Sherwood Tax and Accounting owner Kristen Keats was no stranger to outsourcing when she co-founded a Guadalajara, Mexico-based accounting staffing agency about four years ago to help supplement and support her home team in Oregon.
Having previously worked for a firm that outsourced to a team in India, Keats understood the benefits of outsourcing. She also understood the challenges that can arise.
“We had heard that Guadalajara was a great place as far as the number of universities that are there and just the number of people. It is called ‘the Silicon Valley of Mexico,’ so we were excited that it has more of a technology [focus]. So, we looked at expanding into Mexico,” said Keats. “In 2021, I, with my partner, started Cadencia, the outsourcing firm that now has staffed for our firm but we also work with other accounting firms as well.”
Today, Cadencia employs 45 associates, of whom four are dedicated to supplementing the staff at Sherwood Tax and Accounting in Sherwood, Oregon.
Vitalii Vodolazskyi – stock.adob
Establishing an outsourced staffing agency like Cadencia may not be the preferred route for many U.S.-based accounting firms; however, there is no denying that more and more firms are exploring how outsourcing in some capacity, whether domestically or overseas, can help them broaden bandwidth and better serve clients.
“[Outsourcing] was almost like a dirty word, I would say, like five years ago,” said Keats. “It was always thought of in a bad light, in my opinion. And now I definitely feel like that has shifted. I feel like it has become more accepted and there is more understanding, more openness to thinking about it, I think, in the industry. If nothing else, out of sheer necessity.”
Laurence Whittam, founder of South Amboy, N.J.-based Impact Global Solutions, which provides outsourcing-related consulting and implementation services, agreed and said, “[Outsourcing] is definitely a moving area. A lot more firms are really interested in it and moving on it. They are investing quite heavily in it, which is great. Even private equity is getting involved in it. I’m seeing outsourcing firms now even being acquired by both private equity and firms as well.”
Further highlighting the growing interest in outsourcing, the American Institute of CPAs’ 2023 National Management of an Accounting Practice survey found that roughly 40% of respondents said they planned to outsource work domestically, and 35% planned to use offshore talent in the future. Among the top-performing firms, 52% said they planned to use offshore talent and half were looking to outsource work domestically.
Finding an outsourcing model
The findings come as little surprise given the staffing constraints that are facing the profession due in part to seasoned professionals eyeing retirement and a dwindling pipeline of new accounting majors and graduates entering the profession.
That being said, it is important to keep in mind that outsourcing entails more than simply broadening the talent pool. To achieve success, firms must have a strategy in place and be aware of the outsourcing models that are gaining traction.
1. Onshoring model. Onshoring is essentially outsourcing work domestically. Onshore outsourcing can be achieved by collaborating with a local entity to handle specific tasks or using gig workers. Some firms may also turn to a contracting vendor to find U.S.-based contractors who can work closely with the firm.
Onshore outsourcing can ease compliance concerns as the talent is well-versed in U.S. regulations and has a clearer understanding of U.S. business practices. However, firms may find there are limitations to the availability of qualified candidates in today’s competitive labor market.
2. Nearshoring model. Nearshoring is outsourcing work to a nearby country, such as Mexico or Canada. One of the biggest advantages is the close proximity of the outsourced talent. This makes in-person meetings easier, if needed, and the time difference minimal — maybe only an hour or two, if any at all. And compared with domestic outsourcing, it may be easier for firms to find available talent.
3. Offshoring model. Offshoring is similar to nearshoring; however, the talent is located much farther away, typically on a different continent. With that can come significant differences in time zones, cultural differences, and perhaps language barriers — all of which must be considered by a firm looking at offshoring.
India has emerged as one of the most popular countries for offshoring due in part to the lower labor costs, strong English proficiency, and expertise in tax, accounting and audit services. The Philippines is also a popular choice for outsourcing accounting services, and South America is rising up on the list.
However, the differences do not stop there. As Whittam explained, there are “a spectrum” of approaches when it comes to outsourcing.
For instance, some firms may opt to build their own captive, while other firms may choose to work with a business process outsourcing services provider to handle certain business functions or processes. There’s also the employer-of-record model, which is when a firm contracts with a third party to hire talent on their behalf and the third party handles payroll, compliance, and perhaps infrastructure like office space and equipment; or a firm may want to leverage a traditional full-time employee outsourcing model, in which the candidate will work for only the contracting accounting firm.
“[Firms] have generally heard the options, but I think the differences between the models that are available is very important for them to understand because outsourcing comes in a bit of a spectrum,” Whittam said.
Hitendra Patil, CEO of Miami-based consulting firm Accountaneur, agreed, and said it is important that firms first determine what it is they are looking to achieve. “What is the purpose of outsourcing? Is it just an inability to hire locally and volume is growing and you need to make sure that you have enough people, hence, you are outsourcing? So there are multiple ways in which a firm decides on how to create that capacity. Ultimately, outsourcing or not is technically a decision of capacity planning,” he said.
As outlined by Patil, firms that are trying to determine if it is time to outsource may want to ask themselves such questions as:
Is the firm consistently missing deadlines? If yes, this can be a sign that staff is stretched too thin.
Is it hard to hire new staff and is staff turnover on the rise? If so, staff may be overworked, overwhelmed, and becoming disillusioned with the profession.
Does the firm lack capital for growth? Outsourcing can save firms money and time, enabling them to fuel profitability.
Is the firm turning down new clients or not getting new clients? If yes, outsourcing can help expand capacity so the firm can provide more competitive, value-added services.
Employ best practices
As previously noted, outsourcing involves more than simply expanding the talent pool. To help firms achieve success, there are several important best practices to consider before diving into the outsourcing waters.
Kane Polakoff, a principal and CAS practice leader at New York-based Top 100 Firm CohnReznick, suggested talking with peers who are outsourcing to better understand the lessons learned. “Don’t just jump in to jump in,” he said. “Take the time before you go ahead and start that process. Start small. Of course, determining whether you want to do a captive, or you want to do a third party, or you want to do both. You need to have those discussions too, and then determine what that roadmap is. You definitely want to come up with a good plan and then execute on that.”
According to sources, steps to consider when embarking on the outsourcing journey include, but are not limited to:
Define the firm’s objectives.
Assess internal processes and take steps to improve efficiencies.
Establish and maintain comprehensive process documentation to help ensure consistency and compliance.
Establish strong lines of communication and foster relationship-building between the firm’s home team and the outsourced talent. For instance, conduct regular video conferences and/or on-site visits.
Invest in training to help the outsourcing team enhance their skills and gain a better understanding of the firm’s processes.
Ensure the necessary technology infrastructure and software is in place, such as a project management system to help track projects, tasks and schedules.
Successful outsourcing also involves making sure the right security protocols are in place. This means, for instance, ensuring the secure transmission of data and using two-factor authentication to authenticate users, and limiting access control so only authorized individuals and devices can gain access to the appropriate network resources.
“I know that it feels scarier to have that [talent] located outside of the U.S., but in reality, I believe, it is really no different than having a remote employee in the U.S.,” Keats said.
Embrace transparency
Some accounting firms that outsource work may have clients who are concerned about data security, compliance issues, lack of expertise, and language barriers (when offshoring), among other potential issues. The key, according to sources, is to be fully transparent.
“Today, we are very transparent. … We have a global capacity, a global operation, and here’s what we do and here’s how we do it. So that is an expectation that we set with our clients from the beginning and it’s understood. We really don’t have much of any push back on that,” Polakoff said.
Added Polakoff, “I think the worst thing that you can do is to go ahead and do it but you don’t share that with the client, because that will come back and haunt you.”
Keats agreed: “When we initially started working with the [outsourced] team, I did a video that got sent out to all of the clients. We were extremely transparent about it. … In the beginning, we actually allowed clients to opt out of it. We said, ‘You can opt out of it but you have to pay a higher fee,’ and some folks chose to do that. There were some folks that left us. There were some people that just were not comfortable with it at all.”
Today, the firm no longer allows clients to opt out of outsourcing the work, as it became too difficult to segment the client base. All existing clients have transitioned and new clients are informed during the first phone call to ensure full transparency.
“Just remember that these are human beings. I think sometimes firms tend to think of outsourcing as this monolithic strategy or solution for things. It is good to be reminded that the individuals that you will be interacting with — whoever you go with, wherever they are in the world — are people who are all learning, want to do a good job, and want to advance; they want all the same things that we all do,” said Keats. “So I think that is a good thing to keep in mind — to keep the humanity at the forefront when you are thinking about outsourcing.”
A proposal from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to potentially shift some public companies away from quarterly financial reporting toward a semiannual model is drawing significant pushback from investors, even as it continues moving through the regulatory process. The debate has direct implications for corporate finance teams, auditors, and the broader transparency of U.S. capital markets.
What the SEC Proposed
According to a summary published by accounting advisory firm Cohen & Co., the SEC issued a proposed rule on May 19, 2026, aimed at simplifying financial reporting requirements for many U.S. public companies. The proposal would potentially reduce the frequency of certain mandatory disclosures from quarterly to semiannual, a structural change that has not been made to core U.S. reporting requirements in decades.
The proposal follows an extended debate within U.S. policy circles, with proponents arguing that reduced reporting frequency could lower compliance costs and free up management time for longer-term strategic planning rather than quarter-to-quarter results management.
Why Investors Are Pushing Back
Comment letters submitted in response to the proposal have been extensive, and according to Cohen & Co.’s review of the public record, investors “appear to be largely opposed” to the shift, viewing frequent interim reporting as a core benefit of U.S. capital markets relative to other jurisdictions.
Accounting and law firms have taken a more measured position, generally urging any changes to remain aligned with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), whose existing disclosure requirements and guidance are built around a quarterly reporting cadence. A shift to semiannual reporting without corresponding changes to FASB guidance could create friction between SEC filing requirements and GAAP-based disclosure expectations.
Lessons From the U.K. Experience
The debate is not without precedent. The United Kingdom moved away from mandatory quarterly reporting for listed companies in 2014, returning to a semiannual disclosure requirement. According to Cohen & Co.’s analysis, that experience offers a cautionary data point: there was no measurable increase in capital expenditure or R&D investment following the change, while analyst coverage of affected companies declined as reliable interim information became less available — a particular risk for smaller and newly public companies that rely on analyst coverage to maintain investor visibility.
Practical Implications for Finance Teams
Beyond the debate over disclosure philosophy, the proposal carries practical complications. Many companies have debt covenants and credit agreements structured around quarterly financial delivery; a shift to semiannual reporting could require renegotiating those terms. Reduced reporting frequency would also extend the “window of market silence” between disclosures, a factor that governance and investor-relations teams would need to manage carefully to avoid information asymmetry.
Separately, and unrelated to the reporting-frequency debate, the SEC and FASB have continued finalizing more routine updates this year. New Accounting Standards Updates are taking effect for December 31, 2026, fiscal year-ends covering income tax disclosures, credit loss measurement, induced debt conversions, and stock compensation, according to Eide Bailly’s review of 2026 ASU activity. Additional guidance on paid-in-kind dividends and environmental credits is also on the near-term horizon.
What to Watch Next
The semiannual reporting proposal remains in the comment and review phase, and no final rule has been adopted as of this writing. Finance leaders should monitor the SEC’s regulatory agenda for further movement, while treating the current quarterly reporting requirement as the operative standard until any final rule is issued and an effective date is set.
Given the extent of investor opposition documented in the comment file, a full shift to mandatory semiannual reporting appears more likely to result in either a scaled-back compromise or continued study rather than swift adoption — though the SEC’s ultimate direction remains uncertain.
The accounting profession is undergoing a fundamental structural transition as enterprise finance departments shift from periodic month-end closes toward automated continuous accounting models. By integrating specialized machine learning algorithms directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms, chief accounting officers are transforming financial reporting from a retrospective exercise into a real-time operational asset.
The Shift from Periodic Close to Continuous Financial Reporting
Traditional accounting workflows heavily relied on manual data reconciliation, spreadsheet calculations, and multi-week closing cycles at the end of each fiscal period. In contrast, continuous accounting frameworks utilize automated software agents to process, validate, and post transactional data in real time as business activities occur.
Automated bank reconciliation tools cross-reference incoming bank feeds, invoice records, and purchase orders automatically. By resolving transactional variances instantly throughout the month, corporate accounting teams eliminate the traditional workload spikes associated with quarterly and annual closes.
Machine Learning in Audit Trails and Anomaly Detection
Advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning tools are redefining internal audit and financial control environments. Automated systems analyze 100% of general ledger entries, identifying anomalous transactions, duplicate payments, and unauthorized journal entries in real time.
Rather than relying on random statistical sampling, corporate internal auditors can focus their attention on high-risk flags automatically surfaced by algorithmic monitoring platforms. This continuous risk assessment strengthens internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) and significantly reduces fraud risk.
Evolving Roles for Accounting Professionals
As routine data entry and manual reconciliation tasks become fully automated, the skill set required for accounting professionals is shifting toward data analysis, system design, and strategic business advisory.
– Systems Governance: Accountants are increasingly responsible for monitoring algorithmic accuracy and managing data integration pipelines.
– Business Partnership: Finance professionals leverage real-time financial dashboards to advise operational leaders on margin management and working capital allocation.
– Regulatory Compliance Management: Accounting teams utilize automated platforms to ensure compliance with dynamic tax codes and international accounting standards.
Core Implementation Recommendations
1. Deploy Automated Reconciliation Tools: Integrate continuous transaction processing modules into existing enterprise ERP architectures.
2. Establish Algorithmic Governance Controls: Implement strict internal testing protocols to ensure automated accounting rules comply with GAAP/IFRS standards.
3. Reskill Accounting Teams: Invest in training finance staff on data analytics, workflow automation, and predictive financial modeling.
Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.
Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.
In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.
Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.
Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.
Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.
Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.