Connect with us

Accounting

A comparative look at job creation incentives across the US

Published

on

State-based job creation tax credit programs typically provide a tax credit against the state’s income tax liability. That credit may be passed through to a shareholder level in many cases, though it will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. In other states, credits are sold or brokered if the company cannot utilize the credit. Across the country, job creation tax credits may be refundable, providing excellent value to clients, especially during a new operation or expansion phase where the company may not have tax liability in that state. Each state and each program is different.

It’s important to know how tax credits for job creation are calculated. In states like Indiana, Colorado, Ohio, New York and Illinois, job creation tax credits are calculated based on an approved percentage of the total net new wages or wage withholding generated from qualifying jobs. These credit percentages can vary from 10% to 100% and, in many cases, are negotiable based on the quality of the project. High-quality projects create a high number of jobs, high wages, high skill sets and high amounts of investment. Depending on the program parameters, many companies are eligible for these programs with as few as 10 new employees.

Understanding that these programs typically only consider net new employees, a base period calculation notes the total employees before a specific date. After that certifying date, any net new hires and their associated wages or wage withholdings can generate value through the job creation program. Cyclical hiring and furlough practices, seasonal work, temporary employees or just a replacement of existing positions often do not qualify as “net new.” In addition, many states only qualify full-time (typically 32 to 35-plus hours per week), W-2, benefitted (the employer provides health benefits) and resident (working and living in the state offering the incentive) employee positions as qualifying employees. Part-time, contract or temporary employees do not qualify in most states. Evaluating each client’s hiring practices alongside growth projects is essential.

Some states do not have an income tax. Therefore, the job creation tax credits may be applied to a similar tax the state does have, be it franchise, excise, business operations, insurance liability, worker’s compensation, gross receipts or commercial activities taxes. Each state is different and allows for various tax applications. Clients should always consult their trusted tax professional for further insight on these types of credits and their impact on state, local (and federal) taxes.

Job tax credits as a refund

Providing a tax credit for growing companies is the most common way states offer a job creation incentive. States can control how much they provide in credits on an annual basis and are often capped by a legislated budget amount. Other states allow for a cash refund of the qualifying wages. States like Kentucky, Missouri, Arkansas and Kansas have options to claim a direct cash refund from the associated state tax department for qualifying positions. Like the tax credit valuation, the refund amount may vary from state to state, and there may be some negotiation on the percentage eligible per job created.

Often, the state’s economic development body will receive annual compliance reporting from a client and review the reporting to authorize a certified amount for the refund. Clients then must navigate the state’s tax department to receive the refunds. Many forms and deadlines meet the refund payment to flow back to the client in a timely manner. This timeline can vary from a couple of weeks to several months, depending on the volume and backlog of compliance reports and refund requests. Having a dedicated incentives specialist to follow up regularly with authorizing bodies can help with this timeline.

Cash refunds are usually attractive for clients, as getting a check back from the government is always nice, unlike having to write a check to the government. However, cash reimbursements can affect a company’s tax return on an annual basis. Clients should always discuss this impact with their CPA advisor to best determine how to plan for refunds or the impact of a refund on yearly tax returns.

Grant funding for job creation

Cash upfront? This is not typical; however, some states are able to issue grants or flat payment amounts upon receipt of all required documentation that notes net new job levels have been met, or investment thresholds have been achieved. Michigan, Pennsylvania, Texas, Georgia, North Carolina, Tennessee and Wisconsin have programs allowing for flat payments to projects to achieve pre-agreed thresholds. The key is many of these programs require job threshold commitments for an extended period, say five to 10 years in many circumstances. States want to know their “investment” in a project has a long-term impact. If a client drops below required thresholds, fails to follow through on reporting, or moves out of the state within the agreement term, these activities may trigger a clawback from the state for violating the agreement terms.

When you step back, job creation incentives are beneficial for growing companies. Depending on the program, these incentives can potentially create between $500 and $2,000 in value (credits or cash) per qualifying job per year. CPAs should consistently review client portfolios for credit and incentive opportunities. By identifying clients with plans to grow, CPAs can quickly align with a trusted credit and incentive expert to maximize the potential benefits for clients.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Acting IRS commissioner reportedly replaced

Published

on

Gary Shapley, who was named only days ago as the acting commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, is reportedly being replaced by Deputy Treasury Secretary Michael Faulkender amid a power struggle between Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Elon Musk.

The New York Times reported that Bessent was outraged that Shapley was named to head the IRS without his knowledge or approval and complained to President Trump about it. Shapley was installed as acting commissioner on Tuesday, only to be ousted on Friday. He first gained prominence as an IRS Criminal Investigation special agent and whistleblower who testified in 2023 before the House Oversight Committee that then-President Joe Biden’s son Hunter received preferential treatment during a tax-evasion investigation, and he and another special agent had been removed from the investigation after complaining to their supervisors in 2022. He was promoted last month to senior advisor to Bessent and made deputy chief of IRS Criminal Investigation. Shapley is expected to remain now as a senior official at IRS Criminal Investigation, according to the Wall Street Journal. The IRS and the Treasury Department press offices did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Faulkender was confirmed last month as deputy secretary at the Treasury Department and formerly worked during the first Trump administration at the Treasury on the Paycheck Protection Program before leaving to teach finance at the University of Maryland.

Faulkender will be the fifth head of the IRS this year. Former IRS commissioner Danny Werfel departed in January, on Inauguration Day, after Trump announced in December he planned to name former Congressman Billy Long, R-Missouri, as the next IRS commissioner, even though Werfel’s term wasn’t scheduled to end until November 2027. The Senate has not yet scheduled a confirmation hearing for Long, amid questions from Senate Democrats about his work promoting the Employee Retention Credit and so-called “tribal tax credits.” The job of acting commissioner has since been filled by Douglas O’Donnell, who was deputy commissioner under Werfel. However, O’Donnell abruptly retired as the IRS came under pressure to lay off thousands of employees and share access to confidential taxpayer data. He was replaced by IRS chief operating officer Melanie Krause, who resigned last week after coming under similar pressure to provide taxpayer data to immigration authorities and employees of the Musk-led U.S. DOGE Service. 

Krause had planned to depart later this month under the deferred resignation program at the IRS, under which approximately 22,000 IRS employees have accepted the voluntary buyout offers. But Musk reportedly pushed to have Shapley installed on Tuesday, according to the Times, and he remained working in the commissioner’s office as recently as Friday morning. Meanwhile, plans are underway for further reductions in the IRS workforce of up to 40%, according to the Federal News Network, taking the IRS from approximately 102,000 employees at the beginning of the year to around 60,000 to 70,000 employees.

Continue Reading

Accounting

On the move: EY names San Antonio office MP

Published

on

Carr, Riggs & Ingram appoints CFO and chief legal officer; TSCPA hosts accounting bootcamp; and more news from across the profession.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Tech news: Certinia announces spring release

Published

on


Certinia announces spring release; Intuit acquires tech and experts from fintech Deserve; Paystand launches feature to navigate tariffs; and other accounting tech news and updates.

Continue Reading

Trending