Connect with us

Accounting

Tax enforcement chiefs investigate risks in crypto casinos, trading desks and payment platforms

Published

on

Officials from the Internal Revenue Service’s Criminal Investigation division are meeting with tax enforcement leaders from Australia, Canada, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom this week in an annual challenge to share information and strategies and investigate leads for combating tax crimes tied to technologies like cryptocurrency.

The Joint Chiefs of Global Tax Enforcement, also known as the J5, are holding their annual Cyber Challenge meeting, this year in Brisbane, Australia, bringing together over 30 investigators, analysts, crypto experts and data scientists from the five member agencies and each of the five country’s Financial Intelligence Units for five full days of lead development. The mission is to optimize data from a variety of open and investigative sources available to each country, including offshore account information. 

Representatives from each country are divided into teams where they use analytical tools and new data provided to them through the challenge to generate criminal leads and identify tax offenders who use cryptocurrency. Each country uses data and tools available to all J5 countries to develop leads exchange tools, identify trends and determine methodologies. This is the sixth Cyber Challenge. Each year, the event focuses on a different set of challenges, and this year the investigators examined over-the-counter cryptocurrency trading desks, online cryptocurrency casinos and cryptocurrency payment platforms.

crypto-apps.jpg
Coinbase and other mobile apps

Chesnot/Getty Images

The J5 looked at money laundering and tax evasion risk factors associated with such businesses. More than 30 leads were prepared or developed by the J5 member countries and partner Financial Intelligence Units as part of the Challenge.

“These challenges have been incredibly fruitful over the past few years, and we’ve been able to replicate the model that we’ve used in other areas of our operations,” said IRS Criminal Investigation chief Guy Ficco during a press conference. “In a sense, it’s about innovation, coordination and a whole lot of pressure that we put on these people. We basically take the smartest people in government and business and proverbially put them in a room and lock the door and see what comes out. What’s been coming out has been some really good stuff over the last couple years and this year as well. These challenges, though, really do serve as an excellent example of international collaboration.”

He noted that in previous challenges, the J5 uncovered a $1 billion Ponzi scheme, as well as dozens of other leads that have turned into real investigations every year. Several investigations from previous challenges are currently underway and have proven invaluable in helping the J5 combat international financial crimes. This week’s challenge focused on data involving over-the-counter cryptocurrency trading desks, online cryptocurrency casinos and cryptocurrency payment platforms. 

“We began this week with more than 30 leads from the United States and our partner countries, and that’s a great starting point that will make a huge impact on future investigations,” said Ficco. “In addition to lead generation, we also use these challenges to produce advisories for the financial and tax industries, and as we have done in years past, the J5 hopes to issue advisories about over-the-counter cryptocurrency trading desks and cryptocurrency payment processors based upon information that was exchanged during this challenge.”

Many of those advisories go out to financial institutions and other stakeholders. The J5 has experienced some of its biggest operational successes in the past several months, Ficco added, including the indictment of a former defense contractor and his wife in July for a decadelong scheme to defraud the United States and evade taxes of more than $300 million in income. That same month, the J5 released its first ever report detailing some of the successes since the group’s inception six years ago. The J5 plans to convene next month in Canada for the Global Financial Institutions Partnership, where public and private sector partners will strategize on how to effectively combat tax and financial crimes.

The crimes investigated by the group have a far-reaching impact across the globe. “What we’re looking to do is collectively and together work the largest and most impactful cyber crime investigations related to cryptocurrency that we can in the entire world,” said J5 cyber group lead Michael Wheeler, a special agent with IRS Criminal Investigation. “Our scope certainly focuses on our tax evasion, money laundering and other related financial crimes that affect our core J5 member countries. But in today’s global environment, in the cybercrime landscape, money readily and quickly moves from country to country. Our investigations include conduct within our J5 member countries, but also beyond.”

The 30 participants have been busy working on over 30 different leads in this year’s challenge. 

“We continue to work on impactful leads today, and we’ll continue doing that going forward,” said Wheeler. 

One of the leads relates to a cryptocurrency service provider with over $1 billion in volume that shows indications of tax evasion and money laundering. Other leads relate to darknet markets, as well as over-the-counter cryptocurrency trading desks, crypto casinos and crypto payment solutions providers, in keeping with the theme of this year’s challenge. 

Planning for this year’s challenge started well ahead of this week, including absorbing the lessons learned from past challenges.

“What we wanted to do for this year is really take advantage of the full five days, and we’ve done that,” said Wheeler. “We made sure that we collected our leads beforehand, shared our leads well in advance of arriving here in Brisbane, so that information can be shared across the J5 member agencies, amongst our Financial Intelligence Units, and any information responsive to those leads could be collated and shared well in advance. And we can actually come together here in Brisbane with some background, with some context on these leads, and really just dive into working on them side by side, and that’s really what we accomplished from day one.”

The Australian Taxation Office hosted this year’s Cyber Challenge. “This Challenge builds on the momentum of previous years where our top investigators and experts come together to collaborate and identify quality leads to stop cybercrime cryptocurrency fraud,” said John Ford, deputy commissioner at the Australian Taxation Office, in a statement. “This is the power of the J5 alliance, together with our public and private specialist partners we are getting ahead of the criminals in a rapidly changing cyber ecosystem.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Art of Accounting: An idea from a Chinese takeout menu

Published

on

Complimentary Access Pill

Enjoy complimentary access to top ideas and insights — selected by our editors.

I must have seen more than a thousand Chinese takeout menus. I always look at them, although I pretty much always order the same thing. Last week I noticed something that I have never seen before — a suggestion section for what to order. There were five suggestions. They all looked good and were slightly upscale. That got me thinking about whether CPAs should offer suggested services, and if not, why don’t they?

I did not order any of the suggestions on the menu as my mind was made up about what I was going to order, but the suggestions planted a seed in my mind. I suspect I will order one of them in the near future. 

I liked the idea and, while I’ve never directly presented suggestions as such to a client, I have offered suggestions in the form of a listing of services that were not included in my fixed-price engagements. One example of such wording is: “Not included are services in connection with reviewing your accounting system and its controls that would offer a higher degree of protection against employee theft or embezzlement. This would be a special single purpose engagement at prices and timing to be decided upon along with a catalogue of benefits and value to be conferred upon you.”

This rarely resulted in added engagements. Perhaps a better way of presenting this, using the Chinese menu idea, would have been:

Suggestions of additional high-value single purpose services (prices fixed and guaranteed for one year):

  • Analysis and review of your accounting system and its controls that would offer a higher degree of protection against employee errors, theft or embezzlement: $7,200

This suggestion also provides a fixed price and a deadline for the client to engage you for this service. i.e., one year. At the point of offering this service, you should have a pretty good idea of what would be involved, how it would be staffed and the time it would take. Even if you are too low, you will still receive the added revenue, help your client with a service they need and can benefit from, open the door to further services at a later date and establish a stronger relationship with that client.

Further, if you did not offer a fixed fee, the client might have trepidation at the cost and would be hesitant to ask what it might be or for an estimate or range. In my experience, any estimate on a time-based project becomes a “fixed” fee, plus or minus 10% or 15%, so why not just quote a fixed fee? If you feel you are not able to reasonably estimate a fee for this service, then perhaps you are in the wrong business. 

Here are some other suggestions of added engagements:

  • Special services in connection with a surprise bank reconciliation and a review of the client-prepared bank reconciliations during the previous year, including a reconciliation of any differences in the cash balance the client is working off of compared to the most recent month-end reconciled bank balance. The internal bank reconciliation procedures, and their thoroughness and timeliness, will be reviewed and changes will be suggested if we believe that is necessary. Price: $8,000.
  • An informal valuation of your business will be performed to determine an estimated value of your business, identification of value drivers, how a buyer would value your business, how our valuation could be used as a benchmark to measure growth in the form of value creation, and how this value would interface with your personal financial plan and estate plan. Price with a written valuation and template to measure future changes in value: $12,500. Price with the template but without the written valuation: $8,500.
  • An analysis of your eventual estate liquidity and cash flow based upon your present and projected individual financial statement, your estimate of the current value of your business, your estimate of your cash flow needs in retirement, a review of your will and any trust documents, designations of beneficiary forms and life insurance: Price $9,500.

The above are examples of added high-value services that could confer substantial benefit along with the client having a heightened feeling of financial security, comfort and empowerment. All prices mentioned are illustrative and would be based on the client’s situation. A client with a business with sales of $3 million would have a much lower price for a valuation than a business grossing $30 million a year. Likewise, a client with $3 million net worth would have a much less complicated financial and potential estate situation than a client with $30 million net worth along with multiple trusts, real estate and business investments.

My motive with this column is to pique your interest and imagination about what your clients might need. Examine your clients’ situations, their pain points, and expressed and unmentioned concerns, find ways to help them, and then prepare a listing of three or four suggested services that would allay their fears and concerns.

If my local Chinese restaurant could do it, then you and I should also be able to do it for our clients. Do not wait for the client to ask about added services. Suggest them now! 

Do not hesitate to contact me at [email protected] with your practice management questions or about engagements you might not be able to perform.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Trump nominates hedge fund chief Bessent to lead Treasury

Published

on

President-elect Donald Trump said he is nominating Scott Bessent, who runs macro hedge fund Key Square Group, as the next U.S. Treasury secretary, enlisting a key adviser to manage the sweeping economic agenda he has vowed to enact in a second term.

“Scott has long been a strong advocate of the America First Agenda,” Trump said in a statement Friday. “On the eve of our Great Country’s 250th Anniversary, he will help me usher in a new Golden Age for the United States, as we fortify our position as the World’s leading Economy.”

Bessent, 62, emerged as the pick after an extended search for a Treasury chief that saw Trump consider multiple candidates — and Wall Street executives and business leaders vie to influence the president-elect’s decision. Allies believed that Trump sought a candidate that would be favored both by Wall Street as well as an electoral base eager for him to implement sweeping tariffs, embrace cryptocurrencies and crack down on undocumented migration.

Scott Bessent
Scott Bessent

Stefani Reynolds/Bloomberg

Bessent beat out other prominent contenders including Apollo Global Management Inc. executive Marc Rowan, former Federal Reserve Governor Kevin Warsh and Tennessee Senator Bill Hagerty as well as Trump transition co-chair Howard Lutnick, who was named to lead the Commerce Department.not supported.

If confirmed by the Senate, Bessent would be the first openly gay Treasury chief, and one of the wealthiest in modern times. Bessent has said that he has always wanted to serve his country, but in the 1980s his sexual orientation prevented him from going to the U.S. Naval Academy, and after graduating from Yale University, from joining the State Department.

He joins an economic team beginning to take shape just weeks after Trump won a second presidential term. Trump announced that his former budget director, Russ Vought, would be returning to the same role in a statement to his social media platform later Friday.

“He did an excellent job serving in this role in my First Term – We cut four Regulations for every new Regulation, and it was a Great Success!” Trump said.

Vought, a key architect of Project 2025, the controversial Heritage Foundation policy document released during the campaign, will work alongside Bessent to implement Trump’s economic agenda.

Political thickets

As the nation’s highest ranking economic policymaker, Bessent will have to wade through political thickets in Washington, spearhead international economic diplomacy and bring Wall Street know-how to crisis situations. He will also be closely watched by investors and financial institutions, who are looking for predictability and stability.

He has been a proponent of realigning U.S. currency policy, but has stopped short of supporting an overt strategy of depreciating the dollar. During Trump’s first term, the then-president called out dollar appreciation for being harmful to US manufacturers and even considered government intervention to manage the greenback’s value. 

Bessent has acknowledged that while a weaker dollar would be good for some parts of the economy, some of Trump’s proposals would drive up its value. 

He has criticized President Joe Biden’s administration for its management of federal debt financing, and has talked about expanding its “friendshoring” policy to create a tiered system among trade partners.

At the Treasury, Bessent is expected to advise Trump on candidates to chair the Federal Reserve when that job opens up in May 2026. Earlier this year, he talked about the idea of nominating a new Fed chair well in advance of the expiration of current chair Jerome Powell’s term. Financial markets would turn their attention to that shadow Fed chair instead of Powell, Bessent has said.

He has said the Fed was too slow to respond to rising inflation in 2021, and criticized the US central bank for its large interest-rate cut in September.

Bessent spent part of his career managing money for billionaire George Soros. He lived in London and was part of the team, under Stan Druckenmiller, that made $1 billion in 1992 shorting the pound — a wager that helped force the currency out of the European Exchange Rate Mechanism, and made Soros famous as the man who broke the Bank of England.

He would be the second Treasury secretary, after Steven Mnuchin, who has worked for groups with close ties to Soros.

Soros’ family office made about $10 billion in profit under Bessent as investment chief, or about 13% annualized. Since then, he’s run Key Square, which started with a $2 billion investment from Soros — funds he later returned as other investors came in.

“I think he’ll be outstanding,” said Druckenmiller. “Having worked for me and George for all those years, he’s been exposed to everything a Treasury secretary has to deal with. He has a deep knowledge of markets and he’s also an intellectual who has the chops to work with academic policymakers. It’s a rare combination.” 

Bessent will be returning his hedge fund clients’ capital as soon as possible after Dec. 1, according to a person familiar with his plans. Federal rules require cabinet members to develop plans to remove their potential conflicts of interest, and then follow through on them, usually within as little as 90 days.

Here’s a look at some key areas of responsibility for the role of Treasury Secretary:

Oversight, taxes

Bessent is expected to play a key role in pushing for a renewal of Trump’s 2017 tax cuts through Congress, many of which are set to expire at the end of 2025. 

The Treasury chief could be charged with liaising with Republicans in Congress to expand the scope of the tax bill to include some of Trump’s campaign-trail tax promises, including a 15% corporate rate and exempting tipped wages from taxation.

The Treasury Secretary is also charged with running the Financial Stability Oversight Council, a panel set up after the financial crisis. Under outgoing Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, FSOC looked at the issue of climate change, triggering criticism from Republicans who have been wary of any requirement for banks to incorporate climate in their lending or capital decisions.

FSOC under Yellen also recommended stronger oversight of stablecoins, which the Fed has likened to bank deposits and money market funds — and which are subject to much more regulation. Trump’s advocacy of the crypto space on the campaign trail likely will put the new Treasury chief’s stance under the spotlight.

Economic diplomacy

Peppered through the year are meetings of the finance chiefs of the Group of Seven, G-20 and other international organizations, which the Treasury secretary typically attends as the chief U.S. representative.

The Treasury Department implements U.S. sanctions on foreign countries, companies and individuals, which have soared in number over the past several years. Yellen helped to lead efforts at the G-7 to isolate Russia after its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, and to step up financial assistance for Kyiv.

The secretary also has often served as point person on engagement with China. The Treasury chief tends to be a cautionary voice when it comes to proposals aimed at America’s biggest strategic rival. Mnuchin, Trump’s Treasury head in his first term, was seen as playing that role when tensions escalated in 2018 and 2019.

Debt management

In charge of the nation’s purse strings, Bessent will have to deal with a costly, and ballooning, debt load. The federal budget deficit crept up to 6.4% of GDP in fiscal 2024, historically high for a time of economic expansion and full employment. A key driver has been soaring interest costs, in the wake of Fed rate hikes in 2022 and 2023.

“No one has been more terrified about this debt stack and the coming refinance we’ve got to do,” Bessent said on a recent War Room podcast with longtime Trump adviser Stephen Bannon. What can “stabilize the bond market” is a fiscal package that reins in spending, he said.

Bessent has also complained about the Treasury’s debt financing strategy, claiming that Yellen was trying to juice the economy and help her boss ahead of the November election — a charge she rejected.

Debt managers may need to be active in managing the Treasury’s liquidity, because the federal debt ceiling is scheduled to kick back in at the start of January. That bars the department from issuing new debt, and triggers an oft-deployed sequence of maneuvers to prevent the U.S. government from running out of cash or, worse, defaulting on its debt — an event that could have catastrophic repercussions.

Glen Capelo, who spent more than three decades on Wall Street bond-trading desks and is now a managing director at Mischler Financial Group, called Bessent a “fiscal hawk.”

“He definitely will be positive overall for the economy and the markets. He wants to rein in spending. Bessent wants to get the Secretary of the Treasury back in line with the markets – because he does believe Janet Yellen has twisted the issuance around a bit,” Capelo said.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Macy’s delays earnings after worker hid millions in expenses

Published

on

Macy’s Inc. said it would delay its third-quarter earnings release after an investigation revealed an employee hid more than $100 million of expenses. 

An employee “intentionally” made erroneous accounting accrual entries to hide about $132 million to $154 million of cumulative delivery expenses stretching over multiple years, the company said Monday. 

The worker, who was responsible for small package delivery expense accounting, is no longer employed with the company. 

The Macy's flagship store in the Herald Square neighborhood of New York
The Macy’s flagship store in the Herald Square neighborhood of New York

Yuki Iwamura/Bloomberg

The retailer said it identified an issue with its delivery expenses while it was preparing its quarterly financial statements, prompting the initiation of an independent investigation. The probe revealed a single employee hid the expenses from the fourth quarter of 2021 through the fiscal quarter ended Nov. 2, 2024.

Macy’s shares fell 4% in Monday trading in New York. The stock had lost 19% this year through Friday’s close as Wall Street remains skeptical of Spring’s plan to close poorly performing stores and boost sales at its top locations. 

The company said there’s “no indication” the erroneous accounting accrual entries had any impact on the company’s cash management activities or vendor payments.

Macy’s was slated to release its earnings report and hold a call with analysts on Tuesday. It said it will issue the release, as well as its fourth quarter and full-year outlooks, by Dec. 11. 

Sales drop

Comparable sales at the retailer’s owned and licensed stores during the third quarter dropped 1.3%, according to preliminary results, slightly better than analyst expectations. The picture was rosier at Bloomingdales, where third-quarter comparable sales rose 3.2%, and at Bluemercury, which showed a 3.3% increase on an owned basis. Chief Executive Tony Spring, who took over in February, said November comparable sales are “trending ahead” of third-quarter levels across its various brands.

Third-quarter sales fell 2.4% to $4.74 billion, below Wall Street estimates.

“While we work diligently to complete the investigation as soon as practicable and ensure this matter is handled appropriately, our colleagues across the company are focused on serving our customers and executing our strategy for a successful holiday season,” Spring said.

As the largest department-store chain in the U.S. by revenue, Macy’s often serves as a barometer of mass-market consumer spending during the all-important holiday season. A delay of earnings until after the annual Black Friday shopping extravaganza may provide investors with a deeper look into holiday spending trends.

While the accounting issue and the delay in earnings isn’t good, “the scope of the issue doesn’t seem terribly alarming,” a Vital Knowledge note said. 

Still, the incident — and the fact that the accounting errors go back to 2021 — “raises the question as to the competence of the company’s auditors,” wrote Neil Saunders, managing director at GlobalData. 

“Such things create more nervousness for investors who are already concerned about the company’s performance,” he added.

Continue Reading

Trending