Connect with us

Accounting

Tax Strategy: Provisions of the House tax bill the Senate is most likely to scrutinize

Published

on

The Senate has a stated goal to complete work on the budget reconciliation bill by the beginning of July 2025. Anticipating that the Senate will make modifications to the House version, the bill could then go back to the House for a vote or go to a House/Senate conference to work out differences and then get another vote in both chambers. It appears likely that a July 1 deadline for finalization of the bill will be difficult to achieve.

The most critical deadline Congress is facing for the legislation is enactment of additional government borrowing authority before the current authorization limit is reached, which is expected to be sometime during August. As we approach August, the specific deadline should become clearer. Expect work on the bill to continue toward that deadline.

The bill passed the House by only a one-vote margin. Several Republican senators have said that they want changes to the House bill. However, no Republican senator is saying that they want to defeat the bill. They just want to make it more beautiful. The following are some of the key areas of focus for possible Senate modification.

The SALT deduction limit

The House bill raises the state and local tax deduction limit from $10,000 to $40,000, with a last-minute increase from $30,000 to win over enough Republican House members from high-tax states. The Senate seems inclined to oppose any increase in the limit. There are no Republican Senators from those same high-tax states, such as California, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New York, to form a similar bloc seeking relief that exists in the House. However, the Senate also would realize that eliminating the House SALT limit increase could make it difficult to get passage of the bill next time around in the House without the SALT provision.

This is the type of difference where a compromise might be reached in a conference committee on the bill. One concern is the cost of increasing the deduction limit, and that the increase benefits mostly wealthier taxpayers. Coming up with some additional revenue offsets or cost reductions could help reach a compromise on this issue.

Temporary provisions

The House, to meet its budget targets, has proposed several temporary provisions. Most of the extensions of the individual provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act have been made permanent. However, the new deductions for tips and overtime pay, as well as several other provisions, are only around for as short a time as four years. Some Senate Republicans would prefer to try to make provisions permanent when possible.

The main issue with making them permanent would be coming up with additional revenue or cost cuts to pay for permanence within the agreed-budget parameters. Republicans have already agreed that they will take the position that extensions of provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act do not have to be paid for since they are merely extensions of provisions already in the tax law. Those extensions, of course, still add to the deficit.

Other potential sources of revenue offsets include cost cuts. However, some Republican senators are already uncomfortable with the Medicaid and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, or Food Stamps) cuts in the House version. Other sources of revenue include reductions in the federal workforce; however, the efforts of the Department of Government Efficiency have so far not achieved the reductions that had been hoped. 

Tariffs could also provide a possible source of revenue; however, the level of tariffs keeps changing and it might be hard to settle on an expected level of tariff revenue over the next 10 years. Republicans are also fond of projecting economic growth resulting from the tax cuts in the legislation. Those projections often appear overly optimistic, and the Congressional Budget Office is usually less optimistic about projected economic growth.

Clean energy credits

The House bill eliminates or phases down many of the clean energy credits created by the Inflation Reduction Act in 2022. It is primarily the individual tax breaks for clean energy vehicles and energy-efficient homes that are eliminated. The argument is that clean vehicles and energy-efficient homes no longer need tax incentives, although that might not be true for some of these credits, especially the credit for alternative fuel charging stations. 

In addition to accelerating the phase-outs for some of the business-focused clean energy credits, the bill also restricts their use by foreign entities and eliminates transferability of some of the credits.

Republican Senators are concerned about the possible adverse impact on clean energy projects that have been proposed or are underway in their states. They want the tax credits that incentivized those projects to be available through to completion. These include the Code Sec. 45Y Clean Electricity Production Credit and the Code Sec. 48E Clean Electricity Investment Credit, which under the House bill would end for projects where construction is not commenced until more than 60 days after enactment. Other affected credits include the Code Sec. 45X Advanced Manufacturing Production Credit, the Code Sec. 45U nuclear credit, and the Code Sec. 45Q carbon recapture credit.

Repeal and phase-down of these clean energy credits does provide a source of revenue to help pay for other tax cuts. Therefore, Republican Senators who want to facilitate state projects may be comfortable with just stretching out the phase-down period a little further.

Child Tax Credit

The House has proposed to increase the Child Tax Credit to $2,500 through 2028. After that, the credit would fall to $2,000 but be indexed for inflation. Only up to $1,400 would be refundable. Some Republican senators would prefer to make further enhancements to the Child Tax Credit to assist lower income families. This would probably not be opposed in the House provided that a favorable revenue offset can be identified.

Summary

It will be a few weeks before the stated deadline for the Senate to have completed work on and voted on the bill will have arrived. By that time, the date by which the government will have reached the limit of its borrowing authority will have been more narrowly identified. The deficit hawks in the House may find that they have found more effective support for their position on debt reduction in the Senate. The SALT limitation hawks in the House may find little support for their position among Senate Republicans.

Even as a Senate bill nears completion, it will likely differ in many respects from the House bill, including in the areas discussed herein, and the House and Senate will have until sometime in August to resolve their differences. Those differences will likely somehow get resolved, since Republicans generally view not passing a bill as the worst of all alternatives. It will be the pressure of the August deadline that will force those compromises.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

Tax Fraud Blotter: Prep perps

Published

on

Bank job; the magic is gone; not a beautiful day in the Neighborhood; and other highlights of recent tax cases.

Washington, D.C.: CPA Timothy Trifilo has been sentenced to 20 months in prison for making a false statement on a mortgage loan application and for not filing an income tax return.

Trifilo worked in compliance for several large accounting and finance firms and recently was managing director at a tax firm where he specialized in transaction structuring and advisory service, tax compliance and tax due diligence.

For a decade, he did not file federal income tax returns nor pay taxes owed despite earning more than $7.7 million during that time. He caused a tax loss to the IRS of more than $2 million.

In February 2023, Trifilo sought to obtain a $1.36 million bank-financed loan to purchase a home in D.C. and was working with a mortgage company. After the company told him that the bank would not approve the loan without copies of his filed returns, Trifilo provided fabricated documents to make it appear as if he had filed federal returns for 2020 and 2021. On these returns and other documents, Trifilo listed a former colleague as the individual who prepared the returns and uploaded them for filing with the IRS. This individual did not prepare the returns, has never prepared returns for Trifilo and did not authorize Trifilo to use his name on the returns and other documents.

The bank approved the loan and Trifilo purchased the home.

Trifilo, who previously pleaded guilty, was also ordered to serve two years of supervised release and pay $2,057,256.40 in restitution to the IRS.

New York: Tax preparer Rafael Alvarez, 61, of Cortland Manor, New York, has been sentenced to four years in prison in connection with a decade-long, $145-million tax fraud.

Alvarez, a.k.a. “the Magician,” who previously pleaded guilty, oversaw the filing of tens of thousands of federal individual income tax returns that included false information designed to fraudulently reduce clients’ taxes. From around 2010 to 2020, Alvarez was the CEO, owner and manager of ATAX New York, also d.b.a. ATAX New York-Marble Hill, ATAX Marble Hill, ATAX Marble Hill NY and ATAX Corporation. This high-volume prep company in the Bronx, New York, prepared some 90,000 federal income tax returns for clients during this period.

Alvarez both prepared returns for clients and recruited, supervised and directed other personnel who in turn prepared returns. He oversaw what authorities called “a sweeping fraudulent scheme” where he and his employees submitted false information on clients’ returns. This information included, among other things, bogus itemized tax deductions, made-up capital losses, phony business expenses and fraudulent tax credits.

Alvarez recruited to ATAX and personally trained “impressionable, easily intimidated” workers. When some employees questioned Alvarez about his fraudulent tax prep, he threatened these employees about reporting his scheme.

He deprived the IRS of $145 million in tax revenue. 

He was also sentenced to three years of supervised release and ordered to pay the IRS $145 million in restitution and forfeit more than $11.84 million.

Philadelphia: Tax preparer James J. Sirleaf, 65, of Darby, Pennsylvania, has pleaded guilty to a multiyear scheme to help clients file false income tax returns to fraudulently increase their refunds, as well as to filing false personal income tax returns for himself.

Sirleaf, who previously pleaded guilty, was the sole owner and operator of Metro Financial Services; he prepared false and fraudulent 1040s for clients for at least tax years 2016 through 2019. On the returns he included false deductions, business expenses and dependent information.

He also filed false returns for himself for tax years 2017 through 2019, failing to fully report his income.

Sirleaf caused a tax loss to the IRS of $219,622.

Sentencing is Sept. 3.

jail2-fotolia.jpg

Summerfield, North Carolina: William Lamar Rhew III has pleaded guilty to wire fraud, money laundering, securities fraud, tax evasion and failure to file returns in connection with a $20 million Ponzi scheme.

From November 2017 to December 2023, Rhew defrauded at least 117 investors of at least $24 million. He induced victims to invest with his company, Chadley Capital, which would allegedly buy accounts receivable at a discount, sell them for a profit and provide consistently high rates of return. Rhew touted the company’s increasing deal flow and underwriting standards and claimed $300 million in transactions in 2023, consistent returns exceeding 20% per year and nearly 74% total growth over 24 months.

All Rhew’s representations were false. Instead of investing victims’ funds, Rhew used the money on personal expenses, including the purchases of a boat, a beach house and luxury cars, and to make “interest” and “withdrawal” payments to other victim-investors.

For 2018 through 2022, Rhew willfully failed to report nearly $9 million in income to the IRS.

He has agreed to pay almost $14.9 in restitution to the victims and $3,056,936 to the IRS.

Sentencing is Aug. 22. Rhew faces up to 20 years in prison, supervised release of up to three years and monetary penalties.

Miami: In related cases, three tax preparers have pleaded guilty to tax crimes connected to a scheme to prepare false returns.

Franklin Carter Jr., of Sanford, Florida, pleaded guilty to conspiring to defraud the U.S. and to not filing returns. Jonathan Carrillo, of St. Cloud, Florida, pleaded guilty to conspiring to defraud the U.S. and assisting in the preparation of false returns.

Diandre Mentor has pleaded guilty to conspiring to defraud the United States by filing false returns for clients.

From 2016 to 2020, Carter and Carrillo owned and operated Neighborhood Advance Tax, a tax prep business with a dozen offices throughout Florida. Mentor worked there between January 2017 and 2019. The conspirators inflated client refunds by fabricated deductions and held periodic training to teach Neighborhood employees how to prepare fraudulent returns.

In 2020, Mentor and his co-conspirators also started Smart Tax & Finance, which  expanded to 12 franchise locations throughout South and Central Florida. The next year, Carter, Carrillo and the co-conspirators started Taxmates, which operated out of the same offices that Neighborhood had used. Both firms prepared false returns for clients; many of those returns included false deductions.

The three also continued to teach franchise owners and employees how to prepare false returns for clients. In addition, Carter did not file personal tax returns for 2019 through 2021.

Carter and Carrillo caused a tax loss to the IRS exceeding $12 million. Mentor caused a tax loss to the IRS totaling $3,090,077.

Several co-conspirators have also pleaded guilty, including Abryle de la Cruz, Emmanuel Almonor, Adon Hemley and Isaiah Hayes.

Carter and Carrillo each face up to five years in prison for the conspiracy charge. Carter faces up to a year for each failure to file a return charge; Carillo faces a maximum of three years for each charge of assisting in the preparation of a false return; Mentor faces up to five years in prison. All three also face a period of supervised release, restitution and monetary penalties.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Small business wage growth slowed in May

Published

on

Hourly earnings growth for small business employees dropped to a four-year low at 2.77% in May, while job growth was flat, according to payroll company Paychex.

The Paychex Small Business Employment Watch, which tracks U.S. business with fewer than 50 employees, found that three-month annualized hourly earnings growth fell to its lowest level in May (2.45%) since December 2020, when it was 1.66%.

“There seems to be a very limited amount of dynamism in small businesses right now,” said Frank Fiorille, vice president of risk management, compliance and data analytics at Paychex. “We’re not seeing blockbuster or torrid hiring, but we’re also not seeing major layoffs either. They’re in a frozen state. They don’t want to take any risks.”

The Midwest has represented the strongest region for small business employment growth for the past year, while the West continues to lag all regions and reported an index level below 100 on Paychex’s Small Business Jobs Index for the 14th consecutive month in May. 

“The Midwest is doing well, and the coasts are lagging a little bit,” said Fiorille. 

Construction dropped 0.68 percentage points to a jobs index of 99.69 in May, marking its lowest level since March 2021. Job growth in the leisure and hospitality industry remained in last place among sectors for the fourth month in a row at 98.18 in May.

Uncertainty over tariffs and the massive tax bill in Congress seem to be holding back small businesses, and accountants should keep a close eye on developments to advise their small business clients. “That’s the ballgame right now for everybody to watch,” said Fiorille.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Tesla has $1.2B at risk from EV credits cut in Trump tax bill

Published

on

Tesla Inc.’s shares sank as Elon Musk and President Donald Trump’s simmering feud devolved into a public war of words between two of the world’s most powerful people.

Trump on Thursday said he was “very disappointed” by the Tesla chief executive officer’s criticism of the president’s signature tax policy bill. Musk fired back in several social media posts, saying in one that “without me, Trump would have lost the election.”  

The president later floated terminating federal contracts and subsidies extended to Musk’s companies and said that he had asked the Tesla and SpaceX leader to leave his administration, which Musk said was a “lie.” 

Tesla’s shares dropped 14% on Thursday in New York, the stock’s biggest decline since March 10. The rout erased about $150 billion from the electric-vehicle maker’s market value. 

The spectacle of the world’s richest person and the leader of the free world lobbing insults toward one another on social media marks a stunning breakup of a once formidable political alliance. 

Musk spent more than $250 million to help secure Trump’s return to the White House. Trump in turn deputized Musk to lead a sweeping effort to slash government spending and reshape the federal bureaucracy before the mercurial billionaire stepped back from that role last week.

At the same time, policies advanced by Trump and Republican lawmakers put billions of dollars at risk for Tesla, by far Musk’s largest business.

Trump’s massive tax bill would largely eliminate a credit worth as much as $7,500 for buyers of some Tesla models and other electric vehicles by the end of this year, seven years ahead of schedule. That would translate to a roughly $1.2 billion hit to Tesla’s full-year profit, according to JPMorgan analysts.

After leaving his formal advisory role in the White House last week, Musk has been on a mission to block the president’s signature tax bill that he described as a “disgusting abomination.” The world’s richest person has been lobbying Republican lawmakers — including making a direct appeal to House Speaker Mike Johnson — to preserve the valuable EV tax credits in the legislation.

Separate legislation passed by the Senate attacking California’s EV sales mandates poses another $2 billion headwind for Tesla’s sales of regulatory credits, according to JPMorgan. 

Taken together, those measures threaten roughly half of the more than $6 billion in earnings before interest and taxes that Wall Street expects Tesla to post this year, analysts led by Ryan Brinkman said in a May 30 report.

Tesla didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

The House-passed tax bill would aggressively phase-out tax credits for the production of clean electricity, and other sources years earlier than scheduled. It also includes stringent restrictions on the use of Chinese components and materials that analysts said would render the credits useless and limits the ability of companies to sell the tax credits to third parties.

Tesla’s division focused on solar systems and batteries separately criticized the Republican bill for gutting clean energy tax credits, saying that “abruptly ending” the incentives would threaten U.S. energy independence and the reliability of the power grid.

The clean energy and EV policies under threat were largely enacted as part of former President Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act. The law was designed to encourage companies to build a domestic supply chain for clean energy and electric vehicles, giving companies more money if they produce more batteries and EVs in the U.S. Tesla has a broad domestic footprint, including car factories in Texas and California, a lithium refinery and battery plants.

With those Biden-era policies in place, U.S. EV sales rose 7.3% to a record 1.3 million vehicles last year, according to Cox Automotive data.

Continue Reading

Trending