Connect with us

Personal Finance

Warren Buffett has a record amount of cash. How much savings you need

Published

on

Warren Buffett walks the floor ahead of the Berkshire Hathaway Annual Shareholders Meeting in Omaha, Nebraska on May 3, 2024.

David A. Grogen | CNBC

Warren Buffett is sitting on a record amount of cash.

That’s not necessarily something everyday investors should emulate. If you have money on the sidelines, it may be time to rethink your strategy, experts say.

Buffett’s conglomerate Berkshire Hathaway, with a diverse portfolio of businesses, was sitting on a record $334 billion in cash at the end of last year.

Yet in a February letter to shareholders, Buffett told shareholders that “despite what some commentators currently view as an extraordinary cash position,” the majority of the money invested in Berkshire is in equities.

“Berkshire will never prefer ownership of cash-equivalent assets over the ownership of good businesses, whether controlled or only partially owned,” Buffett wrote.

More from Personal Finance:
Avoid ‘dangerous’ investment instincts amid tariff sell-off
What to know before trying to ‘buy the dip’
20 items and goods most exposed to tariff price shocks

In hindsight, Buffett’s cash position looks wise, as Trump administration tariff policies have caused market turbulence.

Investors have also been thought to have a cash cushion. There is $6.88 trillion in money market funds as of the week ending April 16, according to the Investment Company Institute — even though higher interest rates have made it possible to earn more on cash.

Yet even as the markets have flirted with bear territory, experts still say it’s possible to have too much money on the sidelines.

A 60/40 portfolio beats cash in the long run

Boy_anupong | Moment | Getty Images

A traditional portfolio comprised of 60% stocks and 40% bonds almost always outperforms cash in the long run, according to recent JPMorgan Asset Management.

That is based on a classic 60/40 portfolio comprised of the S&P 500 index and Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index versus cash based on Treasury bills or a certificate of deposit equivalent, according to Jack Manley, global market strategist at JPMorgan Asset Management.

In looking at data over 1995 to 2024, the 60/40 portfolio beat cash on a one-month basis roughly 65% of the time, Manley said. On a six-month basis, that increases to 75% of the time. For one year, that climbs to 80% of the time. And by the time you hit 12 years, it’s 100% of the time, he said.

Yet in times of uncertainty, investors often feel safer in cash.

“When we think about investors making the wrong decisions — investing with their guts, not with their brains, where they are going to if they’re panicking — they’re going to cash,” Manley said.

How to balance cash and investing

In the stock runup of 2024, a “plain-vanilla version” of a 60/40 portfolio gained about 15%, according to new Morningstar research. The portfolio includes a 60% weighting in the Morningstar US Market Index and 40% in the Morningstar US Core Bond Index.

Yet a diversified portfolio of 11 different asset classes only gained about 10%, the research found. That included larger cap domestic stocks, developed markets stocks; emerging markets stocks; Treasuries; U.S. core bonds; global bonds; high yield bonds; small cap stocks, commodities; gold and REITs.

Major shifts in U.S. tariff policy may change how well those strategies perform going forward. Thus far in 2025, a diversified portfolio has held up better, with gold gaining about 32% this year, according to Amy Arnott, portfolio strategist at Morningstar. Meanwhile, commodities, global bonds and real estate have held up better than U.S. stocks, she said.

Managing your money through volatility

With interest rates higher, cash has been a better portfolio diversifier than Treasuries in recent years, according to Morningstar’s research.

Notably, those cash allocations are best held outside the portfolio in an emergency fund or for any large expenses that may come up in the next two years, Arnott said. Current retirees may want to have at least one to two years’ worth of portfolio withdrawals in cash, she said.

With current turmoil and market uncertainty, it’s important to remember that making radical shifts to your portfolio can often backfire, Arnott said.

“If you’ve had an asset allocation that was a good fit for your time horizon and your investment goals previously, it’s probably not a good idea to be making dramatic changes to that just because of all the uncertainty that’s going on right now,” Arnott said.

Investors who have an ample cash position to fit their needs do tend to feel more confident now, said Adrianna Adams, a certified financial planner and head of financial planning at Domain Money.

However, for those who already have a sufficient emergency fund, the best use for extra cash is typically in the markets, Adams said.

“I wouldn’t recommend holding cash if we’re using that account or allocation towards our long-term goals,” Adams said. “If we’re going to need the money in the next two years, then absolutely, we should keep it in cash.”

High-yield savings accounts tend to be a favorite among consumers for emergency funds, Adams said. However, individuals in high-income tax brackets may want to consider municipal money market funds that help limit the tax bills they will pay on the interest they earn on that money, she said.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Personal Finance

Consumers continue to spend even as trade wars raise recession risk

Published

on

Richmond Fed President Tom Barkin: A lot of reasons to be worried about consumer spending

While many Americans are worried about where the U.S. economy is heading, few have changed their spending habits in anticipation of a slowdown.

Nearly three-quarters, or 73%, of adults said they are “financially stressed,” with most pointing to the tariff wars as the culprit, according to a recent CNBC/SurveyMonkey online poll.

And yet, consumer spending has remained remarkably resilient.

In part because of looming tariffs, shoppers are panic buying. In fact, consumer spending was even stronger than expected in March, according to the Commerce Department and ticked up again in April, data released Wednesday from J.P. Morgan showed.

J.P. Morgan also raised its odds for a U.S. and global recession to 60%, by year end, up from 40% previously.

More from Personal Finance:
Cash may feel safe when stocks slide, but it has risks
What higher stagflation risks mean for your money
Should investors dump U.S. stocks for international equities?

Setting the stage for a slowdown

Consumer spending is considered the backbone of the economy because it represents a significant portion of Gross Domestic Product and fuels economic growth.

In a speech earlier this month before business journalists in Arlington, Va., Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said “the economy is overwhelmingly driven by consumer spending.” Powell also said that he expects President Donald Trump’s tariff policies to raise inflation and lower growth.

Most experts agree that in the face of higher prices for many consumer goods, Trump’s tariffs are igniting a fresh wave of declining sentiment, which plays a big part in determining where the economy is headed.

The Conference Boards’ expectations index, which measures consumers’ short-term outlook, plunged to its lowest level in 12 years and well below the recession threshold, signaling heightened recession risk. The University of Michigan’s consumer survey also showed sentiment sank by more than 30% since December among persistent worries of a trade war.

“On-again, off-again rising tariffs and resulting turmoil in the stock market and world economy are clearly impacting consumer concerns about higher prices and future consumer spending growth,” Jack Kleinhenz, chief economist of the National Retail Federation, said in a statement.

How tariffs impact household budgets

The Trump administration’s tariffs on a host of other countries are currently in the middle of a 90-day pause, with a 10% baseline tariff rate instead applying to all imported goods across the board. The pause is due to expire on July 9, with Trump touting a series of rate negotiations with foreign leaders between now and then.

According to an analysis by the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, if the lower tariff rates in effect during the 90-day pause remain in effect permanently, it could reduce real income for the average taxpayer by about $3,100 in 2026. A separate study by the Budget Lab at Yale estimates that tariffs could cost the average household roughly $3,800 per year.

“Household budgets remain under pressure and highly sensitive to further price increases,” said Greg McBride, chief financial analyst at Bankrate. “Inflation will continue to be central to how consumers feel about their finances, and their capacity for additional spending.”

A looming drop off

Financial constraints coupled with expectations that the economy is weakening will eventually cause consumers to spend less, which can cause businesses to cut back or lay off workers, according to Sasha Indarte, an assistant professor of finance at University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School. “That is a self-fulfilling prophecy.”

“Even a small initial cutback in spending gets amplified,” she said. “One person’s spending becomes another person’s income — you can get this echo effect.”

But basic economic theories don’t tell the whole story, Indarte added.

Even when consumers intend to cut back, they don’t always scale back their spending as much as they want to, or should. Behavioral biases and inertia also play a role, according to Indarte.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

How a ‘bond ladder’ can preserve your nest egg amid tariff volatility

Published

on

Robert Daly | Ojo Images | Getty Images

Manage the ‘sequence of returns’ risk

Typically, you should avoid selling assets when the stock market is down, especially during earlier retirement years. Those early withdrawals paired with market dips can stunt your long-term portfolio, known as the “sequence of returns risk.”

Negative returns are more harmful early in retirement than later because you could miss more years of compound growth, according to a 2024 report from Fidelity Investments.

That’s why flexibility is important when it’s time to pull funds from your retirement savings, Caswell said. 

Caswell recommends a bond ladder of Treasuries that mature every six months or one year for up to five years. You can also use the ladder method with certificates of deposit

As assets mature, you can use the proceeds to cover living expenses. Alternatively, you could reinvest part of the cash if you receive more than you need, he said.

The strategy provides “more transparency and control” of when you’re taking money out of that part of your portfolio, Caswell said.

73% of Americans are financially stressed

Create a ‘TIPS ladder’

You could also weigh a ladder of so-called Treasury inflation-protected securities, or TIPS, according to Amy Arnott, a portfolio strategist with Morningstar Research Services.

Issued and backed by the U.S. government, TIPS can provide a hedge against inflation because the principal rises or falls based on the consumer price index. 

“Inflation and loss of purchasing power can be a risk with bonds, which is why a TIPS ladder can be attractive,” especially when you’re able to get a positive return, she said.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Where young adults are most likely to live with parents

Published

on

Catherine Falls Commercial | Moment | Getty Images

In some California cities, it’s common for parents to have roommates: their adult children.

Three California metro areas host the highest shares of 25- to 34-year-olds living in a parent’s home relative to other U.S. metros, according to a new analysis by Pew Research Center, a non-partisan research organization.

In the Vallejo and Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura metros, 33% of young adults were living with their parents in 2023, Pew found. (Those metros are in the San Francisco Bay Area and outside Los Angeles, respectively.)

In El Centro, east of San Diego near the U.S.-Mexico border, 32% of young adults live at home, according to Pew.

Those shares are significantly higher than the 18% U.S. average. In some metros, the share is as low as 3%.

Young adults can save about $13,000 a year by living with their parents, according to a 2019 Federal Reserve analysis. About half of those savings — $6,400 — is from housing and utility costs, it found.

Nationally, 50% of parents with a child older than 18 provide them with some financial support, averaging $1,474 a month, according to Savings.com.

Metros with high, low shares of young adults at home

These are the 10 metro areas with the highest shares of 25- to 34-year-olds living with their parents in 2023, according to Pew:

  1. Vallejo, Calif. — 33%
  2. Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, Calif. — 33%
  3. El Centro, Calif. — 32%
  4. Brownsville-Harlingen, Texas — 31%
  5. Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, Calif. — 30%
  6. Merced, Calif. — 30%
  7. McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, Texas — 29%
  8. Naples-Marco Island, Florida — 29%
  9. Racine-Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin — 29%
  10. Port St. Lucie, Florida — 29%
Student loan matching funds

These are the 10 metro areas with the lowest shares of 25- to 34-year-olds living with their parents in 2023, according to Pew:

  1. Odessa, Texas — 3%
  2. Lincoln, Nebraska — 3%
  3. Ithaca, New York — 3%
  4. Bloomington, Indiana — 3%
  5. Bozeman, Montana — 4%
  6. Cheyenne, Wyoming — 4%
  7. Wausau, Wisconsin — 5%
  8. Midland, Texas — 5%
  9. Manhattan, Kansas — 6%
  10. Bismarck, North Dakota — 7%

Demographics are a driving force

Demographics — and their interplay with personal finances — appear to be the primary driver of high shares of young adults living with their parents in certain metros, said Richard Fry, a senior researcher at Pew and co-author of the analysis.

There are fewer white young adults and more Hispanic, Black and Asian young adults in the top 10 metro areas with the largest proportions of 25- to 34-year-olds living at home, Fry said. (The one exception is Racine, Wisconsin.)

More from Personal Finance:
Cash may feel safe when stocks slide, but it has risks
Is college still worth it? It is for most, but not all
National average credit score falls

“Areas where there are more minority young adults tend to have more young adults living at home,” Fry said. “That’s not always the case, but it is a pattern.”

Black and Hispanic young adults are less likely to have a college degree and tend to have lower earnings as a result, Fry said.

“Being able to live independently may be more of an issue for them,” he said.

The typical Black or Hispanic worker, age 25 to 34, earned about $46,000 a year in 2022, according to the National Center for Education Statistics. The typical white young adult worker earned $58,000.

Part of the reason may also be cultural, Fry said. There are likely other factors at play like cost of living, though the correlation isn’t as strong, he said.

Many of the metros with low shares of young adults living at home are college towns, Fry said.

For example, Ithaca, New York, hosts Cornell University, and Bloomington, Indiana, has Indiana University, Fry said. Many young adults here are likely university graduates who are well-educated and opt to stay there after they graduate instead of moving home, he said.

Nationally, the share of young adults living at home climbed starting in the early 2000s, peaking at 20% in 2017, according to Pew. (It declined to about 18% in 2023.)

Unemployment spiked during the Great Recession and it took many years for the labor market to heal, Fry said. Meanwhile, young adults today are more likely than older generations to be saddled with student debt.

Continue Reading

Trending