Connect with us

Accounting

Speakers urge emphasis on wellness for both clients and staff at Xerocon

Published

2 years ago

on

The accounting profession must address the persistent image problem that, increasingly, is making young people hesitant to enter it in the first place, according to Ben Richmond, managing director for North America for small business accounting platform Xero. 

Speaking during the company’s annual Xerocon event this week in Nashville, Richmond noted that accountants don’t really deserve the image that much of the public carries about them, but acknowledged the unfortunate strength of this perception nonetheless.  

“We need to address this perception challenge that we’re monotone, that we’re dull, that we’re going to be automated out of existence, because that perception is wrong. You don’t deserve it. The trust our small business clients offer us, the jobs we do, means we don’t deserve it. I am proud of my profession,” said Richmond. 

He felt the general public was not aware of all the changes the profession has undergone in the last few years, notably its increasingly tech-driven nature as well as the decline of mundane compliance-based tasks in firms in favor of higher value advisory engagements. While he, himself, is “excited about what the profession has become and where it is going,” many others are not because they’re not aware of either. 

“Put yourself in the shoes of a high school student who doesn’t know what it looks like inside this crazy room [at the conference] as they think about what they are inspired to study. Are they really thinking accounting sounds exciting?” he said. 

Meeting this challenge means embracing the modern accounting practice and all the ways the profession has evolved over the years. A key part of this is truly defining one’s value as an advisor, capitalizing on the trust clients give to their accountants, something that had been difficult before as professionals were often burdened with “the compliance workload or the never-ending tax season.” 

With technology automating many routine tasks today, much more focus can be spent on what he said was the real reason why people hire accountants: peace of mind and wellbeing for clients. He talked about helping his sister find an advisor for her business. They talked to two others before settling on a third, not because of their technical acumen but because they were the ones who truly took time to understand not just her business but herself as a person, including both her aspirations and anxieties. By creating this connection, he said, she let herself be vulnerable, which allowed the advisor to see not just the numbers but the reasoning behind it. More practitioners would benefit from such an approach, he said. 

“Too many firms tell me still they’re just number crunchers. But you are a key lever to supporting your client’s wellbeing. You probably don’t wake up and think I’m the supporter of mental health for my small business clients, but think about the impact when you help them understand where they’re going. When clients know they’re talking to someone who relates, who speaks their language, that will make it easier to work with them and make them open and trusting about their fears and their concerns,” he said. 

He said emotional intelligence is highly underrated in the profession, but it’s vital if one wants to run a successful firm. There is no amount of technology, he said, that can replace it. Instead, let emotional intelligence be your differentiator, your competitive advantage in order to deepen client relationships. 

Demonstrating this kind of commitment is especially important in light of the profession’s persistent talent shortage. Speaking at another panel later in the day, Jeff Phillips, co-founder of recruiting company AccountingFly, noted that the unemployment rate for accountants and auditors in the US is just 1.8%, much lower than the 4.3% national rate. 

“So, what does this tell us? Everyone who wants a job has a job. There isn’t a pocket of people where you can just post a job and find them. So what can you do? You have to compete for talent and you have to go out there,” he said. 

Beyond higher pay and more support for remote work, however, Phillips noted that there is also the matter of addressing the profession’s culture. While the idea that accounting is monotonous repetitive work with no higher purpose is largely a matter of perception, it is all too true that many firms promote a punishing work schedule with little work life balance or mental health support, at least in North America. 

“We work in a profession of very hard workers who are spending so much time at work, and there isn’t much time for physical or mental health and taking care of themselves. I have a friend who owned a firm who, last year, he did not want to tell his clients he was taking vacation because he was worried about how they would feel about him being off. I thought, you’re probably not going to be really on vacation, you’ll hate your vacation with that attitude. That is a problem that needs to be addressed,” he said. 

Shayne Dueck, national leader of accounting and bookkeeping services with Canadian firm MNP raised a similar point, noting that while much is said about work life balance today, it is undermined by a certain pride leaders have in working such a schedule, an attitude which then trickles down to the staff. 

“The badge of honor is how many hours did I work and how much can I pack into a week or a season. That needs to be outright questioned. … Sometimes it’s about calling it out. I don’t want that job. Who wants that job? We have people leaving the profession because they are overworked and burnt out. We have people not wanting to go into the profession because that’s what they hear,” he said, urging accountants to not be afraid to call out this attitude and provide a better example. “You can model that you can be successful, you can have balance, you can have mental health.” 

Kayur Patel, a PwC tax partner and another panelist, said it is largely about taking the same advice they give to their clients all the time. 

“For anyone who has had clients like a family business, you’ve probably been in a situation where you advise the client they’re doing alright and they can take the foot off the gas and spend more time with family. But as an industry we don’t do that ourselves. I think we should take some of our own advice in how we run our own practice because sometimes we know what the right answer is for our clients, but we’re not doing it ourselves,” he said. 

One example to look towards might be accountants in Australia. Heather Smith, the head of Australian firm Anise Consulting, noted that the work culture is quite different not just in accounting firms but the entire country. Saying Australians are “lifestyle first people” she pointed out that workers in general get four to five weeks holiday every year, plus 10-13 public holidays annually, and a standard 37.5 hour work week. On top of that, Australia allows up to 10% of an accountant’s continuing professional education be about mental health awareness, giving credibility to the topic. 

“Australians aren’t perfect, but we are having the conversation, we are actively in communities looking out for each other,” she said. 

When she critiqued a UK accounting body she was a member of for only talking the talk about mental health, she noted that they proceeded to roll out an educational platform on the topic as well as put on more events and activities to support the profession; she noted that mental health and wellness doesn’t have to be just rest and relaxation but also nutrition and spirituality and social connectivity that lets people feel stimulated. 

Emma Reid, a partner in the UK’s Cotton Group, raised a similar point, noting that it’s okay to take an expansive view on wellness. What is important is not to make some perfunctory measure and call it a day but, rather, find what actually works for people. She noted that, at her own firm, there was little response to things like mental health apps or gym memberships. While certain firms might be tempted to call it a day regardless, her own firm continued experimenting to find something people would actually respond to, which ultimately was fun activities they can take part in. 

“It’s finding those things that actually make a difference versus offering something just because it looks good,” she said. 

Related Topics:
Continue Reading

Accounting

Mandatory ESG Reporting Standards Demand Standardized Non-Financial Audit Trails

Published

14 hours ago

on

September 5, 2026

By

Mandatory ESG Reporting Standards Demand Standardized Non-Financial Audit Trails

Corporate accounting departments face an expanded regulatory mandate as mandatory sustainability and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting frameworks take full effect internationally. Governed by the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) IFRS S1 and S2 standards, enterprise financial controllers are now legally required to track, verify, and report non-financial data with the same internal controls and auditability as traditional financial statements.

The expansion shifts ESG compliance

This regulatory expansion shifts ESG compliance from marketing departments to corporate accounting offices. Financial managers are now responsible for gathering, consolidating, and verifying carbon emissions metrics, supply chain labor conditions, water usage, and climate risk exposures across multi-tiered corporate structures. These non-financial metrics must be integrated into standardized general ledgers to withstand rigorous third-party audit assurance processes.

To comply with these rigorous reporting mandates, accounting software providers have added dedicated ESG modules designed to aggregate data from IoT sensors, utility platforms, and vendor management systems. Controllers are implementing internal control frameworks—modeled after traditional COSO frameworks—to ensure the completeness, accuracy, and consistency of sustainability disclosures, protecting organizations against greenwashing penalties and litigation risks.

The transition requires significant cross-functional collaboration between accounting teams, legal counsel, and operational directors. Accounting professionals are expanding their technical expertise beyond financial ledgers to master carbon accounting methodologies, lifecycle assessment standards, and non-financial data governance protocols, fundamentally expanding the role of the modern corporate accountant.

Why This Information Matters
Mandatory ESG disclosures require companies to treat environmental and social metrics as audited financial records. Executives, accountants, and board members must institute formal tracking and assurance processes to satisfy legal mandates, maintain investor confidence, and mitigate regulatory non-compliance risks.

Continue Reading

Accounting

SEC’s Semiannual Reporting Proposal Faces Investor Pushback: What CFOs Need to Know

Published

2 weeks ago

on

August 25, 2026

By

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

A proposal from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to potentially shift some public companies away from quarterly financial reporting toward a semiannual model is drawing significant pushback from investors, even as it continues moving through the regulatory process. The debate has direct implications for corporate finance teams, auditors, and the broader transparency of U.S. capital markets.

What the SEC Proposed

According to a summary published by accounting advisory firm Cohen & Co., the SEC issued a proposed rule on May 19, 2026, aimed at simplifying financial reporting requirements for many U.S. public companies. The proposal would potentially reduce the frequency of certain mandatory disclosures from quarterly to semiannual, a structural change that has not been made to core U.S. reporting requirements in decades.

The proposal follows an extended debate within U.S. policy circles, with proponents arguing that reduced reporting frequency could lower compliance costs and free up management time for longer-term strategic planning rather than quarter-to-quarter results management.

Why Investors Are Pushing Back

Comment letters submitted in response to the proposal have been extensive, and according to Cohen & Co.’s review of the public record, investors “appear to be largely opposed” to the shift, viewing frequent interim reporting as a core benefit of U.S. capital markets relative to other jurisdictions.

Accounting and law firms have taken a more measured position, generally urging any changes to remain aligned with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), whose existing disclosure requirements and guidance are built around a quarterly reporting cadence. A shift to semiannual reporting without corresponding changes to FASB guidance could create friction between SEC filing requirements and GAAP-based disclosure expectations.

Lessons From the U.K. Experience

The debate is not without precedent. The United Kingdom moved away from mandatory quarterly reporting for listed companies in 2014, returning to a semiannual disclosure requirement. According to Cohen & Co.’s analysis, that experience offers a cautionary data point: there was no measurable increase in capital expenditure or R&D investment following the change, while analyst coverage of affected companies declined as reliable interim information became less available — a particular risk for smaller and newly public companies that rely on analyst coverage to maintain investor visibility.

Practical Implications for Finance Teams

Beyond the debate over disclosure philosophy, the proposal carries practical complications. Many companies have debt covenants and credit agreements structured around quarterly financial delivery; a shift to semiannual reporting could require renegotiating those terms. Reduced reporting frequency would also extend the “window of market silence” between disclosures, a factor that governance and investor-relations teams would need to manage carefully to avoid information asymmetry.

Separately, and unrelated to the reporting-frequency debate, the SEC and FASB have continued finalizing more routine updates this year. New Accounting Standards Updates are taking effect for December 31, 2026, fiscal year-ends covering income tax disclosures, credit loss measurement, induced debt conversions, and stock compensation, according to Eide Bailly’s review of 2026 ASU activity. Additional guidance on paid-in-kind dividends and environmental credits is also on the near-term horizon.

What to Watch Next

The semiannual reporting proposal remains in the comment and review phase, and no final rule has been adopted as of this writing. Finance leaders should monitor the SEC’s regulatory agenda for further movement, while treating the current quarterly reporting requirement as the operative standard until any final rule is issued and an effective date is set.

Given the extent of investor opposition documented in the comment file, a full shift to mandatory semiannual reporting appears more likely to result in either a scaled-back compromise or continued study rather than swift adoption — though the SEC’s ultimate direction remains uncertain.

 

Continue Reading

Accounting

AI-Driven Automation and Continuous Accounting Frameworks

Published

3 weeks ago

on

August 15, 2026

By

The accounting profession is undergoing a fundamental structural transition as enterprise finance departments shift from periodic month-end closes toward automated continuous accounting models. By integrating specialized machine learning algorithms directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms, chief accounting officers are transforming financial reporting from a retrospective exercise into a real-time operational asset.

The Shift from Periodic Close to Continuous Financial Reporting
Traditional accounting workflows heavily relied on manual data reconciliation, spreadsheet calculations, and multi-week closing cycles at the end of each fiscal period. In contrast, continuous accounting frameworks utilize automated software agents to process, validate, and post transactional data in real time as business activities occur.

Automated bank reconciliation tools cross-reference incoming bank feeds, invoice records, and purchase orders automatically. By resolving transactional variances instantly throughout the month, corporate accounting teams eliminate the traditional workload spikes associated with quarterly and annual closes.

Machine Learning in Audit Trails and Anomaly Detection
Advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning tools are redefining internal audit and financial control environments. Automated systems analyze 100% of general ledger entries, identifying anomalous transactions, duplicate payments, and unauthorized journal entries in real time.

Rather than relying on random statistical sampling, corporate internal auditors can focus their attention on high-risk flags automatically surfaced by algorithmic monitoring platforms. This continuous risk assessment strengthens internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) and significantly reduces fraud risk.

Evolving Roles for Accounting Professionals
As routine data entry and manual reconciliation tasks become fully automated, the skill set required for accounting professionals is shifting toward data analysis, system design, and strategic business advisory.
– Systems Governance: Accountants are increasingly responsible for monitoring algorithmic accuracy and managing data integration pipelines.
– Business Partnership: Finance professionals leverage real-time financial dashboards to advise operational leaders on margin management and working capital allocation.
– Regulatory Compliance Management: Accounting teams utilize automated platforms to ensure compliance with dynamic tax codes and international accounting standards.

Core Implementation Recommendations
1. Deploy Automated Reconciliation Tools: Integrate continuous transaction processing modules into existing enterprise ERP architectures.
2. Establish Algorithmic Governance Controls: Implement strict internal testing protocols to ensure automated accounting rules comply with GAAP/IFRS standards.
3. Reskill Accounting Teams: Invest in training finance staff on data analytics, workflow automation, and predictive financial modeling.

Continue Reading

Trending