Connect with us

Accounting

OBBBA and the repurposing of life insurance portfolios

Published

on

One of the most significant features of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act that Congress passed in July is it permanently eliminated the federal estate tax liabilities for individuals with less than $15 million of assets in their estates, or $30 million for married couples.

This brings up an important choice for many ultra-high-net-worth individuals who previously had to allocate up to 40-45% of their assets to pay their share of their federal estate tax liability, which for the most part was due nine months after an individual’s death. The vast majority of those high-net-worth individuals chose to pay for those death taxes using a life insurance policy because it was the most tax efficient, leveraged and economical vehicle available.  

The advisor’s role, guiding choices

Legal and tax advisors can play a significant role in alerting their UHNW clients to the availability of the various options and strategies regarding what to do with their now unneeded life insurance death benefit. In addition, an advisor should also be aware of the increasing numbers of clients that are continuously being notified by their life insurance company that their non-guaranteed universal life insurance coverage, which was so popular over the last 25+ years, is now expiring years earlier than anticipated. This is occurring as a result of years of reduced interest rates and neglect on the part of the owners who weren’t aware they should have increased their premiums over the years when interest rates kept declining. 

The question today becomes what to do with those multiple millions of dollars of the client’s current death benefit that are no longer needed as a result of the increased estate tax exemptions. Secondly, since more than 45% of those policies were non-guaranteed universal policies, 30-35% of the coverage in those policies is currently expiring prematurely and needs to be dealt with as well.

Advisors to these high-net-worth clients should have an understanding of the available options rather than just assume that if the death benefit is no longer required for estate tax purposes, then the client should just surrender the policy for its cash value. The purpose of this article is to provide you with several other options to re-arrange or re-purpose a client’s current life insurance portfolio in the most beneficial manner.  

An evaluation should be made as to which policies to keep or alter the premium in some manner to obtain additional benefits, or in some cases end the coverage. It’s imperative not to allow a policy to lapse prior to the insured’s death if there are any gains in the policy, because a lapse in coverage would trigger a phantom income tax on those gains, as well as any outstanding loans.

Options worth considering

Any of the options listed below is effective for a $250,000 policy, a $2.5 million policy or a $25 million policy. These same options are available for a trust-owned life insurance policy as well as for an individually owned life insurance policy.

A client can simply maintain their existing coverage to make a charitable donation to a hospital or university for tax purposes or for assets allocated to the  next generation in a generation skipping/dynasty trust for grandkids who certainly may have significant estate tax problems of their own one day.

Due to the passage of the Pension Protection Act, an individual can now transfer the cash value of a life insurance policy on a tax-free basis to a “linked benefit policy,” which in addition to offering a death benefit, also offers an individual the ability to withdraw dollars from the death benefit of their life insurance policy tax-free, to pay for qualified long-term care benefits where one dollar can become four to five dollars.  

People are now living longer as a result of modern pharmacology and have accordingly influenced the life insurance Industry to financially reward individuals for living healthier lifestyles. Many of today’s life insurance policies contain provisions and policies that were not available 20+ years ago. One such life insurance policy is called Private Placement Life Insurance. 

The advantage of a PPLI type of a product is that it rewards the purchasers of such multimillion-dollar death benefit policies with institutional products that contain lower costs and fees, fewer restrictions on withdrawals, and are managed by hedge funds rather than mutual funds. This type of specialized product often results in better returns with significantly lower costs than traditional retail life insurance policies that are typically offered to the general public.

Another strategy could be to reduce the death benefit by 15-20% using any of the means described below.  They can then increase the premiums up to the modified endowment limits and use the policy for its ability to accumulate cash value on a tax-deferred basis with the intent to later withdraw the cash value on a tax-free basis through a series of surrenders and loans against the death benefit that will never have to be paid back as long as the policy survives the Insured.

This opportunity to supplement one’s retirement with tax-deferred dollars, otherwise known as a private pension, was recently made even more attractive as a result of the passage of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 (Section 7702). which reduced the actuarial interest rate assumptions used by the life insurance companies to define a life insurance contract. Doing so made it possible for the owner of a life insurance policy to place an even larger premium into the policy’s cash value without negatively affecting the policies’ ability to continue to shelter the growth and distribution of the cash value on a tax-free basis.

Surrender the policy for its cash value

The great majority of individuals who decide to cancel their policies in exchange for the remaining cash surrender value can merely contact their agent or broker (or the company directly) and request a form which, once it’s signed, notarized and returned, will conveniently serve to surrender the policy back to the insurance company that issued it in exchange for the stated cash surrender value.

Policies are often surrendered to the insurance company for several reasons: Customers perhaps no longer need or can afford the increased cost of the coverage. They may want to use the existing cash surrender value to supplement their own retirement income, or they want to make a gift to their heirs while they are alive to enjoy it. Life insurance companies are happy to accommodate both goals as they profit nicely when a policy is surrendered back to the insurer as they get to keep all the premiums and never have to pay out a death benefit. There are better ways for the client to accomplish both of those goals. 

An alternate exit strategy

An individual is entitled to sell their life insurance policy as they would their car, boat or home.  The U.S. Supreme Court case of Grigsby v. Russell (1911), established a life insurance policy as “private property,” placing the ownership rights on the same legal footing as an investment property such as stocks and bonds. As such, a life insurance policy can be transferred in whole or part to another person at the discretion of the policy owner. The life settlement market, primarily funded by hedge funds and often referred to as the institutional or secondary market, has greatly enhanced the consumer value of a life insurance policy, often by two to three times the cash value offered by the insurance company, according to a London Business School study.

However, the majority of clients, and many of their advisors, are not familiar with the concept of a life settlement, nor do they feel comfortable about another person owning a life insurance policy on their lives, and in my opinion, rightfully so. The only buyer one should deal with is an institutional buyer. 

While a life settlement can be entered into by anyone who owns a life insurance policy, only those policies that have a face value of at least $100,000, preferably $250,000, with an insured who is at least 65 years old will be of interest to most institutional investors. Contrary to popular belief, even a healthy individual can receive an offer on a term policy, if the policy is still within the convertible period, However, the more severe the health conditions, the more likely they are to receive a higher offer. 

One of the smartest pieces of advice an advisor can give their client is to remind them that if they are in their 60s to 70s and they have a term life insurance policy that’s no longer needed or wanted, rather than let it lapse with no value, the owner should attempt to sell the policy as they may be very pleasantly surprised to learn they could turn the unneeded term life policy with no value into a cash offer as long as the policy is still in its convertibility period usually between ages 65 to 75. 

Taxation of life settlement

A life settlement on a universal life insurance policy is a taxable event, and the proceeds are taxed in three tiers. 

• Tier 1: Tax-free return of cost basis: A portion of the sale proceeds up to the amount of the cost basis or amount paid in premiums is tax free. 
• Tier 2: Ordinary income: A portion of the sale proceeds above the cost basis and up to the policy’s surrender value is taxed as ordinary income. 
• Tier 3: Long-term capital gain: Any remaining sale proceeds above the surrender value are only taxed as long-term capital gains. 

Life settlement taxation case example

• Policy type: $1 million universal life 
• Premiums: $70,000 (cost basis)
• Cash value: $80,000 (surrender value) 
• Policy sale price: $300,000 (settlement amount paid to policy owner) 
• Tax-free return of cost basis: $70,000 (cost basis or amount paid in premiums) 
• Ordinary income: $10,000 (portion of sale proceeds above cost basis ($70,000) and up to surrender value ($80,000)) 
• Long-term capital gains: $220,000(remaining sale proceeds ($300,000 less $70,000 less $10,000))

Ever since the creation of the first non-guaranteed life insurance policy  known as universal life insurance came into being in 1982, life insurance policies have required active management to continue to operate as the owner hoped they would. However, as a result of sustained reduced interest rates and neglect over the last 25+ years, 35-40% of those policies are now expiring prematurely.

Today more than ever, UHNW clients face a choice of what to do with their unneeded life Insurance policies, while many other clients are in the process of discovering that their non-guaranteed universal policies are expiring earlier than anticipated, and the ability to sell a policy to an institutional investor can make the difference between receiving cash or a tax bill.                        

While there are many options and strategies to consider before a decision is made, many clients will just take the easiest way out by simply surrendering their policy back to the insurance company. In so doing the insured will inadvertently be giving up valuable benefits they are contractually entitled to as well as opportunities and cash assets.

The most important decision in considering a settlement option is selecting an independent, experienced licensed life settlement broker, a professional who will provide guidance and assistance while contractually affirming their fiduciary duty to the seller and assist the accountant, their client and their trustee in obtaining the best possible offer, one who has access to and understands the marketplace and is adept with the negotiating process necessary to represent the client’s best interest.

Continue Reading

Accounting

SEC’s Semiannual Reporting Proposal Faces Investor Pushback: What CFOs Need to Know

Published

on

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

A proposal from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to potentially shift some public companies away from quarterly financial reporting toward a semiannual model is drawing significant pushback from investors, even as it continues moving through the regulatory process. The debate has direct implications for corporate finance teams, auditors, and the broader transparency of U.S. capital markets.

What the SEC Proposed

According to a summary published by accounting advisory firm Cohen & Co., the SEC issued a proposed rule on May 19, 2026, aimed at simplifying financial reporting requirements for many U.S. public companies. The proposal would potentially reduce the frequency of certain mandatory disclosures from quarterly to semiannual, a structural change that has not been made to core U.S. reporting requirements in decades.

The proposal follows an extended debate within U.S. policy circles, with proponents arguing that reduced reporting frequency could lower compliance costs and free up management time for longer-term strategic planning rather than quarter-to-quarter results management.

Why Investors Are Pushing Back

Comment letters submitted in response to the proposal have been extensive, and according to Cohen & Co.’s review of the public record, investors “appear to be largely opposed” to the shift, viewing frequent interim reporting as a core benefit of U.S. capital markets relative to other jurisdictions.

Accounting and law firms have taken a more measured position, generally urging any changes to remain aligned with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), whose existing disclosure requirements and guidance are built around a quarterly reporting cadence. A shift to semiannual reporting without corresponding changes to FASB guidance could create friction between SEC filing requirements and GAAP-based disclosure expectations.

Lessons From the U.K. Experience

The debate is not without precedent. The United Kingdom moved away from mandatory quarterly reporting for listed companies in 2014, returning to a semiannual disclosure requirement. According to Cohen & Co.’s analysis, that experience offers a cautionary data point: there was no measurable increase in capital expenditure or R&D investment following the change, while analyst coverage of affected companies declined as reliable interim information became less available — a particular risk for smaller and newly public companies that rely on analyst coverage to maintain investor visibility.

Practical Implications for Finance Teams

Beyond the debate over disclosure philosophy, the proposal carries practical complications. Many companies have debt covenants and credit agreements structured around quarterly financial delivery; a shift to semiannual reporting could require renegotiating those terms. Reduced reporting frequency would also extend the “window of market silence” between disclosures, a factor that governance and investor-relations teams would need to manage carefully to avoid information asymmetry.

Separately, and unrelated to the reporting-frequency debate, the SEC and FASB have continued finalizing more routine updates this year. New Accounting Standards Updates are taking effect for December 31, 2026, fiscal year-ends covering income tax disclosures, credit loss measurement, induced debt conversions, and stock compensation, according to Eide Bailly’s review of 2026 ASU activity. Additional guidance on paid-in-kind dividends and environmental credits is also on the near-term horizon.

What to Watch Next

The semiannual reporting proposal remains in the comment and review phase, and no final rule has been adopted as of this writing. Finance leaders should monitor the SEC’s regulatory agenda for further movement, while treating the current quarterly reporting requirement as the operative standard until any final rule is issued and an effective date is set.

Given the extent of investor opposition documented in the comment file, a full shift to mandatory semiannual reporting appears more likely to result in either a scaled-back compromise or continued study rather than swift adoption — though the SEC’s ultimate direction remains uncertain.

 

Continue Reading

Accounting

AI-Driven Automation and Continuous Accounting Frameworks

Published

on

The accounting profession is undergoing a fundamental structural transition as enterprise finance departments shift from periodic month-end closes toward automated continuous accounting models. By integrating specialized machine learning algorithms directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms, chief accounting officers are transforming financial reporting from a retrospective exercise into a real-time operational asset.

The Shift from Periodic Close to Continuous Financial Reporting
Traditional accounting workflows heavily relied on manual data reconciliation, spreadsheet calculations, and multi-week closing cycles at the end of each fiscal period. In contrast, continuous accounting frameworks utilize automated software agents to process, validate, and post transactional data in real time as business activities occur.

Automated bank reconciliation tools cross-reference incoming bank feeds, invoice records, and purchase orders automatically. By resolving transactional variances instantly throughout the month, corporate accounting teams eliminate the traditional workload spikes associated with quarterly and annual closes.

Machine Learning in Audit Trails and Anomaly Detection
Advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning tools are redefining internal audit and financial control environments. Automated systems analyze 100% of general ledger entries, identifying anomalous transactions, duplicate payments, and unauthorized journal entries in real time.

Rather than relying on random statistical sampling, corporate internal auditors can focus their attention on high-risk flags automatically surfaced by algorithmic monitoring platforms. This continuous risk assessment strengthens internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) and significantly reduces fraud risk.

Evolving Roles for Accounting Professionals
As routine data entry and manual reconciliation tasks become fully automated, the skill set required for accounting professionals is shifting toward data analysis, system design, and strategic business advisory.
– Systems Governance: Accountants are increasingly responsible for monitoring algorithmic accuracy and managing data integration pipelines.
– Business Partnership: Finance professionals leverage real-time financial dashboards to advise operational leaders on margin management and working capital allocation.
– Regulatory Compliance Management: Accounting teams utilize automated platforms to ensure compliance with dynamic tax codes and international accounting standards.

Core Implementation Recommendations
1. Deploy Automated Reconciliation Tools: Integrate continuous transaction processing modules into existing enterprise ERP architectures.
2. Establish Algorithmic Governance Controls: Implement strict internal testing protocols to ensure automated accounting rules comply with GAAP/IFRS standards.
3. Reskill Accounting Teams: Invest in training finance staff on data analytics, workflow automation, and predictive financial modeling.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Trending