Enjoy complimentary access to top ideas and insights — selected by our editors.
Accountants are in the midst of a series of changes, ranging from the future of the Internal Revenue Service to the kick-off of tax season.
President Donald Trump’s hiring freeze for federal government workers, changes at the top at the Internal Revenue Service, a proposed ban on contingency fees from the IRS, massive uncertainty around the Corporate Transparency Act, and a number of other recent developments have introduced a lot of volatility that has professionals wondering where to start.
Catch up on the most pressing issues in the field to stay ahead of the regulatory curve.
President Donald Trump signed a series of executive orders on Jan. 20 after his inauguration, including one that enacted a hiring freeze for federal government workers, particularly at the Internal Revenue Service. He also backed out of a global tax deal that had enjoyed support from the Biden administration.
“I will also issue a temporary hiring freeze to ensure that we are hiring only competent people who are faithful to the American public. And we will pause the hiring of any new IRS agents,” said Trump during a rally and parade at the Capital One Arena. “We will also require that federal workers must return to the office in person.”
Trump then began to refer to claims about thousands of armed IRS agents being hired during the Biden administration, although this claim has been disputed by the IRS and its employee union. “We are going to take the 88,000 people that they hired to go after you with guns — by the way, they are allowed to use guns and harass you like they were, and so many other people,” he said.
The Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service have proposed amendments to Circular 230, which governs practice before the IRS. The amendments are the most extensive since 2014 and cover significant developments that have affected practice since that time.
The proposed regulations would remove or update the parts of Circular 230 that related to registered tax return preparers and tax return preparation, as well as contingent fees to reflect changes in the law since the prior amendments to Circular 230 in 2011 and 2014. The regs would also revise or eliminate other provisions that are out of date.
The proposed regulations would incorporate provisions that better align Circular 230 with the current practice environment, such as requiring practitioners to maintain technological competency as part of their practice before the IRS.
The Supreme Court granted a stay against an injunction on the Corporate Transparency Act and its beneficial ownership information reporting requirement that had been imposed by a federal appeals court, but CTA enforcement nevertheless remains on hold because of a separate nationwide injunction.
The lower courts will continue to hear arguments over the law, which requires companies to file reports on their true owners to the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network as a way to deter illicit activity such as money laundering, tax fraud, drug trafficking and the financing of terrorism by shell companies. New businesses were required to start filing the beneficial ownership information reports with FinCEN last year, and existing ones had to file the BOI reports starting Jan. 1 of this year.
The Federal Trade Commission finalized an order requiring H&R Block to make a number of changes for the 2025 filing season, as well as longer-term changes.
The settlement also requires H&R Block to pay $7 million toward compensating consumers harmed by the company’s unlawful practices.
In a complaint announced last February, the FTC charged that the tax prep giant unfairly required consumers seeking to downgrade to a cheaper H&R Block product to contact customer service, unfairly deleted users’ previously entered data and made deceptive claims about “free” filing.
Top 10 Firm Grant Thornton announced that its CEO, Seth Siegel, is stepping down from his position after 30 years with the firm, though he will still remain involved as a senior advisor.
“I have called Grant Thornton home for almost three decades and am proud to have been part of this amazing team and organization, which has solidified its standing as the destination of choice for clients and talent alike,” said Siegel in the firm’s official statement. He felt that, with Grant Thornton positioned for what he said was strong continued growth, it was the right time to step down.
In a LinkedIn post, Siegel said the move will allow him to pursue other ambitions, focus on his health and spend more time with his family.
The Internal Revenue Service kicked off tax season on Jan. 27 facing a hiring freeze imposed by President Donald Trump in an executive order on Inauguration Day and lingering uncertainty over how to make up for over $20 billion in budget cuts.
The IRS has been rescinding job offers and posted on its website that hiring offers with a start date on or before Feb. 8, 2025, will be allowed to proceed. But offers with a start date after Feb. 8, 2025, or an unconfirmed start date, will be revoked.
Last month, Trump formally nominated Billy Long, a former Republican congressman from Missouri, as IRS commissioner. Trump announced his intention last month to nominate Long, even though then-commissioner Danny Werfel’s term wasn’t set to end until Nov. 12, 2027.
In the continuing saga of the fate of the Corporate Transparency Act, the New Civil Liberties Alliance filed an amicus curiae brief with the Supreme Court on Jan. 13, 2025, in Garland v. Texas Top Cop Shop.
The brief urges the court to reject the government’s request to stay a preliminary injunction against the enforcement of the CTA and its beneficial ownership information reporting mandate.
The CTA mandates that organizations that have filed for incorporation under state law submit detailed reports to the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCEN, with civil and criminal penalties available to the government to punish those who fail to comply, either by omitting information or even accidentally submitting false information.
IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel said on Jan. 17 that he planned to resign on Monday, Jan. 20, coinciding with Inauguration Day.
President Donald Trump had announced plans in December 2024 to nominate former Rep. Billy Long, a Republican from Missouri, as the next IRS commissioner, even though Werfel’s term would not end until November 2027.
“While I had always intended to complete my full term as commissioner, the president-elect has announced his plan to nominate a new IRS commissioner,” Werfel said in an email to all IRS employees. “I have been touched by those who have reached out to me to share how they were hopeful that I could remain in seat and continue the important work underway. But as civil servants, we have a job to do, and that job is to now ensure a new commissioner is set up for success.”
National Taxpayer Advocate Erin Collins released her annual report to Congress on Jan. 8, highlighting improvements in taxpayer service by the Internal Revenue Service, but pointed to persistent delays in processing Employee Retention Credit claims and helping victims of identity theft.
“For the first time since I became the National Taxpayer Advocate in 2020, I can begin this report with good news: The taxpayer experience has noticeably improved,” Collins wrote. “In 2024, taxpayers and practitioners experienced better service, generally received timely refunds, and faced shorter wait times to reach customer service representatives … . After receiving multiyear funding, the IRS has [also] made major strides toward improving its taxpayer services and information technology (IT) systems.”
However, the IRS faces a budget cut of over $20 billion after Congress passed a continuing resolution to avoid a government shutdown last month, repeating language from an earlier continuing resolution that cut the IRS’s budget by a similar amount in 2023.
While much has happened during the past few years, and significant change lies immediately ahead, there is little that is new in the upcoming tax season. However, beneficial ownership reporting and tariffs — which are not part of the typical issues that preparers deal with — are potential topics of concern.
For now, this filing season appears to be business as usual for most accounting professionals, according to Misty Erickson, tax content program manager at the National Association of Tax Professionals.
“That said, there are a few things to keep in mind,” she added. “With the ever-changing landscape with BOI reporting, business owners that have not already filed, and need to, may be dealing with a tax deadline and a BOI deadline at the same time. While we wait for a new deadline to be announced, this is something to keep in mind and be prepared to advise clients on next steps.”
In a decisive move toward standardized environmental financial reporting, accounting standards boards issued updated implementation guidance during the week ending July 25, 2026, regarding the formal recognition and valuation of corporate carbon offsets and environmental credits. The revised frameworks establish precise rules for how enterprises must measure, record, and disclose carbon credits on balance sheets, eliminating years of inconsistent reporting practices across public capital markets.
Under the finalized accounting standard, purchased carbon offsets can no longer be categorized under vague administrative expenses or unstandardized intangible asset accounts. Instead, organizations must classify environmental credits based on underlying operational intent—distinguishing between credits held for immediate compliance compliance obligations, long-term offset obligations, or active market trading. Furthermore, companies are required to evaluate carbon holdings for fair value impairment at the end of each reporting period, ensuring that depreciated or low-quality environmental credits do not distort corporate asset values.
The standardized rules carry significant implications for corporate audit committees and chief accounting officers. External audit firms are implementing rigorous verification protocols to validate the physical legitimacy, legal ownership, and scientific permanence of carbon credits claimed on balance sheets. Inaccurate or overstated carbon accounting claims now carry substantial financial litigation risk, alongside potential regulatory enforcement for misleading ESG disclosures.
To remain fully compliant, corporate accounting departments must establish centralized carbon tracking systems integrated into primary standard ERP ledgers. Accounting teams that proactively adopt standardized environmental reporting protocols will build investor credibility, streamline annual audit processes, and insulate their organizations against evolving regulatory scrutiny.
Corporate tax departments reached a critical juncture in automated operational management. With nations worldwide rapidly enacting digital service taxes, localized value-added tax (VAT) mandates, and real-time electronic invoicing requirements, manual tax calculations have become obsolete. Modern corporate tax divisions are aggressively deploying AI-driven tax engine software to automate complex cross-border indirect tax calculations in real time.
The imperative for automated tax compliance stems from the sheer complexity of current trade policies and multi-jurisdictional commerce. E-commerce platforms, software vendors, and global manufacturers face constantly changing regional tax rates, statutory exemption rules, and cross-border tariff structures. Automated tax engines embed directly into enterprise enterprise resource planning (ERP) architectures, automatically applying correct tax codes at the point of sale, calculating real-time withholding amounts, and generating compliant e-invoices.
Automated audit trail generation represents another key advantage of modern tax tech integration. Advanced compliance platforms log every transactional tax determination on immutable digital ledgers, providing tax authorities with transparent, self-verifying audit trails. This capability drastically reduces the operational duration and administrative cost of corporate tax audits, protecting enterprises against severe penalties resulting from calculation errors or missed reporting deadlines.
For chief financial officers and tax directors, investing in automated tax compliance is a vital operational risk mitigation strategy. Automating routine tax calculations frees high-level accounting professionals to focus on strategic tax planning, transfer pricing optimization, and risk management in an increasingly complex global economic environment.
As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.
Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.
The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.