Connect with us

Accounting

ADM shareholder calls for CEO to leave as probe drags on

Published

on

It’s been almost a year since Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. disclosed a probe into its accounting practices that wiped out $12 billion from one of the world’s largest agricultural commodities traders.

Now, a shareholder and former executive at a company owned by ADM is calling on Chief Executive Officer Juan Luciano to step down, citing the lack of transparency about exactly what happened and how it will be fixed.

In a social media post, Hartwig Fuchs said ADM didn’t do enough to reverse the share loss and that the Chicago-based company “doesn’t communicate any valuable statements.” Fuchs was board chairman at Toepfer International when ADM owned about 80% of the German trader (it now owns all of it). He was also CEO of Nordzucker AG, one of Europe’s largest sugar producers.

“If a highly paid CEO of such an important company cannot manage to provide clarity within a few months — i.e., fully clear up the scandal, communicate with full transparency about what went wrong and what will be done in the future, regain investors trust and, above all, protect the company from long-term damage — then he has to go,” Fuchs said.

A spokeswoman for ADM declined to comment.

ADM in January disclosed an investigation into accounting practices at its nutrition unit, a business that makes ingredients for humans and animals that Luciano was betting on as the future of ADM. Chief Financial Officer Vikram Luthar took the brunt of the blame, agreeing to resign.

But less than 10 months after the scandal that sent shares plunging by a record 24%, the commodity-trading giant was still struggling to sort out its accounting. ADM in early November disclosed it found more errors in the way it reported transactions between its business units and that it would need to restate some of its results.

It canceled its quarterly earnings call with analysts only 14 hours before it was due to start, a move that sent shares plunging another 12%. The stock is down about 30% this year, heading for the biggest decline since the 2008 financial crisis.

“The market is reacting increasingly negatively to ADM,” Fuchs, who criticized himself for buying more of the company’s stock, said on LinkedIn on Sunday. “From a chart perspective, the share price has suffered significantly and there is obviously no effort on ADM’s part to stop or even reverse this trend.”

ADM has replaced its CFO, appointed AT&T Inc.’s top lawyer to its board and implemented new controls as part of efforts to restore credibility. It has corrected sales between units that either were previously recorded at prices that didn’t approximate the market, or included transactions that were improperly classified. So-called intersegment sales for 2023 had been previously overestimated by $1.28 billion.

This isn’t the first scandal involving ADM. Back in the 1990s, it was implicated in a price-fixing conspiracy that later became the basis of the 2009 film “The Informant!” starring Matt Damon. ADM pleaded guilty to the price-fixing charges in 1996. The company has also responded to a lawsuit over allegations of price manipulation involving its trading of ethanol. 

ADM has spent billions on its nutrition bet since 2014, when it made its biggest-ever acquisition — the $3 billion buyout of European natural ingredient maker Wild Flavors GmbH. It also spent about $1.8 billion to buy animal feed maker Neovia from France’s InVivo Group in 2019. But profits have failed to live up to initial expectations due to weakening demand, including for plant-based food.

“The ADM company, the people who work at ADM — and they are good people — they must be protected and these negative reports must be stopped,” said Fuchs. “The share price must rise again to levels that properly reflect the company’s true earning power (which, admittingly, would make me smile again).”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

FASB clarifies date of income statement expense disaggregation standard

Published

on

The Financial Accounting Standards Board released an accounting standards update Monday to clarify the interim effective date of its recently issued standard on disaggregation of income statement expenses for public companies whose fiscal year-end doesn’t coincide with the end of the calendar year.

FASB said public business entities are required to adopt the guidance in Update 2024-03 in annual reporting periods starting after Dec. 15, 2026, and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after Dec. 15, 2027. But early adoption of the new standard is permitted.

FASB released the standard on disaggregation of income statement expenses in November, requiring public companies to disclose, in their interim and annual reporting periods, more information about certain expenses in the notes to financial statements in response to  demand from investors for more detailed information. 

The update originally said that the amendments are effective for public business entities for annual reporting periods beginning after Dec. 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods beginning after Dec. 15, 2027. But after the update was issued, FASB was asked to clarify the initial effective date for entities that don’t have an annual reporting period ending on Dec. 31 (known as non-calendar year-end entities).

Because of how the effective date guidance was written, those companies could have concluded they would be required to initially adopt the disclosure requirements in an interim reporting period, as opposed to an annual reporting period. FASB’s intention was for all public business entities to initially adopt the disclosure requirements in the first annual reporting period starting after Dec. 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods starting after Dec. 15, 2027. It acknowledged there was some ambiguity about that intention in the original guidance, so it has issued the new update to clarify the effective date for non-calendar year-end businesses.

Continue Reading

Accounting

UHY merges in Tama, Budaj & Raab and Botz Deal

Published

on

UHY, a Top 50 Firm based in Farmington Hills, Michigan, is expanding its presence in Michigan and Missouri by combining with two firms: Tama, Budaj & Raab, P.C., also headquartered in Farmington Hills, and Botz Deal & Co. P.C., a firm with three St. Louis-based locations in St. Charles, St. Peters and Wentzville, effective Jan. 1, 2025.

Tama, Budaj & Raab dates back over 50 years. All of TBR’s professional and administrative team members will become part of UHY and continue in their current roles, relocating to UHY’s office in Farmington Hills.

Botz Deal was founded in 1969 and provides services to privately owned businesses and their owners, not-for-profit organizations, and governmental entities, as well as individual tax planning and preparation. All professional and administrative team members will become part of UHY and continue in their current roles.

“UHY is proud to welcome TBR and Botz Deal to our growing, forward-thinking firm,” said UHY U.S. CEO Steve McCarty, in a statement Monday. “These combinations exemplify our commitment to strategic growth—expanding within our established markets as well as breaking new ground in targeted regions across the nation.” 

Financial terms of the deals were not disclosed. UHY ranked No. 29 on Accounting Today‘s 2024 list of the Top 100 Firms, with $349.7 million in annual revenue. The firm now has over 40 offices and more than 1,800 team members and 150 partners.

Last  month,  UHY received private equity funding from Summit Partners, a Boston-based investment firm, helping fuel the mergers. Last January, UHY added Paresky Flitt & Company LLP, headquartered in Wayland, Massachusetts. In 2023, merged in Baird, Cotter & Bishop PC in Cadillac, and Traverse City, Michigan; and Ross, Langan & McKendree in McLean, Virginia, In 2022, it added Jansen Valk Thompson Reahm in Kalamazoo and Dowagiac, Michigan; LWBJ in Des Moines and Ames, Iowa; and TGM Group LLC in Salisbury, Maryland, and Stoy Malone in Towson, Maryland.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Art of Accounting: Make 2025 your best year ever

Published

on

Complimentary Access Pill

Enjoy complimentary access to top ideas and insights — selected by our editors.

Public accounting offers many opportunities for growth, and the proof of this is the rising revenues at most of the firms that submit their numbers in the many surveys. One thing common among those firms is their expanding array of services.

Managing an accounting practice is complicated and involves many functions that need to be carefully calibrated and integrated to achieve success. However, there is one immutable fact, and that is a desire of our clients to engage us for those services. Without that, nothing else matters. Excellence in every other facet of operating the accounting business will not matter. So, how can you grow so that 2025 is your best year ever? You need to offer more services to your current clients and then to new clients. 

Growth from existing clients is called organic growth. Growth from new clients is external and arises from marketing activities and client acquisition by purchase or merger. If you want to grow, you need growth from both organic and external sources. How much you want to grow and whether you want to grow has to be strategically determined, but a minimum decision has to be that some growth is needed.

Added sales of new services are more easily obtained from existing clients. There is no selling who you are, your reliability, or your willingness and ability to provide value in everything you do for your clients. Each of these need to be conveyed to new clients before you even get to the pitch of the services you will perform for them. 

So go after the easier sales first, i.e., to your existing clients. Here’s a way to get started:

  1. Identify potential needs of your top 20 business clients.
  2. Arrange those needs into services you presently offer, and
  3. Services you do not perform.
  4. Match the potential needs with this group of 20 clients with services you presently offer. 
  5. Contact five of those clients to obtain an engagement for at least one such service.
  6. Set a goal of initiating a new service for each of those five clients in the new year.
  7. If you are unsuccessful with your first five targeted clients, then expand the list until you succeed with five added engagements.
  8. You can try to introduce each of these 20 and even more clients with added services, but I think setting a goal of five added engagements is a good way to start.
  9. Expand your service offerings by resolving to learn and gain proficiency in at least one new service during the next year. 
  10. Get started by picking a needed service that you do not perform and use that for your personal growth along with your practice’s growth.

Overly active practitioners might judge my suggestions to be too placid, while many owners and partners who are content with leaving things as they are will judge me to be excessively aggressive. Either way, I do not see how anyone could lose by selling five large clients the services they need and learning a new one for themselves. I view this as a no-lose growth method.

Check out some ideas of added services described in a recent posting.

Make 2025 your best year ever by doing something new to make it your best year ever.

Contact me at [email protected] with your practice management questions or about engagements you might not be able to perform.

Continue Reading

Trending