Connect with us

Accounting

Audit teams missed risks of material misstatement by banks

Published

on

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board staff released a report Monday on how during 2022 and 2023, several firms’ engagement teams working on audits in the banking sector did not adequately identify the risks of material misstatement ahead of the high-profile implosion of several banks.

The Spotlight report, “Bank Financial Reporting Audits, discusses the PCAOB’s inspection response to bank failures in early 2023 and the continued effects of these bank failures on the banking industry and includes an overview of survey responses outlining how dozens of U.S. firms responded to disruptions in the banking industry, including impacts from rising interest rates. It also includes some observations from the PCAOB’s inspection activities, along with a description of good practices at audit firms in key focus areas.

The PCAOB encouraged firms to consider some of the potential risks, including increased volatility in financial and commodity markets due to fluctuations in interest rates and inflationary trends in an earlier Spotlight report, “Staff Overview for Planned 2022 Inspections,” which was published in June 2022.

PCAOB logo - office - NEW 2022

Then, after vulnerabilities in the banking sector were exposed in early 2023 as high-profile banks such as Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank went under, the PCAOB revised its inspection plan to respond in real time, including sending a questionnaire to survey 40 U.S. firms that audit at least one bank, with additional emphasis on the 13 U.S. firms that audit 10 or more banks. The survey was designed to provide insight into how firms evaluated emerging and evolving risks in the sector.

In reviewing the survey responses, the PCAOB found that over 70% of the engagement teams it surveyed did not identify a risk of material misstatement due to rising interest rates. Over 95% did not identify a risk of material misstatement related to liquidity. Over 95% did not identify a risk of material misstatement through reviewing information from short sellers, analysts, or other publicly available information, and over 65% did not identify any risk of material misstatement related to concentration risks. Finally, over 95% of the engagement teams did not identify a risk of fraud related to investments or related disclosures. A few firms indicated rising interest rates were a “business-only” risk, relating to the operations of the bank without directly influencing financial reporting.

As they reviewed the banking sector audits completed in early 2023 for financial statements dated in late 2022, PCAOB inspectors noticed a variety of deficiencies. In some instances, for example, engagement teams did not revisit initial risk assessments performed earlier in the year as interest rates continued to rise. Inspectors also observed instances of interest rate volatility being documented as an operational or business issue – with no financial reporting or internal control over financial reporting considerations.

As a result, some engagement teams did not identify in their audits certain risks of material misstatement despite changes in bank-specific or macroeconomic conditions that indicated increased risk in certain audit areas.

In response to the survey results, the PCAOB adjusted its inspection plan, telling its target team to perform procedures on interim reviews of banks in order to provide real-time perspective on important risks. Inspectors also chose additional bank audits for inspection, and worked to ensure emerging banking and economic trends, and banking issues or common deficiencies, were appropriately considered in our selections.

In addition to some common observations from the PCAOB’s inspection activities, the Spotlight report provides a description of good practices observed at audit firms that may enhance audit quality if broadly adopted. The Spotlight provides these insights in in four focus areas: investment securities, allowance for credit losses, deposit liabilities, and loans and related accounts.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Acting IRS commissioner reportedly replaced

Published

on

Gary Shapley, who was named only days ago as the acting commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, is reportedly being replaced by Deputy Treasury Secretary Michael Faulkender amid a power struggle between Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Elon Musk.

The New York Times reported that Bessent was outraged that Shapley was named to head the IRS without his knowledge or approval and complained to President Trump about it. Shapley was installed as acting commissioner on Tuesday, only to be ousted on Friday. He first gained prominence as an IRS Criminal Investigation special agent and whistleblower who testified in 2023 before the House Oversight Committee that then-President Joe Biden’s son Hunter received preferential treatment during a tax-evasion investigation, and he and another special agent had been removed from the investigation after complaining to their supervisors in 2022. He was promoted last month to senior advisor to Bessent and made deputy chief of IRS Criminal Investigation. Shapley is expected to remain now as a senior official at IRS Criminal Investigation, according to the Wall Street Journal. The IRS and the Treasury Department press offices did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Faulkender was confirmed last month as deputy secretary at the Treasury Department and formerly worked during the first Trump administration at the Treasury on the Paycheck Protection Program before leaving to teach finance at the University of Maryland.

Faulkender will be the fifth head of the IRS this year. Former IRS commissioner Danny Werfel departed in January, on Inauguration Day, after Trump announced in December he planned to name former Congressman Billy Long, R-Missouri, as the next IRS commissioner, even though Werfel’s term wasn’t scheduled to end until November 2027. The Senate has not yet scheduled a confirmation hearing for Long, amid questions from Senate Democrats about his work promoting the Employee Retention Credit and so-called “tribal tax credits.” The job of acting commissioner has since been filled by Douglas O’Donnell, who was deputy commissioner under Werfel. However, O’Donnell abruptly retired as the IRS came under pressure to lay off thousands of employees and share access to confidential taxpayer data. He was replaced by IRS chief operating officer Melanie Krause, who resigned last week after coming under similar pressure to provide taxpayer data to immigration authorities and employees of the Musk-led U.S. DOGE Service. 

Krause had planned to depart later this month under the deferred resignation program at the IRS, under which approximately 22,000 IRS employees have accepted the voluntary buyout offers. But Musk reportedly pushed to have Shapley installed on Tuesday, according to the Times, and he remained working in the commissioner’s office as recently as Friday morning. Meanwhile, plans are underway for further reductions in the IRS workforce of up to 40%, according to the Federal News Network, taking the IRS from approximately 102,000 employees at the beginning of the year to around 60,000 to 70,000 employees.

Continue Reading

Accounting

On the move: EY names San Antonio office MP

Published

on

Carr, Riggs & Ingram appoints CFO and chief legal officer; TSCPA hosts accounting bootcamp; and more news from across the profession.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Tech news: Certinia announces spring release

Published

on


Certinia announces spring release; Intuit acquires tech and experts from fintech Deserve; Paystand launches feature to navigate tariffs; and other accounting tech news and updates.

Continue Reading

Trending