Connect with us

Accounting

Audit firms urge SEC to reject PCAOB firm and engagement metrics and reporting standards

Published

on

Auditing firms are asking the Securities and Exchange Commission to reject the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s recently adopted standards on firm and engagement metrics and firm reporting

The PCAOB voted to adopt the standards in November after making some modifications to assuage several of the concerns raised during the comment process on the rules originally proposed last April. But for many firms, the changes didn’t go far enough.

“The rule introduces a new public oversight model to issuer audits that, in our opinion, has not been adequately studied and is based on metrics susceptible to misinterpretation and misuse that will be costly to produce,” said a comment letter from Ernst & Young.

“We continue to believe that the PCAOB has not sufficiently demonstrated how the metrics within the Release directly relate to or enhance audit quality, which should be the primary objective of any PCAOB rule or standard,” said a comment letter from KPMG. “In fact, our own internal analyses of years of internal and external inspection data indicate that many of the metrics that the PCAOB is proposing do not have a strong correlation to an engagement receiving an inspection comment.” 

The firm and engagement metrics standard would require firms to disclose more information about partner and manager involvement in audits; workload; training hours; audit and industry experience; retention of audit personnel; allocation of audit hours; and restatement history. The PCAOB made some changes to the original proposal, reducing the number of metric areas to eight from 11; refining the metrics to simplify and clarify the calculations; increasing the ability to provide optional narrative disclosure (from 500 to 1,000 characters); and changing the effective date.

“We appreciate the revisions the Board made in its final rules in response to comments received,” said a comment letter from Crowe.  “We remained concerned, however, that the PCAOB does not sufficiently articulate the benefits that are likely to result from this rulemaking, calling into question if the rules are necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors.  As such, we do not support the SEC’s approval of the final Firm and Engagement Metrics rules in their current form.”

Some firms objected to the hurried process behind the new standards. “The speed with which the final rule was approved suggests that sufficient due process was not undertaken, and we believe certain concerns raised by commenters, including tangible operational challenges, were not adequately addressed by the Board in the final rule,” said a comment letter from Grant Thornton. “For such reasons, we ask the SEC not to approve the final rule.” 

The firm reporting standard also underwent modifications from the original proposal in response to comments, reducing the fee disclosure requirements, as well as streamlining disclosures about firm governance and network arrangements. But again the modifications did not go far enough for slime firms. 

“While certain noteworthy improvements have been made to the final rules, concerns persist that elements of the reporting procedures will undermine the confidentiality framework in SOX,” said a comment letter from PwC. “Because alternative effective and less costly measures could be used to gather the information, these concerns should preclude the SEC from approving the final rules.”

Another Big Four firm, Deloitte, pointed out that the burden on smaller firms would be especially acute, particularly in tandem with other recently approved PCAOB standards. 

“These challenges will be compounded by the need for all PCAOB registered firms to simultaneously focus on numerous other new or revised PCAOB requirements currently being considered, or that were recently adopted,” said Deloitte in a comment letter. “We therefore encourage the SEC to consider the cumulative resources needed for firms to implement multiple new standards and other requirements in a short period of time when assessing the costs of the rules. The scope of the Firm Reporting Rules, combined with other PCAOB requirements, will be especially challenging to smaller firms, as the significant resource commitment necessary to implement systems and processes may be necessary even where only a small portion of those firms’ audit practices are subject to PCAOB oversight.”

The American Institute of CPAs has also urged the SEC to reject the new standards. “We believe the recently adopted PCAOB rules will pose significant challenges for accounting firms, especially mid-sized and smaller firms, and may not achieve the intended benefits of improved oversight and audit quality,” said a comment letter from Susan Coffey, CEO of public accounting at the AICPA. “Therefore, we respectfully urge the SEC to refrain from approving these rules. Instead, alternative approaches that better balance transparency, cost, and the needs of audit committees, while continuing to support the quality of audit services and choice of audit providers available to perform public company audits and serve the public interest should be pursued, rather than introducing potentially detrimental unproven regulations.”

The Center for Audit Quality pointed out that any last-minute standards approved by the SEC at the close of the Biden administration could be overturned by the incoming Trump administration or by Congress under the Congressional Review Act. “Notably, any final order approving the rule would be subject to review by a new session of Congress and a new President,” wrote CAQ CEO Julie Bell Lindsay in a comment letter

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has also come out against the rules, as it did last year in conjunction with the CAQ in opposition to the proposed PCAOB standard on noncompliance with laws and regulations, also known as NOCLAR. That standard is currently on hold.

“The Proposed Rules mandating disclosure of audit firm and engagement metrics represent rushed and problematic due process at the PCAOB,” wrote Tom Quaadman, senior vice president of economic policy at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. “The Proposed Rules are not fit for purpose, are costly and burdensome, and will be detrimental to audit quality. The adopting release does not meet the threshold requirements for economic analysis, including appropriate consideration of need, benefits, costs, consequences and alternatives.”

With SEC chair Gary Gensler planning to step aside on Jan. 20, the SEC will be controlled by Republicans. The two Republican members of the Commission, Mark Uyeda and Hester Peirce, met with Quaadman in December to discuss extending the comment deadline.

The standards did win support from some investor and consumer groups. “There needs to be transparency throughout the process that results in the appointment and oversight of the audit firms and the audit process to ensure there is accountability to investors by the PCAOB (the regulator) and the audit committee which is charged with protecting investors interests,” said a comment letter from the CFA Institute on the firm reporting standard. “Investors themselves need this transparency to accomplish their stewardship responsibilities and to hold their agents (i.e., audit committees, management and regulators) accountable.”

“CII, therefore, supports the Commission approving the Proposed Rules because we believe the final metrics represent an important, albeit long overdue, step forward in responding to investors’ information needs relating to the audit,” said a comment letter on the firm and engagement metrics standards from the Council of Institutional Investors.

The Consumer Federation of America expressed its support. “Current PCAOB rules and standards do not require registered audit firms to publicly disclose firm or engagement-level information,” said a comment letter from Micah Hoffman, director of investor protection at the group. “As a result, investors and audit committees lack access to consistent, comparable data on audit services, which hinders their ability to make informed decisions in selecting auditors and allocating their capital. Audit firms have little incentive to voluntarily provide standardized and decision-useful information, and existing voluntary disclosures fail to meet investor needs. The amendments would help address these issues.”

“We applaud the PCAOB’s efforts to modernize its annual and special reporting requirements for audit firms,” said a comment letter from AARP legislative counsel David Certner. “Greater disclosure will support investor protection and enhance the PCAOB’s oversight capabilities. The importance of investor protections is especially key for older adults.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

FAF seeks nominations for leadership, advisory roles

Published

on

The Financial Accounting Foundation today formally opened the search for several leadership roles.

The FAF Board of Trustees’ Appointments Committee is seeking nominations for these positions, which include chair and members of the Board of Trustees, the FAF’s executive director, Financial Accounting Standards Board member, and chair of the Financial Accounting Standards Advisory Council.

FAF executive director

Current FAF executive director John Auchincloss announced in December 2024 that he will retire from his post on Sept. 30, 2025. 

The executive director leads a team of 45 who provide support services to the FASB and the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, including communications and public affairs, legal, IT, human resources, publishing, financial management and administration. The role supports the FAF Trustees, who ultimately oversee the FASB and GASB Boards and their advisory councils. The executive director, in collaboration with the FAF chair, also sets the organization’s U.S. and international outreach strategies.

A full description of the FAF executive director role can be found here. Nominations should be submitted to executive search firm Spencer Stuart at a confidential, dedicated email address [email protected] by Feb. 24, 2025.

FAF Board of Trustees chair

The chair of the FAF Trustees is involved in all major Trustee decisions related to strategy, appointments, oversight and governance, and in representing the organization with high-level stakeholders and regulators.

The new chair will be appointed for a three-year term beginning Jan. 1, 2026, through Dec. 31, 2028, and can stand for reappointment to a second three-year term beginning in 2029.

A full description of the FAF Board chair role can be found here. Nominations should be submitted to executive search firm Spencer Stuart at [email protected] by Feb. 24, 2025.

FAF Board of Trustees at-large member

The FAF Board of Trustees oversees and supports the FASB and the GASB, and exercises general oversight of the organization except regarding technical decisions related to standard setting.

The FAF is recruiting several “at-large” trustees — individuals with business, investment, capital markets, accounting, and business academia, financial, government, regulatory, investor advocate, or other experience.

A full description of the FAF trustee role can be found here. Nominations should be submitted to executive search firm Spencer Stuart at [email protected] by Feb. 24, 2025.

FASB member

FASB members develop financial reporting standards that result in useful information for investors and other financial-statement users. The FASB member roles are full time and based in Norwalk, Connecticut. 

“These are senior and prestigious appointments, demanding not only a high degree of technical accounting expertise but also a high level of understanding of the global financial reporting environment,” the FAF announcement reads.

The official start date for the position would be July 1, 2026, but the newly appointment member would be expected to start some time earlier than year to ensure a successful transition. The five-year term extends through June 30, 2031, at which time the member would be eligible to be considered for reappointment. 

A full description of the FASB member role can be found here. Nominations should be submitted to executive search firm Spencer Stuart at [email protected] by Feb. 24, 2025.

FASAC chair

The chair is the principal officer of the FASAC and advises the FASB on projects on the FASB’s agenda, possible new agenda items and priorities, procedural matters that may require the attention of the FASB, and other matters. The chair is responsible for guiding discussion at FASAC meetings and for implementing and directing the broad operating processes of the FASAC. 

The chair may be appointed for up to a four-year term, or a shorter period of time as agreed upon, and may be eligible for reappointment. 

A full description of the FASAC chair role can be found here. Nominations should be submitted to FAF human resources at a confidential and dedicated email address [email protected] by Feb. 24, 2025.

Headquarters of the Financial Accounting Foundation, Financial Accounting Standards Board and Governmental Accounting Standards Board

Courtesy of the FAF, FASB and GASB

Continue Reading

Accounting

Grant Thornton CEO steps down

Published

on

Top 10 Firm Grant Thornton announced that its CEO, Seth Siegel, is stepping down from his position after 30 years with the firm, though will still remain involved as a senior advisor.

“I have called Grant Thornton home for almost three decades and am proud to have been part of this amazing team and organization, which has solidified its standing as the destination of choice for clients and talent alike,” said Siegel in the firm’s official statement. He felt that, with Grant Thornton positioned for what he said was strong continued growth, it was the right time to step down. In a LinkedIn post, Siegel said the move will allow him to pursue other ambitions, focus on his health and spend more time with his family.

The new CEO will be Jim Peko, current chief operating officer of Grant Thornton Advisors LLC.

“I thank Seth for all he has done to help transform Grant Thornton so adeptly for the future. He has been a colleague, mentor and friend to so many of us, and a tireless advocate for the firm’s best interests. As CEO, my priorities will focus on accelerating our current business strategy and solidifying our standing in the marketplace as a unique global platform, driven by quality, culture and differentiated capabilities. We will continue to be the employer of choice for the industry and always capitalize on compelling opportunities before us as we drive meaningful growth,” said Peko.

Siegel expressed his confidence in Peko, saying he has worked closely with him for many years.

“Jim and I have worked closely together for many years, and he is the right leader for this new chapter — one who knows Grant Thornton well and has been integral to our many recent accomplishments and our quality-focused delivery,” he said.

Siegel became a partner in 2006, became managing partner of South Florida in 2020, and became CEO in 2022.

The announcement comes shortly after the completion of the merger between Grant Thornton Advisors LLC in the U.S. and Grant Thornton Ireland. At the time it was said that Grant Thornton Advisors CEO Seth Siegel would continue in his leadership role at the combined firm, while former Grant Thornton Ireland CEO Steve Tennant would become a member of Grant Thornton Advisors’ executive committee.

Grant Thornton laid off about 150 employees in the U.S. last November across the advisory, tax and audit businesses after the deal was announced. Its U.K. firm also received private equity investment last November from Cinven, which acquired a majority share of Grant Thornton U.K.

Continue Reading

Accounting

IRIS beefs up Firm Management software, customer success

Published

on

Accounting and business solutions provider IRIS announced an expansion to its IRIS Firm Management solution that, among other things, enhances the software’s document management capacities.

“Modern accounting firms are growing quickly, expanding their service lines and client bases,” said Jim Dunham, president and general manager of IRIS Americas. “However, this rapid growth often introduces technology sprawl, added costs and complexity. To tackle today’s challenges, firms need an all-in-one solution that simplifies operations and helps them scale their business. That’s why we created IRIS Firm Management — purpose-built from strategic acquisitions and shaped by four decades of collaboration with our customers.”

IRIS IFM’s integrated document management solution allows for storing, organizing and retrieving critical documents, for compliance with complex regulatory requirements. Today’s update also allows the solution to automatically retain documents for standard periods of time; provides template forms to maintain document consistency and integrity; and produces a detailed audit trail — tracking who accessed which documents and any actions taken, and when. This means firms can securely share encrypted files with clients using drag-and-drop upload functionality.

In addition, customers can now create unlimited customizable reports with step-by-step guidance in order to gain real-time insights through interactive analytics dashboards and data visualization. Using drag-and-drop tools and filtering options, users can refine views, organize and analyze data sets—such as client, geography, accounts receivable, work-in-progress—to create a unified account view.

The update also allows for streamlined hierarchical menus to replace dropdowns for better accessibility and consistency. It also features a new period-lockdown feature which prevents changes to key functions in order to bolster security. Meanwhile, the solution also supports cloud-based receipt storage to simplify setup, as well as options for user preferences allow for tailored workflows.

Finally, IRIS IFM sports a new Configuration Management Component, which offers 140 multilevel configuration options across 40 modules, along with a library of ready-to-use templates. Real-time updates let users enable or disable features without disrupting existing workflows, ensuring seamless, personalized implementations for each client.

Centralized Customer Success Function

IRIS also announced a new centralized Customer Success Function, which will bring together customer-facing resources from across the business into one cohesive global team. This team will collaborate closely with IRIS’ Account Management, Renewals, Product, Marketing and Customer Service teams to engage with customers at every stage of their journey.

The new function is meant to increase touchpoints to engage customers at critical moments that matter, as well as enhance the overall customer experience through establishing a unified approach across products and customer lifecycle stages and expanding customer-centric, outcome-based KPIs to drive impact.

This function will be led by Dave Burns, a newly appointed chief customer officer who previously served as interim chief revenue officer at IRIS Software Group. In his new role, he will oversee a unified team and collaborate closely with global leaders across client-facing teams.

“At IRIS, our customers are our top priority. We design and improve our products based on customer feedback and we strive to deliver exceptional customer experiences throughout our customers’ end-to-end lifecycle,” said Burns. “The launch of this new Customer Success function is just another way that IRIS is continually working to ensure our customers have a seamless and convenient experience from start to finish. We are excited about this evolution and confident it will significantly benefit both our customers and IRIS.”

Continue Reading

Trending