Accounting
Estate planning for the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act expiration
The political calculus involved with the details of estate planning next year and beyond may be distracting financial advisors and clients from a larger, simpler conversation, one expert says.
On the off chance that the federal estate-tax exemption levels of $13.99 million for individuals (and double for couples) revert to half those amounts when Tax Cuts and Jobs Act provisions expire in 2026, only 0.2% of households would face potential duties upon transfer of assets, according to Ben Rizzuto, a wealth strategist with
With
“For financial advisors and clients, I would expect for many of them not to have to worry about federal estate taxes next year,” he said in an interview. “Even though they may not have to worry about it, there are still a lot of good conversations to be had.”
READ MORE:
The 1%
Trust tools that reduce the value of the assets that will transfer to spouses or other beneficiaries upon a client’s death, combined with the available statistics about the shrinking share of estates subject to taxes, could bring some peace of mind to clients. The 2017 tax law itself pushed down estate tax liability as a percentage of gross domestic product to a quarter of its 2001 level,
At the same time, advisors could raise any number of questions with clients
“We’re seeing a fundamental shift in client expectations,” Trust & Will CEO Cody Barbo said
READ MORE:
Get back to the planning basics
In that context, advisors and their clients should steer clear of trying to make sense of a complicated, ever-changing flow of news from Capitol Hill as Trump and the GOP pursue major tax legislation with a year-end deadline, Rizzuto said. If clients truly could be on the hook for estate taxes, a
“Why not gift them upstream?” Rizzuto said. “My father holds it. I tell him, ‘Dad, you have to do these things: Live for another 12 months, make sure you don’t sell, make sure that you update your will or your instructions to gift it back to me when you die.’ That’s another idea that we’ve been talking about with advisors.”
From another perspective, these possible paths forward may beckon to clients this year, if they are tuning into Beltway news about the progress of the tax legislation, he said. To bypass the risk of client perceptions that their advisor isn’t doing any tax planning at all, Washington’s complex maneuvering around the future rules is, “if nothing else,” a “great opportunity for advisors to bring this up at a very high level,” Rizzuto said.
“Advisors will really need to go back to basics and have some foundational conversations with clients,” he said, suggesting their goals with taxes as one key point of discussion. “‘What is it that we actually control within your financial and tax plan?’ When it comes right down to it, it’s really just incomes and deductions.”
A Republican attempt to block states from enforcing new artificial intelligence rules over the next decade has drawn growing bipartisan objections, exposing tension in Washington over allowing for more unchecked AI development.
The proposal, buried on pages 278 and 279 in the sweeping tax bill passed by the House last month, has drawn sharp criticism from Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene and Senator Marsha Blackburn, as well as Democratic Senators Ed Markey and Elizabeth Warren. More than 200 state lawmakers from both parties also urged Congress this week to scrap the measure.
“We have no idea what AI will be capable of in the next 10 years,” Greene
Markey and Warren have also been forceful in pushing back against the measure, arguing that it violates Senate rules that bill language included in the budget reconciliation process must relate to spending. “This backdoor AI moratorium is not serious. It’s not responsible. And it’s not acceptable,” Markey said. Meanwhile, Senate Commerce Chair Ted Cruz (R-Texas) has said he’s “not certain if that provision will survive,” though he has expressed support for it.
Since returning to the White House, President Donald Trump has taken steps to
But bipartisan resistance to the proposed moratorium on AI rules highlights a fierce divide in Washington over how much to let the industry regulate itself.
Congress has yet to pass a federal framework on AI, which has effectively left the states to take the lead on figuring out how to set rules around the technology. California, New York, Utah and dozens of others have introduced or enacted AI laws in recent years, including bills to address concerns about data privacy, copyright and bias raised by the technology.
If Congress backs away from the proposal, it would mark a setback for top AI developers. In March, OpenAI asked the White House to
So far, the leading AI companies have largely stayed quiet as the fight over the measure plays out. Meta Platforms Inc. declined to comment. Alphabet Inc.’s Google didn’t respond to a request for comment. OpenAI declined to comment beyond its previous policy suggestions.
TechNet, a trade group representing Google, OpenAI and other tech companies, echoed the ChatGPT maker’s concerns about the “developing patchwork” of state AI bills. “In 2025, over 1000 AI bills have been introduced in state legislatures — many containing incompatible rules and requirements,” Linda Moore, chief executive officer of TechNet, said in a statement to Bloomberg News. “A consistent national approach is critical,” she added, to address AI risks and “ensure America remains the global leader in innovation for generations to come.”
Anthropic, a safety-focused AI startup that has called for more regulation generally,
“Ten years is a long time,” Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei said at the company’s developer conference on May 22, speaking about the moratorium. “It’s one thing to say, ‘We don’t have to grab the steering wheel now.’ It’s another thing to say, ‘We’re going to rip out the steering wheel and we can’t put it back in for 10 years.'”
Some Republican senators have raised doubts that the AI provision can pass through the reconciliation process, but this camp has also expressed support for an interim ban on state rules to avoid an overly fragmented and complex regulatory landscape.
“I wouldn’t put my money on anything right now until it actually passes,” John Curtis, a Republican senator from Utah, previously
State legislators, however, worry that the provision would rob them of the ability to protect their constituents from the rapidly evolving technology.
“Over the next decade, AI will raise some of the most important public policy questions of our time,” state lawmakers from 49 states wrote in a
Enjoy complimentary access to top ideas and insights — selected by our editors.
This week’s stats focus in part on the job titles seeing the greatest losses at the IRS during layoffs; as well as the states that have proposed or passed alternatives to the 150-hour rule; the percentage of master’s in accounting program applicants since 2020; the number of PwC employees laid off in May; the projected size of Deloitte’s new New York City headquarters; and the amount of 2026 HSA annual contribution limits, depending on coverage.
CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. said U.S. officials have asked for information related to the accounting of deals it’s made with some customers and said the cybersecurity firm is cooperating with the inquiry.
The Austin, Texas-based company said in a filing Wednesday that it has gotten “requests for information” from the U.S. Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission “relating to the company’s recognition of revenue and reporting of ARR for transactions with certain customers.” ARR refers to annual recurring revenue, a measure of earnings from subscriptions.
The company said the federal officials have also sought information related to a CrowdStrike update last year that crashed Windows operating systems around the world.
“The company is cooperating and providing information in response to these requests,” the filing states.
U.S. prosecutors and regulators have been investigating a $32 million deal between CrowdStrike and a technology distributor, Carahsoft Technology Corp., to provide cybersecurity tools to the Internal Revenue Service, Bloomberg News first reported in February. The IRS never purchased or received the products, Bloomberg News
The investigators are probing what senior CrowdStrike executives may have known about the $32 million deal and are examining other transactions made by the cybersecurity firm, Bloomberg News
Asked for comment about the filing, CrowdStrike spokesperson Brian Merrill said, “As we have told Bloomberg repeatedly, this is old news and we stand by the accounting of the transaction.”
A lawyer for Carahsoft previously declined to comment on the federal investigations, and representatives didn’t respond to subsequent requests for comment about them.
What a New Jersey election says about MAGA America
Tax bill’s bid to ban new AI rules faces bipartisan blowback
Pete Hegseth once scared America’s allies. Now he reassures them
New 2023 K-1 instructions stir the CAMT pot for partnerships and corporations
The Essential Practice of Bank and Credit Card Statement Reconciliation
Are American progressives making themselves sad?
-
Economics1 week agoElon Musk says Trump’s spending bill undermines the work DOGE has been doing
-
Accounting1 week agoHighest paid jobs in corporate accounting
-
Blog Post5 days agoCommon Bookkeeping Challenges and Solutions for Small Businesses
-
Economics1 week agoHow young voters helped to put Trump in the White House
-
Personal Finance1 week agoHarvard, Trump international enrollment battle affects college applicants
-
Economics6 days agoWhy the president must not be lexicographer-in-chief
-
Personal Finance1 week agoCrypto in 401(k) plans: Trump administration eases rules
-
Finance1 week agoVail Resorts, GameStop and more