Connect with us

Accounting

Musk’s cost-cutting campaign is annoying Treasury staff

Published

on

When Elon Musk and his team of young deputies gained access to the Treasury Department computer network that the U.S. government uses to pay its bills, and where private financial data of nearly every American is stored, it caused alarm across the country.

It also seemed to put Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in the middle of a delicate standoff between bureaucrats at the agency he is charged with leading and President Donald Trump’s loudest advisor.

With Trump’s blessing, Musk, the world’s richest man and chief executive of automaker Tesla Inc., has been leading a tornadic campaign to remake the federal bureaucracy that some critics have called illegal.

Bessent, a figure of the traditional finance world, is more on board with the Musk crew’s mission than has been widely understood.

As Bessent was building out his team in December, he interviewed Tom Krause, who is now a member of Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, according to a person familiar with the matter. Krause is now digging into Treasury’s systems and data.

Among the topics they discussed during the interview was the very mission in which DOGE is now engaged, the person said.

A group of roughly half a dozen GOP senators reached out privately to the White House to object to Musk’s accessing of Treasury systems, according to people familiar with the conversations. The senators indicated that the moves went beyond DOGE’s stated mission to save the government money.

Yet the secretary they voted to confirm was involved in planning the moves now underway, even recommending Krause for the special government employee status he now is using to plumb Treasury’s servers.

A Treasury spokesperson declined to comment.

Musk’s systematic provocation has put even some allies of the White House in uncomfortable positions. But the relationship with Bessent reflects how the symbiosis between Musk and Trump is holding — for now.

While Trump aides aren’t bothered by Musk’s efforts to reduce outlays, according to people familiar with the dynamic, the manner in which he is doing it is causing some heartburn, since he often plows ahead before the president has previewed his actions.

Overseeing Musk’s efforts has fallen to Trump Chief of Staff Susie Wiles and the White House counsel, while other top Trump aides have tried to steer clear. Wiles and other Trump officials have also had to fix problems Musk created for some of the president’s Cabinet appointees.

So far, Trump has been pleased with the furor Musk has kicked up, people close to the president say, even if he has at times had to reiterate that he — and not the world’s richest man — occupies the Oval Office.

“Sometimes we won’t agree with it, and we’ll not go where he wants to go,” Trump said of Musk this week. “But I think he’s doing a great job.”

Invaluable access

Even if Trump eventually sours on Musk and his frantic effort to rein in federal spending, Musk, who entered government in a prime position to advance his business interests, will come out ahead, say former Trump officials.

By the time Trump tires of Musk, which most Trump advisors see as inevitable, the magnate will have enough information and access to the government to no longer need his compact with the president.

Musk’s rapid-fire moves to peel back financial data and payment systems could be invaluable in the long run, the people said, as it could shed light on pricing and payment data from Boeing Co., with which Musk’s SpaceX has competed for launch business, or tax information for automakers competing with Tesla.

The Treasury Department said in a letter Tuesday to Senator Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat, that Musk’s team only received permission to read Treasury data, not alter code. No valid agency payment requests have been denied, the department said.

Musk’s broad visibility into the government’s finances and operations poses serious questions about the potential for conflicts with his business empire, which in addition to Tesla and SpaceX includes social media platform X and brain-implant maker Neuralink, as well as The Boring Company, a tunneling business.

Musk is classified as a “special government employee,” a temporary designation that in theory limits his term of service to 130 days out of the year, while shielding him from financial disclosures and other ethics requirements imposed on regular federal hires. 

“Everyone is working as a team, led by President Trump and his highly respected Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, and any speculation otherwise is pure fantasy pushed by people who have nothing better to do with their lives,” said White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt.

Disdaining diversity

Musk’s sweeping moves to downsize the government echo the views of other top Trump officials. The casual denigration of government service in emails that the DOGE team blasted out to encourage federal workers to resign recalled speeches given by Russ Vought, the president’s nominee to run the Office of Management and Budget. Vought has reportedly said his goal is for federal workers to dread coming to work, and to feel as if they are “villains.”

Musk and Trump also share a disdain for diversity, equity and inclusion, or DEI. Among the new regime’s earliest moves was to convene a meeting of all the offices at the headquarters of the Federal Aviation Administration, according to a person briefed on the plan. The only section not invited to the meeting: the FAA’s Office of Civil Rights.

Behind the scenes, Trump officials have had to rein in Musk’s unruliness when it risked creating blowback for other parts of the administration.

Last week, Wiles helped direct efforts to clean up after Musk responded to Senator Todd Young’s reported doubts about the nomination of former Representative Tulsi Gabbard to be the director of national intelligence, according to a person familiar with the matter. 

“Todd Young is a deep state puppet,” Musk declared on X. He then walked back the comment two hours later, posting that he and Young had an “excellent” conversation. Young voted to advance Gabbard’s nomination on Tuesday.

Familiar roles

Some of Musk’s DOGE staff have been brought on to do work that echoes tasks they carried out for his companies. 

Nicole Hollander, the romantic partner of a Musk lieutenant named Steve Davis, is embedded at the General Services Administration, working on terminating leases for federal office space. Hollander, who has worked in real estate for over a decade, currently serves as real estate director at X Corp., where she similarly aided Musk’s mission of reducing the social media company’s physical footprint. 

In coordination with DOGE staffers, GSA’s public buildings commissioner this week directed agency employees to terminate 300 federal leases a day until they reach 3,000, part of DOGE’s plan to “right size” the government portfolio, according to two people familiar with the mandate. 

That fast-paced effort will likely put GSA and DOGE on a collision course with lawmakers, who have historically rejected efforts to get rid of buildings in their districts.

Democrats appeared dazed by DOGE’s initial strikes. That was changing this week, as lawmakers joined federal workers rallying outside government office buildings. Increasingly, they are trying to turn Trump against Musk by painting him as a threat to the president’s primacy.

“We don’t pledge allegiance to Elon Musk,” said Senator Chris Murphy, Democrat of Connecticut. “We don’t pledge allegiance to the creepy 22-year-olds working for Elon Musk.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

Lutnick’s tax comments give cruise operators case of deja vu

Published

on

Cruise operators may yet avoid paying more U.S. corporate taxes despite threats from U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to close favorable loopholes. 

Lutnick’s comments on Fox News Wednesday that U.S.-based cruise companies should be paying taxes even on ships registered abroad sent shares lower, though analysts indicated the worry may be overblown.

“We would note this is probably the 10th time in the last 15 years we have seen a politician (or other DC bureaucrat) talk about changing the tax structure of the cruise industry,” Stifel Managing Director Steven Wieczynski wrote in a note to clients. “Each time it was presented, it didn’t get very far.”

Industry shares fell sharply Thursday. Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. closed 7.6% lower, the largest drop since September 2022. Peers Carnival Corp. and Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings dropped by at least 4.9%.

All three continued slumping Friday, trading lower by around 1% each.

Cruise companies often operate their ships in international waters and can register those vessels in tax haven countries to avoid some U.S. corporate levies. It’s exactly those sorts of practices with which Lutnick has taken issue. 

“You ever see a cruise ship with an American flag on the back?,” Lutnick said during the interview which aired Wednesday evening. “They have flags like Liberia or Panama. None of them pay taxes.”

“This is going to end under Donald Trump and those taxes are going to be paid.” He also called out foreign alcohol producers and the wider cargo shipping industry. 

The vessels are embedded in international laws and treaties governing the wider maritime trades, including cargo shipping. Targeting cruise ships would require significant changes to those rule books to collect dues from the pleasure crafts, analysts noted. The cruise industry represents less than 1% of the global commercial fleet, according to Cruise Lines International Association, an industry trade group.

They also pay significant port fees and could relocate abroad to avoid new additional taxes, according to Wieczynski, who sees the selloff as a buying opportunity. 

“Cruise lines pay substantial taxes and fees in the U.S. — to the tune of nearly $2.5 billion, which represents 65% of the total taxes cruise lines pay worldwide, even though only a very small percentage of operations occur in U.S. waters,” CLIA said in an emailed statement. 

Should increased taxes come to pass, the maximum impact to profits would be 21% on US earnings, Bernstein senior analyst Richard Clarke wrote in a note. That hit wouldn’t be enough to change their product offerings, though it may discourage future investment. Recently, U.S. cruise companies have spent billions beefing up their operations in the U.S. and Caribbean. 

Cruise lines already employ tax mitigation teams that would work to counteract attempts by the U.S. to collect taxes on revenue generated in international waters, wrote Sharon Zackfia, a partner with William Blair.

Royal Caribbean did not respond to requests to comment. Carnival and Norwegian directed Bloomberg News to CLIA’s statement. 

Continue Reading

Accounting

AI in accounting and its growing role

Published

on

Artificial intelligence took the business world by storm in 2024. Content creation companies received powerful new AI-powered tools, allowing them to crank out high-quality images with simple prompts. AI also helped cybersecurity companies filter email for phishing attempts. Any company engaging in online meetings received an ever-ready assistant eager to show up, take notes and highlight the most important talking points.

These and countless other AI-driven tools that emerged during the past year are boosting efficiency in virtually every industry by automating the tasks that most often bog down business processes. Essentially, AI takes on the business world’s day-to-day dirty work, delivering with more accuracy and speed than human workers are capable of providing.

For accounting, AI couldn’t have come at a better time. Recent reports show that securing capable accounting staff is becoming more challenging due to a high number of retirees and a low number of new accounting graduates. At the same time, globalization, the rise of the gig economy, the shift to remote work and other recent developments in the business landscape have increased both the volume and complexity of accounting work.

As companies struggle to do more with less, AI offers solutions that promise to reshape the accounting world. However, putting AI to work also forces companies to accept some new risks.

“Bias” has become a huge buzzword in the AI arena, forcing companies to consider how the automation tools they bring in to help with processing data may introduce some questionable or even dangerous ideas. There are also ethical issues associated with next-level AI-powered data processing that have some concerned that achieving AI-assisted business efficiency also means risking consumer privacy.

To make AI worthwhile as an accounting tool, companies must find ways to balance gains in efficiency with the ethical risks it presents. The following explores the growing role AI can play in business accounting while also pointing out some of the downsides that should be carefully considered.

AI upside: Increased accuracy and efficiency

Accounting isn’t accounting if it isn’t accurate. Miskeyed amounts or misplaced decimal points aren’t acceptable, regardless of the company’s size or the business it is doing. When the numbers are wrong, the decision-making that relies on those numbers suffers.

Consequently, manual accounting typically moves slowly to avoid errors. Business leaders have learned to wait on financial reporting prepared by hand. They’ve also learned that because of processing delays, they may not have the numbers they need to take advantage of unexpected opportunities.

AI changes the equation by improving the speed and accuracy of reporting. AI-powered data entry automatically extracts numbers from invoices and other financial statements, eliminating the need for manual entry and the mistakes that can occur when an accountant is distracted, tired or just having an off day. AI can also detect errors or inconsistencies in incoming documents by comparing invoices and other documents to previous records, providing a second set of eyes for accounts as they ensure companies aren’t being overbilled or under-compensated.

When it comes to increasing the pace of accounting, AI’s capabilities are truly astonishing. As Accounting Today has reported, in the past, the type of robotic process automation AI empowers can be used to drive automated processes 745% faster than manual processes. And AI accounting programs never clock out or take a lunch break. They work 24/7, even on bank holidays, to keep the books up to date.

AI accounting gives business leaders accurate financial data in real time, meaning they have relevant and reliable accounting intel when they need it rather than requiring them to wait until the end of the month to have a report on where their cash flow stands. It also has the potential to give a glimpse into the future by drawing upon historical data to drive predictive analytics. AI can look at what has been unfolding in a business and its industry to plot the path forward that makes the most financial sense. It’s not exactly a crystal ball, but it’s as close as most businesses should expect to get.

AI upside: More time for high-level engagement

As AI began to make inroads in the business world, experts warned it would ultimately replace hundreds of millions of jobs. While the consensus seems to be that AI doesn’t have what it takes to replace an accountant, it certainly has the potential to reshape the profession in a positive way.

The manual work typical of conventional accounting is tedious, tiresome and time-consuming. Doing it well eats up much of the energy accountants could otherwise apply to higher-level activities. By using AI automation for those tasks, accountants gain the resources needed for high-level engagement.

Accountants who partner with AI gain the capacity to shift their role from bookkeeper to financial advisor. Rather than focusing all of their energy on preparing reports, they are freed up to interpret the reports. Delegating data entry and other day-to-day tasks to AI allows accountants to become strategic partners with the businesses they serve, whether as in-house employees or external advisors.

Financial forecasting becomes much more doable when AI is in play. Accountants can develop comprehensive financial models that forecast future revenue and expenses. They can also assess investment opportunities, such as determining the viability of mergers and acquisitions, and help with risk management and mitigation.

Tax planning and optimization will also become more manageable once AI automations have been added to the mix. Automating data extraction and categorization streamlines the process of classifying expenses for tax purposes and identifying expenses that are eligible for deductions. AI automation can also be used for tax form completion, adding speed and a higher level of accuracy to a process that very few accountants look forward to completing manually.

AI downside: Higher data security risks

Accountants are well aware of the dangers of data breaches. Allowing financial data to fall into unauthorized hands can lead to financial loss, operational disruption, reputational damage and regulatory consequences. Shifting to AI accounting can potentially increase the risk of data breaches.

Changing to AI accounting often means concentrating financial and other sensitive data and moving it to interconnected networks. Concentrating data creates a target that is more desirable to bad actors. Shifting it to the cloud or other interconnected networks creates a larger attack surface. Both factors create situations in which higher levels of data security are definitely needed.

Addressing the heightened threat of cyberattacks requires a combination of tech tools and human sensibilities. To keep accounting data safe, encryption, multifactor authentication, and regular testing and update protocols should be used. Training should also help accounting teams understand what an attack looks like and how to respond if they sense one is being carried out.

AI downside: Less process customization

Developing the types of platforms that can safely and reliably drive AI automations is not an easy — nor cheap — undertaking. Consequently, many companies choose the economy of “off-the-shelf” platforms. However, opting for a standardized platform could mean closing the door on customized financial workflows a company has developed.

For example, an off-the-shelf platform may not have the option of accommodating the accounting rules of highly specialized industries. It may have a predefined chart of accounts structure that doesn’t fit the structure a company has traditionally used. It also may be limited in the formats that can be used for financial reporting, which could require business leaders to make peace with reports that don’t fit their personal tastes.

To avoid big problems that can surface after shifting to off-the-shelf solutions, companies should make sure to take their time and seek software that can scale with their plans for growth. Like any other technological innovation, AI is a tool meant to support and not supplant a company’s processes. The process of selecting an AI platform to improve accounting efficiency begins with mapping out a company’s unique process and identifying where AI can boost efficiency. If the platform you are considering can’t deliver, keep looking.

AI best practice: Take it slow and learn as you go

The biggest temptation for companies as they begin to embrace AI will likely be doing too much too fast and with too little oversight. Artificial intelligence is a remarkable tech tool, but still in its infancy. Taking advantage of its capabilities also requires managing some risks.

For example, AI has what some experts describe as an “explainability” problem. Developers know what AI can do but don’t always know how it does it. Companies that feel compelled to provide their clients or stakeholders with a solid explanation of the process behind their AI automations may be limited in how they can put AI to work.

Now is the time to begin integrating AI with your company’s accounting efforts, but take it slow and learn as you go. A solid best practice is to explore what is available, experiment with how it can help your business, and expect to make many adjustments before you arrive at an optimal process. Your accounting efforts will serve you best when they combine human and artificial intelligence.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Ascend adds VP of partnerships

Published

on

Ascend, a private-equity backed accounting firm, added a vice president of partnerships to its leadership team.

Maureen Churgovich Dillmore will oversee the expansion of Ascend’s growth platform for regional accounting firms into new U.S. markets, effective Feb. 17. She was previously executive director of the Americas at Prime Global. Prior, she was executive director at DFK International/USA.

“I have dedicated a large part of my career to supporting firms that want to remain independent. The dynamics of achieving success in this area are evolving rapidly, and the Ascend model was created so that firm identity would not be at odds with accessing the community and resources needed to prosper. I am genuinely impressed by Ascend’s ability to assist mid-sized firms in making the necessary strides to stay relevant, sustain growth, and provide their staff and clients with top-tier shared services—all while preserving their unique brand and culture,” Churgovich Dillmore said in a statement.

Ascend has added 14 partner firms across 11 states since the company launched in January 2023.

Maureen Churgovich Dillmore

Maureen Churgovich Dillmore

“So much of association work is theoretical, advising member firms on best practices, and you don’t get to see the end game. What excites me about being on the Ascend team is the opportunity to be a force behind the change, to help enact the change and see where and how it comes in,” Churgovich Dillmore added.

“Maureen’s decision to join Ascend is rooted in her desire to serve the profession in a way that maximizes her impact. We are all excited to welcome someone into our Company who has been an advisor and friend to mid-sized CPA firms for over a decade, and it is all the more rewarding when you realize that the community and resources we are bringing to life will allow Maureen to have conversations with firms that she’s never had before. Her curiosity, commitment, and deep care for others are going to stand out in this role,” Nishaad (Nish) Ruparel, president of Ascend, said in a statement.

Ascend is backed by private equity firm Alpine Investors and works with regional accounting firms with between $15 and $50 million in revenue. It ranked No. 59 on Accounting Today‘s 2024 Top 100 Firms list, with $126 million in revenue and over 600 employees. 

Continue Reading

Trending