

Published

on

Sign in front of IRS building in Washington, D.C.

Pamela Au/wingedwolf – Fotolia

The Internal Revenue Service has released Rev. Proc. 2025-23, which updates the list of automatic procedures for taxpayer-initiated requests for changes in methods of accounting.

 An “automatic change” is a change in method of accounting for which the taxpayer is eligible under Section 5.01(1) of Rev. Proc. 2015-13 for requesting the IRS commissioner’s consent for the requested year of change.

The 430-plus pages of changes cover: gross income, commodity credit loans, trade or business expenses, bad debts, interest expense and amortizable bond premium, depreciation or amortization, research or experimental expenditures, elective expensing provisions, computer software expenditures, start-up expenditures and organizational fees, capital expenditures, and uniform capitalization methods.

Changes also cover losses, expenses and interest in transactions between related taxpayers; deferred compensation; cash-to-accrual methods of accounting; taxable years of inclusion; discounted obligations; prepaid subscription income; long-term contracts; taxable years incurred; rent; inventories (including LIFO inventories); mark-to-market accounting; bank reserves for bad debts; insurance companies; discounted unpaid losses; and REMICs.

Examples are given for many of the changes. 

Rev. Proc. 2025-23 was slated to be in IRB 2025-24 dated June 9.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Pricing lessons: What the winners do differently

Published

on

Many CPA firms struggle to raise pricing and remove problematic clients. It may get brushed off as “no big deal,” but ignoring pricing and client mix harms the firm in significant ways: less revenue equals less growth and lower ability to pay staff well, lower profits for partners or capital to reinvest in the business, and unwieldy clients who burn out staff and partners alike for a paltry financial return.

After helping many firms in this area during strategic planning and retreats, here’s what I’ve seen the successful ones do.

Don’t shock the system

When we talk about increasing prices, many partners imagine an abrupt, across-the-board 20% fee increase and clients pouring out the doors as a result. I’ve seen firms be very successful using an incremental and client-specific approach. Segment your client list by service line and total fees. Consider the 80/20 rule: how many clients do you need to generate 80% of your revenue? It’s likely not as many as you think. Then have each partner recommend appropriate pricing adjustments for each client. If there’s a big gap between current fees and market rates, it may take a few years to get there (unless you’re OK with the possibility of losing them, which sometimes is advisable). Some clients may need only a 5% bump to get to market; some may need 150%. Do what makes sense for each client and total firm revenue.

Communication is the key

Often, partners relax once they grasp the reasons why pricing or client acceptance criteria need to improve: staffing crisis, wage increases, tech costs going up, inflation, undercharged for years, not enough hours to serve all the clients well, etc. Pull a Wall Street Journal article on any given day about the accounting industry, and you’ll have another reason your firm needs to evolve. Then explain that to your clients with empathy and sincerity. Almost all of them will understand.

You can keep some personal favorite clients

Many partners get skittish about changing pricing and client acceptance because they have a stable of long-time clients who have been way under market for years but have strong sentimental value. Whoever they are for you, you are allowed to keep them on one condition: accept that they may not be 20% (or some other meaningful amount) of your total book of business. I have great hope for the accounting industry because of the great care I’ve seen partners take of their clients. We don’t want to diminish that. We do want to run a sustainable business.

You’re worth it and so is your staff

Firms have reported gleeful results when they let their staff give input on clients. The staff know who the ungrateful, late, messy clients are. They also know the appreciative, clean, fun-to-work-with clients. It’s uncanny how some of the lowest-profit clients often fall into the first category. Economics aside, when you protect your staff from problematic clients through higher pricing (enough budget to do quality work) or firing clients who can’t work well with the firm, you send a strong message that you care. The same goes for partners. Firms that have a lot of A and B clients and aren’t afraid to shape up or ship out their lowest clients seem to have much higher enjoyment and peace of mind at work. Your team works hard for your clients, and the reciprocity of fair fees and behavior from them is only right.

If you want to join the firms that are finding success in fees and client mix, here are four ways to start:

1. Grade your clients: Rank them A through F, based on criteria like total fees, realization, growth potential, and how fun or hard it is to work with them.

2. Segment the list: Analyze your now graded client list. Who needs more attention? Who needs to get off the bus?

3. Make an action plan that is specific to each client: Granularity is your friend. By partner, by client, make next steps to improve fees or client behavior to meet current standards.

4. Keep meeting about it regularly: This is the most important step! Just making a list doesn’t count. Partners who regularly meet and act on their lists make big progress.

I know the journey can be uncomfortable, but firms on the other side prove it’s well worth it. Good luck!

Continue Reading

Accounting

Senate plans to deliver Trump-backed tip, overtime tax breaks

Published

on

Senate Majority Leader John Thune said Republicans in his chamber expect to deliver on President Donald Trump’s campaign promises to exempt tips, overtime pay, Social Security and auto loan interest from taxes.

“I think that the president as you know campaigned hard on no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, Social Security, interest on car loans — those were all things that are priorities for the administration and they were addressed in the House bill and I expect they will be in the Senate as well,” Thune told reporters.

The House bill, in lieu of a direct tax cut on Social Security, which would violate Senate budget rules, provided a $4,000 bonus deduction for per taxpayer age 65 and older with incomes up to $75,000 for individuals and $150,000 for married couples. The House provisions on tips, overtime, the elderly and car loans would all expire in 2029.

Thune’s comments come as Senate negotiators tweak the House-passed version of Trump’s giant tax package ahead of a self-imposed deadline to pass the measure before the July 4th holiday, with Thune saying Tuesday the Senate is very close to finishing its draft of the legislation. 

Earlier Tuesday, House Ways and Means Chair Jason Smith, whose committee is responsible for tax legislation, warned that any Senate version of the tax package that doesn’t include the tips and overtime breaks would be “dead on arrival” in the House.

Several Republican senators including Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina have expressed skepticism about the cost and economic wisdom of including the tax exemptions on tips and overtime pay. Senators have instead called for funds to be used to make temporary business tax breaks permanent.

Such a change would be a “no go” for House Republicans, Smith told Bloomberg TV. 

The Senate is now considering the massive tax and spending package after it passed the House by a single vote last month. If the Senate changes the legislation, the House must approve the revised version.

Senator Josh Hawley, a populist Republican, said Trump told him Tuesday morning that tax-exempt tips and overtime, as well as a tax cut for the elderly, are the most important provisions in the bill. 

House Speaker Mike Johnson also has urged senators not to remove or scale back provisions in the legislation that exempt tips and overtime pay from income tax through 2028.

“This is an important promise for us to keep,” Johnson told reporters earlier Tuesday.

Continue Reading

Trending