Connect with us

Accounting

Does the SALT tax deduction cap penalize women?

Published

2 years ago

on

A key provision in next year’s looming debate over the possible extension of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act highlights one of many examples of gender bias in taxes, according to experts.

The current SALT deduction limit of $10,000 for state and local taxes saves taxpayers between $79 billion and $118 billion per year in lower expenditures. It will play a pivotal role in the discussion about TCJA provisions set to expire after 2025 because it’s one of only a handful that lower the price of extensions projected to cost $4.6 trillion. 

Critics have referred to the limitation as a “marriage penalty” and called for raising that ceiling or eliminating it. Others reject that idea on the grounds that the deduction primarily benefits wealthy households in high-tax states such as New York and California.

READ MORE: The 12 firms with the largest percentage of women advisors

One of the “presumably unintended further consequences” of the limit has been discouraging the so-called second earners in a couple, who are often women, from working due to the higher potential taxes on combined income and restrictions on the deduction for state and local duties, said Jennifer Bird-Pollan, a law professor and the Alan S. Schenk Chair in Taxation at Wayne State University. She gave a presentation on the gender implications of the curb on the deduction this past fall at the American Tax Policy Institute‘s Gender and Tax Symposium. 

While the tax policy isn’t likely motivating people’s decisions about whether to get married or “dramatically impacting” a spouse’s decision not to get a job as the lower-earning member of the household, the restraint on the deduction amounts to “a further thumb on the scale in the same direction, without any conversation on whether it was appropriate or not,” Bird-Pollan said. The taxes enter the equation alongside other potential costs such as childcare, commuting, dry cleaning and food preparation, she pointed out in an interview.

“Those are all costs you incur if you decide to work outside the home. The salary has to be high enough so that you’re not actually worse off,” Bird-Pollan said. “The tax bill is just going to be that much higher if they’re not allowed to deduct their state taxes.”

Other areas reflecting gender bias in taxes play out in the form of “tampon taxes,” classifying menstrual products as luxury items subject to sales duties; differences in the value of Social Security benefits for women, who tend to be paid lower wages and live longer than men, as well as the rules for getting the maximum spousal payments; the treatment of paid surrogacy; and the disparate impacts of the child tax credit, the earned income tax credit and savings from capital gains, according to Bridget Crawford, the organizer of the conference as the vice president of the institute and a law professor at Pace University’s Elisabeth Haub School of Law.

READ MORE: 10 big trends in SALT for 2024 

The conference in Washington, D.C., drew about 110 attendees in person and virtually among academics, policy experts and government officials, she noted in an interview. It followed the institute’s conference two years ago about racial disparities in taxes and came before another one this March on tax law, the environment and climate change. The organization welcomes more participation and collaboration from across the tax and wealth professions, Crawford said.

“The tax system is a lens for analyzing our society’s values and choices,” she said. “It’s an excellent starting point for very important conversations that we have had and need to have and will continue to have around all sorts of justice-related concerns.”

In terms of the cap on the deduction for state and local taxes, policymakers could alter the existing policy by imposing the limit on property duties alone or simply boosting the allowable amount for married couples, Bird-Pollan said. Tweaking it or getting rid of it will likely prove difficult, though. 

Democrats don’t often push for “tax cuts for higher-income people,” and they’re in the minority in the House and the Senate anyways, she pointed out. President Donald Trump and his Republican party have the trifecta in Congress and the White House, but they will be facing a complicated challenge from the budgetary effect of extending the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

“It gave them some revenue, and it only hurt people in blue states, because those are the states that have those taxes,” Bird-Pollan said. “The Democrats have a little bit of a hard time arguing this. If it changes, it’s going to be because of Republican legislators from high-tax jurisdictions.”

READ MORE: Why is the pay gap for women financial advisors so wide?

She credited Crawford’s work with encouraging many states to end sales taxes on feminine hygiene products and noted that financial advisors and tax professionals can read forthcoming research from the conference in legal journals. Exploring the gender bias in taxes can often begin “when we acknowledge things like women are still paid less than men,” Bird-Pollan said.

“If that’s true, then let’s think a little bit about whether that’s a fact that we’re comfortable with or whether particular changes are making that worse or easing that a little bit,” she said. “We just need to think about where these costs fall and whether, as a society, we’re comfortable with where they fall and whether we’d like to see that changed.”

Related Topics:
Continue Reading

Accounting

SEC’s Semiannual Reporting Proposal Faces Investor Pushback: What CFOs Need to Know

Published

1 week ago

on

August 25, 2026

By

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

A proposal from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to potentially shift some public companies away from quarterly financial reporting toward a semiannual model is drawing significant pushback from investors, even as it continues moving through the regulatory process. The debate has direct implications for corporate finance teams, auditors, and the broader transparency of U.S. capital markets.

What the SEC Proposed

According to a summary published by accounting advisory firm Cohen & Co., the SEC issued a proposed rule on May 19, 2026, aimed at simplifying financial reporting requirements for many U.S. public companies. The proposal would potentially reduce the frequency of certain mandatory disclosures from quarterly to semiannual, a structural change that has not been made to core U.S. reporting requirements in decades.

The proposal follows an extended debate within U.S. policy circles, with proponents arguing that reduced reporting frequency could lower compliance costs and free up management time for longer-term strategic planning rather than quarter-to-quarter results management.

Why Investors Are Pushing Back

Comment letters submitted in response to the proposal have been extensive, and according to Cohen & Co.’s review of the public record, investors “appear to be largely opposed” to the shift, viewing frequent interim reporting as a core benefit of U.S. capital markets relative to other jurisdictions.

Accounting and law firms have taken a more measured position, generally urging any changes to remain aligned with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), whose existing disclosure requirements and guidance are built around a quarterly reporting cadence. A shift to semiannual reporting without corresponding changes to FASB guidance could create friction between SEC filing requirements and GAAP-based disclosure expectations.

Lessons From the U.K. Experience

The debate is not without precedent. The United Kingdom moved away from mandatory quarterly reporting for listed companies in 2014, returning to a semiannual disclosure requirement. According to Cohen & Co.’s analysis, that experience offers a cautionary data point: there was no measurable increase in capital expenditure or R&D investment following the change, while analyst coverage of affected companies declined as reliable interim information became less available — a particular risk for smaller and newly public companies that rely on analyst coverage to maintain investor visibility.

Practical Implications for Finance Teams

Beyond the debate over disclosure philosophy, the proposal carries practical complications. Many companies have debt covenants and credit agreements structured around quarterly financial delivery; a shift to semiannual reporting could require renegotiating those terms. Reduced reporting frequency would also extend the “window of market silence” between disclosures, a factor that governance and investor-relations teams would need to manage carefully to avoid information asymmetry.

Separately, and unrelated to the reporting-frequency debate, the SEC and FASB have continued finalizing more routine updates this year. New Accounting Standards Updates are taking effect for December 31, 2026, fiscal year-ends covering income tax disclosures, credit loss measurement, induced debt conversions, and stock compensation, according to Eide Bailly’s review of 2026 ASU activity. Additional guidance on paid-in-kind dividends and environmental credits is also on the near-term horizon.

What to Watch Next

The semiannual reporting proposal remains in the comment and review phase, and no final rule has been adopted as of this writing. Finance leaders should monitor the SEC’s regulatory agenda for further movement, while treating the current quarterly reporting requirement as the operative standard until any final rule is issued and an effective date is set.

Given the extent of investor opposition documented in the comment file, a full shift to mandatory semiannual reporting appears more likely to result in either a scaled-back compromise or continued study rather than swift adoption — though the SEC’s ultimate direction remains uncertain.

 

Continue Reading

Accounting

AI-Driven Automation and Continuous Accounting Frameworks

Published

3 weeks ago

on

August 15, 2026

By

The accounting profession is undergoing a fundamental structural transition as enterprise finance departments shift from periodic month-end closes toward automated continuous accounting models. By integrating specialized machine learning algorithms directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms, chief accounting officers are transforming financial reporting from a retrospective exercise into a real-time operational asset.

The Shift from Periodic Close to Continuous Financial Reporting
Traditional accounting workflows heavily relied on manual data reconciliation, spreadsheet calculations, and multi-week closing cycles at the end of each fiscal period. In contrast, continuous accounting frameworks utilize automated software agents to process, validate, and post transactional data in real time as business activities occur.

Automated bank reconciliation tools cross-reference incoming bank feeds, invoice records, and purchase orders automatically. By resolving transactional variances instantly throughout the month, corporate accounting teams eliminate the traditional workload spikes associated with quarterly and annual closes.

Machine Learning in Audit Trails and Anomaly Detection
Advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning tools are redefining internal audit and financial control environments. Automated systems analyze 100% of general ledger entries, identifying anomalous transactions, duplicate payments, and unauthorized journal entries in real time.

Rather than relying on random statistical sampling, corporate internal auditors can focus their attention on high-risk flags automatically surfaced by algorithmic monitoring platforms. This continuous risk assessment strengthens internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) and significantly reduces fraud risk.

Evolving Roles for Accounting Professionals
As routine data entry and manual reconciliation tasks become fully automated, the skill set required for accounting professionals is shifting toward data analysis, system design, and strategic business advisory.
– Systems Governance: Accountants are increasingly responsible for monitoring algorithmic accuracy and managing data integration pipelines.
– Business Partnership: Finance professionals leverage real-time financial dashboards to advise operational leaders on margin management and working capital allocation.
– Regulatory Compliance Management: Accounting teams utilize automated platforms to ensure compliance with dynamic tax codes and international accounting standards.

Core Implementation Recommendations
1. Deploy Automated Reconciliation Tools: Integrate continuous transaction processing modules into existing enterprise ERP architectures.
2. Establish Algorithmic Governance Controls: Implement strict internal testing protocols to ensure automated accounting rules comply with GAAP/IFRS standards.
3. Reskill Accounting Teams: Invest in training finance staff on data analytics, workflow automation, and predictive financial modeling.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

4 weeks ago

on

August 9, 2026

By

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Trending