Finance

Italy’s Mediobanca rejects Monte dei Paschi’s takeover bid

Published

4 months ago

January 28, 2025

Business Finance News

The logo of a Mediobanca Premier bank branch in Brescia, Italy, on Friday, Jan. 24, 2025.

Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Shareholders of Italian lender Mediobanca on Tuesday rejected a 13-billion-euro takeover offer from smaller domestic peer Monte dei Paschi, amid a ramp-up in consolidation bids in the Italian banking sector.

“The Offer is devoid of industrial and financial rationale and is therefore destructive for Mediobanca,” the lender said in a statement.

The company added that the proposal has no industrial value, compromises Mediobanca’s identity and business profile, as well as gains for shareholders of both the lender and Monte dei Paschi, “given the likelihood of a significant loss of customers in those business areas (such as Wealth Management and Investment Banking) which require professionals who are independent and of high standing and professionalism.”

CNBC has reached out to Monte dei Paschi for comment.

The world’s oldest bank, the bailed-out Monte dei Paschi (MPS) unexpectedly launched an all-share takeover proposal for Mediobanca (MB) on Friday, offering 23 of its shares for 10 of those of its acquisition target and valuing Mediobanca’s stock at15.992 euros each — or a 5% premium to the close price of Jan. 23. Some analysts have questioned the synergies that might result from the two banks’ union, with a Barclays note on Jan. 27 flagging that “this complementarity, the value creation drivers and in general MPS strategy on MB are not yet clear.”

Tuscany’s Monte dei Paschi, which required state rescue in 2017 after years of battering losses, has long been the poster child of trouble in the Italian banking sector, before a brisk turnaround in its fortunes after the 2022 appointment of UniCredit veteran Luigi Lovaglio to helm the bank.

The Italian government has long sought to privatize the lender, but retains a 11.73% stake after diluting its position last year. Monte dei Paschi’s investors include Mediobanca shareholders such as business tycoon Francesco Gaetano Caltagirone and Delfin — the holding company of late billionaire Leonardo del Vecchio, which increased its MPS stake to 9.78% since January.

The Rome government of Giorgia Meloni has long attempted to find a partner for Monte dei Paschi, which was once courted as a potential acquisition target by UniCredit until talks dissolved in 2021. Last year, Italy’s third-largest lender Banco BPM purchased a 5% stake in Monte dei Paschi from the government. But UniCredit’s surprise $10.5 billion offer for Banco BPM in November has paralyzed any potential further moves on MPS, pushing Rome into a corner and pitting UniCredit CEO Andrea Orcel against Meloni.

Back in September, UniCredit also unexpectedly spread its wings with a stake build in German lender Commerzbank, raising questions over potential ambitions of cross-border consolidation.

This is a breaking news story. Please refresh for updates.

Finance

Stocks making the biggest moves midday: WOOF, TSLA, CRCL, LULU

Published

2 days ago

June 6, 2025

Business Finance News

Finance

Swiss government proposes tough new capital rules in major blow to UBS

Published

2 days ago

June 6, 2025

Business Finance News

A sign in German that reads “part of the UBS group” in Basel on May 5, 2025.

Fabrice Coffrini | AFP | Getty Images

The Swiss government on Friday proposed strict new capital rules that would require banking giant UBS to hold an additional $26 billion in core capital, following its 2023 takeover of stricken rival Credit Suisse.

The measures would also mean that UBS will need to fully capitalize its foreign units and carry out fewer share buybacks.

“The rise in the going-concern requirement needs to be met with up to USD 26 billion of CET1 capital, to allow the AT1 bond holdings to be reduced by around USD 8 billion,” the government said in a Friday statement, referring to UBS’ holding of Additional Tier 1 (AT1) bonds.

The Swiss National Bank said it supported the measures from the government as they will “significantly strengthen” UBS’ resilience.

“As well as reducing the likelihood of a large systemically important bank such as UBS getting into financial distress, this measure also increases a bank’s room for manoeuvre to stabilise itself in a crisis through its own efforts. This makes it less likely that UBS has to be bailed out by the government in the event of a crisis,” SNB said in a Friday statement.

‘Too big to fail’

UBS has been battling the specter of tighter capital rules since acquiring the country’s second-largest bank at a cut-price following years of strategic errors, mismanagement and scandals at Credit Suisse.

The shock demise of the banking giant also brought Swiss financial regulator FINMA under fire for its perceived scarce supervision of the bank and the ultimate timing of its intervention.

Swiss regulators argue that UBS must have stronger capital requirements to safeguard the national economy and financial system, given the bank’s balance topped $1.7 trillion in 2023, roughly double the projected Swiss economic output of last year. UBS insists it is not “too big to fail” and that the additional capital requirements — set to drain its cash liquidity — will impact the bank’s competitiveness.

At the heart of the standoff are pressing concerns over UBS’ ability to buffer any prospective losses at its foreign units, where it has, until now, had the duty to back 60% of capital with capital at the parent bank.

Higher capital requirements can whittle down a bank’s balance sheet and credit supply by bolstering a lender’s funding costs and choking off their willingness to lend — as well as waning their appetite for risk. For shareholders, of note will be the potential impact on discretionary funds available for distribution, including dividends, share buybacks and bonus payments.

“While winding down Credit Suisse’s legacy businesses should free up capital and reduce costs for UBS, much of these gains could be absorbed by stricter regulatory demands,” Johann Scholtz, senior equity analyst at Morningstar, said in a note preceding the FINMA announcement.

“Such measures may place UBS’s capital requirements well above those faced by rivals in the United States, putting pressure on returns and reducing prospects for narrowing its long-term valuation gap. Even its long-standing premium rating relative to the European banking sector has recently evaporated.”