Connect with us

Accounting

Today’s external ecosystems demand smarter payment solutions

Published

on

Several years ago, MIT Sloan Management Review and Deloitte published a survey on the future of the workforce, finding that most managers consider external workers — including contractors, service providers, app developers and gig workers — to be part of their workforce. 

This still holds true today as organizations rely on external stakeholders to keep their businesses moving. Yet, for the accounting departments of these organizations, managing the expenses of external contributors has long been a pain point that often adds more time and frustration to an already busy accounting team. The potential for unauthorized or inappropriate expenditure, as well as a lack of oversight and regulations, not only hampers operational agility, it also raises red flags for accounting teams tasked with ensuring accuracy, compliance and control.

This is one of the reasons virtual cards, a transformative payment solution that combines enhanced controls with scenario-based purchasing capabilities, have come on the scene as a viable solution for managing purchases made outside the organization. For accountants, who are often on the front lines of ensuring financial accuracy and spend visibility, virtual cards offer tangible benefits. Given their ability to provide precision, security and adaptability, virtual cards are redefining how businesses collaborate with their external ecosystems while giving accounting teams the oversight they need to manage risk and streamline reconciliation.

Accountable by design

A virtual card is a digital payment method purchasers can use for online and in-store transactions at merchants accepting contactless payments. What makes virtual cards especially suitable for external purchasers is their blend of enhanced controls and scenario-based purchasing capabilities. These features make them highly valuable for organizations seeking to extend controlled purchasing power beyond their internal teams, eliminating risks with the ability to embed oversight into every purchase.

Consider a freelance photographer hired for an upcoming event. The organization issues the freelancer a virtual card with a $2,000 limit, valid until one week after the event, restricted to specific merchant categories related to the purchasing scenario for this use case. Upon reaching its expiration date, the card deactivates, preventing further use. This precision ensures both external purchasers and accounting know exactly what the photographer is authorized to spend, without the hassle of reimbursement delays or vague guidelines. 

Enhanced security is another benefit. If a card is compromised, the impact is minimal — no widespread breaches or drained funds. For a job candidate traveling for an interview, this means booking flights with a secure card, while the business retains control without exposing sensitive financial data.

The value of scenario-based purchasing

Another area where virtual cards shine is in their ability to adapt to scenario-based purchasing, a clear, predefined purpose driving the need for a payment tool. This flexibility is especially valuable for giving accounting teams greater clarity and control over decentralized spend. 

Consider a construction firm managing a project with several subcontractors that all need funds for specific tasks: one for materials, another for equipment rental and a third for permits and licenses. Issuing a single virtual card per scenario ensures each purchaser has exactly what they need — no more, no less. The materials subcontractor gets a card capped at $10,000, valid only at a certain building supply wholesaler; the equipment renter gets a one-time-use card with a $3,000 limit; the permits subcontractor receives a card for $1,500, restricted to government or licensing agencies. For accounting purposes, this approach eliminates the guesswork, streamlines reconciliation and provides clear audit trails aligned to project-specific spend.

Recurring payments are another scenario where virtual cards excel. A marketing agency outsourcing content creation to freelancers can issue virtual cards with monthly limits — say, $500 per writer — automatically refreshing each cycle. The writers use these cards to purchase tools or subscriptions, and the agency tracks every transaction in real time via integrated software. This setup reduces administrative overhead while empowering external contributors with immediate access to funds.

How external purchasers benefit

For external suppliers, virtual cards offer practical benefits that traditional payment methods can’t match, such as by eliminating the friction of reimbursement cycles. External stakeholders no longer need to cover costs and wait weeks for a check. This improves cash flow, a critical factor for small businesses or independent contractors working freelance for an organization. 

Additionally, virtual cards simplify compliance. External purchasers are often given strict guidelines from the organizations they serve: specific budgets, approved vendors or merchant categories. With controls baked into the card, compliance becomes automatic. Now, a consultant buying travel accommodations doesn’t need to second guess whether a hotel is “in policy.” The card only works where it’s allowed.

The business case: efficiency and trust

For accounting departments, the appeal of virtual cards lies in their dual impact: accuracy and efficiency when it comes to reconciliation, compliance and having a true handle on costs. Real-time tracking and reporting mean an accounting supervisor can monitor spend as it happens, reducing the need for post-purchase audits. Integration with accounting software — like QuickBooks or SAP — further streamlines reconciliation, cutting administrative costs.

Virtual cards also build trust. By offering a secure, controlled and flexible payment method, businesses show reliability and respect. A job candidate who can book travel without personal expense feels valued. A freelancer with a dedicated virtual card for project needs feels empowered. This trust fosters loyalty and better partnerships over time.

The future of external purchasing

As businesses increasingly rely on external support for a variety of business tasks, the demand for convenient payment solutions that keep security at the forefront continues to grow. Virtual cards, with their enhanced controls and scenario-based versatility, are uniquely positioned to meet this need. For accounting teams, it’s an option that offers significant advantages: reconciliation is simplified by providing detailed, real-time transaction data; security is enhanced through single-use or limited-use parameters; fraud risk is reduced and compliance is improved by allowing precise control over spending limits and merchant categories. 

There ‘s a reason virtual cards are becoming a clear choice for managing external ecosystems — they help accountants maintain tighter control over spending by bridging the gap between internal oversight and external purchasing.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Accountants on IRS and PwC layoffs, accounting students and more

Published

on

Complimentary Access Pill

Enjoy complimentary access to top ideas and insights — selected by our editors.

This week’s stats focus in part on the job titles seeing the greatest losses at the IRS during layoffs; as well as the states that have proposed or passed alternatives to the 150-hour rule; the percentage of master’s in accounting program applicants since 2020; the number of PwC employees laid off in May; the projected size of Deloitte’s new New York City headquarters; and the amount of 2026 HSA annual contribution limits, depending on coverage.

Continue Reading

Accounting

CrowdStrike says DOJ, SEC sent inquiries on firm accounting

Published

on

CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. said U.S. officials have asked for information related to the accounting of deals it’s made with some customers and said the cybersecurity firm is cooperating with the inquiry.

The Austin, Texas-based company said in a filing Wednesday that it has gotten “requests for information” from the U.S. Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission “relating to the company’s recognition of revenue and reporting of ARR for transactions with certain customers.” ARR refers to annual recurring revenue, a measure of earnings from subscriptions.

The company said the federal officials have also sought information related to a CrowdStrike update last year that crashed Windows operating systems around the world.

“The company is cooperating and providing information in response to these requests,” the filing states.

U.S. prosecutors and regulators have been investigating a $32 million deal between CrowdStrike and a technology distributor, Carahsoft Technology Corp., to provide cybersecurity tools to the Internal Revenue Service, Bloomberg News first reported in February. The IRS never purchased or received the products, Bloomberg News earlier reported.

The investigators are probing what senior CrowdStrike executives may have known about the $32 million deal and are examining other transactions made by the cybersecurity firm, Bloomberg News reported in May.

Asked for comment about the filing, CrowdStrike spokesperson Brian Merrill said, “As we have told Bloomberg repeatedly, this is old news and we stand by the accounting of the transaction.” 

A lawyer for Carahsoft previously declined to comment on the federal investigations, and representatives didn’t respond to subsequent requests for comment about them.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Elon Musk urges Americans take action to ‘kill’ Trump tax cut bill

Published

on

Tech titan Elon Musk ratcheted up his offensive against Donald Trump’s signature tax bill on Wednesday, urging that Americans contact their lawmakers to “KILL” the legislation.

“Call your Senator, Call your Congressman,” Musk wrote in a social media post. “Bankrupting America is NOT ok!”

The post came one day after Musk lashed out at the tax bill, describing it as a budget-busting “disgusting abomination” as Republican fiscal hawks stepped up criticism of the massive fiscal package. 

Trump hasn’t publicly responded to Musk’s comments, but the White House put out a statement Wednesday saying the legislation “unleashes an era of unprecedented economic growth.” 

And House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters that Musk is “dead wrong” about the bill and that the tax cuts will pay for themselves through economic growth.

Musk’s public condemnation pits him against the president at a critical time as Trump is personally lobbying holdouts on the bill. His campaign against the legislation threatens to stiffen resistance and delay enactment of the tax cuts and debt ceiling increase. 

Musk has attacked the legislation days after leaving a temporary assignment leading the administration’s Department of Government Efficiency initiative to cut federal spending. The Tesla Inc. chief executive officer’s high-profile role in the Trump administration eroded his business brand and sales of his company’s electric vehicles plunged. 

The House-passed version of the tax and spending bill would add $2.4 trillion to U.S. budget deficits over the next decade, according to an estimate released Wednesday from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

The CBO’s calculation reflects a $3.67 trillion decrease in expected revenues and a $1.25 trillion decline in spending over the decade through 2034, relative to baseline projections. The score doesn’t account for any potential boost to the economy from the bill, which Johnson and Trump argue would offset the revenue losses. 

Musk, the world’s richest man with a net worth of about $377 billion according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, has become a crucial financial backer of the Republican party. After making modest donations most years, Musk became the biggest U.S. political donor in 2024, giving more than $290 million.

Johnson said Musk had promised to help reelect Republicans just a day before savaging Trump’s bill. Musk did not respond to a request for comment. 

Most of Musk’s giving was aimed at electing Trump but he also supported congressional candidates. America PAC, the super political action committee that Musk largely funded, spent $18.5 million in 17 separate House races. Though that total pales in comparison to the roughly $255 million he spent backing Trump, the spending means a lot in a congressional election, where challengers on average raise less than $1 million.

Control of the House will likely be decided by the outcome of fewer than two dozen close races in the 2026 midterm elections. The GOP’s chances of holding their majority would suffer a major blow if Musk were to withdraw his financial support.

Continue Reading

Trending