Enjoy complimentary access to top ideas and insights — selected by our editors.
The Internal Revenue Service, like other government agencies, is a target of thinning and deregulation under the Trump administration and the Department of Government Efficiency, formerly led by Elon Musk. With a new commissioner on the horizon, and everchanging guidelines, here are the latest moves from the IRS.
A campaign to grant Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents access to tax records gained some ground in May, as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem permitted the IRS to share taxpayer information under very limited circumstances.
In exchange for ICE’s provision of a person’s name, address and deportation order date, the IRS can release taxpayer data — but only for non-tax criminal matters.
The IRS has gone through a host of acting commissioners since Donald Trump took office and following the resignation of former Commissioner Danny Werfel. Douglas O’Donnell succeeded Werfel after his Jan. 20 resignation and retired just one month later.
After O’Donnell was Melanie Krause, who was chief operating officer of the IRS prior to being named acting commissioner in February. She held onto the top spot until her resignation in April, and was followed by Gary Shapley, a former special agent in the IRS’s Criminal Investigation division.
Shapely held the role for two days, ceding it to present acting IRS Commissioner Michael Faulkender.
These moves, combined with mass layoffs, have created an air of uncertainty at the IRS.
According to a recent report from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, the agency is poised to become more earnest in its use of artificial intelligence during the auditing process in light of the dropped audits from its reduced headcount.
“There have been news reports about audits that are in process or that are even close to being wrapped up being canceled because members of that audit team were let go and they just didn’t have the staff to carry them on,” Anne Gibson, a senior legal analyst at Wolters Kluwer, told Accounting Today. “I imagine we’ll see more of that.”
Below are noteworthy changes from the IRS and what accountants need to know.
Billy Long at his confirmation hearing
IRS lead nominee Billy Long grilled by Senate Finance panel
Billy Long, the Trump nominee for IRS commissioner, faced probing questions from the Senate Finance Committee on monetary sums earned from promoting tribal tax credits and a failed 2022 Senate campaign, his plans for the agency if confirmed and more.
The former Republican congressman’s December nomination came during then-commissioner Danny Werfel’s term, which was set to conclude in November 2027 but ended when Werfel resigned on Jan. 20. Thus began the revolving door at the head of the IRS and the comings and goings of four acting commissioners.
“I am eager to implement the necessary changes to maximize our effectiveness while also remaining transparent with both Congress and taxpayers,” Long said in his opening statement. “It is important to also recognize the dedicated professionals currently at the IRS whose hard work too often goes unnoticed.”
Elon Musk, former leader of the Department of Government Efficiency.
Samuel Corum/Bloomberg
DOGE cuts oust roughly one-third of IRS auditors
Between layoffs and deferred resignations under the Department of Government Efficiency, the IRS has parted ways with roughly 31% of its auditors.
This announcement follows in the wake of the more than 11,400 employees that were laid off earlier this year as part of the same push from DOGE to curtail perceived overspending from government agencies.
Findings from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration’s recent report concluded that these firings disproportionately impacted various divisions across the IRS, with divisions such as Tax Exempt & Government Entities, Large Business & International and Small Business & Self-Employed all recording double-digit headcount reductions as of March 2025.
IRS falls short of improper payment rate benchmark
A report released in May by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration determined that the IRS still has work to do in achieving the goal of the Payment Integrity Information Act.
The 2019 act’s goal directs the IRA to reduce improper payment rates to less than 10% for four refundable tax credits — the Additional Child Tax Credit, the American Opportunity Tax Credit, the Earned Income Tax Credit and the Net Premium Tax Credit. For the 2024 fiscal year, improper payments for the four credits amounted to roughly $21.4 billion.
The rates for each were 29% for the Net Premium Tax Credit, 28% for the AOTC, 27% for the EITC and 11% for the ACTC.
Individuals with self-only coverage tied to a high-deductible health plan have an annual limitation of $4,400 for the 2026 calendar year, which is a $100 bump from 2025’s limit.
Other noteworthy increases include the $8,750 annual limitation for individuals with family coverage under a high-deductible health plan and the limits for what defines a high-deductible health plan, which have deductibles not less than $1,700 for self-only coverage (up $50 from 2025) or $3,400 for family coverage (from $3,300 in 2025), and for which annual out-of-pocket expenses (but not premiums) are less than $8,500 for self-only coverage (up $100 from this year) or $17,000 for family coverage (up from this year’s $16,600).
IRS crackdown on high-income non-filers needs improvement
Officials with the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration found that IRS “sweeps” that uncovered instances of high-income people not filing taxes were more productive than their non-sweep counterparts, both in terms of closure rate and dollars collected.
The TIGTA report said that revenue officers were able to bring in between 30% to 68% more on average per HINF sweep case than non-sweep case for tax years 2014 through 2020.
“When people don’t file a tax return they’re required to, it’s not fair to those hardworking taxpayers who responsibly do their civic duty under the laws of our nation,” Danny Werfel, former IRS commissioner, said during a press call last year. “When people don’t file their taxes, they need to know there’s a consequence, [and] this is why I was particularly troubled to learn when I became commissioner that the IRS had to back off our core compliance work on non-filers.”
As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.
Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.
The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.
WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.
The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.
Untested Legal Mechanism
To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.
White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.
Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.
“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.
USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs
Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).
However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:
Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
Potash and critical minerals
Fish and seafood
Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)
Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.
Canadian Response and Market Reaction
Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.
With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.
The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.
The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.
Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.