Connect with us

Accounting

A primer for outsourcing for accountants

Published

on

Sherwood Tax and Accounting owner Kristen Keats was no stranger to outsourcing when she co-founded a Guadalajara, Mexico-based accounting staffing agency about four years ago to help supplement and support her home team in Oregon.

Having previously worked for a firm that outsourced to a team in India, Keats understood the benefits of outsourcing. She also understood the challenges that can arise.

“We had heard that Guadalajara was a great place as far as the number of universities that are there and just the number of people. It is called ‘the Silicon Valley of Mexico,’ so we were excited that it has more of a technology [focus]. So, we looked at expanding into Mexico,” said Keats. “In 2021, I, with my partner, started Cadencia, the outsourcing firm that now has staffed for our firm but we also work with other accounting firms as well.”

Today, Cadencia employs 45 associates, of whom four are dedicated to supplementing the staff at Sherwood Tax and Accounting in Sherwood, Oregon.

Outsourcing concept

Vitalii Vodolazskyi – stock.adob

Establishing an outsourced staffing agency like Cadencia may not be the preferred route for many U.S.-based accounting firms; however, there is no denying that more and more firms are exploring how outsourcing in some capacity, whether domestically or overseas, can help them broaden bandwidth and better serve clients.

“[Outsourcing] was almost like a dirty word, I would say, like five years ago,” said Keats. “It was always thought of in a bad light, in my opinion. And now I definitely feel like that has shifted. I feel like it has become more accepted and there is more understanding, more openness to thinking about it, I think, in the industry. If nothing else, out of sheer necessity.”

Laurence Whittam, founder of South Amboy, N.J.-based Impact Global Solutions, which provides outsourcing-related consulting and implementation services, agreed and said, “[Outsourcing] is definitely a moving area. A lot more firms are really interested in it and moving on it. They are investing quite heavily in it, which is great. Even private equity is getting involved in it. I’m seeing outsourcing firms now even being acquired by both private equity and firms as well.”

Further highlighting the growing interest in outsourcing, the American Institute of CPAs’ 2023 National Management of an Accounting Practice survey found that roughly 40% of respondents said they planned to outsource work domestically, and 35% planned to use offshore talent in the future. Among the top-performing firms, 52% said they planned to use offshore talent and half were looking to outsource work domestically.

Finding an outsourcing model

The findings come as little surprise given the staffing constraints that are facing the profession due in part to seasoned professionals eyeing retirement and a dwindling pipeline of new accounting majors and graduates entering the profession.

That being said, it is important to keep in mind that outsourcing entails more than simply broadening the talent pool. To achieve success, firms must have a strategy in place and be aware of the outsourcing models that are gaining traction.

1. Onshoring model. Onshoring is essentially outsourcing work domestically. Onshore outsourcing can be achieved by collaborating with a local entity to handle specific tasks or using gig workers. Some firms may also turn to a contracting vendor to find U.S.-based contractors who can work closely with the firm.

Onshore outsourcing can ease compliance concerns as the talent is well-versed in U.S. regulations and has a clearer understanding of U.S. business practices. However, firms may find there are limitations to the availability of qualified candidates in today’s competitive labor market.

2. Nearshoring model. Nearshoring is outsourcing work to a nearby country, such as Mexico or Canada. One of the biggest advantages is the close proximity of the outsourced talent. This makes in-person meetings easier, if needed, and the time difference minimal — maybe only an hour or two, if any at all. And compared with domestic outsourcing, it may be easier for firms to find available talent.

3. Offshoring model. Offshoring is similar to nearshoring; however, the talent is located much farther away, typically on a different continent. With that can come significant differences in time zones, cultural differences, and perhaps language barriers — all of which must be considered by a firm looking at offshoring.

India has emerged as one of the most popular countries for offshoring due in part to the lower labor costs, strong English proficiency, and expertise in tax, accounting and audit services. The Philippines is also a popular choice for outsourcing accounting services, and South America is rising up on the list.

However, the differences do not stop there. As Whittam explained, there are “a spectrum” of approaches when it comes to outsourcing.

For instance, some firms may opt to build their own captive, while other firms may choose to work with a business process outsourcing services provider to handle certain business functions or processes. There’s also the employer-of-record model, which is when a firm contracts with a third party to hire talent on their behalf and the third party handles payroll, compliance, and perhaps infrastructure like office space and equipment; or a firm may want to leverage a traditional full-time employee outsourcing model, in which the candidate will work for only the contracting accounting firm.

“[Firms] have generally heard the options, but I think the differences between the models that are available is very important for them to understand because outsourcing comes in a bit of a spectrum,” Whittam said.

Hitendra Patil, CEO of Miami-based consulting firm Accountaneur, agreed, and said it is important that firms first determine what it is they are looking to achieve. “What is the purpose of outsourcing? Is it just an inability to hire locally and volume is growing and you need to make sure that you have enough people, hence, you are outsourcing? So there are multiple ways in which a firm decides on how to create that capacity. Ultimately, outsourcing or not is technically a decision of capacity planning,” he said.

As outlined by Patil, firms that are trying to determine if it is time to outsource may want to ask themselves such questions as:

Is the firm consistently missing deadlines? If yes, this can be a sign that staff is stretched too thin.

Is it hard to hire new staff and is staff turnover on the rise? If so, staff may be overworked, overwhelmed, and becoming disillusioned with the profession.

Does the firm lack capital for growth? Outsourcing can save firms money and time, enabling them to fuel profitability.

Is the firm turning down new clients or not getting new clients? If yes, outsourcing can help expand capacity so the firm can provide more competitive, value-added services.

Employ best practices

As previously noted, outsourcing involves more than simply expanding the talent pool. To help firms achieve success, there are several important best practices to consider before diving into the outsourcing waters.

Kane Polakoff, a principal and CAS practice leader at New York-based Top 100 Firm CohnReznick, suggested talking with peers who are outsourcing to better understand the lessons learned. “Don’t just jump in to jump in,” he said. “Take the time before you go ahead and start that process. Start small. Of course, determining whether you want to do a captive, or you want to do a third party, or you want to do both. You need to have those discussions too, and then determine what that roadmap is. You definitely want to come up with a good plan and then execute on that.”

According to sources, steps to consider when embarking on the outsourcing journey include, but are not limited to:

  • Define the firm’s objectives.
  • Assess internal processes and take steps to improve efficiencies.
  • Establish and maintain comprehensive process documentation to help ensure consistency and compliance.
  • Establish strong lines of communication and foster relationship-building between the firm’s home team and the outsourced talent. For instance, conduct regular video conferences and/or on-site visits.
  • Invest in training to help the outsourcing team enhance their skills and gain a better understanding of the firm’s processes.
  • Ensure the necessary technology infrastructure and software is in place, such as a project management system to help track projects, tasks and schedules.

Successful outsourcing also involves making sure the right security protocols are in place. This means, for instance, ensuring the secure transmission of data and using two-factor authentication to authenticate users, and limiting access control so only authorized individuals and devices can gain access to the appropriate network resources.

“I know that it feels scarier to have that [talent] located outside of the U.S., but in reality, I believe, it is really no different than having a remote employee in the U.S.,” Keats said.

Embrace transparency

Some accounting firms that outsource work may have clients who are concerned about data security, compliance issues, lack of expertise, and language barriers (when offshoring), among other potential issues. The key, according to sources, is to be fully transparent.

“Today, we are very transparent. … We have a global capacity, a global operation, and here’s what we do and here’s how we do it. So that is an expectation that we set with our clients from the beginning and it’s understood. We really don’t have much of any push back on that,” Polakoff said.

Added Polakoff, “I think the worst thing that you can do is to go ahead and do it but you don’t share that with the client, because that will come back and haunt you.”

Keats agreed: “When we initially started working with the [outsourced] team, I did a video that got sent out to all of the clients. We were extremely transparent about it. … In the beginning, we actually allowed clients to opt out of it. We said, ‘You can opt out of it but you have to pay a higher fee,’ and some folks chose to do that. There were some folks that left us. There were some people that just were not comfortable with it at all.”

Today, the firm no longer allows clients to opt out of outsourcing the work, as it became too difficult to segment the client base. All existing clients have transitioned and new clients are informed during the first phone call to ensure full transparency.

“Just remember that these are human beings. I think sometimes firms tend to think of outsourcing as this monolithic strategy or solution for things. It is good to be reminded that the individuals that you will be interacting with — whoever you go with, wherever they are in the world — are people who are all learning, want to do a good job, and want to advance; they want all the same things that we all do,” said Keats. “So I think that is a good thing to keep in mind — to keep the humanity at the forefront when you are thinking about outsourcing.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

IRS Direct File reportedly ending next year

Published

on

The Trump administration is reportedly making plans to shut down the Internal Revenue Service’s Direct File free tax prep system next year.

The Associated Press reported Wednesday about the plans, which come amid widespread layoffs at the IRS. Elon Musk had posted on X in February that he had “deleted” 18F, a digital services team that helped build the Direct File system ahead of its initial pilot test last year. The IRS staff who had taken over development of the program were reportedly told last month to end their work on developing the system for next tax season. The U.S. Digital Service that also worked on developing Direct File has been renamed the U.S. DOGE Service after a takeover by Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency. 

Senate Finance Committee ranking member Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, blamed the move on lobbying by the tax prep software industry, as well as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.

“No one should have to pay huge fees just to file their taxes,” Wyden said in a statement Wednesday. “Direct File was a massive success, saving taxpayers millions in fees, saving them time and cutting out an unnecessary middleman that took money out of Americans’ pockets for no good reason,” Wyden said. “Trump and Secretary Bessent are robbing regular American families to pay back lobbyists that spend millions to make tax filing more expensive and more difficult.”

The Direct File system expanded from pilot tests in 12 states last year to 25 states this year, aided by the nonprofit group Code for America and its FileYourStateTaxes project.  A survey of over 1,000 Direct File and FileYourStateTaxes users reportedly found that 98% of respondents said they were either satisfied or very satisfied with the programs, according to the Federal News Network. Last year, former IRS commissioner Danny Werfel announced plans to make the Direct File program permanent, but the program has been repeatedly attacked by Republican lawmakers in Congress and the tax prep industry.

Continue Reading

Accounting

S corporations bring tax advantages with caveats

Published

on

Electing to establish an S corporation could unlock the tax benefits enjoyed by millions of small business owners — as long as financial advisors and clients avoid some pitfalls.

Those include the ramifications of filing for deductions on the pass-through entity’s so-called qualified business income, the requirement of one single class of stock for the company’s equity and the implications of the S corp holding real estate, according to Tal Binder, CEO of Gelt. Binder’s firm works with high net worth clients and business owners through certified public accountants and artificial intelligence-powered tax services.

The caveats of S corp classification

For advisors and their clients, the S corp entity classification — named after Subchapter S of the Internal Revenue Code as a “Subchapter S corporation” or a “Small Business Corporation” — represents an opportunity with some tradeoffs. 

“Instead of thinking about it as just a tax structure, think about it as a tool — it’s a tool in the toolbox when you’re doing tax planning or tax strategy,” Binder said in an interview. “The S corp has a lot of tax benefits. It just becomes more complicated as you dig into the specifics and the numbers.”

Business owners and their advisors have likely run into those challenges in any number of situations — Binder noted that professional services firms such as a small wealth management company usually make the best candidates to be S corporations. The entity classifications of registered investment advisory firms affect industry M&A deals, and S corporations come in handy for clients who, for example, may be elite college athletes seeking tax savings on their “name, image and likeness” payments.

Most service-based businesses do elect to be S corporations, according to Miklos Ringbauer, the founder of Los Angeles-based tax firm MiklosCPA. However, state tax rules can alter the equation significantly, he noted, citing how California charges a flat annual duty of $800 per year for limited liability partnerships regardless of their profit, compared with a 1.5% rate on the net income generated by S corporations.

“You have to understand the state rules first — before you look at tax structure,” Ringbauer said in an interview. “Where we shine as tax professionals is providing that value, that guidance to the taxpayers, the investors to make the right choices, to help them to decide what is the best, optimized tax structure for their operation.”

READ MORE: 24 tax tips for self-employed clients

History to of S corporations

And tax pros have been doing so for decades.

Almost 70 years ago, small business owners gained the exemption from double taxation on corporate income flowing to their personal returns to the IRS, so long as they are domestic corporations, maintain a limited number and type of shareholders and have one class of stock. Today, there are about 5 million S corporations, according to the S Corporation Association, a business association and advocacy group. Before a recommendation by President Dwight Eisenhower’s Republican administration passed through Congress with the support of Harry Byrd, a Democrat from Virginia who was chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, small business owners faced “an oppressive level of tax,” a history on the group’s website stated.

“How significant was the creation of subchapter S?” it asked. “Consider that in 1958, the top income tax rate was 52% for corporations and 91% for individuals. That means dividends paid by a C-corporation to a high-income shareholder faced an effective tax rate of 96% Even a shareholder with median family income faced an effective federal tax of more than 60%.”

READ MORE: Business entities affect taxes and M&A — how RIAs weigh the choice

Potential downsides to S corp entities

The savings to the owners of S corporations add up in the right circumstances, but laws and individual tax implications could call for a sole proprietorship, partnership, limited liability company or a C corporation as a better fit.

In the case of a pass-through business tapping into the deduction for qualified business income that started with the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in 2017, the S corporation could be a limiting factor based on the fact that the owner’s direct W-2 salary is likely to be lower in that situation, Binder noted. For some businesses that have a 401(k) or profit-sharing plan, the S corporation owners’ maximum tax-advantaged contribution can only rise to the level of their personal salary.

As another caveat to the S corporation, certain RIAs launch when advisors team up, but one of the advisors may bring a much more substantial base of clients to the business. That would suggest that one of the owners should have more control of the firm than the other, even if they each own half of the RIA, Binder said. They couldn’t set up the business that way as an S corporation that can only have one class of stock, though.  

“It doesn’t make sense, because you started it and built it for many, many years,” he said. “That might disqualify the S corp, so it’s not best in those cases.”

He brought up the additional problematic use of the structure with the idea of an S corporation RIA holding the building housing the business in the same entity, which is “the right approach” from the perspective of the general tax savings for real estate assets but “in the vast majority of cases not beneficial to you,” Binder said. The real estate could bring higher payments to Uncle Sam for an S corporation, based on the rules for tax basis and mortgage financing.

An LLC or LLP structure also provides more flexibility than an S corporation for transferring the real estate asset out of the business and into the client’s personal holdings without generating a taxable event, Ringbauer noted. From the perspective of a startup company that must take out heavy loans for capital expenses while incurring business losses in the first few years after launch, the S corporation could further cap the level of deductions — far below the amount available to an LLC or LLP, he said.

READ MORE: 25 tax tips for RIA M&A deals and other small business sales

Don’t go it alone on business-entity decisions

Unfortunately, many business owners attempt to choose their entity based on a simple online search or even a question to a public chatbot, according to Ringbauer.

“There’s a lot of incorrect information out there, which would result in incorrect guidance on how to treat stuff,” he said. “It’s a personal preference, but if it is properly guided, then the individuals who are starting the business will be able to make the right choice.”

In that vein, advisors who might otherwise avoid any mention of tax-related topics that fall outside their expertise should engage a local certified public accountant or enrolled agent “just to make sure that everything is correct” before the client fills out IRS Form 2553 electing to be treated as an S corporation, Binder said.

“I’d highly recommend the wealth manager to partner with a competent tax professional or CPA firm,” he said.

Continue Reading

Accounting

FAF reports on standard-setting activity at FASB and GASB

Published

on

The Financial Accounting Foundation released its annual report Wednesday, offering an overview of its activities in 2024, especially at the two standard-setters it oversees, the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the Governmental Accounting Standards Board.

The report is available as both a downloadable PDF file and a digital, mobile-friendly version on the FAF website.

The report includes perspectives from leaders of the FAF, FASB and GASB, along with snapshots of how the teams keep stakeholders engaged. It also lists some of the highlights of 2024 FASB and GASB standards and exposure drafts on FASB projects such as recognition of intangibles and financial key performance indicators for business entities, as well as GASB exposure drafts on subsequent events and infrastructure assets. There’s also an update on the FAF’s strategic plan, plus a complete 2024 management’s discussion and analysis along with audited financial statements.

FAF executive director John Auchincloss and FAF chair Edward Bernard noted this will be their final annual report as Auchincloss will retire as FAF’s executive director in September, and  Bernard’s’s term as chair of the FAF board of trustees concludes in December. 

“When we assumed these roles, we inherited an organization that had a well-deserved reputation for excellence due to the experience, intelligence, and commitment of every single employee to our standard-setting mission,” they wrote. “We have been honored to serve in our roles and firmly believe in the organization’s bright future under new leadership.”

Continue Reading

Trending