Connect with us

Accounting

From ledgers to lecturers: A CPA’s path to professor

Published

on

Have you ever wondered how to get involved in the classroom, whether a small or large commitment, and be a driver for change in the accounting profession? 

Many CPAs have a strong interest in helping build the next generation of accountants, but may not know how to directly impact it. This article explores how CPAs can start their careers in higher education as an adjunct or full-time professor, even without a terminal degree. 

To start, CPAs can find rewarding opportunities as adjunct professors, balancing their professional careers with part-time teaching roles. Typically for these roles, a CPA license and master’s degree are required. 

Serving as an adjunct allows CPAs to share their expertise and knowledge with aspiring accountants, enriching the educational experience, while giving back to the profession. These roles offer personal satisfaction as they witness the growth and development of their students, knowing that they are contributing to the future of the field. 

Managing a position as an adjunct while working full-time is feasible with proper time management and support from the primary employer. Many institutions offer flexible scheduling, allowing CPAs to teach evening or weekend classes. 

This dual role not only diversifies their professional activities, but also enhances their own skills and perspectives, making them more effective and well-rounded professionals, and can enhance an employer’s recruiting efforts at that school. 

Making the jump to a full-time professor

Securing your first full-time faculty position in academia requires careful preparation and a strategic approach to the application process. 

The journey typically begins with identifying institutions that align with your career goals, research interests, and teaching philosophy. Some schools, even AACSB accredited schools, do not require a terminal degree for full-time and/or tenure track positions. Understanding these aspects will help you tailor your application to each institution, demonstrating how your experience and goals align with their needs.

Crafting a strong application involves four major elements:

  1. Curriculum vitae: Your CV should be comprehensive, highlighting your academic qualifications, professional experience, research publications, teaching experience, and any service or leadership roles you’ve undertaken. For your first academic position, emphasize any experience that showcases your ability to contribute to both teaching and research. Include sections on conferences you’ve attended or presented at, workshops, and any professional certifications relevant to the field of accounting.
  2. Cover letter: Your cover letter is your opportunity to make a strong first impression. It should be tailored to the specific institution and position, clearly stating why you are interested in the role and how you can contribute to the department. Highlight your teaching philosophy, research agenda, and how your background fits with the institution’s goals. Mention any connections you have within the academic community that might be relevant, as this can show that you are well-integrated into the field.
  3. Research statement: If you’re applying to a research-focused institution, your research statement will be a critical part of your application. This document should outline your past research, current projects, and future research plans. Emphasize how your work contributes to the broader field of accounting and how you plan to involve students in your research. Showing that you have a clear, sustainable research agenda is key to convincing a hiring committee that you will be a valuable long-term asset to their faculty.
  4. Teaching philosophy: A teaching statement or philosophy is often required and should reflect your approach to education, how you engage students, and your methods for fostering critical thinking and practical skills in the classroom. Provide examples of successful teaching experiences, student feedback, and innovative techniques you’ve used to enhance learning. If you have experience with online or hybrid teaching, this is also valuable to highlight, especially in the current academic environment.

Here are three keys to navigating the interview process:

  1. Initial interviews: Many academic positions begin with a preliminary interview, often conducted via video conference. During this interview, you should be prepared to discuss your research and teaching experience, why you are interested in their institution, and how you see yourself contributing to their program. Be ready to answer questions about how you manage time between research and teaching, how you handle challenges in the classroom, and your long-term career goals.
  2. Campus visits: If you advance to the next stage, you will likely be invited for an on-campus interview. This usually includes a research presentation, a teaching demonstration, meetings with faculty and administrators, and sometimes interactions with students. During the campus visit, it’s crucial to demonstrate your ability to communicate your research clearly, engage with students, and show enthusiasm for contributing to the academic community.
  3. Follow-up: After your interview, sending a thoughtful thank-you note to the faculty members and administrators you met with can leave a positive impression. This is also an opportunity to reiterate your enthusiasm for the position and reflect briefly on any particularly meaningful conversations or observations you had during your visit.

Once you go through the application and interview process, below are some additional advantages and disadvantages you should consider to determine if the position is the right fit for you. 

  • Advantage 1: One of the biggest advantages to obtaining a position as an accounting professor within higher education is the amount of time that you have off during the academic year and during the summer months. As a professor, you get the same breaks that the students do. This first advantage can be very appealing to many.
  • Advantage 2: A second major advantage that a job in higher education entails is that there is no busy season like you see in almost every job inside and outside of public accounting. Unfortunately, due to the shortage of CPAs, traditional busy times or seasons have turned into perpetual busy seasons for experienced staff.
  • Advantage 3: The sense of fulfillment that one gets from a career as a professor can be unparalleled. This type of profession allows you to share knowledge that you have gained from your time working in the profession and can be a significant contributor to your student’s intellectual growth. 
  • Advantage 4: Having autonomy within a job is something that many applicants seek. The amount of autonomy within higher education can be far more significant than a traditional job as an accountant for a business or a CPA working for a public accounting firm. In the world of academia, there is a tremendous amount of independence. You have the leisure to set your own schedule and be the captain of your own ship. 
College students

Gorodenkoff Productions OU/Gorodenkoff – stock.adobe.com

Although the pros can outweigh the cons, it is always important to consider what disadvantages a job like this could entail.

  • Disadvantage 1: Unfortunately, a career within higher education may not have the earnings potential of a career in public accounting or industry. Depending upon a plethora of different factors at the specific college or university that you land a job at, your earnings can range from $75,000 and up.
  • Disadvantage 2: One of the major advantages of working in public accounting is the opportunity for accelerated advancement. Unfortunately, within higher education, it may take up to six or seven years to advance to the next level. This could all be dependent upon the work you produce as a scholarly practitioner or even as simple as the reviews that you receive at the end of the semester by your students. 
  • Disadvantage 3: Scholarship expectations for some universities can be incredibly demanding. Depending upon the university that you land a full time offer at, they might come with more rigorous scholarship expectations than at some of the smaller colleges or universities. On top of a heavy teaching and advising load, this can sometimes create a more challenging workload.

Did you know …?

  • Growing demand: The demand for accounting professors is on the rise. As the accounting profession continues to evolve with advancements in technology and regulatory changes, the need for qualified educators to train the next generation of accountants and CPAs has never been greater.
  • Industry experience counts: Many academic institutions value real-world experience. If you’ve spent years in the industry, your practical knowledge can give you a unique edge in the classroom, bridging the gap between theory and practice for your students.
  • PhDs are not the only path: While a PhD is a common requirement for full-time faculty positions, some universities offer alternative pathways, such as the AACSB Bridge Program, designed for experienced professionals who wish to transition into academia. Additionally, there are now many hybrid AACSB-accredited PhD and DBA programs that allow you to work and complete your terminal degree.
  • Research isn’t just for scientists: Accounting professors contribute to the field through research that influences policy, advances accounting practices, and shapes educational methods. Starting with small research projects or co-authoring with experienced researchers can be a great way to enter the academic world.
  • A lifelong journey of learning: Becoming an accounting professor isn’t just about teaching, it’s also about continuous learning. Whether through research, attending conferences, or keeping up with industry trends, professors are lifelong learners. 

The importance of giving back

Throughout this process, it’s important to keep in mind the broader purpose behind becoming an adjunct or fulltime professor: the urge to help others and give back to the accounting profession. 

This intrinsic motivation will not only fuel your efforts during the application process, but will also be evident to hiring committees. Institutions are looking for faculty who are not only skilled researchers and teachers, but who are also committed to mentoring students, advancing the profession, and contributing to the academic community.

By approaching the application process with a clear strategy, a strong understanding of the academic environment, and a genuine passion for teaching and research, you can successfully transition into a full-time faculty position and begin a rewarding career in academia.

Continue Reading

Accounting

SEC’s Semiannual Reporting Proposal Faces Investor Pushback: What CFOs Need to Know

Published

on

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

A proposal from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to potentially shift some public companies away from quarterly financial reporting toward a semiannual model is drawing significant pushback from investors, even as it continues moving through the regulatory process. The debate has direct implications for corporate finance teams, auditors, and the broader transparency of U.S. capital markets.

What the SEC Proposed

According to a summary published by accounting advisory firm Cohen & Co., the SEC issued a proposed rule on May 19, 2026, aimed at simplifying financial reporting requirements for many U.S. public companies. The proposal would potentially reduce the frequency of certain mandatory disclosures from quarterly to semiannual, a structural change that has not been made to core U.S. reporting requirements in decades.

The proposal follows an extended debate within U.S. policy circles, with proponents arguing that reduced reporting frequency could lower compliance costs and free up management time for longer-term strategic planning rather than quarter-to-quarter results management.

Why Investors Are Pushing Back

Comment letters submitted in response to the proposal have been extensive, and according to Cohen & Co.’s review of the public record, investors “appear to be largely opposed” to the shift, viewing frequent interim reporting as a core benefit of U.S. capital markets relative to other jurisdictions.

Accounting and law firms have taken a more measured position, generally urging any changes to remain aligned with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), whose existing disclosure requirements and guidance are built around a quarterly reporting cadence. A shift to semiannual reporting without corresponding changes to FASB guidance could create friction between SEC filing requirements and GAAP-based disclosure expectations.

Lessons From the U.K. Experience

The debate is not without precedent. The United Kingdom moved away from mandatory quarterly reporting for listed companies in 2014, returning to a semiannual disclosure requirement. According to Cohen & Co.’s analysis, that experience offers a cautionary data point: there was no measurable increase in capital expenditure or R&D investment following the change, while analyst coverage of affected companies declined as reliable interim information became less available — a particular risk for smaller and newly public companies that rely on analyst coverage to maintain investor visibility.

Practical Implications for Finance Teams

Beyond the debate over disclosure philosophy, the proposal carries practical complications. Many companies have debt covenants and credit agreements structured around quarterly financial delivery; a shift to semiannual reporting could require renegotiating those terms. Reduced reporting frequency would also extend the “window of market silence” between disclosures, a factor that governance and investor-relations teams would need to manage carefully to avoid information asymmetry.

Separately, and unrelated to the reporting-frequency debate, the SEC and FASB have continued finalizing more routine updates this year. New Accounting Standards Updates are taking effect for December 31, 2026, fiscal year-ends covering income tax disclosures, credit loss measurement, induced debt conversions, and stock compensation, according to Eide Bailly’s review of 2026 ASU activity. Additional guidance on paid-in-kind dividends and environmental credits is also on the near-term horizon.

What to Watch Next

The semiannual reporting proposal remains in the comment and review phase, and no final rule has been adopted as of this writing. Finance leaders should monitor the SEC’s regulatory agenda for further movement, while treating the current quarterly reporting requirement as the operative standard until any final rule is issued and an effective date is set.

Given the extent of investor opposition documented in the comment file, a full shift to mandatory semiannual reporting appears more likely to result in either a scaled-back compromise or continued study rather than swift adoption — though the SEC’s ultimate direction remains uncertain.

 

Continue Reading

Accounting

AI-Driven Automation and Continuous Accounting Frameworks

Published

on

The accounting profession is undergoing a fundamental structural transition as enterprise finance departments shift from periodic month-end closes toward automated continuous accounting models. By integrating specialized machine learning algorithms directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms, chief accounting officers are transforming financial reporting from a retrospective exercise into a real-time operational asset.

The Shift from Periodic Close to Continuous Financial Reporting
Traditional accounting workflows heavily relied on manual data reconciliation, spreadsheet calculations, and multi-week closing cycles at the end of each fiscal period. In contrast, continuous accounting frameworks utilize automated software agents to process, validate, and post transactional data in real time as business activities occur.

Automated bank reconciliation tools cross-reference incoming bank feeds, invoice records, and purchase orders automatically. By resolving transactional variances instantly throughout the month, corporate accounting teams eliminate the traditional workload spikes associated with quarterly and annual closes.

Machine Learning in Audit Trails and Anomaly Detection
Advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning tools are redefining internal audit and financial control environments. Automated systems analyze 100% of general ledger entries, identifying anomalous transactions, duplicate payments, and unauthorized journal entries in real time.

Rather than relying on random statistical sampling, corporate internal auditors can focus their attention on high-risk flags automatically surfaced by algorithmic monitoring platforms. This continuous risk assessment strengthens internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) and significantly reduces fraud risk.

Evolving Roles for Accounting Professionals
As routine data entry and manual reconciliation tasks become fully automated, the skill set required for accounting professionals is shifting toward data analysis, system design, and strategic business advisory.
– Systems Governance: Accountants are increasingly responsible for monitoring algorithmic accuracy and managing data integration pipelines.
– Business Partnership: Finance professionals leverage real-time financial dashboards to advise operational leaders on margin management and working capital allocation.
– Regulatory Compliance Management: Accounting teams utilize automated platforms to ensure compliance with dynamic tax codes and international accounting standards.

Core Implementation Recommendations
1. Deploy Automated Reconciliation Tools: Integrate continuous transaction processing modules into existing enterprise ERP architectures.
2. Establish Algorithmic Governance Controls: Implement strict internal testing protocols to ensure automated accounting rules comply with GAAP/IFRS standards.
3. Reskill Accounting Teams: Invest in training finance staff on data analytics, workflow automation, and predictive financial modeling.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Trending