Connect with us

Accounting

New wrinkles for accounting’s people problems

Published

on

Accounting firms have built up a whole arsenal of strategies to cope with the shortage of new talent, but staffing issues are still top of mind for firm leaders. 

Processing Content

When asked to identify the biggest issues they see facing the accounting profession, senior executives from Accounting Today’s 2026 Top 100 Firms named a wide range of issues — from private equity’s catalytic effect on dealmaking, the subsequent wave of consolidation spreading across the profession, to the speed of technological advancements and the impact of artificial intelligence and automation — but when it comes to staffing, they homed in on the ongoing shortage of CPAs, the struggle to recruit, retain and develop that talent, and succession planning. 

The profession as a whole has made nationwide efforts to make accounting more appealing and accessible to young professionals, which has resulted in a slight uptick in new enrollments. In recent years, for instance, many states have been adopting legislation to create alternative pathways to licensure beyond the 150 credit-hour rule. Still, firms must compete — not just with other accounting firms, but with other financial services providers and the technology sector — to recruit, retain and develop talent.

(Read more: “What’s keeping accounting firms up at night”)

Tulsa, Oklahoma-based HoganTaylor’s CEO Randy Nail summarized the issue: “Capacity constraints driven by persistent talent shortages and declining accounting graduates — even as firms expect to hire at similar or higher levels — [are] creating structural pressure on delivery models.”

Tim Brackney, CEO of Springline Advisory Group, said his firm has tackled this issue by “building a national talent acquisition function, embracing hybrid and remote work, and building learning and development for up-and-coming talent that is a gateway to equity.”

Recruiting, retention and development

The accounting profession has been grappling with an ongoing talent shortage for a decade or more. Not enough college students are studying accounting, fewer go on to become CPAs, and even fewer are sticking around long enough to become partners.

“The traditional talent model is no longer sufficient,” said Paul Bailey, chief growth officer at CLA. “Firms must expand access, reimagine career pathways, and intentionally develop future leaders earlier and more broadly. At scale, succession depth becomes just as critical as hiring, particularly as experienced leaders retire and new roles emerge. Firms that succeed will be those that actively shape their workforce, invest continuously in learning, and prepare leaders who can navigate disruption, complexity, and change, ensuring continuity, resilience, and long-term growth.”

Compensation is another lever firms must pull to recruit talent, as jobs in business, finance and technology offer higher pay to junior-level employees, whereas entry-level accountant salaries historically have lagged behind. 

(Read more: “The 2025 Accounting Today Salary Survey: Sweetening the deal”)

“As leaders, we must compete not only on compensation, but on opportunity,” said Chad Anschuetz, CEO of Troy, Michigan-based Doeren Mayhew Advisors. “By offering competitive pay, meaningful equity participation, clear career pathways, continuous development, and a culture that values flexibility, purpose and collaboration, we are positioning our firm to attract the next generation of leaders and sustain long-term success.”

Louis Grassi, CEO at Grassi in New York City, added, “With a declining number of accounting graduates and increased competition for experienced professionals, firms must focus on building a sustainable pipeline of future leaders. Prioritizing employee engagement, work-life balance, and clear career development paths will be critical for attracting and retaining top talent.”

Retaining talent and talent development go hand-in-hand. More than ever, young people are looking to add new skills to their toolbelt to remain competitive and employable, for mentorship from senior employees, and to be satisfied mentally and emotionally in their work.

“It is imperative that professional service firms develop people earlier and more intently during their careers to solve complex problems for our clients,” said Thomas Angelo, CEO at Hill, Barth & King in Canfield, Ohio. “In addition, as we do develop these team members, it is even more important that we nurture their careers and give them opportunities to grow and develop so that we can retain them.”

“The profession is evolving rapidly and firms must attract, develop and retain professionals while redefining roles and career paths,” said Kevin Keane, CEO at New York City-based PKF O’Connor Davies. “That requires investment in training, flexibility in how work is done and a clear value proposition for why professionals should build long-term careers at a firm like ours.”

Other firms are taking a slightly different approach: SC&H Group in Hunt Valley, Maryland, for instance, is leveraging its employer stock ownership plan to attract talent.

“Competition for strong accounting, advisory, and technology professionals remains intense,” said chief marketing officer Colin Kendall. “Firms must offer more than competitive compensation — clear career paths, meaningful work, flexibility, and strong leadership all matter. For SC&H, long-term employee ownership also plays a meaningful role. As a 100% ESOP firm since 2016, we are able to offer a true ownership mindset that encourages long-term commitment, collaboration, and accountability, helping us attract and retain professionals who are invested in the firm’s future.”

Help wanted sign in window

Luis A. Orozco/Cin8 – stock.adobe.com

Similarly, Indianapolis-based Katz, Sapper & Miller has operated under an ESOP for more than 20 years and is confident in its course. 

Jamie Ellis, the firm’s chief operating officer, said that while private equity throws “big money at firms to innovate, we feel our ESOP structure is well-suited to grow organically and by acquiring other firms, thus competing with PE-backed firms.”

Finally, there’s the matter of specialization in the age of rapid technological advancement. Automation and AI are taking over the rote tasks that entry-level accountants used to perform, and thus forcing them to upskill faster and interact with clients sooner.

“What will truly set firms apart as AI and technology become more prevalent will be their ability to take data and provide insights, support, and advice to businesses and individuals,” said Reyes Florez, CEO at Holladay, Utah-based Platform Accounting Group. “As an industry and firm, it will be critical to continue honing and developing the skills, reimagining and investing in new ways to develop talent and enable our people to go beyond the data to tell a story and guide decision-making for their clients.”

“We pride ourselves on being large enough to offer diverse career paths in specialized service areas, yet small enough to sustain personal connections and a collaborative culture,” said Ed Monborne, CEO at RKL. “Finding the right people to bolster and contribute to that firm culture is a top priority. For that reason, we have robust hiring practices, a talent acquisition team and a supportive culture to ensure an exceptional experience for both our team and our clients.”

Avani Desai, CEO at Schellman in Tampa, Florida, added, “Another critical issue is access to talent in highly specialized areas, such as AI algorithm audits and emerging technology assurance. While competition for this talent is intense, we are committed to developing these capabilities internally through training and career investment.”

Succession planning

Succession planning is another critical issue for leaders. As Baby Boomers prepare for retirement en masse, few young professionals are lining up to take their place. The traditional path to partner — wherein accountants are promised major payouts after decades of climbing the ranks — is no longer appealing to a generation that prioritizes wellbeing and work-life balance. But it’s not just a matter of who will run the firm next. 

“As firms grow in size and complexity, leadership succession extends beyond replacing retiring shareholders,” said Ryan Cook, managing shareholder at Omaha, Nebraska-based Lutz. “The critical challenge is transferring institutional knowledge, client relationships, and decision-making responsibility in a way that preserves confidence, culture, and strategic momentum. Firms must develop future leaders early, clarify governance and accountability, and ensure leadership transitions are visible, intentional, and well-supported for both clients and teams.”

“Retaining qualified professionals and building a succession pipeline is our top priority as competition for talent intensifies, said Nick Lew Ton, partner and chief growth officer at San Ramon, California-based Sensiba. “We’re investing in mentorship and clear career pathways to ensure institutional knowledge transfers and future leaders are prepared.”

“When partners retire without adequate succession, firms face knowledge loss and client relationship disruption,” Springline’s Brackney said. “This is a key driver for our program to provide equity below the level of partner; we think it is paramount for the next generation of leaders to develop an enterprise mindset and ownership mentality earlier in their careers.”

He continued, “These three reinforce each other: Technical debt makes firms less attractive to tech-savvy talent, talent shortages prevent firms from modernizing systems, and both make succession planning harder because there’s little bench strength to promote from within.”

Preserving firm culture

Preserving culture is another top concern for firm leaders. That issue includes the debate of working from home versus returning to office. 

“While more firms are embracing remote work and reducing their brick-and-mortar presence, we continue investing in real estate and building office space,” said Travis Horton, partner at HHM CPAs in Chattanooga, Tennessee. “Our service culture is rooted in relationships, accessibility, and face-to-face meetings. While this approach can put us at a disadvantage in today’s recruitment environment, we believe an on-site team model ensures quality work, timely client service, and a collaborative approach to problem-solving.”

And as the speed of technology adoption increases, firms need to balance digitization with the human side of the business, both internally and with clients. 

Russell Shinskey, managing partner at Anchin, based in New York City, commented, “Increased efficiency will ultimately shift client expectations around pricing, requiring firms to evolve their service models and strengthen their value propositions so that price does not become the primary driver in provider selection.”

“We have learned there is a thin line between leveraging technology and losing the human touch that is our firm’s trademark,” HHM’s Horton said. “Importantly, we do not believe in forcing clients into a one-size-fits-all model. We tailor each client’s experience to their individual preference.”

“Regardless of the tools used, our clients rely on us to answer the phone when they call, to be available when they stop by, and to provide real people who know them — not an automated menu of options,” he continued. “We will embrace modern technology that makes us a better firm, but we will never choose innovation over delivering tax and accounting services with a true human touch.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

SEC’s Semiannual Reporting Proposal Faces Investor Pushback: What CFOs Need to Know

Published

on

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

A proposal from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to potentially shift some public companies away from quarterly financial reporting toward a semiannual model is drawing significant pushback from investors, even as it continues moving through the regulatory process. The debate has direct implications for corporate finance teams, auditors, and the broader transparency of U.S. capital markets.

What the SEC Proposed

According to a summary published by accounting advisory firm Cohen & Co., the SEC issued a proposed rule on May 19, 2026, aimed at simplifying financial reporting requirements for many U.S. public companies. The proposal would potentially reduce the frequency of certain mandatory disclosures from quarterly to semiannual, a structural change that has not been made to core U.S. reporting requirements in decades.

The proposal follows an extended debate within U.S. policy circles, with proponents arguing that reduced reporting frequency could lower compliance costs and free up management time for longer-term strategic planning rather than quarter-to-quarter results management.

Why Investors Are Pushing Back

Comment letters submitted in response to the proposal have been extensive, and according to Cohen & Co.’s review of the public record, investors “appear to be largely opposed” to the shift, viewing frequent interim reporting as a core benefit of U.S. capital markets relative to other jurisdictions.

Accounting and law firms have taken a more measured position, generally urging any changes to remain aligned with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), whose existing disclosure requirements and guidance are built around a quarterly reporting cadence. A shift to semiannual reporting without corresponding changes to FASB guidance could create friction between SEC filing requirements and GAAP-based disclosure expectations.

Lessons From the U.K. Experience

The debate is not without precedent. The United Kingdom moved away from mandatory quarterly reporting for listed companies in 2014, returning to a semiannual disclosure requirement. According to Cohen & Co.’s analysis, that experience offers a cautionary data point: there was no measurable increase in capital expenditure or R&D investment following the change, while analyst coverage of affected companies declined as reliable interim information became less available — a particular risk for smaller and newly public companies that rely on analyst coverage to maintain investor visibility.

Practical Implications for Finance Teams

Beyond the debate over disclosure philosophy, the proposal carries practical complications. Many companies have debt covenants and credit agreements structured around quarterly financial delivery; a shift to semiannual reporting could require renegotiating those terms. Reduced reporting frequency would also extend the “window of market silence” between disclosures, a factor that governance and investor-relations teams would need to manage carefully to avoid information asymmetry.

Separately, and unrelated to the reporting-frequency debate, the SEC and FASB have continued finalizing more routine updates this year. New Accounting Standards Updates are taking effect for December 31, 2026, fiscal year-ends covering income tax disclosures, credit loss measurement, induced debt conversions, and stock compensation, according to Eide Bailly’s review of 2026 ASU activity. Additional guidance on paid-in-kind dividends and environmental credits is also on the near-term horizon.

What to Watch Next

The semiannual reporting proposal remains in the comment and review phase, and no final rule has been adopted as of this writing. Finance leaders should monitor the SEC’s regulatory agenda for further movement, while treating the current quarterly reporting requirement as the operative standard until any final rule is issued and an effective date is set.

Given the extent of investor opposition documented in the comment file, a full shift to mandatory semiannual reporting appears more likely to result in either a scaled-back compromise or continued study rather than swift adoption — though the SEC’s ultimate direction remains uncertain.

 

Continue Reading

Accounting

AI-Driven Automation and Continuous Accounting Frameworks

Published

on

The accounting profession is undergoing a fundamental structural transition as enterprise finance departments shift from periodic month-end closes toward automated continuous accounting models. By integrating specialized machine learning algorithms directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms, chief accounting officers are transforming financial reporting from a retrospective exercise into a real-time operational asset.

The Shift from Periodic Close to Continuous Financial Reporting
Traditional accounting workflows heavily relied on manual data reconciliation, spreadsheet calculations, and multi-week closing cycles at the end of each fiscal period. In contrast, continuous accounting frameworks utilize automated software agents to process, validate, and post transactional data in real time as business activities occur.

Automated bank reconciliation tools cross-reference incoming bank feeds, invoice records, and purchase orders automatically. By resolving transactional variances instantly throughout the month, corporate accounting teams eliminate the traditional workload spikes associated with quarterly and annual closes.

Machine Learning in Audit Trails and Anomaly Detection
Advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning tools are redefining internal audit and financial control environments. Automated systems analyze 100% of general ledger entries, identifying anomalous transactions, duplicate payments, and unauthorized journal entries in real time.

Rather than relying on random statistical sampling, corporate internal auditors can focus their attention on high-risk flags automatically surfaced by algorithmic monitoring platforms. This continuous risk assessment strengthens internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) and significantly reduces fraud risk.

Evolving Roles for Accounting Professionals
As routine data entry and manual reconciliation tasks become fully automated, the skill set required for accounting professionals is shifting toward data analysis, system design, and strategic business advisory.
– Systems Governance: Accountants are increasingly responsible for monitoring algorithmic accuracy and managing data integration pipelines.
– Business Partnership: Finance professionals leverage real-time financial dashboards to advise operational leaders on margin management and working capital allocation.
– Regulatory Compliance Management: Accounting teams utilize automated platforms to ensure compliance with dynamic tax codes and international accounting standards.

Core Implementation Recommendations
1. Deploy Automated Reconciliation Tools: Integrate continuous transaction processing modules into existing enterprise ERP architectures.
2. Establish Algorithmic Governance Controls: Implement strict internal testing protocols to ensure automated accounting rules comply with GAAP/IFRS standards.
3. Reskill Accounting Teams: Invest in training finance staff on data analytics, workflow automation, and predictive financial modeling.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Trending