Top 10 Firm RSM US today established an Audit Quality Board.
The Audit Quality Board is an advisory body composed of three independent board members — Tracey Golden, Dave Sullivan and Dan Sunderland — who are responsible for evaluating the effectiveness of quality control and system of quality management matters within the firm’s assurance practice. The members will also provide advice and recommendations on audit-quality related aspects of the firm.
“Audit quality is essential to ensuring confidence in the capital markets and is at the core of our role as gatekeepers for the public trust,” Joel Shamon, RSM’s enterprise assurance leader, said in a statement. “Our Audit Quality Board members bring extensive experience in leading audit quality initiatives in the U.S. and globally. As we continue to enhance our services and improve the audit experience for management teams, boards and our people, we look forward to benefiting from their counsel and objective insights.”
In 2023, RSM US had a 47% Part I.A deficiency rate, up from 24% in 2022 and 2021, according to an inspection report by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. The PCAOB selected 17 audits to review and found eight of those to have deficiencies, primarily relating to the firm’s testing of controls and substantive testing of revenue and related accountancy, inventory and long-lived assets.
Photo courtesy of RSM US LLP
“The creation of our Audit Quality Board reinforces our commitment to the principles of integrity, independence, objectivity and excellence that are hallmarks of our profession,” Jamie Klenieski, RSM’s audit quality and risk management leader, said in a statement. “As we strive for continuous improvement in the effectiveness of our work, the board’s guidance and diverse viewpoints will help us ensure we’re consistently delivering high quality audits.”
Golden is a past chair of the boards of the American Institute of CPAs and the Association of International CPAs. She was an audit partner at Deloitte and previously served as a professional accounting fellow at the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Sullivan is currently a member of the Public Interest Oversight Board. He was an audit partner at Deloitte, leading global audit and assurance quality, and was a member of the firm’s executive committee and board of directors. He has served as a member of the Professional Practice Executive Committee of the Center for Audit Quality, Financial Accounting Standards Advisory Committee of the Financial Accounting Standards Board, Standing Advisory Group of the PCAOB, and the SEC and Financial Reporting Institute’s Advisory Councils. Previously, he was a practice fellow at the FASB.
Sunderland is currently a professor of practice in the accounting group at Northeastern University and an advisor on PCAOB QC 1000. He was a partner at Deloitte, where his roles included chief auditor, national professional director, lead audit partner and lead engagement quality partner. He previously held leadership positions with the auditing section of the American Accounting Association and with the CAQ, where he chaired the research advisory board.
In a decisive move toward standardized environmental financial reporting, accounting standards boards issued updated implementation guidance during the week ending July 25, 2026, regarding the formal recognition and valuation of corporate carbon offsets and environmental credits. The revised frameworks establish precise rules for how enterprises must measure, record, and disclose carbon credits on balance sheets, eliminating years of inconsistent reporting practices across public capital markets.
Under the finalized accounting standard, purchased carbon offsets can no longer be categorized under vague administrative expenses or unstandardized intangible asset accounts. Instead, organizations must classify environmental credits based on underlying operational intent—distinguishing between credits held for immediate compliance compliance obligations, long-term offset obligations, or active market trading. Furthermore, companies are required to evaluate carbon holdings for fair value impairment at the end of each reporting period, ensuring that depreciated or low-quality environmental credits do not distort corporate asset values.
The standardized rules carry significant implications for corporate audit committees and chief accounting officers. External audit firms are implementing rigorous verification protocols to validate the physical legitimacy, legal ownership, and scientific permanence of carbon credits claimed on balance sheets. Inaccurate or overstated carbon accounting claims now carry substantial financial litigation risk, alongside potential regulatory enforcement for misleading ESG disclosures.
To remain fully compliant, corporate accounting departments must establish centralized carbon tracking systems integrated into primary standard ERP ledgers. Accounting teams that proactively adopt standardized environmental reporting protocols will build investor credibility, streamline annual audit processes, and insulate their organizations against evolving regulatory scrutiny.
Corporate tax departments reached a critical juncture in automated operational management. With nations worldwide rapidly enacting digital service taxes, localized value-added tax (VAT) mandates, and real-time electronic invoicing requirements, manual tax calculations have become obsolete. Modern corporate tax divisions are aggressively deploying AI-driven tax engine software to automate complex cross-border indirect tax calculations in real time.
The imperative for automated tax compliance stems from the sheer complexity of current trade policies and multi-jurisdictional commerce. E-commerce platforms, software vendors, and global manufacturers face constantly changing regional tax rates, statutory exemption rules, and cross-border tariff structures. Automated tax engines embed directly into enterprise enterprise resource planning (ERP) architectures, automatically applying correct tax codes at the point of sale, calculating real-time withholding amounts, and generating compliant e-invoices.
Automated audit trail generation represents another key advantage of modern tax tech integration. Advanced compliance platforms log every transactional tax determination on immutable digital ledgers, providing tax authorities with transparent, self-verifying audit trails. This capability drastically reduces the operational duration and administrative cost of corporate tax audits, protecting enterprises against severe penalties resulting from calculation errors or missed reporting deadlines.
For chief financial officers and tax directors, investing in automated tax compliance is a vital operational risk mitigation strategy. Automating routine tax calculations frees high-level accounting professionals to focus on strategic tax planning, transfer pricing optimization, and risk management in an increasingly complex global economic environment.
As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.
Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.
The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.