Connect with us

Accounting

Donor advised funds’ tax benefits shown by client scenarios

Published

on

Financial advisors and charitable-minded clients can tap into tax savings through donor-advised funds when balancing portfolios, making regular gifts and after windfalls, according to an expert.

Those three scenarios show in part why donor-advised funds have amassed around $230 billion in assets — with another trillion dollars in growth expected for the next decade, according to a presentation at this week’s Future Proof conference by Adam Nash, an angel investor and former Wealthfront CEO who’s now CEO of Daffy, a donor-advised funds service. 

The other reasons for that rising popularity include the flexibility with an upfront deduction for the donation that doesn’t require a grant to be allocated immediately and the ability to send charities other types of assets besides cash such as appreciated stock or other securities, Nash noted.

In his presentation, Nash compared donor-advised funds to other types of tax-advantaged accounts that have evolved into pivotal roles as part of clients’ long-term financial plans over recent decades, like individual retirement accounts, 401(k) plans and 529 college savings plans.

“A donor-advised fund is basically the perfect account for putting money aside for charity,” Nash said. “You can put money or assets into the account, and you get an immediate tax deduction this year against income when you put the assets in the account. The accounts have investment options — some more than others — but your money is invested tax-free for as long as you want it to compound. And then any time you want to give money to an operating charity — it could just be a few clicks and that money gets sent off and taken care of. 

“And it’s not surprising that, even at the very high end, a lot of people are thinking about,” Nash added, “‘Do I really need to set up a foundation? Do I really need to set up a trust? I can just use a donor-advised fund to handle the philanthropy needs, the back end and the back office for my clients.”

READ MORE: IRS donor-advised fund proposal could have ‘chilling effect’

The three examples Nash laid out in his talk displayed the possible role of donor-advised funds in a client’s portfolio.

The sale of a stock that has risen in value or the spinoff of a part of a small business or another “positive event” can bring capital gains and income — along with accompanying taxes in a particular year, he noted. The donor-advised fund can help advisors and their clients offset those gains.

“If you have a windfall, you can immediately say, ‘Hey, put that money, put some of those assets into a donor-advised fund and take your time evaluating organizations and thinking about who you want to give that money to,” Nash said. “Maybe you can put aside money that’s good enough to support your giving, not just for one year, five years, 10 years — build a real legacy for you and your family or for your business. And so this is the most common reason that advisors fall in love with donor-advised funds.”

Regular gifts of assets to donor-advised funds at any time can bring a bigger tax advantage than donating cash, and the structure enables advisors and their clients to send stocks, ETFs or even digital holdings like cryptocurrency to organizations that may not have the capacity to receive non-cash contributions directly.

“Let’s say they give $30,000 to charity every year,” Nash said. “If you can just tell them, instead of taking that cash and giving it to the charity, to actually put the stock in a donor-advised fund, get those tax benefits, then they can give that cash to those charities, the same as they always did, but save money on taxes. And here’s the kicker, for people who care about this stuff, there is no wash-sale rule with donations, right? You can donate the shares out of their account to the donor-advised fund that had the lowest cost basis and then, literally, a millisecond later, you can take the cash that they would have given to charity and use it instead to replenish their investment account with higher cost-basis shares. So you permanently eliminate that tax liability.”

READ MORE: You’re doing it wrong: Annual portfolio rebalancing isn’t enough

Portfolio rebalancing may also present some “unforgiving” numbers when it comes to the “tax draft” of selling off one category of assets that took on unexpectedly high values in order to buy more investments in a lower-valued type of security, Nash pointed out.

“What if, instead of selling those appreciated shares, you actually donate some of those shares to a donor-advised fund, and then you use the cash that you would have used to rebalance the portfolio to buy up the underrepresented asset in the portfolio,” he said. “So you’re just moving the same amount of money around, but by having a donor-advised fund to capture that tax benefit of those appreciated securities, you just eliminate that liability.”

Advisors and their clients can choose among many donor-advised fund providers that are operating in the space, but Nash’s firm is making its pitch based on newer technology tools, the capacity for clients to add other family members and advisors to their accounts and flat-fee price points between $3 and $20 a month. 

Its name, Daffy, stands for “donor-advised funds for you,” Nash noted. Last year, the firm launched a tool for matching campaigns, such as one that Nash shared with Future Proof attendees in which a widower started a fund in honor of his late wife.      

“It’s very personal, and the organizer, the person running the campaign, can pick up to six charities to support and let their donors pick amongst them, and then the matching just automatically happens within minutes every time someone makes a donation in a campaign,” Nash said. “They’re not just giving to the organization. They’re supporting the organization, and they bring new people into the community — which is what the charities really want, is more and more exposure to people who care about their cause.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Acting IRS commissioner reportedly replaced

Published

on

Gary Shapley, who was named only days ago as the acting commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, is reportedly being replaced by Deputy Treasury Secretary Michael Faulkender amid a power struggle between Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Elon Musk.

The New York Times reported that Bessent was outraged that Shapley was named to head the IRS without his knowledge or approval and complained to President Trump about it. Shapley was installed as acting commissioner on Tuesday, only to be ousted on Friday. He first gained prominence as an IRS Criminal Investigation special agent and whistleblower who testified in 2023 before the House Oversight Committee that then-President Joe Biden’s son Hunter received preferential treatment during a tax-evasion investigation, and he and another special agent had been removed from the investigation after complaining to their supervisors in 2022. He was promoted last month to senior advisor to Bessent and made deputy chief of IRS Criminal Investigation. Shapley is expected to remain now as a senior official at IRS Criminal Investigation, according to the Wall Street Journal. The IRS and the Treasury Department press offices did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Faulkender was confirmed last month as deputy secretary at the Treasury Department and formerly worked during the first Trump administration at the Treasury on the Paycheck Protection Program before leaving to teach finance at the University of Maryland.

Faulkender will be the fifth head of the IRS this year. Former IRS commissioner Danny Werfel departed in January, on Inauguration Day, after Trump announced in December he planned to name former Congressman Billy Long, R-Missouri, as the next IRS commissioner, even though Werfel’s term wasn’t scheduled to end until November 2027. The Senate has not yet scheduled a confirmation hearing for Long, amid questions from Senate Democrats about his work promoting the Employee Retention Credit and so-called “tribal tax credits.” The job of acting commissioner has since been filled by Douglas O’Donnell, who was deputy commissioner under Werfel. However, O’Donnell abruptly retired as the IRS came under pressure to lay off thousands of employees and share access to confidential taxpayer data. He was replaced by IRS chief operating officer Melanie Krause, who resigned last week after coming under similar pressure to provide taxpayer data to immigration authorities and employees of the Musk-led U.S. DOGE Service. 

Krause had planned to depart later this month under the deferred resignation program at the IRS, under which approximately 22,000 IRS employees have accepted the voluntary buyout offers. But Musk reportedly pushed to have Shapley installed on Tuesday, according to the Times, and he remained working in the commissioner’s office as recently as Friday morning. Meanwhile, plans are underway for further reductions in the IRS workforce of up to 40%, according to the Federal News Network, taking the IRS from approximately 102,000 employees at the beginning of the year to around 60,000 to 70,000 employees.

Continue Reading

Accounting

On the move: EY names San Antonio office MP

Published

on

Carr, Riggs & Ingram appoints CFO and chief legal officer; TSCPA hosts accounting bootcamp; and more news from across the profession.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Tech news: Certinia announces spring release

Published

on


Certinia announces spring release; Intuit acquires tech and experts from fintech Deserve; Paystand launches feature to navigate tariffs; and other accounting tech news and updates.

Continue Reading

Trending