Connect with us

Finance

How China’s exporters are scrambling to mitigate the impact of punishing U.S. tariffs

Published

on

A large number of machinery and vehicles are ready for shipment at the dock of the Oriental Port Branch of Lianyungang Port in Lianyungang, China, on September 27, 2024. 

Costfoto | Nurphoto | Getty Images

BEIJING — U.S. has raised tariffs on Chinese imports to triple digits. For China’s exporters, it means raising prices for Americans while accelerating plans to diversify operations — and, in some cases, stopping shipments entirely.

U.S. consumers could lose access to certain products in June since some American companies have halted their plans to import textiles from China, said Ryan Zhao, director at Jiangsu Green Willow Textile.

For products that continue to be shipped from China, “it’s impossible to predict” by how much their prices will rise for U.S. consumers, he said Thursday in Chinese, translated by CNBC. “It takes two to four months for products to be shipped from China’s ports and arrive on U.S. supermarket shelves. In the last two months tariffs have climbed from 10% to 125% today.”

The White House has confirmed the U.S. tariff rate on Chinese goods was effectively at 145%. Triple-digit tariffs essentially cut off most trade, a Tax Foundation economist told CNBC’s “The Exchange.”

But U.S.-China trade relationship won’t change overnight, even as American companies that source from China are looking for alternatives.

NEC's Kevin Hassett on 90-day tariff pause: Treasury market helped make decision with more urgency

Tony Post, CEO of U.S.-based running shoe company Topo Athletic, said he is planning to work more with suppliers based in Vietnam in addition to his existing China suppliers.

When the initial two rounds of 10% U.S. tariffs were imposed this year, he said his four China suppliers offered to split the cost with Topo. But now “more than the cost of the product itself has been added in import duties just in the last few months,” he said.

“I’m going to eventually have to raise prices and I don’t know for sure what impact that is going to have on our business,” Post said. Before Trump started with tariffs, Post predicted nearly $100 million in revenue this year — primarily from the U.S.

Economic fallout

Hopes for a U.S.-China deal to resolve trade tensions have faded fast as Beijing has hit back in the last week with tit-for-tat duties on American goods and wide-ranging restrictions on U.S. businesses.

With steep tariffs, China’s shipments to the U.S. will likely plunge by 80% over the next two years, Julian Evans-Pritchard, head of China economics at Capital Economics, said late Thursday.

Goldman Sachs on Thursday cut its China GDP forecast to 4% given the drag from U.S. trade tensions and slower global growth.

While Chinese exports to the U.S. only account for about 3 percentage points of China’s total GDP, there’s still a significant impact on employment, Goldman Sachs analysts said. They estimate around 10 million to 20 million workers in China are involved with U.S.-bound export businesses.

As Beijing tries to address already slowing growth, one of its strategies is to help Chinese exporters sell more at home. China’s Ministry of Commerce said Thursday it recently gathered major business associations to discuss measures to boost sales domestically instead of overseas.

But Chinese consumers have been reluctant to spend, a trend reinforced by yet another drop in consumer price inflation, data released Thursday showed.

“The Chinese domestic market can’t absorb existing supply, much less additional amounts,” said Derek Scissors, senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute think tank.

He expects Beijing could follow its playbook of making concessions to the U.S., dump products on other countries, subsidize loss-making firms and let other businesses die. Diverting goods to other countries would likely increase local trade barriers for China, while subsidies would exacerbate debt and deflationary pressures at home, Scissors said.

China has made boosting consumption its priority this year and has expanded subsidies for a consumer trade-in program focused on home appliances. Tsinghua University professor Li Daokui told CNBC’s “The China Connection” Thursday that he expected measures to boost consumption would be announced “within 10 days.”

Hard to replace

While the U.S. government has strived over the last several years to encourage manufacturers to build factories in the country, especially in the high-tech sector, businesses and analysts said it won’t be easy to develop those facilities and find experienced workers.

“We cannot obtain comparable equipment from sources in the U.S.,” Ford said in a U.S. tariff exemption request last month for a manufacturing tool used to make its electric-vehicle battery cells. “A U.S. supplier would not have the specific experience with the handling and heating process.”

Tesla and other major corporations have also filed similar requests for exclusion from U.S. tariffs.

A large chunk of goods can mostly be sourced from China alone. For 36% of U.S. imports from China, more than 70% can only come from suppliers based in the Asian country, Goldman Sachs analysts said this week. They said that indicates it will be hard for U.S. importers to find alternatives, despite new tariffs.

On the other hand, just 10% of Chinese imports from the U.S. rely on American suppliers, the report said.

The world’s second-largest economy has also sought to move into higher-end manufacturing. In addition to apparel and footwear, the U.S. relies on China for computers, machinery, home appliances and electronics, Allianz Research said last week.

Diversification

China was the second-largest supplier of U.S. goods in 2024, with imports from China rising by 2.8% to $438.95 billion last year, according to U.S. Census Bureau data. Mexico climbed to first place starting in 2023, while U.S. imports from Vietnam — which has benefitted from re-routing of Chinese goods — more than doubled in 2024 from 2019, the data showed.

Several large Chinese textile companies have been moving some production to Southeast Asia, Green Willow Textile’s Zhao said.

Tariff situation 'calls for us to move quicker' to diversify outside Asia: Lever Style

As for his own company, “this year we are developing customers in Southeast Asia, Latin America, the Middle East and Europe in order to reduce our reliance on the U.S. market,” Zhao said, noting the company could not bear the cost of the additional tariffs given its already low net profit of 5% last year.

China’s trade with Southeast Asia has grown rapidly since 2019, making the region the country’s largest trading partner, followed by the European Union and then the U.S. in 2024, according to Chinese customs data.

Chinese President Xi Jinping is set to visit Vietnam on Monday and Tuesday, followed by a trip to Malaysia and Cambodia later in the week, state media said Friday, citing China’s foreign ministry.

“I suspect that we will have a bit of a whack-a-mole situation where there will be new rules coming to crack down on Chinese content in products that ultimately end up in the United States,” Deborah Elms, head of the Hinrich Foundation, said on CNBC’s “The China Connection” Thursday.

Trump on Wednesday paused plans for a sharp hike on tariffs for most countries, including in Southeast Asia, but not for China.

That pause has offered a brief relief to people like Steve Greenspon, CEO of Illinois-based houseware company Honey-Can-Do International, whose company has moved more production from China to Vietnam since Trump’s first term.

“The pause allows us to continue with business as usual outside of China, but we cannot make any long term plans,” said Greenspon. “It’s hard to know how to pivot as we don’t know what will happen in 90 days.”

The economic realities could push the U.S. and China toward a deal, some analysts predict.

Gary Dvorchak, managing director at Blueshirt Group, pointed out Thursday that the latest tariffs have only been announced in the last several days and he expects ratcheting up of duties is likely posturing ahead of a deal — potentially as soon in the next few days.

Despite aggressive rhetoric, he thinks both countries have much to lose if the tariffs are made permanent. To have the U.S. cut off from Chinese goods would plunge China into a deeper depression, he said.

Continue Reading

Finance

Treasury Bond Volatility Forces Bessent to Double Debt Buyback Size as Yields Swing

Published

on

Bessent

A turbulent week in the U.S. Treasury market prompted the Treasury Department to sharply increase the size of its long-term debt buyback program, as bond prices fell even while equity markets pushed toward record highs. The divergence has drawn attention from fixed-income strategists who see it as a signal of underlying investor unease about federal borrowing levels.

What Happened This Week

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNBC on Thursday, August 20, 2026, that the Treasury had doubled the size of its long-term debt buyback operations, moving from roughly $2 billion to at least $4 billion per operation. Bessent indicated the figure could climb further, saying “we’re going to increase the size of the buyback,” and noted the accelerated pace could exceed the announced $4 billion threshold per issue.

Buybacks allow the Treasury to repurchase outstanding government bonds directly from the market, which can help support prices and dampen yield volatility during periods of stress. The expanded program came as stocks staged a late-week recovery: the S&P 500 and Russell 2000 both advanced on Friday, August 21, even as Treasuries logged mild losses, according to Bloomberg market data.

Why Bond and Equity Markets Are Diverging

Capital.com senior market analyst Daniela Hathorn described the week’s dynamic as markets “ending the week on a softer tone after the relative calm of early August was disrupted by renewed pressure in global bond markets, another rise in oil prices, and growing uncertainty around the Federal Reserve’s next move.” She noted that higher long-term borrowing costs are increasingly challenging elevated equity valuations, even as U.S. equities pull back modestly from record highs.

This divergence — equities near record levels while bonds sell off  is unusual and reflects two different sets of investor concerns. Equity investors have remained focused on corporate earnings strength, particularly from large technology companies ahead of Nvidia’s closely watched August 26 earnings report. Bond investors, by contrast, are more directly exposed to concerns about the scale of federal borrowing, highlighted this week by the national debt crossing the $40 trillion threshold for the first time.

The Fed and Treasury “Working in Opposite Directions”

Wilmington Trust senior bond portfolio manager Wil Stith told Yahoo Finance that current conditions reflect “the Fed and the Treasury basically working in sort of opposite directions,” adding that the imbalance will likely require the Federal Reserve  which he described as having “the larger sandbox”  to adjust the federal funds rate rather than relying on Treasury market interventions alone to manage yields.

Notably, the bond market’s reaction to the Treasury’s buyback expansion was relatively muted; strategists described the move as being largely absorbed without a major rally, suggesting the underlying pressure on yields stems from factors, such as inflation persistence and debt sustainability concerns, that a buyback program alone cannot resolve.

What Comes Next

Markets are now looking to two major events in the days ahead: Nvidia’s earnings report on Wednesday, August 26, and the Federal Reserve’s Jackson Hole Economic Symposium, running August 27-29. This will be the first Jackson Hole gathering under new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh, whose public communication style and policy signals remain less established than his predecessors’, according to market commentary from Regards of Wall Street.

For investors, the key metrics to watch are the size and frequency of future Treasury buyback operations, movements in the 10-year Treasury yield, and any policy signals from Warsh’s keynote address. Continued yield volatility alongside record equity valuations would suggest the market imbalance identified this week has not yet been resolved.

 

Continue Reading

Finance

Cross-Border Settlement Innovation and Real-Time Payment Architecture

Published

on

The global banking system is undergoing a comprehensive modernization of cross-border payment infrastructure. Driven by real-time settlement networks, open banking APIs, and interoperable messaging standards, financial institutions and multinational corporations are eliminating multi-day delays and reducing transaction costs associated with legacy international wire transfers.

Transition to Real-Time Gross Settlement Networks
Historically, international business-to-business (B2B) payments relied on complex correspondent banking relationships involving intermediary fees and processing delays. In 2026, the widespread adoption of ISO 20022 messaging protocols alongside interconnected Real-Time Gross Settlement (RTGS) systems allows direct, end-to-end processing of cross-border transfers.

Commercial banks are providing corporate clients with continuous, 24/7 payment clearing capabilities. Real-time transaction confirmation and automated FX rate locking allow international businesses to settle cross-border trade obligations within minutes, significantly reducing counterparty risk.

Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) Interoperability
Wholesale Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) pilot initiatives are reaching operational maturity across several key financial centers. Collaborative multi-CBDC platforms enable participating central banks and commercial institutions to settle foreign exchange and international trade transactions directly on shared distributed ledgers.

These wholesale digital currency networks eliminate traditional clearinghouse delays and minimize foreign exchange slippage. Enterprise treasury departments benefit from enhanced liquidity management, as cross-border cash balances can be deployed and repatriated instantaneously.

Corporate Treasury Transformation
For enterprise treasurers, instant cross-border settlement transforms cash management strategies:
– Working Capital Optimization: Reduced transaction float allows companies to lower precautionary cash reserves and optimize short-term liquidity investments.
– Automated Reconciliation: Enriched data formats embedded in ISO 20022 payment messages streamline automated general ledger posting and invoice matching.
– Reduced Processing Overhead: Account-to-account (A2A) real-time clearing bypasses costly intermediary correspondent banking fees.

Strategic Financial Priorities
1. Upgrade Treasury Systems: Ensure internal core enterprise software supports real-time ISO 20022 payment messaging standards.
2. Leverage Instant Clearing Rails: Utilize direct payment networks to lower cross-border transaction fees and eliminate settlement delays.
3. Evaluate Multi-Currency Liquidity: Modernize liquidity management frameworks to capitalize on 24/7 real-time settlement capabilities.

Continue Reading

Finance

Private Credit Expansion and Regulatory Oversight in 2026 Capital Markets

Published

on

The global private credit market has solidified its role as a fundamental pillar of enterprise finance, expanding rapidly across middle-market lending, asset-backed finance, and infrastructure financing. As non-bank financial institutions capture a larger share of corporate debt origination, global regulatory bodies are increasing oversight to evaluate market transparency and systemic risk interconnections.

Growth Drivers in Direct Lending
Direct lending platforms have continued to attract substantial institutional allocations from pension funds, sovereign wealth entities, and insurance companies seeking attractive risk-adjusted yields. Private debt funds offer corporate borrowers customized financing structures, faster execution timelines, and confidentiality compared to syndicated loan markets.

In 2026, private credit managers are increasingly financing larger corporate transactions, providing multi-billion-dollar credit facilities for buyout deals and corporate restructurings. The flexibility of private debt contracts—featuring unitranche pricing and tailored covenant packages—has made direct lending the preferred capital source for middle-market enterprise sponsors.

Regulatory Scrutiny and Systemic Risk Assessment
The rapid growth of non-bank intermediation has drawn heightened scrutiny from financial regulators in North America and Europe. Because private debt agreements are negotiated privately without public exchange disclosures, central banks are evaluating potential vulnerabilities related to asset valuation consistency and fund liquidity profiles.

Regulatory agencies are introducing guidelines aimed at improving reporting standards for private investment vehicles managing institutional assets. Key focus areas include monitoring leverage ratios within private credit funds and evaluating indirect credit exposures between commercial banking institutions and private debt funds.

Navigating Elevated Refinancing Costs
With benchmark interest rates remaining elevated, private debt borrowers face higher debt service obligations on floating-rate credit facilities. Financial advisory firms report an increase in proactive liability management strategies, including payment-in-kind (PIK) interest options, equity infusions from sponsors, and covenant modifications.

Private credit managers with deep operational capabilities are actively working alongside portfolio companies to optimize working capital and maintain cash flow coverage ratios during periods of higher borrowing costs.

Key Financial Takeaways
1. Mainstream Asset Class: Private credit has expanded beyond niche alternative asset status into a core corporate finance solution.
2. Enhanced Transparency Standards: Regulatory frameworks are evolving toward greater disclosure requirements for private debt managers.
3. Proactive Risk Management: Lenders and sponsors must prioritize debt sustainability and active portfolio monitoring amid high benchmark rates.

Continue Reading

Trending