Traders work on the floor at the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York City, U.S., February 7, 2024.
Brendan Mcdermid | Reuters
The benefits of scale will never be more obvious than when banks begin reporting quarterly results on Friday.
Ever since the chaos of last year’s regional banking crisis that consumed three institutions, larger banks have mostly fared better than smaller ones. That trend is set to continue, especially as expectations for the magnitude of Federal Reserve interest rates cuts have fallen sharply since the start of the year.
The evolving picture on interest rates — dubbed “higher for longer” as expectations for rate cuts this year shift from six reductions to perhaps three – will boost revenue for big banks while squeezing many smaller ones, adding to concerns for the group, according to analysts and investors.
JPMorgan Chase, the nation’s largest lender, kicks off earnings for the industry on Friday, followed by Bank of America and Goldman Sachs next week. On Monday, M&T Bank posts results, one of the first regional lenders to report this period.
The focus for all of them will be how the shifting view on interest rates will impact funding costs and holdings of commercial real estate loans.
“There’s a handful of banks that have done a very good job managing the rate cycle, and there’s been a lot of banks that have mismanaged it,” said Christopher McGratty, head of U.S. bank research at KBW.
Pricing pressure
Take, for instance, Valley Bank, a regional lender based in Wayne, New Jersey. Guidance the bank gave in January included expectations for seven rate cuts this year, which would’ve allowed it to pay lower rates to depositors.
Instead, the bank might be forced to slash its outlook for net interest income as cuts don’t materialize, according to Morgan Stanley analyst Manan Gosalia, who has the equivalent of a sell rating on the firm.
Net interest income is the money generated by a bank’s loans and securities, minus what it pays for deposits.
Smaller banks have been forced to pay up for deposits more so than larger ones, which are perceived to be safer, in the aftermath of the Silicon Valley Bank failure last year. Rate cuts would’ve provided some relief for smaller banks, while also helping commercial real estate borrowers and their lenders.
Valley Bank faces “more deposit pricing pressure than peers if rates stay higher for longer” and has more commercial real estate exposure than other regionals, Gosalia said in an April 4 note.
Meanwhile, for large banks like JPMorgan, higher rates generally mean they can exploit their funding advantages for longer. They enjoy the benefits of reaping higher interest for things like credit card loans and investments made during a time of elevated rates, while generally paying low rates for deposits.
JPMorgan could raise its 2024 guidance for net interest income by an estimated $2 billion to $3 billion, to $93 billion, according to UBS analyst Erika Najarian.
Large U.S. banks also tend to have more diverse revenue streams than smaller ones from areas like wealth management and investment banking. Both should provide boosts to first-quarter results, thanks to buoyant markets and a rebound in Wall Street activity.
CRE exposure
Furthermore, big banks tend to have much lower exposure to commercial real estate compared with smaller players, and have generally higher levels of provisions for loan losses, thanks to tougher regulations on the group.
That difference could prove critical this earnings season.
Concerns over commercial real estate, especially office buildings and multifamily dwellings, have dogged smaller banks since New York Community Bank stunned investors in January with its disclosures of drastically larger loan provisions and broader operational challenges. The bank needed a $1 billion-plus lifeline last month to help steady the firm.
NYCB will likely have to cut its net interest income guidance because of shrinking deposits and margins, according to JPMorgan analyst Steven Alexopoulos.
There is a record $929 billion in commercial real estate loans coming due this year, and roughly one-third of the loans are for more money than the underlying property values, according to advisory firm Newmark.
“I don’t think we’re out of the woods in terms of commercial real estate rearing its ugly head for bank earnings, especially if rates stay higher for longer,” said Matt Stucky, chief portfolio manager for equities at Northwestern Mutual.
“If there’s even a whiff of problems around the credit experience with your commercial lending operation, as was the case with NYCB, you’ve seen how quickly that can get away from you,” he said.
Bernstein is looking at Chinese internet tech stocks like it’s the downtrodden days of Covid-19. “For all the justified consternation around geopolitics and trade headwinds, we think the mantra of ‘fade sentiment extremes’ still applies,” Bernstein China internet analyst Robin Zhu and a team said in an April 14 report. “Several of the other conditions that marked prior bottoms in the China internet sector now apply again,” they said, pointing out that valuation multiples have mostly fallen back to the lows seen in the 2021 to 2023 period. Tighter government regulation on Chinese internet businesses and the Shanghai lockdown in 2022 had weighed heavily on investor sentiment. But as Beijing ramped up its stimulus announcements in recent months and signaled more private sector support — especially with the advent of DeepSeek’s artificial intelligence breakthrough — Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index broke a four-year losing streak in 2024 and kicked off 2025 with a strong start. “Looking across global markets, we can’t help but feel the rate of regulatory change Stateside feels mildly reminiscent of China in 2021,” the Bernstein analysts said, noting China’s current policy stance now appears more predictable in contrast. “Within our [China internet] coverage, video gaming feels like the sector most insulated from trade and macro headwinds, while digital ads might even be benefitting from merchants pivoting to selling domestically,” the Bernstein report said, highlighting two sweet spots for social media and gaming giant Tencent . U.S.-China trade tensions escalated into an essential standoff over the last two weeks, while uncertainty has grown over whether major Chinese companies will need to delist from U.S. exchanges. The Hang Seng curtailed its earlier 2025 gains and is up nearly 7% this year as of Thursday’s close. The market was closed Friday for a holiday. Tencent, the largest Hong Kong-listed company by market cap, remains Bernstein’s top pick in the China Internet sector. The tech company trades at 13.5 times estimated 2026 earnings, which the analysts pointed out is not far from the bottom of a recent range, before investors started buying the stock on expectations it can benefit from generative AI. The firm rates Tencent overweight with a 640 Hong Kong dollar price target — for expected upside of nearly 40% from Thursday’s close. Bernstein also rates Chinese gaming company NetEase overweight, with a $125 price target, or nearly 27% upside from Thursday’s close. The stock is listed in both the U.S. and Hong Kong. China approved 362 new games in the first quarter, almost recovering to 2020 levels, Bernstein analysis showed. Beijing had temporarily halted new game approvals in the interim while trying to restrict minors from playing games for too many hours each week. Major Chinese companies’ digital ads revenue has been growing by at least 10% year on year in recent quarters, the Bernstein analysts said. For Tencent in particular, they expect the company can benefit from Chinese merchants needing to compete more in the domestic market due to high U.S. tariffs. “Our channel checks with advertisers have pointed to improvements in AI and ad tech driving clear upside in ad [return on investment] across Tencent’s properties,” the Bernstein analysts said, pointing to the Chinese company’s Miaosi ad creation platform and increased ads on short videos hosted within Tencent’s ubiquitous WeChat social media and messaging app. Part of the Chinese government’s efforts to support local exporters is to assist them with selling products once destined for the U.S. to Chinese market instead. China reported first-quarter gross domestic product growth last week of 5.4% , above expectations. Economists meanwhile have started cutting targets — with UBS down to a forecast of just 3.4% for the year, versus China’s official target of around 5%. “While pressure from US-China trade issues poses clear risks for the Chinese economy, the 100-200bps of top-down slowdown most analysis we’ve read do not point to some kind of economic apocalypse,” the Bernstein analysts said. “On the local services front, Meituan’s forward guidance remained robust, pointing to mid-20% [gross transaction value] growth (higher than Q4 levels), and slightly lower growth in revenues,” the Bernstein analysts said of the food-delivery giant, which is listed in Hong Kong. The firm rates the stock overweight and has a price target of 200 HKD, or 46.5% upside from Thursday’s close. Bernstein also has overweight ratings on Alibaba and JD.com , which have shares listed in both the U.S. and Hong Kong. Their only China internet stock pick that doesn’t have a Hong Kong listing yet is Temu’s parent PDD. Chinese companies listed in the U.S. have started offering shares in Hong Kong in the last several years as worries increased about a potential forced delisting from New York exchanges. The concerns picked up again after the White House in late February said it would review U.S. investments in Chinese companies. And when asked by Fox Business on April 9 about a potential delisting, U.S. Treasury Scott Bessent said, ” Everything’s on the table .” The Bernstein analysts pointed out that investors have recently preferred Hong Kong stocks that are also accessible from mainland China via the “Southbound” stock connect, and avoided U.S.-listed Chinese companies that may find it difficult to list in Hong Kong. They expect PDD may already be seeking a deal of some kind to mitigate the business impact of any increased U.S. restrictions. — CNBC’s Michael Bloom contributed to this report.
“What we try to do is help investors leverage the upside through sector rotation, but also minimize drawdowns,” the Fairlead Strategies founder told CNBC’s “ETF Edge” this week. “That’s obviously a big advantage longer term when you can just go into a less deep hole to climb out of.”
According to Stockton, her ETF is particularly nimble in this environment because it uses multiple strategies — not just one. Since President Donald Trump announced his “reciprocal” tariffs on April 2, the ETF has fallen just over 4%, while the S&P 500 has lost 6.9%.
Stockton’s ETF rotates monthly between all 11 S&P 500 sectors.
“We don’t own technology anymore,” Stockton said. “Some of the sectors that we like to invest in have fallen out of favor.”
As of Thursday’s close, the Fairlead Tactical Sector ETF is down 4% so far this year.
Meanwhile, ETFs that are centered around specific sectors or strategies are largely under pressure. For example, the Invesco Top QQQ Trust (QBIG), which tracks the top 45% of companies in the Nasdaq-100 index, is down 22% in 2025.
BTIG’s Troy Donohue, the firm’s head of Americas portfolio trading, thinks Stockton’s ETF employs a sound strategy – particularly during the recent “dramatic pullback.”
“TACK is a great example of how you can be nimble during these market times,” Donohue said. “It’s great to see it in an ETF product that has performed really well during this recent drawdown.”
“The Board evaluated the application under the statutory factors it is required to consider, including the financial and managerial resources of the companies, the convenience and needs of the communities to be served by the combined organization, and the competitive and financial stability impacts of the proposal,” the Fed said in a release.
Capital One first announced it had entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Discover in February 2024. It will also indirectly acquire Discover Bank through the transaction.
Under the agreement, Discover shareholders will receive 1.0192 Capital One shares for each Discover share or about a 26% premium from Discover’s closing price of $110.49 at the time, Capital One said in a release.
Capital One and Discover are among the largest credit card issuers in the U.S., and the merger will expand Capital One’s deposit base and its credit card offerings.
After the deal closes, Capital One shareholders will hold 60% of the combined company, while Discover shareholders own 40%, according to the February 2024 release.
In a joint statement, Capital One and Discover said they expect to close the deal on May 18.