Finance
Capital One (COF) climbs as investors buy into the Discover vision
Published
10 months agoon
Capital One shares rose on Tuesday evening despite the company reporting an extremely noisy second-quarter result due to the Discover integration. Still, we like where the company is headed with this game-changing acquisition. Revenue in the three months ended June 30 increased 31% year over year to $12.5 billion, missing the consensus estimate of $12.7 billion, according to LSEG. Adjusted earning per share (EPS) increased 75% year over year to $5.48, exceeding the $3.72 estimate, LSEG data showed. Shares are trading up about 3% in extended trading Tuesday night to around $224 per share. If the stock closes above $220.91 on Wednesday, it will mark a new all-time high. Bottom line This was not the easiest quarter to judge, but long-term benefits of owning Discover are easy to see. The blockbuster Discover acquisition, which closed on May 18, required a lot of different accounting treatments and analyst estimates were all over the board. For example, Capital One actually reported a quarterly net loss of $4.3 billion, or $8.58 per share, based on Generally Acceptable Accounting Principles (GAAP) — but, on an adjusted basis to strip out one-time impact from the deal, the company turned a huge profit of $5.48 per share. One of the largest financial impacts from the deal was the $8.8 billion worth of initial allowance build for Discover’s non-purchased credit deteriorated loans. The accounting treatment for Discover’s book of business is why there was a significant increase in the reported companywide provision for credit losses. Provisions for credit losses are funds that Capital One sets aside to cover potential loan defaults; the higher the provisions, the worse sign of credit quality. Backing out the Discover provisions tells a different story. If it was still a standalone company, Capital One would have had an allowance release of around $900 million, which is a great sign of improving credit trends. This is a big difference, to say the least. Capital One Financial Why we own it : Capital One’s acquisition of Discover is a transformative deal with significant strategic advantages and financial benefits. There are also several billions of dollars worth of expense and network synergies that should make this deal highly accretive to earnings per share. Lastly, the acquisition strengthens Capital One’s balance sheet, allowing for aggressive share repurchases in the future. Competitors : American Express, MasterCard, Visa Most recent buy : May 23, 2025 Initiated : March 6, 2025 Beyond the nitty gritty of the credit metrics, the focus of Tuesday night’s earnings call was all about the Discover integration and what management’s plans are now that it owns a payments network — the most coveted part of the $35 billion acquisition. As CEO Richard Fairbank proudly pointed out, “There are only two banks in the world with their own network, and we are one of them. We are moving to capitalize on this rare and valuable opportunity.” American Express is the other. Our thesis is that the Discover acquisition will boost Capital One’s earnings power and expand its price-to-earnings multiple. With the integration just getting started, the stock remains undervalued. Although Capital One will have to invest aggressively to achieve its vision, those returns should be worth the costs and help the company grow sustainably for years. We’re reiterating our buy-equivalent 1 rating and price target of $250. Deal outlook On the earnings call, the company provided some early thoughts on the how Discover integration is progressing. Broadly speaking, the integration “is off to a great start,” and that’s good to hear since so much of our thesis hinges on this deal being a success. However, management now expects integration costs to be “somewhat higher” than its previous announced target of $2.8 billion, which is a slightly negative development. According to Fairbank, the “integration budget” covers expenses like deal costs; moving Discover onto Capital One’s tech stack; integrating products and experience; additional investments in risk management and compliance; integrating talent; and taking care of employees. In addition to the higher cost outlook, the phrase “sustained investment” came up multiple times on the conference call. Fears of endless spending to make the deal work could spook some investors. However, the firm believes these sustained investments will lead to sustained growth and stronger returns for the long run. “The portfolio of opportunities we have is the broadest and biggest set of opportunities that I’ve seen in our history. But the only way to get there is with investment,” Fairbank said — and we’re banking on Fairbank being right. “I think there’s a lot of value creation opportunity, but we’re going to invest significantly to get there,” he later added. On the synergy side, Capital One said it’s on track to hit its target of $2.5 billion of net synergies, which is made up of cost savings and revenue synergies generated by moving its debit business and some of its credit business onto the Discover network. Capital One began the process of reissuing Capital One debt cards onto that network last month, Fairbank said. The conversion process will continue “in phases through early 2026,” he said. Longer term, the company sees a significant opportunity to invest in the network to achieve greater international acceptance and build a global network brand. Management wants to do this to lure bigger spenders onto the Discover network, and doing so could eventually could help the company exceed its synergy targets , Fairbank has said. Commentary As mentioned earlier, the actual quarterly results were hard to evaluate versus expectations because the estimates themselves varied tremendously. Analysts need time to fine-tune their models for the combined company. For that reason, we’re not putting too much stock into all the red seen in the chart above. The bearish view on Capital One is that the tariff-driven plunge in consumer sentiment would hurt the economy and materially impact Capital One’s credit performance. Since Capital One is one of the more exposed credit card companies to subprime, it’s usually the first to feel the pain of an economic slowdown. And yet, the bank’s credit performance has been healthy and steadily getting better. “Capital One’s card delinquencies have been improving on a seasonally adjusted basis since October of last year, and our losses have been improving since January of 2025,” Fairbank said on the call. Capital One’s “legacy” domestic card portfolio, which does not include Discover, also saw its net charge off rate decline 55 basis points year over year to 5.5%. Net charge-offs refer to the amount of debt a bank has written off as uncollectible, minus any recoveries. A decline is a good thing. Toward the end of Tuesday night’s call, Fairbank spoke more generally about the health of the U.S. consumer and economy, striking an upbeat tone. “If we don’t read the news and just look at what our customers are telling us with their behaviors, it is a picture of strength,” he said. As for buybacks, the company repurchased $150 million worth of stock in the quarter, bringing its full-year total to $300 million. Following another successful round of Federal Reserve stress tests in June, there’s a lot of potential here for years of multibillion dollar buybacks. But management is still working through the internal modeling of the combined company, and they plan on making an update once that is complete. (Jim Cramer’s Charitable Trust is long COF. See here for a full list of the stocks.) As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust’s portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED.
You may like
Finance
Why software stocks, 2026’s market dogs, have joined the rally
Published
2 weeks agoon
April 19, 2026

Cybersecurity and enterprise software stocks have been market dogs in 2026, with fears that AI will wipe out a wide range of companies in the enterprise space dominating the narrative. But they snapped a brutal losing streak this past week, joining in the broader market rally that saw all losses from the U.S.-Iran war regained by the Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500.
Cybersecurity has been “a victim of some of the AI-related headlines,” Christian Magoon, Amplify ETFs CEO, said on this week’s “ETF Edge.”
It wasn’t just niche cybersecurity names. Take Microsoft, for example, which was recently down close to 20% for the year. Its shares surged last week by 13%.
A big driver of the pummeling in software stocks was a rotation within tech by investors to AI infrastructure and semiconductors and some other names in large-cap tech, Magoon said, and since cybersecurity stocks and ETFs are heavily weighted towards software companies, they were left behind even as those businesses continue to grow on a fundamental basis.
But Wall Street now has become more bullish with the stocks at lower levels. Brent Thill, Jefferies tech analyst, said last week that the worst may be over for software stocks. “I think that this concept that software is dead, and then Anthropic and OpenAI are going to kill the entire industry, is just over-exaggerated,” he said on CNBC’s “Money Movers” on Wednesday.
“Big Short” investor Michael Burry wrote in a Substack post on Wednesday that he is becoming bullish about software stocks after the recent selloff. “Software stocks remain interesting because of accelerated extreme declines last week arising from a reflexive positive feedback loop between falling software stocks and changes in the market for their bank debt,” he wrote.
The Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG), is down about 12% since the beginning of the year, with top holdings including Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet, Akamai Technologies and CrowdStrike. But BUG was up 12% last week. The First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) is down 6% for the year, but up 9% in the past week.
Piper Sandler analyst Rob Owens reiterated an “overweight” rating on Palo Alto Networks which helped the stock pop 7% — it is now down roughly 6% on the year. Its peers saw similar moves, including CrowdStrike.
Performance of Global X cybersecurity ETF versus S&P 500 over past one-year period.
Magoon said expectations may have become too high in cybersecurity, and with a crowding effect among investors, solid results were not enough to to push stocks higher. But the down-and-then-back-up 2026 for the sector is also a reminder that when stocks fall sharply in a short period of time, opportunity may knock.
“Once you’re down over 10% in some of these subsectors, you start to see the contrarians start to say, ‘well, maybe I’ll take a look at this,'” Magoon said.
He said AI does add both opportunity and uncertainty to the cybersecurity equation, increasing demand but also introducing new competition. But he added, “I think the dip is good to buy in an AI-driven world,” specifically because the risks to companies may lead to more M&A in cyber names that benefits the stocks.
For now, investors may look for opportunity on the margins rather than rush back into beaten-up tech names. “I think investors are still going to remain underweight software,” Thill said.
But Magoon advises investors to at least take the reminder to keep an eye on niches in the market during pronounced downturns. “The best-performing are often the least bought and do the best over the next 12 months versus late-in-the-game piling on,” he said.
While that may have been a mindset that worked against the last investors into cybersecurity and enterprise software in mid-2025 when the negative sentiment started building, at least for now, it’s started working for the stocks in the sector again.
Meanwhile, this year’s biggest winner is also a good example of what can be an extended trade in either a bullish or bearish direction. Last year, institutional ownership of energy was at multi-year lows, Magoon said, referencing Bank of America data. “Reverse sentiment can be a great indicator,” he said.
But he cautioned that any selective buying of stocks that have dipped does have to contend with the risk that there is a potentially bigger drawdown in the market yet to come in 2026. That is because midterm election years historically have been marked by large drawdowns. “If you think it is bad right now, it could get a lot worse,” Magoon said. But he added that there’s a silver-lining in that data, too, for the patient investor. The market has posted very strong 12-month returns after midterm election drawdowns end. So, for investors with a longer-term time horizon and no need for short-term liquidity, Magoon said, “stick in there.”
Sign up for our weekly newsletter that goes beyond the livestream, offering a closer look at the trends and figures shaping the ETF market.
Finance
Violent downturns could test new ETF strategies, warns MFS Investment
Published
2 weeks agoon
April 17, 2026

New innovation in the exchange-traded fund industry could come at a cost to investors during extreme conditions.
According to MFS Investment Management’s Jamie Harrison, ETFs involved in increasingly complex derivatives and less transparent markets may be in uncharted territory when it comes to violent downturns.
“Those would be something that you’d want to keep an eye on as volatility ramps up,” the firm’s head of ETF capital markets told CNBC’s “ETF Edge” this week. “As innovation continues to increase at a rapid pace within the ETF wrapper, [it’s] definitely something that we advise our clients to be really front-footed about… Lack of transparency could absolutely be an issue if we’re going to start seeing some deep sell-offs.”
His firm has been around since 1924 and is known for inventing the open-end mutual fund. Last year, ETF.com named MFS Investment Management as the best new ETF issuer.
“It’s important to do due diligence on the portfolio,” he said. “Having a firm that has deep partnerships, deep bench of subject matter experts that plays with the A-team in terms of the Street and liquidity providers available [are] super important.”
Liquidity as the real issue?
Harrison suggested the real issue is liquidity, particularly during a steep sell-off.
“We’ve all seen the news and the headlines around potential private credit ETFs. That picture becomes much more murky,” he added. “It’s up to advisors, to investors [and] to clients to really dig in and look under the hood and engage with their issuers.”
He noted investors will have to ask some tough questions.
“What does this look like in a 20% drawdown? How does this liquidity facility work? Am I going to be able to get in? Am I going to be able to get out? And if I’m able to get out, am I able to get out at a price that’s tight to NAV [net asset value], and what’s the infrastructure at your shop in terms of managing that consideration for me,” said Harrison.
Amplify ETFs’ Christian Magoon is also concerned about these newer ETF strategies could weather a monster drawdown. He listed private credit as a red flag.
“If your ETF owns private credit, I think it’s worth taking a look at, kind of what the standards are around liquidity and how that ETF is trading, because that should be a bit of a mismatch between the trading pace of ETFs and the underlying asset,” the firm’s CEO said in the same interview.
Magoon also highlighted potential issues surrounding equity-linked notes. The notes provide fixed income security while offering potentially higher returns linked to stocks or equity indexes.
“Those could potentially be in stress due to redemptions and the underlying credit risk. That’s another kind of unique derivative,” Magoon said. “I would very closely look at any ETF that has equity-linked notes should we get into a major drawdown or there be a contagion in private credit or something related to the banking system.”
Finance
Anthropic Mythos reveals ‘more vulnerabilities’ for cyberattacks
Published
3 weeks agoon
April 15, 2026
Jamie Dimon, chief executive officer of JPMorgan Chase & Co., right, departs the US Capitol in Washington, DC, US, on Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2026.
Graeme Sloan | Bloomberg | Getty Images
JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon said Tuesday that while artificial intelligence tools could eventually help companies defend themselves from cyberattacks, they are first making them more vulnerable.
Dimon said that JPMorgan was testing Anthropic’s latest model — the Mythos preview announced by the AI firm last week — as part of its broader effort to reap the benefits of AI while protecting against bad actors wielding the same technology.
“AI’s made it worse, it’s made it harder,” Dimon told analysts on the bank’s earnings call Tuesday morning. “It does create additional vulnerabilities, and maybe down the road, better ways to strengthen yourself too.”
When asked by a reporter about Mythos, Dimon seemed to refer to Anthropic’s warning that the model had already found thousands of vulnerabilities in corporate software.
“I think you read exactly what is it,” Dimon said. “It shows a lot more vulnerabilities need to be fixed.”
The remarks reveal how artificial intelligence, a technology welcomed by corporations as a productivity boon, has also morphed into a serious threat by giving bad actors new ways to hack into technology systems. Last week, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent summoned bank CEOs to a meeting to discuss the risks posed by Mythos.
JPMorgan, the world’s largest bank by market cap, has for years invested heavily to stay ahead of threats, with dedicated teams and constant coordination with government agencies, Dimon said.
“We spend a lot of money. We’ve got top experts. We’re in constant contact with the government,” he said. “It’s a full-time job, and we’re doing it all the time.”
‘Attack mode’
Still, the CEO warned that risks extend beyond any single institution, given the interconnected nature of the financial system.
“That doesn’t mean everything that banks rely on is that well protected,” Dimon said. “Banks… are attached to exchanges and all these other things that create other layers of risk.”
JPMorgan Chief Financial Officer Jeremy Barnum said the industry has long been aware that AI cuts both ways in cybersecurity.
“These tools can make it easier to find vulnerabilities, but then also potentially be deployed by bad actors in attack mode,” Barnum said on the earnings call. Recent advances from Anthropic and others have simply intensified an existing trend, he said.
Dimon also said that while advanced AI tools are important, old-school cybersecurity practices remain essential.
“A lot of it is hygiene… how do you protect your data? How do you protect your networks, your routers, your hardware, changing your passcode?” he said. “Doing all those things right dramatically reduces the risk.”
Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon said Monday during an earnings call that his bank was testing Mythos, though he declined to comment further.
What that means for consumer loans
Checks and Balance newsletter: Of God and MAGA
Why software stocks, 2026’s market dogs, have joined the rally
Armanino adds Strategic Accounting Outsourced Solutions
New 2023 K-1 instructions stir the CAMT pot for partnerships and corporations
