Accounting
Keeping an eye on DEI at accounting firms
As the conversation around diversity, equity and inclusion continues to evolve, many accounting firms find themselves in a complex dance where the music occasionally skips a beat due to recent legislative actions in states like Florida, Texas and Utah. While these states have opted to cut back on DEI education, the corporate world has been slow to raise its voice, leaving DEI leaders to juggle the impacts of landmark rulings, like the U.S. Supreme Court’s take on affirmative action.
In today’s often-mercurial environment, DEI professionals can face apathy or active resistance, a reality highlighted by a
The costs of DEI burnout
Most leaders in the DEI space only last about three years. This short tenure highlights just how taxing the emotional and physical demands can be in this line of work. According to the Journal of Organizational Behavior, emotional labor, or the need to fabricate positive feelings and suppress negative ones, can lead to burnout and reduced job satisfaction, especially in roles where employees must continually advocate for underrepresented groups. This is exacerbated by corporate display rules, which dictate how emotions should be shown, placing an additional burden on DEI leaders to manage their feelings while promoting inclusivity. This “surface acting” — masking your true emotions — often leads to emotional exhaustion and eventually, burnout.
The odds are often stacked against our DEI leaders, making retention a significant challenge and hurdle for sustainable policies. To help these teams overcome internal obstacles like stereotypes, resistance and other societal pressures, firms should invest in frameworks that align with their DEI goals and provide support to their leaders.
Essential support strategies for DEI leaders
Here are three key pillars that accounting firm leaders can use to effectively support and retain DEI professionals:
- Strong advocacy and resource allocation: To support DEI efforts meaningfully, firms should cultivate strong internal advocates who understand the long-term nature of this work. They must also invest in resources — financial and otherwise — that allow DEI leaders to implement effective programs. Engaging firm leadership as champions of these initiatives can amplify DEI efforts across all levels of the organization.
- The learning and effectiveness paradigm: Research from Harvard Business School suggests that organizations with a “learning-and-effectiveness” DEI approach see better results than those that merely check boxes. This model values employees for their unique identities and encourages the integration of DEI values into all processes, from hiring to decision-making. For accounting firms, this approach can help shift the focus from compliance to true inclusivity, which is essential for long-term growth and employee satisfaction.
- Supportive flexibility: Providing flexibility, such as offering paid time off for DEI-related responsibilities or recognition for their contributions in performance reviews, can go a long way in helping these leaders focus on creating and implementing broader goals.
Practical strategies for alleviating DEI stress
DEI professionals are often an “army of one,” responsible for maintaining firmwide inclusivity goals. To manage the emotional weight of this work, consider these quick strategies to improve morale and reduce burnout.
- Celebrate milestones and wins: Recognizing even small achievements can boost morale. Studies show that marking milestones can have a significant impact on motivation and job satisfaction. Regularly reviewing DEI metrics to track and celebrate progress helps to maintain momentum and commitment, creating a cycle of positive reinforcement for DEI efforts.
- Encourage participation in DEI events: A strong network is essential for any professional, and this is especially true for DEI leaders. Events and industry connections provide fresh perspectives and insights that can inform DEI strategies. They also offer valuable opportunities to connect with others who understand the unique challenges of DEI work, helping professionals feel less isolated in their roles.
- Encourage emotional health: DEI work is emotionally taxing, and professionals need to establish boundaries for their mental well-being. Accounting firms can actively support DEI leaders by fostering a workplace culture that respects boundaries, promotes self-care and provides opportunities for delegation. A well-resourced DEI team can better handle the pressures of the role, ensuring a sustainable impact on firm culture.
Moving forward: A balanced approach to DEI
The journey toward inclusivity may be challenging, but the benefits are clear: a robust DEI strategy isn’t just good for employee morale — it’s essential for attracting and retaining talent. In fact, the vast majority of job seekers consider diversity an important factor when evaluating companies and job offers. A recent Glassdoor survey asked more than 4,000 employees or job seekers how important corporate investment in diversity, equity and inclusion is to them when considering a new job. Not surprisingly, 77% of Gen Z men and 76% of Gen Z women said it was somewhat or very important. But older workers felt similarly. In fact, both millennial men and women felt even more strongly about it, at 79%. Even Gen X (69% of men and 76% of women) and Boomers (56% of men and 70% of women) felt it was either somewhat or very important. So while news reports may posit that people care less about DEI in the workplace, the vast majority consider it important.
Creating a work environment that genuinely promotes diversity, equity and inclusion not only improves employee engagement but also contributes to innovation, job satisfaction and, ultimately, a stronger bottom line. Accounting firms that invest in DEI — especially in supportive structures for DEI professionals — are more likely to create a workplace where employees feel safe, respected and empowered, which is critical when competing for talent in today’s shrinking pool.
By acknowledging the challenges DEI leaders face and providing them with the resources, autonomy and support they need, accounting firms can cultivate an inclusive culture that attracts and retains diverse talent. As external pressures continue to shape the DEI landscape, firms that proactively support DEI efforts — and the employees leading the charge — will be better equipped to navigate these challenges, building a resilient, adaptable workplace where employees thrive.
Captive audience; some disagreement; game of 21; and other highlights of recent tax cases.
Barrington, Illinois: Tax preparer Gary Sandiego has been sentenced to 16 months in prison for preparing and filing false returns for clients.
He owned and operated the tax prep business G. Sandiego and Associates and for 2014 through 2017 prepared and filed false income tax returns for clients. Instead of relying on information provided by the clients, Sandiego either inflated or entirely fabricated expenses to falsely claim residential energy credits and employment-related expense deductions.
Sandiego, who
He was also ordered to serve a year of supervised release and pay $2,910,442 in restitution to the IRS.
Ft. Worth, Texas: A federal district court has entered permanent injunctions against CPA Charles Dombek and The Optimal Financial Group LLC, barring them from promoting any tax plan that involves creating or using sham management companies, deducting personal non-deductible expenses as business expenses or assisting in the creation of “captive” insurance companies.
The injunctions also prohibit Dombek from preparing any federal returns for anyone other than himself and Optimal from preparing certain federal returns reflecting such tax plans. Dombek and Optimal consented to entry of the injunctions.
According to the complaint, Dombek is a licensed CPA and served as Optimal’s manager and president. Allegedly, Dombek and Optimal promoted a scheme throughout the U.S. to illegally reduce clients’ income tax liabilities by using sham management companies to improperly shift income to be taxed at lower tax rates, improperly defer taxable income or improperly claim personal expenses as business deductions. As alleged by the government, Dombek also promoted himself as the “premier dental CPA” in America.
The complaint further alleges that in promoting the schemes, Dombek and Optimal made false statements about the tax benefits of the scheme that they knew or had reason to know were false, then prepared and signed clients’ returns reflecting the sham transactions, expenses and deductions.
The government contended that the total harm to the Treasury could be $10 million or more.
Kansas City, Missouri: Former IRS employee Sandra D. Mondaine, of Grandview, Missouri, has pleaded guilty to preparing returns that illegally claimed more than $200,000 in refunds for clients.
Mondaine previously worked for the IRS as a contact representative before retiring. She admitted that she prepared federal income tax returns for clients that contained false and fraudulent claims; the indictment charged her with helping at least 11 individuals file at least 39 false and fraudulent income tax returns for 2019 through 2021. Mondaine was able to manufacture substantial refunds for her clients that they would not have been entitled to if the returns had been accurately prepared. She charged clients either a fixed dollar amount or a percentage of the refund or both.
The tax loss associated with those false returns is some $237,329, though the parties disagree on the total.
Mondaine must pay restitution to the IRS and consents to a permanent injunction in a separate civil action, under which she will be permanently enjoined from preparing, assisting in, directing or supervising the preparation or filing of federal returns for any person or entity other than herself. She is also subject to up to three years in prison.
Los Angeles: Long-time lawyer Milton C. Grimes has pleaded guilty to evading more than $4 million in federal taxes over 21 years.
Grimes pleaded guilty to one count of tax evasion relating to his 2014 taxes, admitting that he failed to pay $1,690,922 to the IRS. He did not pay federal income taxes for 23 years — 2002 through 2005, 2007, 2009 through 2011, and 2014 through 2023 — a total of $4,071,215 owed to the IRS. Grimes also admitted he did not file a 2013 federal return.
From at least September 2011, the IRS issued more than 30 levies on his personal bank accounts. From at least May 2014 to April 2020, Grimes evaded payment of the outstanding income tax by not depositing income he earned from his clients into those accounts. Instead, he bought some 238 cashier’s checks totaling $16 million to keep the money out of the reach of the IRS, withdrawing cash from his client trust account, his interest on lawyers’ trust accounts and his law firm’s bank account.
Sentencing is Feb. 11. Grimes faces up to five years in federal prison, though prosecutors have agreed to seek no more than 22 months.
Sacramento, California: Residents Dominic Davis and Sharitia Wright have pleaded guilty to conspiracy to file false claims with the IRS.
Between March 2019 and April 2022, they caused at least nine fraudulent income tax returns to be filed with the IRS claiming more than $2 million in refunds. The returns were filed in the names of Davis, Wright and family members and listed wages that the taxpayers had not earned and often listed the taxpayers’ employer as one of the various LLCs created by Davis, Wright and their family members. Many of the returns also falsely claimed charitable contributions.
Davis prepared and filed the false returns; Wright provided him information and contacted the IRS to check on the status of the refunds claimed.
Davis and Wright agreed to pay restitution. Sentencing is Feb. 3, when each faces up to 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.
St. Louis: Tax attorneys Michael Elliott Kohn and Catherine Elizabeth Chollet and insurance agent David Shane Simmons have been sentenced to prison for conspiring to defraud the U.S. and helping clients file false returns based on their promotion and operation of a fraudulent tax shelter.
Kohn was sentenced to seven years in prison and Chollet to four years. Simmons was sentenced to five years in prison.
From 2011 to November 2022, Kohn and Chollet, both of St. Louis, and Simmons, who is based out of Jefferson, North Carolina, promoted, marketed and sold to clients the Gain Elimination Plan, a fraudulent tax scheme. They designed the plan to conceal clients’ income from the IRS by inflating business expenses through fictitious royalties and management fees. These fictitious fees were paid, on paper, to a limited partnership largely owned by a charity. Kohn and Chollet fabricated the fees.
Kohn and Chollet advised clients that the plan’s limited partnership was required to obtain insurance on the life of the clients to cover the income allocated to the charitable organization. The death benefit was directly tied to the anticipated profitability of the clients’ businesses and how much of the clients’ taxable income was intended to be sheltered.
Simmons earned more than $2.3 million in commissions for selling the insurance policies, splitting the commissions with Kohn and Chollet. Kohn and Chollet received more than $1 million from Simmons.
Simmons also filed false personal returns that underreported his business income and inflated his business expenses, resulting in a tax loss of more than $480,000.
In total, the defendants caused a tax loss to the IRS of more than $22 million.
Each was also ordered to serve three years’ supervised release and to pay $22,515,615 in restitution to the United States.
Hannis T. Bourgeois celebrates 100 years with charitable initiative; KPMG and Moss Adams release surveys; and more news from across the profession.
The American Institute of CPAs is still concerned about the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s new firm and engagement metrics standard, despite some modifications from the original proposal.
During a board meeting Thursday, the PCAOB
Under the new rules, PCAOB-registered public accounting firms that audit one or more issuers that qualify as an accelerated filer or large accelerated filer will be required to publicly report specified metrics relating to such audits and their audit practices. The metrics cover the following eight areas:
- Partner and manager involvement;
- Workload;
- Training hours for audit personnel;
- Experience of audit personnel;
- Industry experience;
- Retention of audit personnel (firm-level only);
- Allocation of audit hours; and,
- Restatement history (firm-level only).
The AICPA reacted cautiously to the announcement. “We’re still studying the components of the final firm metrics requirements but, as we stated in our comment letter to the PCAOB this past summer, these rules will place a significant burden on small and midsized audit firms and could lead some to exit public company auditing altogether,” said the AICPA in a statement emailed Friday to Accounting Today. “This is not just conjecture: a majority of respondents (51%) to a recent survey we did of Top 500 firms with audit practices said they would rethink engaging in public company audits if the requirements were approved.”
The PCAOB it made some modifications to the original proposal in response to the comments had received since April:
- Reduced the metric areas to eight (from 11);
- Refined the metrics to simplify and clarify the calculations;
- Increased the ability to provide optional narrative disclosure (from 500 to 1,000 characters); and,
- Updated the effective date. (If approved by the SEC, the earliest effective date of the firm-level metrics will be Oct. 1, 2027, with the first reporting as of September 30, 2028, and engagement-level metrics for the audits of companies with fiscal years beginning on or after Oct. 1, 2027.)
The AICPA welcomed those changes but doesn’t think they go far enough. “We’re glad the PCAOB took some comments to heart by extending implementation dates, particularly for smaller firms, and lowering the number of required metrics,” said the AICPA. “But the potential consequences of the remaining requirements — reduced competition and market diversity in the public audit space — are a significant risk. We hope the SEC will give these unintended outcomes the weight they deserve before giving final approval to the requirements.”
The Securities and Exchange Commission would still need to give final approval to the standard, as well as the new firm reporting standard. Last week, the PCAOB decided to
Super Micro’s stock had a historic week — but it’s still 70% off its highs
Hoping for an OpenAI or Anthropic IPO? Here’s why that’s unlikely anytime soon.
Trump’s Treasury pick is Scott Bessent. He’s said it’s absurd to fear ‘Trump-flation.’
Are American progressives making themselves sad?
U.S. Beneficial Ownership Information Registry Now Accepting Reports
New 2023 K-1 instructions stir the CAMT pot for partnerships and corporations
-
Accounting6 days agoHow to Create an Effective Invoice Process for Small Businesses
-
Personal Finance1 week agoOlder voters prioritized personal economic issues on Election Day: AARP
-
Personal Finance1 week agoHere’s the inflation breakdown for October 2024 — in one chart
-
Personal Finance1 week agoHouse just voted yes to increase Social Security for some beneficiaries
-
Economics1 week agoClimate change and the next administration
-
Economics1 week agoWholesale prices rose 0.2% in October, in line with expectations
-
Personal Finance1 week agoHere’s what to expect on mortgage rates into early 2025
-
Accounting1 week agoAccountants eye sustainable business management