Connect with us

Accounting

Tax Fraud Blotter: Place your bets

Published

on

Close personal relationships; home is where the scam is; tort trouble; and other highlights of recent tax cases.

Los Angeles: Mathew R. Bowyer, of San Juan Capistrano, California, has agreed to plead guilty to running an illegal gambling business that took in unlawful sports bets, including from professional athletes as well as a former Major League Baseball Japanese-language interpreter who now faces prison time.

Bowyer operated an unlicensed and illegal bookmaking business that focused on sports betting and violated a California law that prohibits bookmaking. Bowyer’s gambling business remained in operation for at least five years until October 2023 and at times had more than 700 bettors.

He operated this business out of various locations in Los Angeles and Orange Counties as well as in Las Vegas. Bowyer also employed agents and sub-agents — including casino hosts — who worked for his illegal gambling business who were paid a portion of the losses that bettors incurred.

One of Bowyer’s clients was Ippei Mizuhara, who pleaded guilty on June 4 to one count of bank fraud and one count of subscribing to a false return. Mizuhara was the Japanese-language interpreter and de facto manager of baseball superstar Shohei Ohtani. Mizuhara admitted to stealing nearly $17 million from Ohtani to pay off gambling debts and to failing to pay tax on his gambling income.

Authorities consider Ohtani a victim; Mizuhara’s sentencing is Oct. 25.

From September 2021 to January 2024, Mizuhara placed at least 19,000 bets with Bowyer’s gambling business. During this time, Mizuhara had total winning bets of at least $142,256,769, and total losing bets of at least $182,935,206, leaving Mizuhara owing approximately $40,678,436.

Bowyer admitted in his plea agreement to knowingly and willfully falsely reporting his taxable income to the IRS on his 2022 return: Bowyer reported $607,897 in total income but his unreported income for that year was $4,030,938 — income from his illegal gambling business. Bowyer owes additional taxes of $1,613,280 for 2022, not including interest and penalties.

Bowyer has agreed to plead guilty to operating an unlawful gambling business, money laundering and subscribing to a false return. He faces up to 10 years in prison on the money laundering count, up to five years for the unlawful gambling business and up to three years for the false return. 

Madison, Wisconsin: David Swartz, of Highland Park, Illinois, has been sentenced to two years in prison for wire fraud and assisting in the preparation of a false return. 

Swartz worked as an unregistered investment advisor and fund manager and had a close personal relationship with his first victim, a resident of Madison. Beginning in January 2009, the victim made regular and periodic investments in Swartz’s investment fund with the understanding that Swartz was conservatively investing. 

Beginning in 2018, Swartz began misrepresenting the performance of the fund. When the fund lost significant value in February 2020 due to risky trades, Swartz lied to the victim about the fund’s performance and induced them to invest an additional $150,000. Swartz also produced a doctored Charles Schwab account statement for the fund and a phony K-1 for 2019.

Relying on the falsified document, on Oct. 12, 2020, the victim filed a 1040 for 2019 that substantially overreported capital gains, causing the victim to report owing an unjustified amount of federal income tax.

Swartz, who pleaded guilty in April, was also ordered to pay $181,915 in restitution to the victim.

jail2-fotolia.jpg

Bristol, Vermont: Jodi Lathrop has been sentenced to 15 months in prison following her guilty plea to charges of wire fraud and federal tax evasion.

In 2023, a federal grand jury returned an indictment charging Lathrop with 11 counts of mail and wire fraud, four of personal tax evasion and four of aiding the preparation of false corporate returns. Lathrop pled guilty to one count of wire fraud and one of tax evasion.

Between 2014 and 2020, she embezzled from Claire Lathrop Band Mill, a logging and wood chipping business, while serving as the company’s office manager and bookkeeper. She used company credit cards to make personal purchases and used company money to pay off personal credit cards and other personal expenses. Lathrop falsely recorded unauthorized checks in company books and caused the company to file returns that falsely deducted Lathrop’s personal expenses as legitimate business expenses.

She was also ordered to pay some $479,000 in restitution and a $15,000 fine and two years of supervised release after her prison term.

Rockwood, Pennsylvania: Resident Jason R. Svonavec has been sentenced to a year and one day in prison, to be followed by one year of supervised release, and ordered to pay a fine of $40,000 and restitution of $207,378 (which has already been paid) to the IRS on his conviction of tax evasion and filing false income tax returns.

Svonavec evaded taxes in 2017 by illegally expensing the construction of his home in Somerset, Pennsylvania, through entities he operates called Heritage Coal and Natural Resources LLC and Banshee Crane. In 2018, he filed a tax return reporting false tax deductions for Heritage Coal.

Scranton, Pennsylvania: Robert J. Powell, of Palm Beach, Florida, has pleaded guilty to tax evasion in connection with substantial legal fees he earned while associated with a local law firm.

Powell sought to dodge a substantial federal tax bill for 2016 by using nominee bank accounts, causing an accountant to file a request for a filing extension that falsely reported zero estimated tax liability for 2016 and making false statements during an IRS audit in 2019.

Powell’s license to practice law was suspended in 2009 and he was disbarred in 2015. In 2009 he relinquished his ownership of the Powell Law Group but retained the right to collect 90% of the remainder of any future fees collected by the firm after firm expenses.

The Powell Group represented thousands of plaintiffs in a mass tort litigation in 2015 for which Powell was expected to receive some $120 million in attorneys’ fees. Prior to the attorneys’ fees disbursement, the Powell Group and its co-counsel used those future legal fees as collateral to obtain a series of loans totaling more than $125 million.

Instead of depositing the loan money into the firm’s bank accounts and paying firm expenses, Powell directed the loans to nominee bank accounts under his control then used the money for personal debts and expenses, as well as his and his former law partner’s personal benefit. In June 2016, most of the attorneys’ fees were finally disbursed and the loans repaid. 

Still, Powell did not file a personal income tax return and pay taxes on the receipt of the fees in that year. After the initial disbursement and through October 2019, an additional $12 million in attorneys’ fees was distributed and the Powell Law Group’s share continued to be directed into nominee bank accounts that Powell controlled. Powell personally received an additional $3.6 million of the fees. For 2010 through 2022, Powell did not file income tax returns despite receiving and spending other personal income.

In 2019, when the IRS commenced an audit, he lied to revenue agents to conceal his income and expenditures for 2014 through 2016, claiming that his only source of funds were loan advances, that he and his spouse did not have signature authority or control over other bank accounts and that he had no ownership in any corporations.

Powell agreed to pay full restitution to the IRS.

Morgantown, West Virginia: Dr. David M. Anderson has admitted to filing a false return.

He filed false tax returns that understated his taxable income, causing a loss to the IRS of $143,599.

Anderson faces up to three years in prison. 

Continue Reading

Accounting

How AI can help solve accounting’s labor shortage

Published

on

The accounting profession is facing a perfect storm of staffing challenges. There aren’t enough accountants to handle the rising workloads, the workforce is getting older, and the number of new CPAs coming in has been slowing to a trickle over the past ten years. Companies are desperate for ways to keep their quality of service high, even though they have smaller teams. Artificial intelligence (AI) is one possible answer. 

Accounting’s Talent Shortage By the Numbers

About three-quarters of the CPAs who work now are either at or close to retirement age and will be leaving the workforce in the next ten years. This “silver tsunami” means that many experienced professionals will soon leave the field.

Also, fewer people are taking the CPA exam, which means there are fewer new graduates entering the profession. Because of things like the 150-hour CPA requirement, lower starting salaries, and not understanding the profession well, fewer students are choosing accounting.

In addition to retirements, a lot of accountants in the middle of their careers have left the profession in the last few years. Over 300,000 U.S. accountants and auditors left their jobs between 2019 and 2022, a 17% decline in the workforce. This is a lot higher than the average quit rate in the economy, which shows that people in the field are facing burnout and dissatisfaction. 

Ironically, there continues to be strong demand for accounting services. Companies need to find ways to do more with less because there is more work and fewer people. This is where technology, particularly AI, comes into play.

What Accounting Firms Can Automate Today

Recent advances in AI offer a timely opportunity to boost efficiency and alleviate overburdened staff. Modern AI tools can handle many routine, time-consuming accounting tasks, allowing human professionals to focus on higher-value work. 

Here are some examples of how automation powered by AI can be used across different accounting tasks:

Bookkeeping and data entry: AI-powered software can classify revenue and expenses and reconcile accounts, automating bookkeeping and data entry. Algorithms scanning invoices or receipts can automatically extract all relevant fields, saving time and reducing data entry errors. AI matching ledger transactions to bank statement lines accelerates bank reconciliations from hours to minutes by detecting exceptions for human inspection.

Document review and audits: AI systems can quickly read and extract data from documents for audits and document review. AI lets audit teams evaluate entire contracts, agreements, and financial records for issues. Deloitte used cognitive artificial intelligence to examine all contracts and detect auditor-relevant phrases and irregularities. 

Tax preparation and research: AI is simplifying tax preparation and research, from data collection to filing. Tax prep and research machine learning models can automatically extract and prepare W-2s, 1099s, and other tax documents for returns. This makes hand-entering taxes much easier. AI can optimize a client’s tax situation by finding qualified credits or deductions by verifying transactions against tax legislation. 

Analytics and forecasting: AI can find trends and generate concepts that humans cannot. Accounting and advising firms use AI-driven analytics for risk assessment, fraud detection, and predictive forecasting. An AI model can analyze client financial data and identify unusual transactions or trends, alerting accountants to potential issues. 

What AI Does Not Replace: The Human Judgment Factor

Despite AI’s amazing potential, there are crucial areas of accounting that technology should not (and cannot) replace. Accounting is, at its core, a profession of judgment, ethics, and trust – all elements that require a human touch. 

Professional judgment and expertise: AI doesn’t have the background, skepticism, or experience that accountants do. Experienced accountants can comprehend unclear legislation, apply accounting standards to new scenarios, and make difficult transaction decisions. AI can propose or offer facts, but ultimate judgments like audit opinions or tax positions require human skill and accountability. 

Ethics and skepticism: Accountants must follow strong ethical guidelines and take care. AI lacks ethics and skepticism. Fraud detection requires questioning and verifying facts with a healthy doubt, not merely noticing irregularities. A human auditor must determine if an unusual pattern is fraudulent or not. Human monitoring is needed to check AI outputs since algorithms can make mistakes or “hallucinate”. 

Client relationships and communication: Accounting often involves talking to and working directly with clients. In uncertain times, clients rely on their trusted advisors to look at the numbers, explain options, and put their minds at ease. AI cannot replace the trust and understanding CPAs build with clients. When a business has to make a tough financial decision, they want a human advisor who can listen to its concerns and tailor advice to the specific situation.

Strategic thinking and creativity: AI can evaluate data effectively but not innovate or think strategically. Accounting firms must develop strategies, solve difficult financial problems, and solve client problems creatively. AI might show that a client’s costs are going up, but accountants need to be creative and think outside the box to find the best pathway forward. AI works with people to quickly analyze data and give them information that helps them make those decisions. Then, people use their judgment and creativity to choose the best course of action.

So how does my firm get started?

In general, AI should handle tasks, not responsibilities. By automating routine tasks, AI lets accountants use their most valuable human skills, such as judgment, ethical reasoning, communication, and strategic insight.

The bottom line is that AI can be a powerful ally in solving the accounting labor shortage, but success requires choosing the right tools and using them wisely. Start by addressing your firm’s pain points with proven AI solutions – whether that’s automating a tedious workflow or augmenting your team’s analysis – and ensure you maintain robust human oversight. With a thoughtful strategy, accounting firm leaders can harness AI to not only fill the labor gap but also to transform their firms for the better: boosting efficiency, enhancing services, and making the profession more attractive for the next generation of talent.

Continue Reading

Accounting

SEC plans ahead for PCAOB takeover

Published

on

(Left to right) EY partner Mark Kronforst, SEC acting chief accountant Ryan Wolfe and FASB chair Richard Jones at the Financial Executives International and USC Leventhal conference.

(Left to right) EY partner Mark Kronforst, SEC acting chief accountant Ryan Wolfe and FASB chair Richard Jones at the Financial Executives International and USC Leventhal conference.

The Securities and Exchange Commission is already making plans in the event that the massive tax bill now moving through Congress ends up shifting the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s duties to the SEC.

In late May, the House passed far-reaching tax and spending legislation that included a provision transferring the PCAOB’s responsibilities to the SEC. The so-called One Big Beautiful Bill is now in the hands of the Senate, where much of it is likely to pass. However, it’s unclear whether there will be changes in the PCAOB provision, which has not been attracting as much attention as the tax and Medicaid provisions. Nevertheless, the SEC is preparing in case it inherits the PCAOB’s work.

“I guess as an initial matter, certainly, we are aware of the proposed legislation that is both in the House and the Senate as part of the budget reconciliation bill,” said SEC acting chief accountant Ryan Wolfe during Financial Executives International’s SEC and Financial Reporting Conference at the University of Southern California’s Leventhal School of Accounting. “I think from the staff perspective, where we’re assisting the Commission, it’s important that we are thinking about these issues, are monitoring and are prepared as the potential for these bills to move forward would result in the Commission having new statutory responsibilities. Specifically with respect to standard-setting and inspections, the enforcement authorities would also transfer, but we already have shared jurisdiction with respect to those activities.” 

He noted that the SEC has been hearing a great deal of feedback about it across the spectrum. 

“I would observe that one thing that I hear, I don’t want to say universally, but quite consistently, is the importance or the overall ecosystem of the three major programs that the PCAOB engages in, being standard-setting for auditors, inspections of auditors to evaluate the compliance with those standards, and similarly, the enforcement function,” said Wolfe. “And so I think that these are incredibly important objectives that will continue regardless, which is just to say, without providing any significant details, that we’re aware of it and we are working on those issues.”

On the other hand, the SEC’s Office of Chief Accountant is prepared in case the provision gets dropped from the final bill.

“But in the event that that would not go forward, the OCA’s assistance with the Commission and the oversight of the PCAOB will continue regardless,” said Wolfe. 

He also pointed to the importance of continuing standards such as the PCAOB’s recent quality control standard, QC 1000, which takes effect at the end of the year. “QC 1000 is a big project,” he said. “I know that firms are working really hard. The PCAOB is committed to engaging with those firms to work through implementation issues. I would ask any auditors watching to continue that effort and raise those issues. We as OCA staff are also willing to engage on those issues and hear what’s working and what maybe can be addressed throughout the process.”

Panel moderator Mark Kronforst, a partner at Ernst & Young, pointed out that SEC chair Paul Atkins said during a recent congressional hearing that despite a recent 15% reduction in staff at the SEC, there would still be room in the budget for the PCAOB under the legislation.

Another SEC official also acknowledged the recent reduction in the staff during a later panel discussion.

“Certainly, there has been a reduction in the federal workforce and the Commission, the SEC, has been no exception to that,” said Gaurav Hiranandani, acting deputy chief accountants at the SEC. “Many of the talented staff at the Commission have decided to retire or have sought opportunities outside of the commission. Within OCA, we have also seen some talent depart, some longstanding staff.” He noted that some of the speakers at last year’s conference are among those who left.

Financial Accounting Standards Board chair Richard Jones also spoke at the conference and discussed the progress that FASB has been making on its standard-setting. 

“A couple years ago, we comprehensively reset our agenda,” he said. “We did robust stakeholder output to really ask an open-ended question of what should be the FASB’s priority, and what you’ve seen over the last couple of years is us executing on that revised agenda. If you pull up our technical agenda today, you’ll see there are 12 projects on our technical agenda. Of those 12 projects, five of those have been voted out by our board to proceed to final standards. Five of those are in redeliberations, meaning that we’ve already issued an exposure draft, we’ve gotten great input from our stakeholders, and our board will be redeliberating to decide what direction to go forward on those standards. We voted to move forward with an exposure draft on another standard, so that’s 11 of the 12. If you follow those through, and you follow a plan of execution on those standards, it’s very reasonable that we could complete substantially all the projects on our agenda at or about the end of this year.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Optimism declines among accountants | Accounting Today

Published

on

U.S. accountants who advise small and midsized businesses are feeling less confident this year, according to a new survey.

The 2025 Avalara Accountants Confidence Report, produced by Avalara in conjunction with CPA Trendlines, polled 623 accounting professionals and found a shift from cautious optimism to greater pessimism, thanks to various economic pressures and policy uncertainty.

Between January and April, the net sentiment among accountants swung from a positive 19% to a negative 39%. Initially, nearly half (47%) of advisors foresaw improving conditions. But by April, only 25% held this view, with nearly two-thirds (64%) expecting worsening economic environments. The shift signifies growing apprehension across Main Street accounting firms serving as advisors on tax, payroll and compliance decisions amid a backdrop of historic tariff actions, continued inflation and unpredictable tax and trade policies. 

Accounting advisors pointed to the top issues impacting their clients, with 61% citing inflation, costs and pricing; 60% naming tariffs and trade impacts and uncertainty; 59% pinpointing unease around new tax legislation; 42% identifying ongoing labor supply and wage issues; and 37%  citing technology and AI adoption as a priority.

confidence-vs-doubt-foto-250.jpg

“Accountants are sounding an urgent alarm,” said CPA Trendlines founder Rick Telberg in a statement Wednesday. “They’re advising SMBs to conserve cash, curb discretionary expenses, and resist taking on unnecessary debt. Amid volatility in tariffs, inflation, and complex tax legislation, SMBs face serious barriers to strategic growth and operational stability.”  

According to the accountants polled, the biggest challenges facing SMBs are hiring and retaining talent (60%), keeping pace with technology (55%), and managing rising costs (52%). The added strain of tariffs has handicapped SMBs’ adaptability and agility, which is typically their key advantage over larger competitors.

Other challenges include adapting to disruption (35%), meeting evolving customer expectations (32%), and managing product costs (29%). 

Accountants feel the most confidence in their professional services sector — including doctors, lawyers and other professionals — with 60% believing this sector will thrive during a downturn. Not far behind that is the technology sector, where 57% of accountants expressed confidence driven by strong demand for digital solutions and AI that boost operational efficiency and resilience. And the oil, energy and mining sectors show 39% of respondents optimistic due to recent spikes in supply and demand for these resources.

On the other hand, farming (6%), franchising (3%), and arts and entertainment (2%) are seen as the most vulnerable sectors. These sectors depend heavily on broader economic performance, and the recent tariffs have further strained their growth and output.

Firms are encouraging clients to monitor their burn rates, cut overhead and avoid unnecessary borrowing. AI and automation are also important as survival tools amid labor shortages and pricing pressure.

“This year’s survey underscores a critical moment for the SMB business sector,” said Sona Akmakjian, head of global strategic accountant partnerships at Avalara, in a statement. “Accountants are urging businesses to fortify themselves against ongoing economic turbulence by sharpening their operational focus, adopting intelligent technology, and carefully managing resources. Clients are, more than ever, relying on the accretive business acumen and advisory skills of their trusted advisor for guidance through historic headwinds and uncertainty.”

The 2025 Accountants Confidence Report can be accessed here by using the code “avlr”.

Continue Reading

Trending