Connect with us

Personal Finance

Federal minimum wage has been $7.25 for 15 years. How that may change

Published

on

Activists demonstrate in support of a $15-per-hour minimum wage and tips for restaurant workers in Washington, D.C. on Feb. 8, 2022.

Mandel Ngan | AFP | Getty Images

The federal minimum wage recently marked a new anniversary. But for affected workers, that may not be something to celebrate.

The federal minimum wage has now been stuck at $7.25 per hour for 15 years.

On the campaign trail, Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris recently suggested that should change.

“When I am president, we will continue our fight for working families of America, including to raise the minimum wage and eliminate taxes on tips for service and hospitality workers,” Harris said at an Aug. 10 Nevada campaign event.

More from Personal Finance:
Trump and Harris both want no taxes on tips. Experts don’t like the idea
Walz vs. Vance: What candidates could mean for your wallet
Trump doubles down on call for presidential influence on Fed policy

Many states have enacted minimum hourly pay rates that are higher than the federal minimum wage. Yet 20 states have wages that are no higher than the federal level, according to Business for a Fair Minimum Wage. They include Alabama, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Hampshire, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Wisconsin and Wyoming.

The federal minimum wage for tipped workers is $2.13 per hour, provided their tips bring them to the $7.25 per hour federal minimum wage. Michigan recently became the first state in more than four decades to eliminate the subminimum wage for tipped workers.

Harris has not said how high she wants to raise the minimum wage, though she has praised states that have raised the rate to at least $15 per hour.

The Harris campaign did not return a request for comment by CNBC.

Fast-food minimum wage hits $20 in California

Congressional Democrats in 2021 tried to raise the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour as part of a broader Covid relief package. However, those efforts failed after it was determined the change could not be included in legislation handled through a one-party majority.   

During a 2020 debate, then President Donald Trump expressed concerns about whether raising the federal pay threshold would hurt small businesses.

“How are you helping your small businesses when you’re forcing wages?” Trump said during the 2020 debate. “What’s going to happen and what’s been proven to happen is when you do that these small businesses fire many of their employees.”

Trump’s campaign did not respond a request for comment by CNBC.

A CNBC survey from earlier this year found a majority of small business owners — 61% — support raising their state’s minimum wage, though half said such a change could make it difficult to be able to afford to pay workers who are critical to their businesses.

One point that tends to get lost in the minimum wage debate is the connection between a higher wage and stronger consumer buying power, according to Holly Sklar, CEO of advocacy group Business for a Fair Minimum Wage.

“When you lose minimum wage buying power, it means you’re losing customer buying power,” Sklar said.

Once workers earn higher minimum wages, they will be more likely to spend that money, which will help businesses, she said.

Raising today’s federal minimum wage would help low-wage workers who are trying to earn a living and have a sense of economic security, said Ben Zipperer, senior economist at the Economic Policy Institute, a Washington, D.C., think tank that provides economic research.

“The minimum wage has basically lost, 29%, 30% of its purchasing power over the last 15 years, simply because Congress has failed to update it,” Zipperer said.

Lifting the minimum wage threshold to $15 per hour would increase the incomes of about 20 million workers, Zipperer said. That would include people who are low-wage workers who may be earning hourly pay that is slightly more than the federal minimum wage threshold.

“Changes in wages don’t necessarily result in big changes in employment,” Zipperer said.

“When you raise wages at a particular workplace, that makes it a lot easier to recruit and retain workers,” he said.

Some companies, such as Target and Walmart, have set their own higher minimum pay thresholds, at $15 and $14 per hour, respectively, in response to tight retail labor market conditions.

Still, advocates hope for a broader change at the national level.

“We look forward to supporting efforts to raise the minimum wage in the next White House, in the next Congress, and showing that there’s a very good business case for that,” Sklar said.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Here’s how to leverage tax-loss harvesting amid tariff volatility

Published

on

Sean Anthony Eddy | E+ | Getty Images

Amid stock market volatility, many investors are seeking portfolio protection. But they could be missing a prime tax planning opportunity, experts say.  

The strategy, known as tax-loss harvesting, is selling losing assets from a brokerage account to offset other investing gains to lower taxes. Losses are typically used to offset gains, such as those from investment sales or capital gains distributions from mutual funds or exchange-traded funds.

Once losses exceed profits, you can subtract up to $3,000 from regular income. After that, you can carry excess losses into future tax years indefinitely.       

“It’s looking for a silver lining on a pouring, rainy, cloudy day,” said certified financial planner Sean Lovison, founder of Philadelphia-area Purpose Built Financial Services. 

More from Personal Finance:
Don’t miss these tax strategies during the tariff sell-off, experts say
Selling out during the market’s worst days can hurt you, research shows
3 strategies to keep your money safe amid market volatility

Investors should weigh tax-loss harvesting opportunities anytime there’s stock market volatility, experts say. 

“That should be throughout the year,” said Lovison, who is also a certified public accountant. 

Tax-loss harvesting could be attractive with the S&P 500 Index still down more than 15% from an all-time high in February as of midday Tuesday. The index briefly entered bear market territory — more than 20% off its record — during Monday’s session amid tariff uncertainty.    

Here are some key things to know about tax-loss harvesting, financial advisors say.

You need a ‘very granular’ strategy

While tax-loss harvesting sounds simple, the current market pullback requires a “very granular” approach, according to CFP Judy Brown at SC&H Group in the Washington, D.C., and Baltimore area.

After many years of market growth, investment losses could include more recent purchases, said Brown, who is also a certified public accountant. She has been busy identifying specific “tax lots,” which are transaction records showing an asset’s purchase date and price.

You need systems to “quickly find those lots” to sell for the tax-loss harvesting benefit, Brown said.

Seeking safety amid market volatility: Strategies to keep your money safe

Know the ‘wash sale’ rule

One of the perks of tax-loss harvesting is that you can sell assets for a loss and reinvest a similar investment to maintain exposure, Lovison said. 

But you need to know about the “wash sale rule,” which blocks the tax break for buying a “substantially identical” asset within 30 days before or after the sale, according to the IRS.

While individual stocks may be easy, there’s less IRS guidance on how “substantially identical” applies to mutual funds and ETFs, experts say. 

For example, you could sell one large cap fund family for another from a different family when the holdings are slightly different, Lovison said.  

But if you’re repurchasing the same exact index holding identical funds, “that might not pass the [IRS] sniff test,” he said.  

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

529 college savings account tips as market roils

Published

on

D3sign | Moment | Getty Images

It’s an uneasy time for the many families who rely on the stock market’s returns to send their children to college.

Stocks have been in the red amid President Donald Trump’s new tariff policy and worries of a global trade war. The S&P 500 dropped around 15% between when Trump took office on Jan. 20 and Apr. 7, according to Morningstar Direct.

The index shed almost 11% in the two days of trading ending Friday, and continued its decline Monday. It was little changed Tuesday afternoon.

State-sponsored 529 college savings plans, like other investment accounts, may see the market selloff reflected in their balances. These plans, which are named after Section 529 of the Internal Revenue Code, allow parents to invest money and then withdraw it tax-free to cover certain education expenses.

Fortunately, you have options if a college bill is due soon, financial experts say. Meanwhile, if your child is still young, it may actually be a good time to buy stocks at a discount.

“The stock market will eventually recover,” said higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz.

At least that’s what history has shown. If an investor put $10,000 into the S&P 500 index on Jan. 3, 2005, and left that money untouched until Dec. 31, 2024, they would have amassed $71,750, for a 10.4% annualized return over that time, according to JPMorgan Asset Management’s research.

Here’s what college savers should know during the market volatility.

Age-based risk should protect many investors

Many 529 plans use an age-based asset allocation — meaning the mix of investments is based on the beneficiary’s age and time horizon, and typically becomes more conservative as they approach college enrollment age. In other words, families likely have very little invested in stocks by the time college is around the corner, and more in investments like bonds and cash. That can help blunt their losses.

“A 5 year-old has a long time horizon, whereas someone entering [college] this fall should not have that much at risk,” said Barry Glassman, a certified financial planner and the founder and president of Glassman Wealth Services.

Another benefit of the age-based investment strategy is that the funds automatically rebalance to sell high and buy low, added Glassman, who is also a member of the CNBC Financial Advisor Council.

“So not only are they getting less risky over time, but they have been taking profits as stocks have soared to bring risk back into check,” he said.

More from Personal Finance:
Selling out during the market’s worst days can hurt you
3 strategies to keep your money safe amid market volatility
Don’t miss these tax strategies during the tariff sell-off

Parents should check to see if their 529 plan account is invested in “a dynamic” portfolio, Kantrowitz said.

“The dynamic portfolios change the asset allocation either by age or enrollment date,” he said.

Typically, the age-based accounts start off at the time of the child’s birth with 80% to 90% in stocks, and gradually reduce that share to under 30% as college approaches, Kantrowitz said.

Short-term workarounds to preserve your 529

If you’re facing an imminent college bill and see that your 529 account balance has taken a big hit of late, you still have options to avoid drawing down the balance and to give stocks time to potentially recover, experts said.

You can use other potential cash savings or income to try to delay a 529 plan distribution until the market comes back, Kantrowitz said.

Student loan matching funds

‘Families should save more now’

Families with many years ahead of them before sending their child to college should see the current moment as investment opportunity, Glassman said.

“During market turmoil, they are scooping up bargains to invest for the future,” Glassman said.

Kantrowitz agreed.

“Pulling out funds now will lock in losses,” Kantrowitz said. “If anything, families should save more now that the market is down.”

Over longer periods, the stock market has historically given more than it takes.

Advisors say it’s best for investors, once they’ve set up a smart allocation strategy, to look away from headlines and let the market do its thing.

As stressful as the last few weeks may have been, such dips are not unusual, Kantrowitz pointed out. The stock market typically experiences at least three 10% drops and at least one 20% drop in any 17-year period, the typical timeline from birth to college, he added.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Why the stock market hates tariffs and trade wars

Published

on

Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange. 

Spencer Platt | Getty Images

The stock market has been throwing a temper tantrum, fueled by fear of President Donald Trump’s tariff policy and the specter of an escalating global trade war.

Americans may wonder why trade policy has made stock investors so skittish.

At a high level, investors are nervous that a prolonged trade war poses significant risks for corporate profits and the U.S. economy, according to investment analysts.

That’s not a foregone conclusion, however. The Trump administration could strike trade deals and blunt the overall impact, for example, experts said.

“But if that doesn’t happen, the market may still be a long way from the bottom,” Thomas Mathews, head of Asia-Pacific markets at Capital Economics, wrote in a note on Monday.

The scope of the stock sell-off

The S&P 500 shed almost 11% in the two days of trading ended Friday.

It was the worst two-day stretch for the U.S. stock benchmark since March 12, 2020 — in the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic — and the fourth worst since 1950, according to Callie Cox, chief market strategist at Ritholtz Wealth Management.

Stocks briefly entered “bear market” territory — meaning they’d fallen 20% from their recent peak — during trading on Monday before paring some of those losses.

The market downside could come if the President is not about negotiation, says Jim Cramer

The sell-off came after Trump announced a sweeping plan Wednesday to put a 10% baseline tariff on U.S. trading partners. He set significantly higher rates for nations including China and traditional allies like European Union members.

Their scope caught many investors off guard.

The announcement “was more significant than most expected, so we had a material sell-off” in the stock market, Chris Harvey, head of equity strategy at Wells Fargo Securities, wrote in an e-mail.

Wall Street fears a hit to growth

The stock market is a forward-looking barometer of investor sentiment — and tends to fall when investors sense collective danger.

The fear is that tariffs will dent growth for publicly listed companies and the broader U.S. economy. Wall Street has raised its odds for a U.S. recession.

Tariffs are a tax paid by U.S. companies that import goods from abroad, and they therefore raise costs for U.S. businesses. Companies may eat some of that cost to avoid raising prices for consumers, eroding profits.

More from Personal Finance:
Selling out during the market’s worst days can hurt you
3 strategies to keep your money safe amid market volatility
Don’t miss these tax strategies during the tariff sell-off

But economists expect businesses will pass at least some of the extra cost to consumers. The average household will lose $3,800 of purchasing power per year due to tariff policies announced so far, according to the Yale Budget Lab.

Consumers may pull back on spending, and lower sales would likely dent company profits. Companies may opt to lay off workers, further pressuring consumer spending, which accounts for about 70% of the U.S. economy.

Trump tariffs raise recession threat: Here's how experts are reacting

Retaliatory trade measures compound the problems, economists said.

China put a 34% tariff on U.S. products after Trump’s announcement of “reciprocal” tariffs last week, and vowed it would “fight to the end.” Canada put 25% tariffs on a range of U.S. goods, while the EU bloc is readying its own 25% retaliatory duties.

(The S&P 500 was up over 2% Tuesday morning on rising hopes for trade deals with China and South Korea.)

Retaliatory tariffs make U.S. goods sold abroad more expensive, hurting export-reliant businesses — perhaps leading to layoffs and lower consumer spending.

“We expect many — if not all — countries outside the U.S. to adopt retaliatory tariffs of their own,” the Wells Fargo Investment Institute wrote in a note Friday.

Wells Fargo expects “significantly lower” growth for the U.S. economy in 2025 due to “unexpectedly aggressive tariff increases.” It lowered its target for gross domestic product to 1% from 2.5% this year.

For now, the economy isn’t yet showing signs of dramatic weakening, said Joe Seydl, senior markets economist at J.P. Morgan Private Bank. If tariff policy proves to be long lasting rather than temporary, the shock would likely cause a “mild” U.S. recession, he said.

Tariffs may impact inflation — and interest rates

U.S. Federal Reserve Board Chairman Jerome Powell speaks during a news conference following a meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) at the headquarters of the Federal Reserve on June 14, 2023 in Washington, DC.

Drew Angerer | Getty Images News | Getty Images

Economists also expect tariffs to raise U.S. inflation this year, at a time when it hasn’t yet fallen back to earth from pandemic-era highs.

“While tariffs are highly likely to generate at least a temporary rise in inflation, it is also possible that the effects could be more persistent,” Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said Friday.

The Fed may not cut interest rates as quickly as anticipated as a result.

The dynamic would likely keep borrowing costs higher for businesses, dampening growth prospects for those unable to invest in and expand their operations.

Market hates uncertainty, not tariffs

The current “tariff battle” is “very different” from tariffs in Trump’s first term, Seydl said.

One way: The scale.

The first Trump administration put tariffs on about $380 billion of imports, in 2018 and 2019, according to the Tax Foundation. Now, there are tariffs on more than $2.5 trillion of U.S. imports — or, about seven times more.

Another difference is the White House’s public stance toward tariffs and communication about it, analysts said.

During Trump’s first term, there was level of stock market volatility the administration didn’t find tolerable, Seydl said. Now, there appears to be less concern about stock gyrations — which is perhaps the most important factor in the stock sell-off, he said.

“The capital markets (especially equities) are sending a signal to the Administration that all is not well and the probability of recession, job losses, and a negative wealth effect are all increasing,” wrote Harvey of Wells Fargo.

“The Administration has been somewhat dismissive of these signals, creating a negative feedback loop,” Harvey wrote.

Uncertainty around the framework, goals, potential duration and the White House’s economic tolerance regarding tariffs makes it difficult for investors to assess market risk, he added.

It’s not all tariffs

While tariff policy was a catalyst for the recent sell-off, it wasn’t necessarily the only factor that contributed to the slide, analysts said.

For one, stock valuations were already elevated heading into 2025, Seydl said.

The market was trading at 22 times forward earnings — a measure of stock valuations — which was well above the 16.5 average over 1990 to 2024 and 12.8 average over 1950 to 2024, he said.

“When you have those elevated valuations, the market will be more sensitive to bad news,” Seydl said.

Continue Reading

Trending