Personal Finance

What it takes for creatives to sustain a career

Published

1 month ago

September 7, 2024

Business Finance News

Carol Yepes | Moment | Getty Images

In Stacey D’Erasmo’s new book, “The Long Run,” she interviews artists who are late in their careers.

There’s dancer and performer Valda Setterfield, who performed through her 80s despite serious injuries from a car accident in her 40s. There’s writer Samuel Delany, now 82, who has published more than 40 books although he’s dyslexic.

D’Erasmo also provides anecdotes from artists of the past, including that Monet painted his impressionist water lilies the way he did because his vision was deteriorating from cataracts.

Author Stacey D’Erasmo

Photo: Sarah Shatz

What interested D’Erasmo was not what got these artists going, but what kept them going over decades of life. Romanticized ideas of the starving artist, she says, ignore the reality that art is made “by real people with real needs in real places.” Those include financial realities, which often require balancing one’s art with another job.

“What gets us started — those first few years, or perhaps those early moments of artistic ignition — is brief, fiery, and beautiful, of course,” D’Erasmo said. “It’s a story the culture loves to tell as in, say, ‘A Star is Born.'”

On the other hand, she said, “The story of duration, of a sensibility unfolding over time and the life that evolves to keep art at the center is a story that gets told less often. To me, that is such a heroic story.”

CNBC interviewed D’Erasmo, the author of five novels and two nonfiction books, by email this month. (The conversation has been edited and condensed for style and clarity.)

‘When you starve the artist, you starve artmaking’

Annie Nova: Why is it a heroic story when someone sticks to their art over a lifetime?

Stacey D’Erasmo: In this world, it is so hard to do that. As a writer who knows lots of other writers and artists, I’ve experienced firsthand the urgency of this question: How do we keep doing this, on all levels? Which is to say: How do I support a complex and often difficult practice that means everything to me, even though it may not immediately, or ever, produce money, glory or approval? That’s not a three-act drama, roll credits. It’s a life.

AN: The idea of the “starving artist” is a familiar trope in our culture. What does it get wrong? How does financial stability help to create art?

SD: Well, if all the artists were starving, they’d be dead, and we wouldn’t have any art! That trope romanticizes deprivation, and it’s a fantasy of art as some sort of magic that can live on nothing, but art doesn’t get made in some ethereal realm. It’s made by real people with real needs in real places.

Financial stability is a godsend to the artist, primarily because the less you have to think about money, the more you can think about what truly matters to you. In this country, though, even basic financial stability can be very hard to come by, as we know. Among other things, that is never good for the arts. When you starve the artist, you starve artmaking.

We long endlessly for more time.

AN: What do you see with people balancing a job to pay the bills with their art? Does it matter if the job is related to their art?

SD: I would say that 99% of the artists and writers I know balance a bill-paying job with their own work. Whether it’s related to one’s art or not is a matter of temperament: Some people love to do something totally unrelated, and others want to be immersed in cultural work.

The problem people constantly face is that the day job’s demands are often urgent — things need to happen today, this week, right now, before 5. That’s true whether your job is woodworking or running a gallery. Art-making has its own idiosyncratic clock. The difference between these two clocks is hard to navigate, which is why I and nearly everyone I know pines not so much for money per se as for time. We long endlessly for more time.

‘There really is no free lunch’ for artists

AN: The artists profiled in your book work in all different mediums. Do some take more money to sustain than others?

SD: Film, as we all know, just inhales money. Even the lowest-budget film costs way more than what it costs a writer to sit down at their desk and write. Visual art requires all sorts of materials. Dance requires not only costumes and lighting and so on, not to mention dancers who need to eat, but rehearsal space, and space often does not come cheap. Artists, writers and arts organizations all spend a fair amount of time seeking grants and other sources of funding just to keep the lights on. Writing is probably the cheapest medium in terms of art creation, but distributing it in the world — publishing, also requires a fair amount of money that someone has to pay. Sadly, there really is no free lunch.

AN: How does economic inequality determine who gets to make art?

SD: That’s a book-length question, but the short answer is: A lot.

I would also say that economic inequality is most brutal not only in who gets to make art, but also in who gets to have a career and a life in art. I live in New York City, and I see acts of creation everywhere every day: a person walking down the street who has put together a fantastic look, a person making glorious graffiti, or something like ball culture, which you can now see in the glossy television show “Pose.” All of those people are making art, but the structural inequality of opportunity means that few of them would ever be able to build a life around it. We’re missing out greatly on what those people might be able to do not for a moment or a season, but for decades.

‘As the artist changes over time, so does the art’

Valda Setterfield attends the Hold My Hand Forever Exhibition By Forevermark at Highline Studios in New York City, Nov. 17, 2014.

Dustin Harris | Getty Images

AN: There are some artistic professions that come with an early retirement age. I’m thinking of dancers. How do people reinvent themselves after an early end to a career?

SD: Some dancers become choreographers. Some actors move into directing — think of someone like Ron Howard. But that makes it sound seamless or easy, and often it isn’t. Valda Setterfield, a dancer whom I profile in the book, had a horrific car accident at 40 and she thought her life on stage might be over. Her husband, choreographer David Gordon, helped her learn to move again, and she also began to do more theater and film work, which continued for the rest of her life.

Vera Wang was an aspiring Olympic figure skater, but she didn’t make the Olympic team in 1968. Then she turned to fashion. Later, she began designing costumes for Olympic-level figure skaters such as Nancy Kerrigan and Michelle Kwan. When I look at Wang’s designs, it seems to me that they have a precision and grace not unlike a figure skater’s balletic moves.

Often, people reinvent themselves by opening up a slightly different channel through which their gifts can flow

AN: What advantages do middle and later career artists hold over younger ones?

SD: So much more comfort with the weirdness, unpredictability and challenges of the process. You’re just not as freaked out all the time. I don’t mind my own stumbling. I also don’t feel as brittle or defensive. When I was younger, for instance, I would look at all the incredible writers who had come before me, and who were around me, and feel terribly intimidated by the depth and breadth of the field.

But now, it all looks to me like this extraordinary abundance. If you’re fortunate enough to have a long run, there can be so much freedom in mid- and late career.

AN: How do you see people’s art change as they get older?

SD: Again: a book-length question, and several books have been written about it, such as Edward Said’s “Late Style.” What I noticed about the people I interviewed is that their work changed, and changed again, over time. They weren’t waxwork replicas of their younger selves.

The musician Steve Earle, for instance, who came up as a rollicking solo artist in country music in Nashville in the ’70s and ’80s, has moved increasingly toward musical theater in the latter half of his life — a collaborative, multimedia form. The renowned writer Samuel Delany has traversed myriad genres over the course of his life. Intuitively, it makes sense. As the artist changes over time, so does the art, because we make it out of ourselves.

‘Creativity isn’t a machine’

AN: In the end, what were the biggest things you found that helped people sustain a creative life?

SD: As we get older, the willingness to be open, to be vulnerable, to be a beginner, to be out of one’s comfort zone can get a little stiff. You aren’t always so confident that you won’t break something, literally or figuratively. Shame lurks around. But the people who have sustained what looks to me like a truly alive creative practice are the ones who are willing to take the risk of flopping. I hope that I am able to risk embarrassment for the rest of my life.

AN: What can people do if they hit a period of disillusionment with their art or creativity?

SD: Remember that it happens to everyone — this I know for a fact. Creativity isn’t a machine, it’s an organism. Organisms get tired, bored, distracted, daunted, ornery. Stop. Take a walk — and by this I mean: Go somewhere else, do something different, maybe for an hour, maybe for a year. Or several. Keep walking. Look around. What do you see?

Accounting

Key Factors to Select for Optimal Bookkeeping Software Solution

Published

3 hours ago

October 19, 2024

Business Finance News

Selecting the Optimal Bookkeeping Software Solution: Key Factors to Consider

In today’s fast-paced, digital environment, businesses have an abundance of bookkeeping software options to choose from. However, not all platforms are equally suited to every organization’s needs. Selecting the ideal software requires thorough research and evaluation to ensure it effectively supports accounting processes, enhances efficiency, and meets the business’s unique operational demands. This article highlights key factors to consider when choosing the optimal bookkeeping software solution.

User Access and Permissions

A critical starting point in selecting bookkeeping software is determining the number of users who will need access. Many software providers structure their pricing plans based on the number of users, making it essential to assess how many employees, accountants, or managers require permissions to view, edit, or manage financial data. This consideration not only influences costs but also ensures that appropriate security settings are in place to protect sensitive financial information. Businesses should prioritize platforms that offer customizable user roles and permissions, allowing access to be granted according to each individual’s responsibilities.

Integration Capabilities with Other Systems

The ability of bookkeeping software to integrate seamlessly with other operational systems is essential for efficiency. Many modern solutions offer built-in integrations with bank accounts, credit cards, payroll software, customer relationship management (CRM) platforms, e-commerce tools, and inventory management systems. Such integrations reduce the need for manual data entry, minimize the likelihood of errors, and enable real-time financial tracking. For businesses that rely heavily on multiple tools, it is crucial to choose bookkeeping software that supports smooth data exchange across platforms to streamline processes and enhance productivity.

Robust Reporting and Financial Statement Generation

Effective bookkeeping software must offer advanced reporting capabilities that align with standard accounting practices and business-specific needs. The software should provide customizable reports that allow businesses to track critical metrics, such as cash flow, profit margins, and accounts receivable. Reporting flexibility ensures that stakeholders—whether internal or external—receive clear and actionable financial insights. Additionally, the ability to generate compliant financial statements, such as income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements, is essential for meeting regulatory requirements and supporting strategic decision-making.

Mobile Access and Cloud Technology

As remote work becomes increasingly common, cloud-based bookkeeping software solutions have grown in importance. Cloud platforms allow users to access financial data securely from any location, using mobile devices or web browsers. This flexibility ensures that accounting teams and business leaders can monitor and manage financial information on the go, facilitating faster decision-making. When selecting bookkeeping software, businesses should assess their mobile access needs and choose platforms that offer reliable mobile apps or responsive interfaces that enhance accessibility and collaboration.

Industry-Specific Features

Certain industries—such as construction, nonprofits, retail, and professional services—have unique accounting requirements. For example, construction companies may need to track project-based expenses, while nonprofits must adhere to specific reporting standards. Selecting bookkeeping software with industry-specific features can help businesses reduce the need for manual adjustments and ensure that the system aligns with operational workflows. These tailored functionalities can improve accuracy and efficiency, making it easier to meet both day-to-day and long-term accounting objectives.

Implementation, Training, and Customer Support

Even the most feature-rich bookkeeping software will fail to deliver value without proper implementation and team adoption. Vendors that offer comprehensive implementation support and seamless integration services can make the transition to new software smoother. Additionally, access to training resources—such as webinars, tutorials, and customer support—ensures that employees can quickly become proficient in using the software. Businesses should evaluate the quality of vendor support, including availability of live assistance and responsiveness to inquiries, to ensure ongoing success.

Cost vs. Value: A Balanced Approach

While pricing is an important consideration, businesses should not select bookkeeping software based solely on cost. The goal is to find a solution that delivers the best value by meeting both current and future accounting needs efficiently. In some cases, higher-priced software may offer features or integrations that significantly reduce manual work and increase accuracy, providing a strong return on investment over time. Companies should carefully weigh the total cost of ownership, including subscription fees, implementation expenses, and potential upgrades, against the benefits the software provides.

Scalability and Future Needs

Businesses evolve over time, and their accounting requirements grow more complex. It is crucial to choose bookkeeping software that can scale with the business, accommodating future needs without requiring frequent platform changes. Features such as multi-currency support, automated invoicing, and advanced analytics may become essential as the organization expands. Opting for scalable software ensures that the system remains a valuable tool even as the business grows.

Selecting the optimal bookkeeping software is a strategic decision that requires a comprehensive evaluation of various factors. From user access and integration capabilities to mobile access and industry-specific features, businesses must align software functionality with their operational needs. Proper implementation, along with reliable vendor support and training resources, ensures smooth adoption and long-term success. While pricing is an important factor, the focus should be on finding a solution that provides the most value by streamlining accounting processes and preparing the organization for future growth. By taking a balanced approach to these considerations, businesses can select the best bookkeeping software to enhance financial management and drive success in a competitive marketplace.

Norene

Accounting

Strategies for Effective Financial Record-Keeping System

Published

49 seconds ago

October 19, 2024

Admin

Maintaining well-organized financial records is essential for both individuals and businesses. A robust record-keeping system ensures accountability, aids in financial planning, supports legal compliance, and prepares you for unforeseen events. However, without a structured approach, managing financial documents can quickly become overwhelming. This article explores strategies for building an efficient and sustainable financial record-keeping system.

Identify Records to Retain

The first step in developing a reliable system is identifying what documents you need to keep. Regulatory requirements, tax obligations, and future needs will determine which records are essential. Individuals typically retain documents such as tax returns, bank statements, pay stubs, investment reports, medical bills, insurance policies, and purchase receipts for high-value items. Businesses, on the other hand, need to store financial statements, general ledgers, payroll records, accounts payable and receivable reports, W-9s, 1099s, and various tax forms.

Understanding the scope of required records ensures that nothing crucial is missed and establishes a solid foundation for organizing your system.

Develop a Logical Organizational Structure

Once you know what records to retain, the next step is to design an intuitive filing system. A logical structure helps maintain order and makes retrieval quick and painless. For both physical and digital records, it’s helpful to create primary categories such as Banking, Taxes, Assets, and Insurance. Within these categories, you can further divide documents by year or type.

Physical records can be organized using labeled folders, with color-coded categories for quick identification. Digital files should mirror this structure, ensuring consistency across both formats. Using cloud storage platforms with folder hierarchies makes it easy to manage digital records efficiently.

Ensure Security and Controlled Access

Financial records often contain sensitive information, so security must be a priority. For physical documents, consider using a locking file cabinet or a safe to prevent unauthorized access. When it comes to digital records, cloud storage solutions with encryption, multi-factor authentication (MFA), and role-based access permissions offer robust security.

Routine backups are also critical to prevent data loss. Schedule regular cloud backups or store files on external hard drives to ensure recoverability in case of technical failures or cyber incidents.

Implement Processes for Ongoing Organization

Establishing a system is only half the battle—maintaining it requires consistent processes. Introduce habits that encourage the continuous integration of new records. For example, set up a designated bin or tray for physical documents that need to be filed. Schedule weekly or monthly sorting sessions to prevent paperwork from piling up.

Digital records can be managed efficiently with the help of mobile scanning apps, which allow you to upload and store documents instantly. Automating document uploads or using templates for financial reports can also help reduce administrative workload.

Define Record Retention Policies

A well-organized financial record-keeping system includes clear retention guidelines. Different types of records have varying lifespans, particularly when it comes to tax and legal documentation. Tax-related files, for example, often need to be kept for three to seven years, while loan documents and property deeds may require longer retention.

Implement an annual archiving process to remove outdated records and free up space. Be sure to securely dispose of old physical documents through shredding and properly delete digital files to maintain data security.

Review and Update the System Regularly

As business operations evolve or personal circumstances change, your financial record-keeping system must also adapt. Periodically assess the system’s effectiveness to ensure it aligns with current needs. Technological advancements, regulatory changes, or the addition of new financial processes may necessitate updates.

Regular evaluations help you identify inefficiencies, improve workflows, and implement new tools that can further enhance your record-keeping efforts. Staying proactive in maintaining your system ensures it remains optimized over time.

The Benefits of a Structured Record-Keeping System

Creating an organized financial record-keeping system requires upfront effort, but the long-term benefits far outweigh the initial investment. A well-maintained system improves efficiency, reduces stress during tax season, ensures legal compliance, and provides quick access to critical documents when needed. For businesses, an effective record-keeping system supports better financial management and helps avoid costly mistakes, such as missed deadlines or lost receipts.

Whether managing personal finances or business accounts, a systematic approach keeps you in control. By following these strategies, you can establish a financial record-keeping system that is secure, sustainable, and adaptable to future needs. In the long run, the effort invested in building a reliable system pays off with enhanced organization, improved decision-making, and peace of mind.

An effective financial record-keeping system is essential for staying organized, meeting legal obligations, and preparing for the unexpected. By identifying the necessary records, creating a logical structure, ensuring security, and defining retention policies, individuals and businesses can manage financial documents efficiently. Regular evaluations and updates keep the system optimized as circumstances evolve. Ultimately, a well-organized approach to financial record-keeping promotes accountability, compliance, and readiness for whatever the future holds.

Norene

Personal Finance

How 2024 presidential race may influence Social Security

Published

2 hours ago

October 19, 2024

Business Finance News

Former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris are shown on screen during a debate watch party at the Cameo Art House Theatre in Fayetteville, North Carolina, Sept. 10, 2024.

Allison Joyce | Bloomberg | Getty Images

With the Social Security Administration facing a looming funding crisis over the next decade, it’s clear that the next U.S. president — either Democratic candidate Kamala Harris or Republican candidate Donald Trump — is poised to inherit a Social Security dilemma.

Almost 68 million Americans receive Social Security payments every month. The benefits support seniors in their retirement, disabled Americans and survivors of beneficiaries, but the future of the Social Security Administration has been in jeopardy for years.

More than 11,200 Americans are now turning 65 every day. As more retirees start to claim Social Security, there are not enough workers contributing to the program to make up for that increase in benefit payments.

When such a shortfall happens, Social Security turns to its trust funds — money that is set aside to help pay for benefits and other administrative costs.

But the trust fund Social Security relies on to pay retirement benefits is projected to be depleted in 2033. At that time, just 79% of benefits may be payable, according to the program’s trustees.

The average retired worker would see about a $403 cut to their current average monthly benefit of $1,920.

Most Americans rank Social Security as “one of the top” or a “very important” issue that will help determine how they vote in November, a recent CNBC poll found.

Social Security is a key issue for voters, survey finds: Here’s how to maximize benefits

Both presidential candidates — former president Trump and Vice President Harris — have vowed to protect Social Security benefits.

But restoring the program’s solvency will require changes — benefit cuts, tax increases or a combination of both. Yet some experts say the candidates’ discussions have thus far avoided specific details on how to address that shortfall.

“We’re not seeing anyone step up and say, ‘In nine years, our main retirement program is looking at the trust of being insolvent, and that could lead to roughly a 20% benefit cut across the board of everybody,” said Jason Fichtner, chief economist at the Bipartisan Policy Center and executive director of the Alliance for Lifetime Income’s Retirement Income Institute.

Trump promises no taxes on Social Security benefits

Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a rally in Coachella, California, U.S., October 12, 2024.

Mike Blake | Reuters

On the campaign trail, Trump has touted an idea aimed at letting retirees keep more of their Social Security checks — ending taxes on benefits.

“Seniors should not pay tax on Social Security,” Trump wrote on July 31 in all capital letters on social media platform Truth Social.

A recent ABC News/Ipsos poll found 85% of voters support the idea.

Currently, retirees pay federal income taxes on up to 85% of their benefits, depending on their incomes.

Just how much taxes retirees pay on benefits is based on a formula called combined income, the sum of adjusted gross income, nontaxable interest and half of Social Security benefits.

Married couples may pay taxes on up to 50% of their benefits if their combined incomes are between $32,000 and $44,000. If their incomes are over $44,000, up to 85% of their benefits may be taxable.

Individuals may be liable for taxes on up to 50% of their benefits if their incomes are between $25,000 and $34,000. If they have more than $34,000 in income, up to 85% of their benefits are taxable.

Because those thresholds do not change from year to year, more beneficiaries are paying taxes on their benefit income over time.

Ending taxes on Social Security benefits would move the insolvency date of Social Security’s trust fund closer by over one year, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.

And it may not make a big difference in retirees’ budgets, according to Howard Gleckman, senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center.

The median household income for retirees is about $50,000, so the “vast majority” pay very little or nothing in taxes on their Social Security benefits, Gleckman said.

Exempting taxes on benefits would mostly help those with incomes between $63,000 and $200,000, the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center’s research found.

But while the top 20% of households would see an average tax cut of about $1,400 after the elimination of the taxes on Social Security benefits, Gleckman explained, they would see an average tax increase of $6,500 with Trump’s plans to impose tariffs on imports.

“The net effect of what Trump is trying to do, if you look at everything including the tariffs, is probably increased taxes on retirees, even if they do get some benefit from repealing the tax on Social Security benefits,” Gleckman said.

The Trump campaign did not respond to a request for comment by press time.

Harris wants ‘wealthiest Americans’ to ‘pay their fair share’

Democratic presidential nominee U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris looks on as she participates a “town hall” with radio host Charlamagne Tha God, in Detroit, Michigan, U.S., October 15, 2024.

Kevin Lamarque | Reuters

The Harris campaign’s economic plan promises to “shore up Social Security and Medicare so that these essential programs will stay solvent in the long run by making corporations and the wealthiest Americans pay their fair share in taxes.”

In budget proposals and during the State of the Union, President Joe Biden has likewise called for having high earners pay more into the program.

More specific details on how Democratic candidate Harris would restore solvency to the program as president were not available by press time.

Employers and employees each pay 6.2% of wages to Social Security up to a taxable maximum (self-employed individuals pay 12.4%). In 2024, the limit on earnings that are subject to the Social Security payroll tax is $168,600. Top earners with $1 million in gross annual wage income stopped paying into the program as of March 2, according to the Center for Economic and Policy Research.

Washington Democrats have proposed reapplying those taxes for earnings over $400,000 or $250,000 in separate proposals, while also potentially raising taxes on investment income. Those tax increases would improve the program’s solvency, while also making certain benefit increases possible, per the proposals.

If Harris holds to the $400,000 threshold set by the Biden administration, her Social Security proposal would have “no impact on the vast majority of households,” according to Gleckman, since around 95% to 98% of households make that amount or less.

“Vice President Harris and Governor Walz are fighting to lower costs and will always protect and strengthen Social Security and Medicare,” campaign spokeswoman Mia Ehrenberg said in a statement.

Older Americans may feel effects of reform

As Social Security’s depletion dates get closer, any reform changes would need to phase in more quickly.

And people ages 55 and over — who are typically left out of Social Security reform proposals such as raising the retirement age — may also feel the effects of any changes, according to Fichtner.

“You don’t have a lot of time to change your retirement trajectory once you hit 55,” Fichtner said. “But now that we’re getting so close to trust fund depletion … and the magnitude is so large, I’m not sure we can actually afford from a financial standpoint to hold them harmless.”

Regardless of who is elected, it remains to be seen how much a new president can accomplish on Social Security.

With 60 votes required in the Senate to pass Social Security reform, both parties would have to agree.

Experts say it is possible lawmakers may wait until the last minute to address the issue.

“As you get closer and closer to the insolvency date, it means the benefit reductions have to be steeper and quicker, and it means the tax increases have to be more significant and faster,” Gleckman said. “So it makes it even harder.”